This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | → | Archive 35 |
I would like to enquire as to why the Flix Premiere page I recently created has been deleted without any consultation? I do not believe the page to be for advertising purposes.
Northds ( talk) 09:39, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, I will re-write the page content, taking note of your suggestions. I'm pretty new to adding content to Wikipedia. My tone of language, I agree was to generic and advetorial like. I shall re-create but only state true and relevant information.
Northds ( talk) 21:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
I was just a bit curious as to why you objected to speedying this. Since you had, I didn't actually do it (and since you objected, I technically couldn't), but I certainly would have absent that. I'd agree G4 wasn't quite met, since it was different than the deleted version, but G11 certainly seemed to be. Created by a brand new editor, with a bunch of puffery ("...standout...", "...using his knowledge and experience to help teach others how to get the most out of their career and life" (what does that even mean?), "...bestselling author..." (with that claim "sourced" only to his own website), and so on), and the Big List O'Books, complete with a "reference" of an Amazon link, would normally be more than enough red flags for me to G11 it. Anyway, it's at AfD now. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Tokyogirl79,
It looks like you were working on an article for Alarms & Clock but didn't get a chance to finish. I created a fairly basic version today. Check it out and see if you'd like to add anything!
Thanks,
Onecatowner 12:51 UTC —Preceding undated comment added 00:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
I've tried to get this article included now for a couple of years. Anne Elizabeth is as notable a romance writer and comics creator as 90% of those already on Wikipedia and I'd like to see her have an entry here as well. She has influenced the genre for Navy Seal Romance and for larger teen comics. Thanks again for your assistance. Odubhain ( talk) 00:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Saw your ANI comment, and I concur. You might want to see this and this for why we initially suspected just that. GAB gab 16:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Tokyogirl79. Hope you're having a good 2017 so far. Would you mind taking a look at Víctor M. Marroquín when you get some time? The article's been tag with some maintenance templates since late last year, some of which may be warranted and some of which may be not, but it's kinda hard to tell be it appears to be quite a lot of IP SPAs editing the article, including some making claims like this. I re-added some maintenance templates just removed despite the edit sum since they reason did not seem like one that really addressed the issues, and now there's an IP apparently edit warring over them, I did start a discussion about this at BLPN, but the it was archived without getting much of a response. So, I was wondering if you'd mind taking a peek and see whether you think the subject is notable and whether the COI tag is warranted. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:My Name is 'A' by Anonymous poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
Black Women &
Women Anthropologists online editathons |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hey, I've been gathering sources and news coverage on Beyond Unbroken and I plan on submitting a edit request of a re-created version of the page. Just a heads up seeing as your the admin who has the lock on it. Let me know what you think :) Teddy2Gloves (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi!
Thanks for your thorough review of the submission for Emily Noyes Maxwell. I have reflected on your comments and feel that resubmission with minimal revision is warranted. I'll explain in a little bit of depth right now:
1) The basic premise of this resubmission, as of the original submission, is that Emily Noyes Maxwell (ENM) is notable independent of her husband. This is supported by two strands in her working life: her painting and her writing. A sub-thesis of this resubmission is that ENM is independently notable because of her relationship with her husband. This is an independent argument from derivative notability, like might be claimed, for example, by Melania Trump. The relationship that ENM had with her husband was an essential part of working life for a number of authors. This is referenced directly in the Salinger warrant. Wikipedia's own entry on literary salons confirms the importance of these informal gathering spaces for artistic production, and also the central place that women had in them. I think both of these claims for notability were clear, though I can see how only a cursory reading would elide the salon role into a derivative notability claim.
A bit tangentially but on this same topic - the suggestion that ENM ought to be included in her husband's Wikipedia entry is: a) not supported by Wikipedia's own entries regarding the independent notability of women in creating spaces for work, for example in the salon example cited above; b) entirely unsupported by any of EMN's independent work; c) a bit disconcerting, given that I see no precedent for such a suggestion in Wikipedia's own guidelines.
