Hello
Tim121212, We
welcome your contributions, but where editors have an external relationship with the people, places or things, the
conflict of interest (COI) policies apply. Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
Please also read WP:EW, WP:RS and WP:NPA. (Simply declaring that an otherwise reliable source is wrong or biased, without providing evidence and only relying on first-hand experience, is a form of WP:OR that isn't in keeping with norms. Describing other editors as "uneducated" or "[out to] make the party look bad", simply for restoring or adding such reliable sources, is also not on. And an example of why we have COI guidelines [just because you hold a POV or self-acknowledged bias, and another editor edits in a way that appears counter to that bias, does not mean that they hold an opposite bias; It is just as likely that they are simply and dispassionately upholding project norms. See also WP:AGF.].) Guliolopez ( talk) 15:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at National Party (Ireland, 2016) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have been reverted by no less than four different editors over the last day. If you revert again, you will be reported. Please instead engage on the Talk page, as you have been asked to do.
Bastun
Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello. As has been noted above, if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest are expected to:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer or affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms work for which you receive compensation.
Also, editing for the purpose of publicising, promoting or advocating for anyone or anything is not permitted. Nor is Wikipedia a free webhost for (or extension to the website of) any organisation with which you may have an association. Guliolopez ( talk) 23:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at
National Party (Ireland, 2016), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use
your sandbox for that. Thank you.
Bestagon ⬡ 15:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Friendly request to stop adding election promo. We are writing a neutral encyclopedia, not an election flyer. The Banner talk 19:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.
ser! (
chat to me -
see my edits) 17:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello
Tim121212, We
welcome your contributions, but where editors have an external relationship with the people, places or things, the
conflict of interest (COI) policies apply. Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
Please also read WP:EW, WP:RS and WP:NPA. (Simply declaring that an otherwise reliable source is wrong or biased, without providing evidence and only relying on first-hand experience, is a form of WP:OR that isn't in keeping with norms. Describing other editors as "uneducated" or "[out to] make the party look bad", simply for restoring or adding such reliable sources, is also not on. And an example of why we have COI guidelines [just because you hold a POV or self-acknowledged bias, and another editor edits in a way that appears counter to that bias, does not mean that they hold an opposite bias; It is just as likely that they are simply and dispassionately upholding project norms. See also WP:AGF.].) Guliolopez ( talk) 15:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at National Party (Ireland, 2016) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have been reverted by no less than four different editors over the last day. If you revert again, you will be reported. Please instead engage on the Talk page, as you have been asked to do.
Bastun
Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:39, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello. As has been noted above, if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest are expected to:
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer or affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms work for which you receive compensation.
Also, editing for the purpose of publicising, promoting or advocating for anyone or anything is not permitted. Nor is Wikipedia a free webhost for (or extension to the website of) any organisation with which you may have an association. Guliolopez ( talk) 23:45, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at
National Party (Ireland, 2016), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been
reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use
your sandbox for that. Thank you.
Bestagon ⬡ 15:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
Friendly request to stop adding election promo. We are writing a neutral encyclopedia, not an election flyer. The Banner talk 19:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.
ser! (
chat to me -
see my edits) 17:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)