ya sorry! accidentally deleted some stuff there :S
just added a spolier warning to the characters!
Thanks for fighting vandalism on the Drew Carey page, however, you reverted a correction by a bot and left the vandalism there. I appreciate the effort, but please ensure the vandalism is reverted, not the correction. Keep up the good work. -- Nehrams2020 03:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
In response to your message, I removed the image because 1.) There is already an image of a dual-blade lightsaber in the section and 2.) the image doesn't even appear to be Star Wars related, short of the lightsaber. Whereas the image already there is from Episode 1; top lvl canon. Raveled 01:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
I saw your comments regarding posting a picture of a male breast. I don't know if you realized it, but your comment was especially appropriate since, upon checking the image that was posted, the picture actually was the user who commented right before you. Chuchunezumi 17:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
This image's description refers to me (or rather, an old account of mine). I changed the description to refer to you. I hope that's right! — Toby Bartels 20:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
just wanted to thank you for supporting my image's Featured image nomination here. Blind14 22:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Speaking as no more than a fellow Wiki user butting in on a conv :)
If you took it yourself, I usually use "own work, attribution required". An example of this licence can be seen at
(an image I uploaded in similar circumstances). Entirely up to you of course what copyright you use, and everyone's got their own opinion on it.
Orderinchaos78 (
t|
c)
21:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
He is the cutest dog ever! I posted him on my page because he represents the patrollers who spot vandalism and other nonsense. And yes it is now safe to say that Tripp is famous, congrats Tripp.___ Seadog ♪ 22:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
You didn't complete the process for filling out your featured picture page. Sharkface217 19:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'll try to fix what I can. Sharkface217 19:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I added in all the info you left out. You're welcome. Sharkface217 19:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Heh heh, nice image, but it is already a featured image :p. I have removed it from the main page. Just make sure if you look at the image you will see a featured image template. Cheers! — Arjun 14:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi and thanks for creating Template:POTD/2007-03-20. However, it's not time for this picture yet. The FPs go in order of promotion, which you can find at WP:FPT. March 19's is Image:Richat Structure - SRTM.jpg, and the WWI pic you scheduled is 56 pictures behind it, so it's still got some time before it's supposed to appear. As such, I've deleted the template for now. If you're interested in helping schedule the PsOTD and writing the blurbs, let me know and I'll actually get around to writing the guidelines instead of letting them sit on the back-burner. Thanks. howcheng { chat} 17:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Due to a general increase in interest in writing the POTD by a number of different Wikipedians, I've created the POTD scheduling guidelines. Please have a look and feel free to schedule more PsOTD. Thanks! howcheng { chat} 01:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 |
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
Image:Ww2-198.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for nominating it!
KFP (
talk |
contribs)
18:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
|
Hi Toby,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Australian infantry small box respirators Ypres 1917.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 22, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-05-22. howcheng { chat} 16:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Toby,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Ww2-198.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 1, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-07-01. However, please note that I've also created a delist nomination so that it can be replaced by a brightness-and-contrast-enhanced version that had been uploaded in February 2005. Please see Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Ww2-198.jpg for the nomination. Regards, howcheng { chat} 19:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- FYI, this image has been moved to appear on July 10 instead, July 1 being Canada Day so I'm going to put a Canada-related image there instead. howcheng { chat} 22:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Please add source and author to the image (on commons) and then remove the no source template. Thank you! Amada44 talk to me 11:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Hoyt Archery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Too Short Maybe Move to WP:AFC Thanks!
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Dudel250 (
talk)
21:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rio Grande Gorge Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taos. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
You've violated 1RR several times on the article e.g., this and this. JDiala ( talk) 18:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wasn't reverting anything, I cited a specific article that said that. So no I did not. Tobyw87 ( talk) 19:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Since you violated the 1RR restriction and to avoid reporting you, I'm giving you the chance to revert this edit. Please reply to this comment. M.Bitton ( talk) 17:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
-
Note: if you don't revert in the next 10 minutes, I will go ahead and report you to the admins.