2) I have reviewed your specific source concerns. They are not convincing.
a) You say: "The claim of popularizing TPT is problematic because the New Yorker doesn't actually say that she was responsible for popularizing it." Tricky attribution issues aside I'm happy to concede the point that the New Yorker itself does not say this: it is in fact THE AUTHOR of TPT who makes this claim, in an article published in the New Yorker. The full quote is: "Fifty years ago, the book was rescued from the remainder table, Juster recalls, when a rhapsodic review appeared in this magazine, by Emily Maxwell (who was, among many other things, the wife of the longtime New Yorker fiction editor William Maxwell), and then children readers instantly, mysteriously, took to it." Failure to recognize the source of the quote here is understandable as a byproduct of speed. I hope I have now cleared this up. Overemphasizing the "mysterious" nature of the relationship between the review and the subsequent popularity of The Phantom Tollbooth would require being willfully obstructionist and obtuse. The claim that because this is an essay about the New Yorker in the New Yorker and is therefore biased is supported by no Wikipedia editing policy that I am aware of, and quite candidly, given the extensive reliance on poor-quality internet sources abounding throughout this website. Even if this were not a comparative matter, I would assume the presumption would be on an editor to establish the biased nature of a source, rather than merely assert bias.
b) You say: "The New York Times obituary isn't really useful ... since it's more of an obituary." I am at a loss to understand this argument. Here is a comparable article on the wife Akiva Goldsman which is entirely dependent on an obituary: /info/en/?search=Rebecca_Spikings-Goldsman. Here is another article entirely dependent on obituaries that I produced and that passed editorial standards: /info/en/?search=Cecily_Mackworth. I understand the concern about press releases. Again, I think the presumption ought to be that if you wish to discredit the New York Times (or any newspaper) or the New Yorker (or any magazine) as biased as a result of either press-release style writing or shoddy internal auditing, that is upon the editor. The presumption should be in favor of reliability in these cases, as it is throughout this site.
c) Neither of these source concerns, it should be noted, answer the core of ENM's core claims for independent notability: writing and painting. These are can be sourced elsewhere in the submission. The claims in both the obituary and the NYer piece add color to these primary claims.
3) Systemic Impacts:
Finally, you write: "In the end it's super difficult to establish notability for one spouse when the other is the far more notable of the two." You cite Tabitha King as a counterexample to ENM. It would not do to overemphasize this point, so I will make it succinctly: this counter example is as poorly chosen as possible. It merely establishes that the MORE notable the dominant spouse, the MORE LIKELY there will be coverage of the other spouse. This issue is precisely the opposite of independent notability - it is a form, rather, of superderivative liability.
As a mea culpa, I will admit: I have a deep personal interest in couples in which the wife, after a long and productive marriage, dies and the husband follows short after. (See, e.g., /info/en/?search=Johnny_Cash; see also /info/en/?search=Henry_Friendly) In my haste to emphasize this personal taste, I included the fact of EMN's marriage in the first line of this short submission. It has now been removed to later in the submission, to allow ENM's own work to stand independently. I think this a sufficient edit for inclusion in the People's Encyclopedia.
If this change is not sufficient, it will pain me deeply. This will be for at least two reasons:
A) The difficulty of establishing the independent notability of wives of notable spouses is a particularly fraught issue at this time. For generations the only path to notability for women was through marriage. I had thought that America, at least, was entirely past this cruel (and ultimately unproductive) mode of accomplishment. And I had thought that the example of the independent successes (and subsequent notability) of ENM was evidence of this fact. Discovering recently that not only was America not past this wretched ghettoization of female notability has been difficult; an official Wikipedia announcement that ENM has not even established her independent notability would be, I think, devastating.
