Todd Doors ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Todd Doors ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hello Diannaa, I am very grateful if you would kindly agree to unblock the entry. The entry was written with the purpose of including a historical account of the growth of a well-run family business into a solid corporate entity within the retail sector from a neutral perspective with fresh eyes. A small level of clarity was required with regards to the use of external linking, which were included not to advertise or promote the business or it’s website, but were included with the sole purpose of providing reference to legitimate sources testifying to the press activity and progress made by the company in the eyes of recognised media. Upon reviewing all entries for Wikipedia specific policies and consulted other experienced Wikipedia editors/ users regarding relevant citations and external linking/ reference activity. I have verified that it will be acceptable remove to all the current external links, listed at the foot of the article and include just the following 3 citations to notable sources: 1. http://www.businessdorset.co.uk/news/news/4226899.New_door_opens/ 2. https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/todd-doors-offer-price-cuts-140300073.html and 3. https://www.realhomesmagazine.co.uk/design/todd-doors-celebrates-its-60th-year-in-business/ . I fully understand that the amount of external links included within the article - written in a factually neutral manner will need to be drastically reduced. There was no intent and only an initial understanding of Wikipedia's regularly updated policy guidance requirements. At this stage I can agree to remove all the external links and only keep the ‘See Also’ and link to the company’s website. Please kindly confirm whether these changes will be acceptable and whether there are any other changes you recommend in order to approve the Todd Doors entry. I have requested a change in the username as well, as this will not be the only entry I make on Wikipedia. I understand you require only external links and citations to non-paid for, media sources written by journalism professionals. There will be no repeat behaviour. Thank you. Yours faithfully, Henry Asafo-Agyei
Decline reason:
If "British heritage, history & quality are now synonymous with the timber door industry expertise, distribution and supply that Todd Doors provide as a service" is what you call "from a neutral perspective" you have a competency issue here. Also, of 3 sources you provided in this request, 2 are press releases and 1 is a trivial mention in some obscure local news source. Max Semenik ( talk) 10:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Todd Doors (November 30)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Todd Doors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Todd Doors,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk)
19:54, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
|
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is against Wikipedia's policy: an account is for an individual, not a group. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising service.
If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{
unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See
Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our
username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
{{
unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
23:39, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Todd Doors ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Requested username:
Request reason:
Decline reason:
Todd Doors ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hello Diannaa, I am very grateful if you would kindly agree to unblock the entry. The entry was written with the purpose of including a historical account of the growth of a well-run family business into a solid corporate entity within the retail sector from a neutral perspective with fresh eyes. A small level of clarity was required with regards to the use of external linking, which were included not to advertise or promote the business or it’s website, but were included with the sole purpose of providing reference to legitimate sources testifying to the press activity and progress made by the company in the eyes of recognised media. Upon reviewing all entries for Wikipedia specific policies and consulted other experienced Wikipedia editors/ users regarding relevant citations and external linking/ reference activity. I have verified that it will be acceptable remove to all the current external links, listed at the foot of the article and include just the following 3 citations to notable sources: 1. http://www.businessdorset.co.uk/news/news/4226899.New_door_opens/ 2. https://uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/todd-doors-offer-price-cuts-140300073.html and 3. https://www.realhomesmagazine.co.uk/design/todd-doors-celebrates-its-60th-year-in-business/ . I fully understand that the amount of external links included within the article - written in a factually neutral manner will need to be drastically reduced. There was no intent and only an initial understanding of Wikipedia's regularly updated policy guidance requirements. At this stage I can agree to remove all the external links and only keep the ‘See Also’ and link to the company’s website. Please kindly confirm whether these changes will be acceptable and whether there are any other changes you recommend in order to approve the Todd Doors entry. I have requested a change in the username as well, as this will not be the only entry I make on Wikipedia. I understand you require only external links and citations to non-paid for, media sources written by journalism professionals. There will be no repeat behaviour. Thank you. Yours faithfully, Henry Asafo-Agyei
Decline reason:
If "British heritage, history & quality are now synonymous with the timber door industry expertise, distribution and supply that Todd Doors provide as a service" is what you call "from a neutral perspective" you have a competency issue here. Also, of 3 sources you provided in this request, 2 are press releases and 1 is a trivial mention in some obscure local news source. Max Semenik ( talk) 10:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Todd Doors (November 30)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Todd Doors and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
|
Hello! Todd Doors,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk)
19:54, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
|
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing, because this account has been used only for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to Wikipedia's content policy. Also, your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is against Wikipedia's policy: an account is for an individual, not a group. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a free advertising service.
If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{
unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See
Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our
username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
{{
unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
23:39, 30 November 2015 (UTC)