M.Bitton (
talk)
17:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC) - I reverted it, however the original edit was mine and someone made a reversion claiming that it wasn't sourced properly (it was, the source uses the exact wording as what I wrote). Please participate in the Talk page and try and defend how using human shielding does not make you at least partially morally culpable if humans die during a rescue operation.
Tobyw87 (
talk)
17:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- You also reverted
Nori2001's edit in the process (see
diff). Please be more careful in the future.
M.Bitton (
talk)
17:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well you gave me 10 minutes. Maybe you should give people more time in the future. Thanks! Tobyw87 ( talk) 17:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- You also reverted
Nori2001's edit in the process (see
diff). Please be more careful in the future.
M.Bitton (
talk)
17:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
M.Bitton ( talk) 17:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks but I am well aware of 1RR. Tobyw87 ( talk) 17:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)!
Please note that @ Ecpiandy is well aware of the CT restrictions as evidenced from his Talk page history. [1] You are not allowed to post repeated warnings, and I've reverted it. Additionally, Ecpiandy immediately self-reverted on Gaza genocide, and the text you re-added was not inserted by him. Your stern warnings and edit summaries mentioning 1RR are misplaced.
Regarding the passage you're edit warring about, interviews and opinion pieces are not a reliable source for Wikipedia, as they are not subject to editorial control. — kashmīrī TALK 09:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- The article on "Gaza genocide" cites the opinions of many experts in this field. You act as if the head of the ICC is not a relevant source, when her writings are as significant as quotes by Chief Justice Roberts who are quoted extensively on Wikipedia. It was not an "Edit war", since it was removed incorrectly through an IRR violation. And no, it was not corrected---I did that. Please refrain from assuming I am acting in bad faith as it is against the ethos of Wikipedia. Your comment and the comments of many others are indicative of the extreme anti-Israel (Jewish) bias going on on Wikipedia right now.
Tobyw87 (
talk)
19:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Go through the page history again please. You restored what I removed [2], not what Ecpiandy removed.
- Donoghue's interview was discussed on Talk [3]], and Donogue's interpretation was viewed as not aligned with reliable secondary sources, and so it was not given much weight. Note she wasn't head of the ICJ – she was a former head, also she spoke only for herself, not for the ICJ. — kashmīrī TALK 23:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
:::Again you are fact-free and proud. As this is my own talk page I am free to say what I want (unlike the rest of the entirety of Wikipedia which is clearly pro-Hamas and pro-murdering as many Jews as possible). I simply do not care that you think that the head of the ICJ is an irrelevant source, she absolutely 100% is, just as Chief Justice Roberts is relevant in the US and is extensively cited on Wikipedia, so should President Joan Donaghue who clearly knows more about the ICJ than any of these Wikipedia editors who would rather cite in favor of terrorist sympathizers than the truth. Your friend violated IRR and I reverted his violations (nobody else did that), so you can continue to lie about it all you want but it changes nothing at all. Eventually the truth will win and your hateful/bigoted narrative will lose. The ethos of Wikipedia is about truth over lies---therefore I am in the right here and you are in the wrong. Unlike you, I won't remove your comments here because I see them more as a totem to what is so wrong with the world than a threat.
Tobyw87 (
talk)
05:01, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Tobyw87. Thank you. starship .paint ( RUN) 12:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
The following topic ban now applies to you:
You are indefinitely topic banned from the Arab/Israel conflict, broadly construed
You have been sanctioned for personal attacks and battleground editing
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.
If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 12:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- I've made a statement on the complaint page. I will respect this ban and may appeal later. Thank you for your consideration into these matters. Tobyw87 ( talk) 21:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
See WP:UOWN which says "Most community policies including No personal attacks and Biographies of living persons will apply to your user space, just as elsewhere.". I'd advise you to read the whole of that page. Doug Weller talk 13:36, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Also note that you can no longer discuss anything here related to the Arabi-Israeli conflict
Doug Weller
talk
15:11, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. Tobyw87 ( talk) 21:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
ya sorry! accidentally deleted some stuff there :S
just added a spolier warning to the characters!