B) While encyclopedias make claims to being purely descriptive reality, Wikipedia at least acknowledges a number of its shortcomings in this area. It is a normative position, and not a descriptive one, to claim that ENM is not notable, because her husband is. I think it also revealing of the systemic bias that this institution is often accused of, but which I thought was a result of participation matters, and not a result of ideology. Because of my enthusiasm for, and reliance upon, this institution, recognizing the depths of its inherited biases will be quite a blow to my self-conception of my mind. Which is really the only thing I really value.
Once again, thank you for the time you have taken to review ENM's submission and resubmission, and also, hopefully, this response. I look forward to a new, and hopefully revised, disposition on this matter.
Peace and aloha for 2017,
Colin Everest
Thanks. Last night I was going to suggest this to you and see what you thought but didn't get around to it. Doug Weller talk 09:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Josephine Salt (
talk)
16:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
I require assistance from an ADULT ENGLISH PERSON WHO UNDERSTANDS HOW DIFFICULT IT IS TO FIND LIUNKS TO NON EXISTANT NEWSPAPER ARTICLES DUE THEM BEING WRITTEN IN 1928.
Hi @ Tokyogirl79: - I noticed in September 2013 here you re-directed this film from a disambiguation page that was deleted for being non-notable to the director's page, here: [2]. I found this in searching for films on the late actor's page John Hurt which lists the film as a direct link. This causes much confusion to users unfamiliar with how WP works since the film is not listed in the director's credits, it was never released, and does not show up in IMDB for many of its actors. I would kindly suggest that you remove this redirect since it will most undoubtedly cause more problems in the future. In addition, by removing this link, it will allow others to create a more notable page in the future; since a "The Absinthe Drinkers (film)| The Absinthe Drinkers" tag will be red - indicating that a page is in need of construction. Thoughts? Comments? Thank you. Best. Maineartists ( talk) 13:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
FYI please see my edit summary here. - Brianhe ( talk) 03:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed that in the past, you've been involved in improving Hearsay Social. I'm hoping you can help with some edits to that article, which hasn't been significantly updated in several years. I've proposed and mocked up several updates on the article's Talk page, including updating the company name, updating the infobox, and fleshing out the details of the page. I work for a communications agency that represents Hearsay, and due to my COI I won't be editing the article myself. Would you be willing to take a look and implement my suggestions or share feedback? Thanks for your time! Mary Gaulke ( talk) 17:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
I've just deleted another Wisdom Collins thing and blocked User:John Michealson as 'not here'. I don't know if an SPI is in order, as there may be more lurking. One thing that seems to be lacking is wisdom... Peridon ( talk) 21:37, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks to the edit on my Silent Hill: Betrayal pages. Wasn't sure how to reply to your message. I've noted your edit and agree with the removal of specified items. Shadowolfdg ( talk) 17:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Tokyogirl! Thanks for taking care of the Dice Bob AfD. For longstanding hoaxes, it is customary to follow the archiving instructions at Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. That way there is a public record of them for later analysis. Kaldari ( talk) 16:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi! User:Tokyogirl79, I have resubmitted this article - Draft:J-Pimp (Recording engineer) - to incorporate all the changes suggested by Wikipedia reviewer (User:SwisterTwister). I have made substantial changes throughout this article J-Pimp (Recording engineer), I believe this article significant for independent notability. Please help J-Pimp Wikipedia article by re-review Tokyogirl79.
/info/en/?search=Draft:J-Pimp_(Recording_engineer) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:581:4503:4B55:DE6:E468:B6D:8673 ( talk) 13:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
InfoDataMonger ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Time: Feb 18, 2017 17:26:14
Message: null
Notes:
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 17:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to... Women's History Month worldwide online editathon Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Dear Sir/ Madame Tokyogirl79
The bradlay2016 and gwan123 both were not my account. I did not use these users to create Grace Wan Wikipedia website.
My user account is Gracewan2016.
I want to ask who are you? Are you Wikipedia editor?
