Congrats on your RfA!!! — Deckill e r 23:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey there. Congratulations, you've just been made a sysop! You've volunteered to do housekeeping duties that normal users sadly cannot participate in. Sysops can't do a lot of stuff: They can't delete pages just like that (except junk like "LALALALAL*&*@#@THIS_SUXX0RZ"), and they can't protect pages in an edit war they are involved in. But they can delete random junk, ban anonymous vandals, delete pages listed on Votes for deletion (provided there's a consensus) for more than one week, protect pages when asked to, and keep the few protected pages that exist on Wikipedia up to date.
Almost anything you can do can be undone, but please take a look at The Administrators' how-to guide and the Administrators' reading list before you get started (although you should have read that during your candidacy ;). Take a look before experimenting with your powers. Also, please add Administrators' noticeboard to your watchlist, as there are always discussions/requests for admins there. If you have any questions drop me a message at My talk page. Have fun!— Ilyan e p (Talk) 23:15, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Congrats! I'm glad I had the chance to support such a great candiate! Use the mop well! -- light darkness ( talk) 04:08, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Good job and congratulations! - W e zzo (talk) (ubx) 06:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations TigerShark, good luck:) -- Ugur Basak 07:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GDFL. |
Best wish for your adminship.-- Jusjih 15:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Congrats and best of luck for the future! You WILL be a good admin! -- S iva1979 Talk to me 15:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations and enjoy your mop and bucket! :) - W e zzo (talk) (ubx) 16:26, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on your adminship (is that a real word?) — you've been a great help to Wikipedia. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello TigerShark: Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a final tally of 77/3/0. I hope I can perform at the standards expected for administrators. If I make any mistakes, or you need anything, please let me know. Prodego talk 01:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC) |
Can you semi protect my talk page from anonimous editing. It appears that either User:PSYCH or someone associated with him has posted to another site to get people to vandalise my page. Xtra 07:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on your adminship, and good luck! Jayjg (talk) 21:20, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
I can't create it, it seems that AfD pages are also a restricted function now. 132.205.44.134 22:59, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, try to block this guy right now, or keep his address on your list, because he is a chronic vandalizer, since Feb, he has disrupted too many articles by blatant, vulgar vandalism [1]. Zmmz 00:02, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
When is it appropriate to post someone on WP:AIV because you removed my post [2]. Why do the Templates say "This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia" if they get another chance. I didn’t' want to post on WP:AIV but I also didn't want to put a blank warning on his talk page. When is it appropriate to post on WP:AIV?-- E-Bod 22:57, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your interest in VandalProof! You've been added to the safe list, and I will do my best to notify you once a download becomes available. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 05:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
The code in the Swift aricle was showing through the text. There was no end to the tags so I could not figure out what it was so I deleted it. Will mark edit notes in future. Ronan
You deleted List of Sharp products after its 5 days on proposed deletion ran out - remember to delete the talk page, as well! ;) Proto|| type 09:32, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi TigerShark- thanks a lot for your support on my recent, (barely) successful rfa, and congrats on the success of your own. Please feel free to leave me any comments or criticisms on my talk page! -- He: ah? 22:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
From the speedy tag: ...it is an article about a real person or group of people that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. (CSD A7)
If you can explain to me how that explicit criteria doesn't fit, I'd be grateful -- or how it somehow escapes "...it is a very short article providing little or no context (CSD A1)". -- Calton | Talk 16:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, now that you're an admin, you assistance is required. User:Avg has been listed at WP:PAIN for something and a very large discussion thread has been going on for quite some time. Could you please see to it and either remove it or ban Avg, because I want to go to bed and I'm afraid to leave the discussion :P Edwy ( talk) 22:36, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
I don't think anyone should be banned. If I'm wrong, please feel free to ban, it's just that the atmosphere there is extremely unpleasent and I wanted to have a word with Bitola so that we could stop this bitterness between Greek and Macedonian editors and as long as that discussion is there, I don't think that it is going to happen. Bitola seems very upset (and I understand him), I tried to have a word with Avg about it and he agreed to take a step back. In my opinion, now no one is acting improperly, but I just don't like the intense dislike some of them seem to show (the same is true vice versa). Essentially, I'm asking you to decide if a ban is needed and to do it as soon as possible. If it isn't, delete (or archive) that debate. Edwy ( talk) 22:54, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick response to the alert. The user in Wisconsin is playing a live trivia contest and is trying to sabotage the other teams by providing false information. The contest started 6 pm CDT yesterday and will run until midnight CDT 09 April Jafree 00:37, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
As you can notice, Avg ( [8], [9], [10]) supported by two Greek editors Edwy and NikoSilver ( [11], [12], [13]) continued with using insulting terms like Fyromians, FYROM nationals etc. Is there any way to stop this madness? Bitola 15:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that a download of VandalProof has recently been made available. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 09:51, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
About your vote on
my RFA... I am totally cool with you opposing because of edit summaries, etc. Still, I hadn't yet had a chance to answer the additional questions placed there before you voted, and I would like to request that you take a look there, and then decide if your oppose vote should stand. Many of your objections have been answered (though not "explained away"--there's no excuse for most of the things you brought up.) (By the way, I really am impressed that you were able to oppose me after careful consideration (instead of rubber-stamp support) even though I supported your RFA. If this sounds sarcastic to you, it shouldn't--that's really, really cool of you to have the integrity to do that.
