This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tomatoman. |
File:Ion qc electrodes.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Ion qc electrodes.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Ion qc electrodes.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 15:18, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanx for fixing the time zones on Oxford; I didn't look at it too closely - my main concern was putting right what Dr. Universe messed up. I tried to go back to the last version before he started messing (ie your revision as of 10:05, 2 October 2009), and add in what I believe Dr. Universe wanted. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 21:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
|timezone=
Greenwich Mean Time
field lost by
Dr. Universe, and then putting in the field which I believe he wanted - ie |population_demonym=
Oxonian
(valid) instead of |demonym=
Oxonian
(invalid). You did no sabotage. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
10:53, 5 October 2009 (UTC)You have the patience of a saint, sir! Thanks for keeping a cool head throughout - Alison ❤ 01:45, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
You're absolutely right, Janelle. I hereby admonish you, Tomatoman, for criticizing an entire nation when you said you were almost ashamed to be Bulgarian. Shame upon you, sir, for making such a scurrilous comment!! - Alison ❤ 03:36, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Tomatoman: I have made a request of you on Monshuai's page. Thanks for your help. Bielle ( talk) 22:25, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I wish to clarify the following points.
secondly, as far as I'm aware there is no such thing as the "mass effect".
It is mentioned in the article that the hyperfine interaction is collections of weak interactions between the nucleus and the electrons. The interaction which cause the energy of the levels to shift by some factors are primarily due to two reasons:
1) The difference in the number of nucleons in various different species of the same elements. They are as, you would know isotopes of the elements. This is the Mass effect.
2) The hyperfine interaction which results from the difference in the charge distribution between nuclei of the same element is called the Volume effect.
Having that clarified, I do want to confess that it could have been written in a better and more specific way.
As far the information in the second para is concerned, it was meant to inform the reader that while hyperfine interaction is actually a group of effects, the name is now mainly associated with the splitting of energy levels. It also mentions which particular interaction the article is referring to i.e. the magnetic dipole moment and the electric quadruple moment. Hence the lines,
"The term Hyperfine interaction, now a days, is generally referred to the interaction of the nuclear magnetic dipole moment and the electric quadruple moment of the nucleus with the externals electrons within the atoms as well as ions. . This type of hyperfine interaction causes the electronic levels to split into several levels."
The following line was just to explain the point further:
"Due to this, a single spectral line which, generally (under low resolution), appears to be a single line is actually a group of fine lines with very minute separation between them."
In atoms hyperfine structure is due to the energy of the nuclear magnetic dipole moment in the magnetic field generated by the electrons and the energy of the nuclear electric quadrupole moment in the electric field gradient due to the distribution of charge within the atom.
Electric quadruple moment is caused by the non-spherical distribution of charges within the nucleus. The result of which is an electric field gradient experienced by the electrons around the nucleus.
Also, the Magnetic dipole moment is the interaction of the outer electrons with the field of the magnetic dipole at the origin. Not the other way round!!
Lastly, I do realize now that the content could have been written in a better way but the original content could be written in a better and more informative way, which I had tried to do in my article.
No hard feelings taken!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahbaznihal ( talk • contribs) 11:12, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
No, caused no issue on my monitor, but it is widescreen. FWIW the resize brought it into line with the above images for me. Perhaps you have your user preferences set to 175px for images? The other images above it have no specific size set. I will remove the size specification, which gives the 250px for me - see how it looks for you. -- jjron ( talk) 14:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
This is a Wikipedia
user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Tomatoman. |
|
File:Ion qc electrodes.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Ion qc electrodes.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Ion qc electrodes.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. -- Erwin85Bot ( talk) 15:18, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Thanx for fixing the time zones on Oxford; I didn't look at it too closely - my main concern was putting right what Dr. Universe messed up. I tried to go back to the last version before he started messing (ie your revision as of 10:05, 2 October 2009), and add in what I believe Dr. Universe wanted. -- Redrose64 ( talk) 21:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
|timezone=
Greenwich Mean Time
field lost by
Dr. Universe, and then putting in the field which I believe he wanted - ie |population_demonym=
Oxonian
(valid) instead of |demonym=
Oxonian
(invalid). You did no sabotage. --
Redrose64 (
talk)
10:53, 5 October 2009 (UTC)You have the patience of a saint, sir! Thanks for keeping a cool head throughout - Alison ❤ 01:45, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
You're absolutely right, Janelle. I hereby admonish you, Tomatoman, for criticizing an entire nation when you said you were almost ashamed to be Bulgarian. Shame upon you, sir, for making such a scurrilous comment!! - Alison ❤ 03:36, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi Tomatoman: I have made a request of you on Monshuai's page. Thanks for your help. Bielle ( talk) 22:25, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
I wish to clarify the following points.
secondly, as far as I'm aware there is no such thing as the "mass effect".
It is mentioned in the article that the hyperfine interaction is collections of weak interactions between the nucleus and the electrons. The interaction which cause the energy of the levels to shift by some factors are primarily due to two reasons:
1) The difference in the number of nucleons in various different species of the same elements. They are as, you would know isotopes of the elements. This is the Mass effect.
2) The hyperfine interaction which results from the difference in the charge distribution between nuclei of the same element is called the Volume effect.
Having that clarified, I do want to confess that it could have been written in a better and more specific way.
As far the information in the second para is concerned, it was meant to inform the reader that while hyperfine interaction is actually a group of effects, the name is now mainly associated with the splitting of energy levels. It also mentions which particular interaction the article is referring to i.e. the magnetic dipole moment and the electric quadruple moment. Hence the lines,
"The term Hyperfine interaction, now a days, is generally referred to the interaction of the nuclear magnetic dipole moment and the electric quadruple moment of the nucleus with the externals electrons within the atoms as well as ions. . This type of hyperfine interaction causes the electronic levels to split into several levels."
The following line was just to explain the point further:
"Due to this, a single spectral line which, generally (under low resolution), appears to be a single line is actually a group of fine lines with very minute separation between them."
In atoms hyperfine structure is due to the energy of the nuclear magnetic dipole moment in the magnetic field generated by the electrons and the energy of the nuclear electric quadrupole moment in the electric field gradient due to the distribution of charge within the atom.
Electric quadruple moment is caused by the non-spherical distribution of charges within the nucleus. The result of which is an electric field gradient experienced by the electrons around the nucleus.
Also, the Magnetic dipole moment is the interaction of the outer electrons with the field of the magnetic dipole at the origin. Not the other way round!!
Lastly, I do realize now that the content could have been written in a better way but the original content could be written in a better and more informative way, which I had tried to do in my article.
No hard feelings taken!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahbaznihal ( talk • contribs) 11:12, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
No, caused no issue on my monitor, but it is widescreen. FWIW the resize brought it into line with the above images for me. Perhaps you have your user preferences set to 175px for images? The other images above it have no specific size set. I will remove the size specification, which gives the 250px for me - see how it looks for you. -- jjron ( talk) 14:36, 12 November 2009 (UTC)