I want my name to be appear on the Wikipedia. There were few editor Wikipedia that sent me message such as Tokyogirl79, etc says my name will be delete. Why delete my name on Wikipedia.
There were few Wikipedia users says want to delete Grace Wan on your website. I want to know why you want to delete Grace Wan?
I believe myself as Grace Wan is real person and the information that I shared biography is real. I am wellknown person on website. I am real did film/tv job.
I telling you that My real Wikipedia user account is Gracewan2016.
I don't know Bradlay2016 and Gwan123 because i am not those users. Two users were different person not me. They are different users not Grace Wan. They both try to edit Grace Wan page on Wikipedia.
I want to know why Brittney Wilson she have no biography on your website why her name post on your website and my name Grace Wan delete?
I did read the Wikipedia instructions, but i am no create my own biography. Its another person Bradlay2016 edit and talk about me on Wikipedia website.
My name was on Jia Fu family portrait show 2004 on google website and almost showed my name to Wikipedia, but why the Wikipedia did not accept Grace Wan on website?
All my information that another person Bradlay2016 edit and post my name on Wikipedia are all real.
Can you tell me how to avoid speedy deletion. I want my name to appear on Wikipedia website.
Why other well known people get to appear on the Wikipedia and my account is delete? I did not violate and copyright. Why there is speedy deletion policy? All those info about Grace Wan is real is not fake.
Please email me ASAP. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gracewan2016 ( talk • contribs) 10:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Shut up Tokyogrl79. You are lying that you are no japanese girl. You are lying your name. Are you famous well known star celebrity. No you mot. You have your user name, but you don't have your real name. You are bsh. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bradlay2016 (
talk •
contribs)
05:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi TokyoGirl,
It appears Secular Talk & Kyle Kulinski have been created and deleted before. Where could I find the discussion so that I could try to address the notability issues? Thanks in advance. AshLin ( talk) 08:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your addition to the article on The Spook's Nightmare. You added a citation but the URL is impossible for almost all WP readers to access it as it is via a university access system. Please could you adjust the URL to an address that people who are not related to the university can use? (even though the URL will go to a site that is behind a paywall). Thanks, Guffydrawers ( talk) 18:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
The Story of GROWL | |
Hi Tokyogirl79, i have recently created an article on the above book, it is a story about a little monster called Growl, who i reckon is probably the cutest monster ever! (here is a link to a pic of the cover - Growl in her garden) Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC) |
Appreciate your intervention. Dan arndt ( talk) 10:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Respected Wikipedia Security Team , My Name Sreedeep.Ck Alavil an Independent Web Security Researcher, India (Kerala Police Cyber Dome Volunteers Commander) Today on of my friend create a page on Wikipedia he make my name with my permission now I can't see that page .
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sreedeep_ck_alavil
Sir I need to recover this page in that page 101% genuine content
I'm in Google, Microsoft , Intel, Belkin , ESET, Trendmicro, Sony Hall Of Fame list so plz get back that profile
It's my humble request plz Sreedeep007 ( talk) 14:01, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to
Women in Red's | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) ---- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello. You deleted Share What Ya Got because Defiance, Ohio (band) was deleted in error. I'm wondering if you could reverse this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evanw ( talk • contribs) 14:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
@Tokyogirl79: I saw your comment and I wonder if you can help me create an article. I have been trying to create a Wikipedia page called List of Meet the Press episodes /info/en/?search=Draft:List_of_Meet_The_Press_episodes Can you help me create this page? Here is a link that can help you, if you decide to help me create the page. Thanks!!! http://www.digitaldeliftp.com/DigitalDeliToo/dd2jb-Meet-The-Press.html PoliticalBuff ( talk) 15:09, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 25 | ← | Archive 29 | Archive 30 | Archive 31 | Archive 32 | Archive 33 | → | Archive 35 |
I would like to enquire as to why the Flix Premiere page I recently created has been deleted without any consultation? I do not believe the page to be for advertising purposes.