Thanks for fighting vandalism on the Drew Carey page, however, you reverted a correction by a bot and left the vandalism there. I appreciate the effort, but please ensure the vandalism is reverted, not the correction. Keep up the good work. -- Nehrams2020 03:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
In response to your message, I removed the image because 1.) There is already an image of a dual-blade lightsaber in the section and 2.) the image doesn't even appear to be Star Wars related, short of the lightsaber. Whereas the image already there is from Episode 1; top lvl canon. Raveled 01:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
I saw your comments regarding posting a picture of a male breast. I don't know if you realized it, but your comment was especially appropriate since, upon checking the image that was posted, the picture actually was the user who commented right before you. Chuchunezumi 17:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
This image's description refers to me (or rather, an old account of mine). I changed the description to refer to you. I hope that's right! — Toby Bartels 20:00, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
just wanted to thank you for supporting my image's Featured image nomination here. Blind14 22:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Speaking as no more than a fellow Wiki user butting in on a conv :)
If you took it yourself, I usually use "own work, attribution required". An example of this licence can be seen at
(an image I uploaded in similar circumstances). Entirely up to you of course what copyright you use, and everyone's got their own opinion on it.
Orderinchaos78 (
t|
c)
21:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
He is the cutest dog ever! I posted him on my page because he represents the patrollers who spot vandalism and other nonsense. And yes it is now safe to say that Tripp is famous, congrats Tripp.___ Seadog ♪ 22:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
You didn't complete the process for filling out your featured picture page. Sharkface217 19:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'll try to fix what I can. Sharkface217 19:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I added in all the info you left out. You're welcome. Sharkface217 19:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Heh heh, nice image, but it is already a featured image :p. I have removed it from the main page. Just make sure if you look at the image you will see a featured image template. Cheers! — Arjun 14:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi and thanks for creating Template:POTD/2007-03-20. However, it's not time for this picture yet. The FPs go in order of promotion, which you can find at WP:FPT. March 19's is Image:Richat Structure - SRTM.jpg, and the WWI pic you scheduled is 56 pictures behind it, so it's still got some time before it's supposed to appear. As such, I've deleted the template for now. If you're interested in helping schedule the PsOTD and writing the blurbs, let me know and I'll actually get around to writing the guidelines instead of letting them sit on the back-burner. Thanks. howcheng { chat} 17:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Due to a general increase in interest in writing the POTD by a number of different Wikipedians, I've created the POTD scheduling guidelines. Please have a look and feel free to schedule more PsOTD. Thanks! howcheng { chat} 01:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
|
Your
Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for
featured picture status,
Image:Ww2-198.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at
Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for nominating it!
KFP (
talk |
contribs)
18:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
|
Hi Toby,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Australian infantry small box respirators Ypres 1917.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 22, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-05-22. howcheng { chat} 16:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi Toby,
Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Ww2-198.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on July 1, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-07-01. However, please note that I've also created a delist nomination so that it can be replaced by a brightness-and-contrast-enhanced version that had been uploaded in February 2005. Please see Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Image:Ww2-198.jpg for the nomination. Regards, howcheng { chat} 19:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- FYI, this image has been moved to appear on July 10 instead, July 1 being Canada Day so I'm going to put a Canada-related image there instead. howcheng { chat} 22:40, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi. Please add source and author to the image (on commons) and then remove the no source template. Thank you! Amada44 talk to me 11:47, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
The article Hoyt Archery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Too Short Maybe Move to WP:AFC Thanks!
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Dudel250 (
talk)
21:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rio Grande Gorge Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taos. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}} to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
You've violated 1RR several times on the article e.g., this and this. JDiala ( talk) 18:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wasn't reverting anything, I cited a specific article that said that. So no I did not. Tobyw87 ( talk) 19:30, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Since you violated the 1RR restriction and to avoid reporting you, I'm giving you the chance to revert this edit. Please reply to this comment. M.Bitton ( talk) 17:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
-
Note: if you don't revert in the next 10 minutes, I will go ahead and report you to the admins.
