Hi, I've updated the Yam Ah Mee page. I'm incontinent and wear Tena Slip Maxi ( talk) 18:31, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article
Singapore Armed Forces ranks, please cite a
reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of
verifiability. See
Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Strange Passerby (
talk •
cont)
10:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Singapore Armed Forces ranks. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Strange Passerby (
talk •
cont)
10:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Singapore Armed Forces ranks, you may be
blocked from editing. You need to provide
reliable sources to back up your changes, otherwise repeatedly adding original research is not acceptable.
Strange Passerby (
talk •
cont)
03:58, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
Singapore Armed Forces ranks, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Strange Passerby (
talk •
cont)
04:15, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Qwyrxian ( talk) 05:50, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced content, as you did to
Singapore Armed Forces ranks. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
BilCat (
talk)
20:59, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Who says its NOT verified?! Please read the link provided if you understand English.
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. CambridgeBayWeather ( talk) 16:23, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
You were blocked in August 2011 and you are asking about that now? I suggest you look a bit further up this page and ask the person who blocked you. Their name and a link to their talk page is there. CambridgeBayWeather ( talk) 19:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I've updated the Yam Ah Mee page. I'm incontinent and wear Tena Slip Maxi ( talk) 18:31, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article
Singapore Armed Forces ranks, please cite a
reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of
verifiability. See
Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Strange Passerby (
talk •
cont)
10:40, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Singapore Armed Forces ranks. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Strange Passerby (
talk •
cont)
10:47, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Singapore Armed Forces ranks, you may be
blocked from editing. You need to provide
reliable sources to back up your changes, otherwise repeatedly adding original research is not acceptable.
Strange Passerby (
talk •
cont)
03:58, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at
Singapore Armed Forces ranks, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Strange Passerby (
talk •
cont)
04:15, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Qwyrxian ( talk) 05:50, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced content, as you did to
Singapore Armed Forces ranks. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
BilCat (
talk)
20:59, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Who says its NOT verified?! Please read the link provided if you understand English.
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. CambridgeBayWeather ( talk) 16:23, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
You were blocked in August 2011 and you are asking about that now? I suggest you look a bit further up this page and ask the person who blocked you. Their name and a link to their talk page is there. CambridgeBayWeather ( talk) 19:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)