Northds ( talk) 09:39, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, I will re-write the page content, taking note of your suggestions. I'm pretty new to adding content to Wikipedia. My tone of language, I agree was to generic and advetorial like. I shall re-create but only state true and relevant information.
Northds ( talk) 21:43, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
I was just a bit curious as to why you objected to speedying this. Since you had, I didn't actually do it (and since you objected, I technically couldn't), but I certainly would have absent that. I'd agree G4 wasn't quite met, since it was different than the deleted version, but G11 certainly seemed to be. Created by a brand new editor, with a bunch of puffery ("...standout...", "...using his knowledge and experience to help teach others how to get the most out of their career and life" (what does that even mean?), "...bestselling author..." (with that claim "sourced" only to his own website), and so on), and the Big List O'Books, complete with a "reference" of an Amazon link, would normally be more than enough red flags for me to G11 it. Anyway, it's at AfD now. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Tokyogirl79,
It looks like you were working on an article for Alarms & Clock but didn't get a chance to finish. I created a fairly basic version today. Check it out and see if you'd like to add anything!
Thanks,
Onecatowner 12:51 UTC —Preceding undated comment added 00:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
I've tried to get this article included now for a couple of years. Anne Elizabeth is as notable a romance writer and comics creator as 90% of those already on Wikipedia and I'd like to see her have an entry here as well. She has influenced the genre for Navy Seal Romance and for larger teen comics. Thanks again for your assistance. Odubhain ( talk) 00:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Saw your ANI comment, and I concur. You might want to see this and this for why we initially suspected just that. GAB gab 16:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Tokyogirl79. Hope you're having a good 2017 so far. Would you mind taking a look at Víctor M. Marroquín when you get some time? The article's been tag with some maintenance templates since late last year, some of which may be warranted and some of which may be not, but it's kinda hard to tell be it appears to be quite a lot of IP SPAs editing the article, including some making claims like this. I re-added some maintenance templates just removed despite the edit sum since they reason did not seem like one that really addressed the issues, and now there's an IP apparently edit warring over them, I did start a discussion about this at BLPN, but the it was archived without getting much of a response. So, I was wondering if you'd mind taking a peek and see whether you think the subject is notable and whether the COI tag is warranted. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:47, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:My Name is 'A' by Anonymous poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- B-bot ( talk) 19:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
| |
---|---|
Black Women &
Women Anthropologists online editathons |
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 20:55, 28 January 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hey, I've been gathering sources and news coverage on Beyond Unbroken and I plan on submitting a edit request of a re-created version of the page. Just a heads up seeing as your the admin who has the lock on it. Let me know what you think :) Teddy2Gloves (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi!
Thanks for your thorough review of the submission for Emily Noyes Maxwell. I have reflected on your comments and feel that resubmission with minimal revision is warranted. I'll explain in a little bit of depth right now:
1) The basic premise of this resubmission, as of the original submission, is that Emily Noyes Maxwell (ENM) is notable independent of her husband. This is supported by two strands in her working life: her painting and her writing. A sub-thesis of this resubmission is that ENM is independently notable because of her relationship with her husband. This is an independent argument from derivative notability, like might be claimed, for example, by Melania Trump. The relationship that ENM had with her husband was an essential part of working life for a number of authors. This is referenced directly in the Salinger warrant. Wikipedia's own entry on literary salons confirms the importance of these informal gathering spaces for artistic production, and also the central place that women had in them. I think both of these claims for notability were clear, though I can see how only a cursory reading would elide the salon role into a derivative notability claim.
A bit tangentially but on this same topic - the suggestion that ENM ought to be included in her husband's Wikipedia entry is: a) not supported by Wikipedia's own entries regarding the independent notability of women in creating spaces for work, for example in the salon example cited above; b) entirely unsupported by any of EMN's independent work; c) a bit disconcerting, given that I see no precedent for such a suggestion in Wikipedia's own guidelines.