M.Bitton (
talk)
17:26, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- I reverted it, however the original edit was mine and someone made a reversion claiming that it wasn't sourced properly (it was, the source uses the exact wording as what I wrote). Please participate in the Talk page and try and defend how using human shielding does not make you at least partially morally culpable if humans die during a rescue operation.
Tobyw87 (
talk)
17:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- You also reverted
Nori2001's edit in the process (see
diff). Please be more careful in the future.
M.Bitton (
talk)
17:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well you gave me 10 minutes. Maybe you should give people more time in the future. Thanks! Tobyw87 ( talk) 17:36, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- You also reverted
Nori2001's edit in the process (see
diff). Please be more careful in the future.
M.Bitton (
talk)
17:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{ Ctopics/aware}} template.
M.Bitton ( talk) 17:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks but I am well aware of 1RR. Tobyw87 ( talk) 17:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)!
Please note that @ Ecpiandy is well aware of the CT restrictions as evidenced from his Talk page history. [1] You are not allowed to post repeated warnings, and I've reverted it. Additionally, Ecpiandy immediately self-reverted on Gaza genocide, and the text you re-added was not inserted by him. Your stern warnings and edit summaries mentioning 1RR are misplaced.
Regarding the passage you're edit warring about, interviews and opinion pieces are not a reliable source for Wikipedia, as they are not subject to editorial control. — kashmīrī TALK 09:22, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- The article on "Gaza genocide" cites the opinions of many experts in this field. You act as if the head of the ICC is not a relevant source, when her writings are as significant as quotes by Chief Justice Roberts who are quoted extensively on Wikipedia. It was not an "Edit war", since it was removed incorrectly through an IRR violation. And no, it was not corrected---I did that. Please refrain from assuming I am acting in bad faith as it is against the ethos of Wikipedia. Your comment and the comments of many others are indicative of the extreme anti-Israel (Jewish) bias going on on Wikipedia right now.
Tobyw87 (
talk)
19:02, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
- Go through the page history again please. You restored what I removed [2], not what Ecpiandy removed.
- Donoghue's interview was discussed on Talk [3]], and Donogue's interpretation was viewed as not aligned with reliable secondary sources, and so it was not given much weight. Note she wasn't head of the ICJ – she was a former head, also she spoke only for herself, not for the ICJ. — kashmīrī TALK 23:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
:::Again you are fact-free and proud. As this is my own talk page I am free to say what I want (unlike the rest of the entirety of Wikipedia which is clearly pro-Hamas and pro-murdering as many Jews as possible). I simply do not care that you think that the head of the ICJ is an irrelevant source, she absolutely 100% is, just as Chief Justice Roberts is relevant in the US and is extensively cited on Wikipedia, so should President Joan Donaghue who clearly knows more about the ICJ than any of these Wikipedia editors who would rather cite in favor of terrorist sympathizers than the truth. Your friend violated IRR and I reverted his violations (nobody else did that), so you can continue to lie about it all you want but it changes nothing at all. Eventually the truth will win and your hateful/bigoted narrative will lose. The ethos of Wikipedia is about truth over lies---therefore I am in the right here and you are in the wrong. Unlike you, I won't remove your comments here because I see them more as a totem to what is so wrong with the world than a threat.
Tobyw87 (
talk)
05:01, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Tobyw87. Thank you. starship .paint ( RUN) 12:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
The following topic ban now applies to you:
You are indefinitely topic banned from the Arab/Israel conflict, broadly construed
You have been sanctioned for personal attacks and battleground editing
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Index/Palestine-Israel articles#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.
If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. You are free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 12:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- I've made a statement on the complaint page. I will respect this ban and may appeal later. Thank you for your consideration into these matters. Tobyw87 ( talk) 21:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
See WP:UOWN which says "Most community policies including No personal attacks and Biographies of living persons will apply to your user space, just as elsewhere.". I'd advise you to read the whole of that page. Doug Weller talk 13:36, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Also note that you can no longer discuss anything here related to the Arabi-Israeli conflict
Doug Weller
talk
15:11, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- Understood. Tobyw87 ( talk) 21:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)