|
OK - will look. Cheers. 4u1e ( talk) 16:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, it's no problem at all. I know that the peer review process is important - I intend to ask for one with my own "pet project", Forti, at some stage in the future. Happy editing!-- Diniz ( talk) 00:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Tommy, nice to meet you, haven't really had the pleasure of seeing you on Wikipedia. However, like Michael Schumacher and Ferrari, Mosley is a subject that I am very touchy with, however I'll have a look at the article tomorrow, I've been on the PC all day and my eyes are in much needed rest.
Rest assure Tom, I will have a look at it tomorrow when my eyes are better and I'm is in a better frame of mind to give advice on an article. Thanks for the message Tom and good luck in the future. ;-) -- Phill talk Edits Review this GA review! 22:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks - will do. 4u1e ( talk) 16:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I finally found a little titbit on Mosley's later political aspirations. Nothing on Labour, but according to Lovell between 1982 and 1984 he worked for the Conservative Party, in the hope of becoming a parliamentary candidate. I've added it to the 'Politics' section. I think we're getting close, by the way! 4u1e ( talk) 20:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Featured articles are expected to be stable, so until this scandal is over, promotion to FA is impossible anyway. MaxSem( Han shot first!) 18:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Autosport has the same story, pretty much. I'm obviously missing something you're seeing - you may have to be a bit more obvious! :D I always assumed Serp91 was likely someone vaguely connected to Max Mosley through the FIA (given that his/her stance was basically pro-Mosley). You never quite know who you're really dealing with here though, I had a fairly lengthy debate with someone who claimed to be, and quite possibly was, Tom Rubython a few months ago. He wasn't very pleased with the contents of articles relating to him either... 4u1e ( talk) 20:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Good catch, thanks. 4u1e ( talk) 17:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
It does mention a gift of $300M from Ecclestone! I've started to plough through it though, and it looks like just turning into another tirade against Purnell and Woods - two of the people Rubython's lost libel cases against in the past (although he's also won one against Woods, just to be fair). 4u1e ( talk) 19:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -- SineBot ( talk) 09:43, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi mate, hope you've not been put off Wikipedia for good by the GA saga on Max Mosley. It's been re-listed as a GA now, so I guess we could think about pushing for FA again! Cheers. 4u1e ( talk) 20:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
|
OK - will look. Cheers. 4u1e ( talk) 16:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, it's no problem at all. I know that the peer review process is important - I intend to ask for one with my own "pet project", Forti, at some stage in the future. Happy editing!-- Diniz ( talk) 00:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Tommy, nice to meet you, haven't really had the pleasure of seeing you on Wikipedia. However, like Michael Schumacher and Ferrari, Mosley is a subject that I am very touchy with, however I'll have a look at the article tomorrow, I've been on the PC all day and my eyes are in much needed rest.
Rest assure Tom, I will have a look at it tomorrow when my eyes are better and I'm is in a better frame of mind to give advice on an article. Thanks for the message Tom and good luck in the future. ;-) -- Phill talk Edits Review this GA review! 22:12, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks - will do. 4u1e ( talk) 16:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
I finally found a little titbit on Mosley's later political aspirations. Nothing on Labour, but according to Lovell between 1982 and 1984 he worked for the Conservative Party, in the hope of becoming a parliamentary candidate. I've added it to the 'Politics' section. I think we're getting close, by the way! 4u1e ( talk) 20:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Featured articles are expected to be stable, so until this scandal is over, promotion to FA is impossible anyway. MaxSem( Han shot first!) 18:49, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Autosport has the same story, pretty much. I'm obviously missing something you're seeing - you may have to be a bit more obvious! :D I always assumed Serp91 was likely someone vaguely connected to Max Mosley through the FIA (given that his/her stance was basically pro-Mosley). You never quite know who you're really dealing with here though, I had a fairly lengthy debate with someone who claimed to be, and quite possibly was, Tom Rubython a few months ago. He wasn't very pleased with the contents of articles relating to him either... 4u1e ( talk) 20:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
Good catch, thanks. 4u1e ( talk) 17:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
It does mention a gift of $300M from Ecclestone! I've started to plough through it though, and it looks like just turning into another tirade against Purnell and Woods - two of the people Rubython's lost libel cases against in the past (although he's also won one against Woods, just to be fair). 4u1e ( talk) 19:29, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -- SineBot ( talk) 09:43, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi mate, hope you've not been put off Wikipedia for good by the GA saga on Max Mosley. It's been re-listed as a GA now, so I guess we could think about pushing for FA again! Cheers. 4u1e ( talk) 20:57, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)