2) I have reviewed your specific source concerns. They are not convincing.
a) You say: "The claim of popularizing TPT is problematic because the New Yorker doesn't actually say that she was responsible for popularizing it." Tricky attribution issues aside I'm happy to concede the point that the New Yorker itself does not say this: it is in fact THE AUTHOR of TPT who makes this claim, in an article published in the New Yorker. The full quote is: "Fifty years ago, the book was rescued from the remainder table, Juster recalls, when a rhapsodic review appeared in this magazine, by Emily Maxwell (who was, among many other things, the wife of the longtime New Yorker fiction editor William Maxwell), and then children readers instantly, mysteriously, took to it." Failure to recognize the source of the quote here is understandable as a byproduct of speed. I hope I have now cleared this up. Overemphasizing the "mysterious" nature of the relationship between the review and the subsequent popularity of The Phantom Tollbooth would require being willfully obstructionist and obtuse. The claim that because this is an essay about the New Yorker in the New Yorker and is therefore biased is supported by no Wikipedia editing policy that I am aware of, and quite candidly, given the extensive reliance on poor-quality internet sources abounding throughout this website. Even if this were not a comparative matter, I would assume the presumption would be on an editor to establish the biased nature of a source, rather than merely assert bias.
b) You say: "The New York Times obituary isn't really useful ... since it's more of an obituary." I am at a loss to understand this argument. Here is a comparable article on the wife Akiva Goldsman which is entirely dependent on an obituary: /info/en/?search=Rebecca_Spikings-Goldsman. Here is another article entirely dependent on obituaries that I produced and that passed editorial standards: /info/en/?search=Cecily_Mackworth. I understand the concern about press releases. Again, I think the presumption ought to be that if you wish to discredit the New York Times (or any newspaper) or the New Yorker (or any magazine) as biased as a result of either press-release style writing or shoddy internal auditing, that is upon the editor. The presumption should be in favor of reliability in these cases, as it is throughout this site.
c) Neither of these source concerns, it should be noted, answer the core of ENM's core claims for independent notability: writing and painting. These are can be sourced elsewhere in the submission. The claims in both the obituary and the NYer piece add color to these primary claims.
3) Systemic Impacts:
Finally, you write: "In the end it's super difficult to establish notability for one spouse when the other is the far more notable of the two." You cite Tabitha King as a counterexample to ENM. It would not do to overemphasize this point, so I will make it succinctly: this counter example is as poorly chosen as possible. It merely establishes that the MORE notable the dominant spouse, the MORE LIKELY there will be coverage of the other spouse. This issue is precisely the opposite of independent notability - it is a form, rather, of superderivative liability.
As a mea culpa, I will admit: I have a deep personal interest in couples in which the wife, after a long and productive marriage, dies and the husband follows short after. (See, e.g., /info/en/?search=Johnny_Cash; see also /info/en/?search=Henry_Friendly) In my haste to emphasize this personal taste, I included the fact of EMN's marriage in the first line of this short submission. It has now been removed to later in the submission, to allow ENM's own work to stand independently. I think this a sufficient edit for inclusion in the People's Encyclopedia.
If this change is not sufficient, it will pain me deeply. This will be for at least two reasons:
A) The difficulty of establishing the independent notability of wives of notable spouses is a particularly fraught issue at this time. For generations the only path to notability for women was through marriage. I had thought that America, at least, was entirely past this cruel (and ultimately unproductive) mode of accomplishment. And I had thought that the example of the independent successes (and subsequent notability) of ENM was evidence of this fact. Discovering recently that not only was America not past this wretched ghettoization of female notability has been difficult; an official Wikipedia announcement that ENM has not even established her independent notability would be, I think, devastating.