) In any case, thanks a bundle for your time and obvious consideration of my RFA. Happy editing!
Matt Yeager
♫ (
Talk?)
03:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, this is Matt Yeager. I wanted to thank you for your vote on my request for adminship. The count was something like was 14/20/5 when I decided to withdraw the request. My decision was based on the fact that there are enough things wasting people's time on the Internet that doomed RFA's shouldn't be kept up for voters to have to think about. Regardless of the rationale behind your vote, I hope you will read this note for an extended note and discussion on what will happen before I make another try at adminship (I didn't want to clog up your userpage with drivel that you might not be interested in reading). Thank you very, very much for your vote and your time and consideration of my credentials--regardless of whether you voted support, nuetral, or oppose. Happy editing! Matt Yeager ♫ ( Talk?) 01:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Speedy tags:
Perhaps instead of another chorus of "Every Sperm is Sacred", you could turn it into an actual stub? And if you don't care enough about the subject to do so, leave it red-linked so someone who does care will know to write an actual stub or article? -- Calton | Talk 04:13, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
-- Calton | Talk 05:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Greetings TigerShark, please in the future when a user does repetitive and extremely evident vandalizing and breaks WP:3RR as was done on Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy, just block straight away. Netscott 12:30, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
If you look here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_investigation/Archives/2006/04 you will see that i posted this on the Wikipedia:Requests for investigation and was told that if it contiunes I should report it. Also this person has done this same thing so many times and on such a scale that it could be confused bym content despute. But almos all his edits are always reverted in the high trafic pages but it is the small ones that are the problems, where people dont travle so often there his acts of sneaky vandalism are untuched. I will post 10 times in 10 diffrent articles to prove that he is a sneaky vandal if that is no enough I can post 100 links to show that he is a sneaky vandal and if there is still doubt I can post 200 links. The removal of sourced figures without one self stateing a source is sneaky vandalism. The spreading of missinformation and removal of key paragraphs is sneaky vandalism.
As you can see this is not a matter of content dispute but a clear act of sneaky vandalism. He changes sourced numbers, he removes key paragraphs and he alters sometimes the whole content of an article. And if this is not enough I can give an even more detailed account of his action. One should also take note that his edits almost always get reverted but he contiunes for such a long time that sooner or later people just leave that article.( Deng 14:28, 14 April 2006 (UTC))
Greetings TigerShark,
I created the article because it was linked to in John 3:16 and didn't know of the existence of the information in separate, more detailed articles. Now that I do, I see no reason to keep the article that I started.
Thank you for your concern,
Grumpy Troll (talk) 16:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC).
Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 06:51, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
By chance I noticed that you had jumped on vandalism by User:GeniusMaster on a talk page. Good work! Cje 15:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Nice work on the HENFREE page, thanks. Vint 01:28, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
I put this article up for deletion after your speedy was removed. You can see the vote at the link above. Thanks. -- Strothra 02:15, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Well TigerShark, where have I bumped into you before ;)? Thanks for your support at my recent RfA. As usual, if you have any questions or comments, I can be contacted here. Cheers, Jay( Reply) 00:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC).
