Hello! I recently made edits to the page on Xenon dioxide which you reverted. I do not have much history with editing Wikipedia pages, but this change added two factual sentences which can be confirmed through the main source, Brock, David S.; Schrobilgen, Gary J. (2011). I do not believe my edits violated any wiki etiquette, but those changes add important content to the page. Thanks :) (User: 134.114.181.183)
Hello. It seems like you have been reverting lots of edits. Some of them are vandalism and should be reverted but others seems legitimate and I don't understand why they should be reverted. Please make sure that you understand what is vandalism. Also, if you are running some kind of bot or automated editing to do this you need to get it approved first because you are giving me the impression you are using a bot to revert. Thanks. User3749 ( talk) 12:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
flagged up as vandalism? That implies you are using a bot to revert. User3749 ( talk) 06:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
I always find a much higher hit rate of vandalism editsand
a few false positives are getting through- suggests previous experience; have you edited before, under another name or IP addresses???
Listen here, my brother, what is this story that threatened to block my younger sister just because she edited the article about " Além do Guarda-Roupa"? In case you didn't know, I was the one who created that article and I was the one who asked her to edit it, because I'm working right now. Then she called me desperate because of what you told her. I'm going to tell you straight: what you did to her was disrespectful and you better explain why you did it, because I'm one step away from reporting you to the Wikipedia administrators because of this disrespect towards her. What you did to her was wrong, bro... MafiaBoy123 ( talk) 15:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 15:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello I saw that you reverted my edits to the Gregorio Luperon page. The source that source is from a well documented book from a actual historian, so I don't understand how its vandalism. 76.98.78.191 ( talk) 03:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
here you reverted an ip making a correct edit (sfn citations do not go inside <ref></ref> tags) where the editor left a perfectly clear edit summary. You then warned the editor for making this perfectly correct edit. Please be more careful - this was not vandalism and shouldn't have been reverted. Please be more careful and don't revert blindly. Nigel Ish ( talk) 09:40, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GeneralNotability (
talk) 02:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Hello! I recently made edits to the page on Xenon dioxide which you reverted. I do not have much history with editing Wikipedia pages, but this change added two factual sentences which can be confirmed through the main source, Brock, David S.; Schrobilgen, Gary J. (2011). I do not believe my edits violated any wiki etiquette, but those changes add important content to the page. Thanks :) (User: 134.114.181.183)
Hello. It seems like you have been reverting lots of edits. Some of them are vandalism and should be reverted but others seems legitimate and I don't understand why they should be reverted. Please make sure that you understand what is vandalism. Also, if you are running some kind of bot or automated editing to do this you need to get it approved first because you are giving me the impression you are using a bot to revert. Thanks. User3749 ( talk) 12:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
flagged up as vandalism? That implies you are using a bot to revert. User3749 ( talk) 06:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
I always find a much higher hit rate of vandalism editsand
a few false positives are getting through- suggests previous experience; have you edited before, under another name or IP addresses???
Listen here, my brother, what is this story that threatened to block my younger sister just because she edited the article about " Além do Guarda-Roupa"? In case you didn't know, I was the one who created that article and I was the one who asked her to edit it, because I'm working right now. Then she called me desperate because of what you told her. I'm going to tell you straight: what you did to her was disrespectful and you better explain why you did it, because I'm one step away from reporting you to the Wikipedia administrators because of this disrespect towards her. What you did to her was wrong, bro... MafiaBoy123 ( talk) 15:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 15:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Hello I saw that you reverted my edits to the Gregorio Luperon page. The source that source is from a well documented book from a actual historian, so I don't understand how its vandalism. 76.98.78.191 ( talk) 03:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
here you reverted an ip making a correct edit (sfn citations do not go inside <ref></ref> tags) where the editor left a perfectly clear edit summary. You then warned the editor for making this perfectly correct edit. Please be more careful - this was not vandalism and shouldn't have been reverted. Please be more careful and don't revert blindly. Nigel Ish ( talk) 09:40, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GeneralNotability (
talk) 02:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)