B) While encyclopedias make claims to being purely descriptive reality, Wikipedia at least acknowledges a number of its shortcomings in this area. It is a normative position, and not a descriptive one, to claim that ENM is not notable, because her husband is. I think it also revealing of the systemic bias that this institution is often accused of, but which I thought was a result of participation matters, and not a result of ideology. Because of my enthusiasm for, and reliance upon, this institution, recognizing the depths of its inherited biases will be quite a blow to my self-conception of my mind. Which is really the only thing I really value.
Once again, thank you for the time you have taken to review ENM's submission and resubmission, and also, hopefully, this response. I look forward to a new, and hopefully revised, disposition on this matter.
Peace and aloha for 2017,
Colin Everest
Thanks. Last night I was going to suggest this to you and see what you thought but didn't get around to it. Doug Weller talk 09:31, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Josephine Salt (
talk)
16:13, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
I require assistance from an ADULT ENGLISH PERSON WHO UNDERSTANDS HOW DIFFICULT IT IS TO FIND LIUNKS TO NON EXISTANT NEWSPAPER ARTICLES DUE THEM BEING WRITTEN IN 1928.
Hi @ Tokyogirl79: - I noticed in September 2013 here you re-directed this film from a disambiguation page that was deleted for being non-notable to the director's page, here: [2]. I found this in searching for films on the late actor's page John Hurt which lists the film as a direct link. This causes much confusion to users unfamiliar with how WP works since the film is not listed in the director's credits, it was never released, and does not show up in IMDB for many of its actors. I would kindly suggest that you remove this redirect since it will most undoubtedly cause more problems in the future. In addition, by removing this link, it will allow others to create a more notable page in the future; since a "The Absinthe Drinkers (film)| The Absinthe Drinkers" tag will be red - indicating that a page is in need of construction. Thoughts? Comments? Thank you. Best. Maineartists ( talk) 13:06, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
FYI please see my edit summary here. - Brianhe ( talk) 03:34, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed that in the past, you've been involved in improving Hearsay Social. I'm hoping you can help with some edits to that article, which hasn't been significantly updated in several years. I've proposed and mocked up several updates on the article's Talk page, including updating the company name, updating the infobox, and fleshing out the details of the page. I work for a communications agency that represents Hearsay, and due to my COI I won't be editing the article myself. Would you be willing to take a look and implement my suggestions or share feedback? Thanks for your time! Mary Gaulke ( talk) 17:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
I've just deleted another Wisdom Collins thing and blocked User:John Michealson as 'not here'. I don't know if an SPI is in order, as there may be more lurking. One thing that seems to be lacking is wisdom... Peridon ( talk) 21:37, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Just wanted to say thanks to the edit on my Silent Hill: Betrayal pages. Wasn't sure how to reply to your message. I've noted your edit and agree with the removal of specified items. Shadowolfdg ( talk) 17:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Tokyogirl! Thanks for taking care of the Dice Bob AfD. For longstanding hoaxes, it is customary to follow the archiving instructions at Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. That way there is a public record of them for later analysis. Kaldari ( talk) 16:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi! User:Tokyogirl79, I have resubmitted this article - Draft:J-Pimp (Recording engineer) - to incorporate all the changes suggested by Wikipedia reviewer (User:SwisterTwister). I have made substantial changes throughout this article J-Pimp (Recording engineer), I believe this article significant for independent notability. Please help J-Pimp Wikipedia article by re-review Tokyogirl79.
/info/en/?search=Draft:J-Pimp_(Recording_engineer) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:581:4503:4B55:DE6:E468:B6D:8673 ( talk) 13:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
InfoDataMonger ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Time: Feb 18, 2017 17:26:14
Message: null
Notes:
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 17:26, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to... Women's History Month worldwide online editathon Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) -- Rosiestep ( talk) 22:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Dear Sir/ Madame Tokyogirl79
The bradlay2016 and gwan123 both were not my account. I did not use these users to create Grace Wan Wikipedia website.
My user account is Gracewan2016.