You don't really need to do too much except post a note when you can connect using an open proxy (or my test script shows it to be true) - if you have any huge lists of open proxies you find just post 'em on the mass proxy scan list and my proxycheck bot will take a look and if they're open block em on mass. Welcome to the project BTW -- Tawker 06:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:TheFreak.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:11, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
OK, i listen your advice to remove it. Thanks. BUT i blur of how to remove it, of course you can be my assistance. Aleenf1 11:49, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey you gave me a message on my talk page User talk:86.2.28.16 im sorry but i forgot to log in first before i lefted that warning, please get back to me on my discussion page User:Becky-RE-fan Thanks 01:06, 23 April 2006
TigerShark, I wanted to inform you as a courtesy that I unblocked the above user to apply a longer block. You had blocked them for 24 hours, and as their edits show they are likely a sockpuppet account of VaughanWatch ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) I wanted to close down their possible avenues of vandalism. :) -- Syrthiss 02:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I see you blocked this editor for a month; I protected his talk page due to abuse, when do you think it can be unprotected? CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 06:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you recently reverted an anonymous user's deletion of information from the Jo Ann Emerson article. Following your reversion, another incident of the same occured, which I reverted. I logged on today to find out that the same info was deleted by the same anonymous user, who also deleted the relevant discussion from the Talk page, which I reverted. How do we deal with this problem, without violating any Wikipedia policies, including but not limited to the three revert rule? -- TommyBoy 01:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
I never even look at the edit history of my userpage, but I just noticed that some prick had been vandalizing and that you reverted it several times. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. Ryu Kaze 18:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for voting at my RFA. Even though you did not vote for me, your counsel was appreciated. In the next few months, I intend to work on expanding my involvement in other namespaces and try a few different subjects than in the past. - CTSWyneken Talk |
I am presently coordinating a team of advocates re: my RfC for harassment by user:woggly. I welcome you to be one. Simply read the RFC lodged against me by user:woggly and the RFC which I have filed against her. It's really simple stuff when all of her harassment and my (and others) various attempts to resolve any issues are in black and white. Please also view the talks pages where Woggly admits to harassment and infers that she will not cease. Thank you for your consideration. Best wishes, IsraelBeach 19:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. :)
Moe Epsilon is saying on the RfA page that I was blocked for "POV violations". First for vandalism, then for POV violations...It would be very good if you could set him straight...
-- VKokielov 23:19, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
I beg to differ. I think TigerShark has just opened up a new door for me. I will remove the comment. (If VKokielov hasn't already removed it). And in addition to my coment being removed I am going to remove myself from Wikipedia. You can all thank VKokielov for his contribution in making me leave. -- Moe ε 00:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that vandalism on my user page. An old fashioned blanking, eh? I do prefer a rude comment from my vandals, I must say. Flower party☀ 14:21, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the note during the Scottish stereotypes revert war. What you really meant was i'd like my version here, not yours, and don't even think of adding to it.-- 87.82.26.178 23:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my userpage.-- Isotope23 00:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted my edit on "Peat", where I changed the description of the picture from "Netherland" to "Germany". If you click at the image you'll see that it is namend "Torfabbau" which is German for "peat exploitation". The description from the author of the picture says: "Description: Peat exploitation in the nature conservation area (!) of "Ewiges Meer" ("Eternal lake"), a big moor lake in East Frisia, NW Germany." "Ewiges Meer" is a German term. East Frisia is a region in north west Germany and it even says that it is in Germany. The author is named "Fischer" which is a German name. I think therefore that my edit was correct and your's wasn't.
Dear TigerShark/Talk Archive 22nd May 2006,
I have requested an received a History Purge involving the removal of some edits made during an edits you made to my talk page The result in the page history is [15]. Just letting you know why a random out of place message is attached to your message in the edit history. User_talk:Yskyflyer#History_Purges.-- E-Bod 04:22, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
TigerShark, nice to meet you. You wrote to User_talk:Ptmccain "Please do not remove notices", therefore, you may be interested in the following response:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Ptmccain&diff=49673739&oldid=49669078 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Ptmccain&oldid=51612804 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Ptmccain&action=history
Regards, Doright 22:21, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 22:47, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you, TigerShark, for voting in my RFA. It closed with a final result of 75/1/0. Now that I am an administrator here, I will continue to improve this encyclopedia, using my new tools to revert vandalism, block persistent vandals, protect pages that have been vandalized intensively, and close AFD discussions. Any questions? Please contact me by adding a new section on my talk page. Again, thanks to all of you who participated!!! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:21, 20 May 2006 (UTC) |
Congrats on your RfA!!! — Deckill e r 23:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey there. Congratulations, you've just been made a sysop! You've volunteered to do housekeeping duties that normal users sadly cannot participate in. Sysops can't do a lot of stuff: They can't delete pages just like that (except junk like "LALALALAL*&*@#@THIS_SUXX0RZ"), and they can't protect pages in an edit war they are involved in. But they can delete random junk, ban anonymous vandals, delete pages listed on Votes for deletion (provided there's a consensus) for more than one week, protect pages when asked to, and keep the few protected pages that exist on Wikipedia up to date.
