Hi everybody! This is where you talk to me!
Hi Topsfield. Regarding LÖVE, this article was previously deleted due to lack of independent verifiability; and by extention a lack of notability. Do you think you will be able to address these issues? Marasmusine ( talk) 09:52, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MonoGame is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MonoGame until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spinning Spark 00:47, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PhysicsFS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhysicsFS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WubTheCaptain ( talk • contribs) 15:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Hi everybody! This is where you talk to me!
Hi Topsfield. Regarding LÖVE, this article was previously deleted due to lack of independent verifiability; and by extention a lack of notability. Do you think you will be able to address these issues? Marasmusine ( talk) 09:52, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MonoGame is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MonoGame until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spinning Spark 00:47, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PhysicsFS is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhysicsFS until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WubTheCaptain ( talk • contribs) 15:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)