I want to ask who are you? Are you Wikipedia editor?
I want my name to be appear on the Wikipedia. There were few editor Wikipedia that sent me message such as Tokyogirl79, etc says my name will be delete. Why delete my name on Wikipedia.
There were few Wikipedia users says want to delete Grace Wan on your website. I want to know why you want to delete Grace Wan?
I believe myself as Grace Wan is real person and the information that I shared biography is real. I am wellknown person on website. I am real did film/tv job.
I telling you that My real Wikipedia user account is Gracewan2016.
I don't know Bradlay2016 and Gwan123 because i am not those users. Two users were different person not me. They are different users not Grace Wan. They both try to edit Grace Wan page on Wikipedia.
I want to know why Brittney Wilson she have no biography on your website why her name post on your website and my name Grace Wan delete?
I did read the Wikipedia instructions, but i am no create my own biography. Its another person Bradlay2016 edit and talk about me on Wikipedia website.
My name was on Jia Fu family portrait show 2004 on google website and almost showed my name to Wikipedia, but why the Wikipedia did not accept Grace Wan on website?
All my information that another person Bradlay2016 edit and post my name on Wikipedia are all real.
Can you tell me how to avoid speedy deletion. I want my name to appear on Wikipedia website.
Why other well known people get to appear on the Wikipedia and my account is delete? I did not violate and copyright. Why there is speedy deletion policy? All those info about Grace Wan is real is not fake.
Please email me ASAP. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gracewan2016 ( talk • contribs) 10:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Shut up Tokyogrl79. You are lying that you are no japanese girl. You are lying your name. Are you famous well known star celebrity. No you mot. You have your user name, but you don't have your real name. You are bsh. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Bradlay2016 (
talk •
contribs)
05:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi TokyoGirl,
It appears Secular Talk & Kyle Kulinski have been created and deleted before. Where could I find the discussion so that I could try to address the notability issues? Thanks in advance. AshLin ( talk) 08:02, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your addition to the article on The Spook's Nightmare. You added a citation but the URL is impossible for almost all WP readers to access it as it is via a university access system. Please could you adjust the URL to an address that people who are not related to the university can use? (even though the URL will go to a site that is behind a paywall). Thanks, Guffydrawers ( talk) 18:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
The Story of GROWL | |
Hi Tokyogirl79, i have recently created an article on the above book, it is a story about a little monster called Growl, who i reckon is probably the cutest monster ever! (here is a link to a pic of the cover - Growl in her garden) Coolabahapple ( talk) 07:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC) |
Appreciate your intervention. Dan arndt ( talk) 10:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Respected Wikipedia Security Team , My Name Sreedeep.Ck Alavil an Independent Web Security Researcher, India (Kerala Police Cyber Dome Volunteers Commander) Today on of my friend create a page on Wikipedia he make my name with my permission now I can't see that page .
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sreedeep_ck_alavil
Sir I need to recover this page in that page 101% genuine content
I'm in Google, Microsoft , Intel, Belkin , ESET, Trendmicro, Sony Hall Of Fame list so plz get back that profile
It's my humble request plz Sreedeep007 ( talk) 14:01, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to
Women in Red's | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) ---- Rosiestep ( talk) 18:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello. You deleted Share What Ya Got because Defiance, Ohio (band) was deleted in error. I'm wondering if you could reverse this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evanw ( talk • contribs) 14:29, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
@Tokyogirl79: I saw your comment and I wonder if you can help me create an article. I have been trying to create a Wikipedia page called List of Meet the Press episodes /info/en/?search=Draft:List_of_Meet_The_Press_episodes Can you help me create this page? Here is a link that can help you, if you decide to help me create the page. Thanks!!! http://www.digitaldeliftp.com/DigitalDeliToo/dd2jb-Meet-The-Press.html PoliticalBuff ( talk) 15:09, 25 March 2017 (UTC)