Almost anything you can do can be undone, but please take a look at The Administrators' how-to guide and the Administrators' reading list before you get started (although you should have read that during your candidacy ;). Take a look before experimenting with your powers. Also, please add Administrators' noticeboard to your watchlist, as there are always discussions/requests for admins there. If you have any questions drop me a message at My talk page. Have fun!— Ilyan e p (Talk) 23:15, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Congrats! I'm glad I had the chance to support such a great candiate! Use the mop well! -- light darkness ( talk) 04:08, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Good job and congratulations! - W e zzo (talk) (ubx) 06:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations TigerShark, good luck:) -- Ugur Basak 07:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GDFL. |
Best wish for your adminship.-- Jusjih 15:02, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Congrats and best of luck for the future! You WILL be a good admin! -- S iva1979 Talk to me 15:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations and enjoy your mop and bucket! :) - W e zzo (talk) (ubx) 16:26, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on your adminship (is that a real word?) — you've been a great help to Wikipedia. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 21:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello TigerShark: Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed with a final tally of 77/3/0. I hope I can perform at the standards expected for administrators. If I make any mistakes, or you need anything, please let me know. Prodego talk 01:47, 4 April 2006 (UTC) |
Can you semi protect my talk page from anonimous editing. It appears that either User:PSYCH or someone associated with him has posted to another site to get people to vandalise my page. Xtra 07:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Congratulations on your adminship, and good luck! Jayjg (talk) 21:20, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
I can't create it, it seems that AfD pages are also a restricted function now. 132.205.44.134 22:59, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, try to block this guy right now, or keep his address on your list, because he is a chronic vandalizer, since Feb, he has disrupted too many articles by blatant, vulgar vandalism [1]. Zmmz 00:02, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
When is it appropriate to post someone on WP:AIV because you removed my post [2]. Why do the Templates say "This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia" if they get another chance. I didn’t' want to post on WP:AIV but I also didn't want to put a blank warning on his talk page. When is it appropriate to post on WP:AIV?-- E-Bod 22:57, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your interest in VandalProof! You've been added to the safe list, and I will do my best to notify you once a download becomes available. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 05:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
The code in the Swift aricle was showing through the text. There was no end to the tags so I could not figure out what it was so I deleted it. Will mark edit notes in future. Ronan
You deleted List of Sharp products after its 5 days on proposed deletion ran out - remember to delete the talk page, as well! ;) Proto|| type 09:32, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi TigerShark- thanks a lot for your support on my recent, (barely) successful rfa, and congrats on the success of your own. Please feel free to leave me any comments or criticisms on my talk page! -- He: ah? 22:26, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
From the speedy tag: ...it is an article about a real person or group of people that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. (CSD A7)
If you can explain to me how that explicit criteria doesn't fit, I'd be grateful -- or how it somehow escapes "...it is a very short article providing little or no context (CSD A1)". -- Calton | Talk 16:05, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, now that you're an admin, you assistance is required. User:Avg has been listed at WP:PAIN for something and a very large discussion thread has been going on for quite some time. Could you please see to it and either remove it or ban Avg, because I want to go to bed and I'm afraid to leave the discussion :P Edwy ( talk) 22:36, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
I don't think anyone should be banned. If I'm wrong, please feel free to ban, it's just that the atmosphere there is extremely unpleasent and I wanted to have a word with Bitola so that we could stop this bitterness between Greek and Macedonian editors and as long as that discussion is there, I don't think that it is going to happen. Bitola seems very upset (and I understand him), I tried to have a word with Avg about it and he agreed to take a step back. In my opinion, now no one is acting improperly, but I just don't like the intense dislike some of them seem to show (the same is true vice versa). Essentially, I'm asking you to decide if a ban is needed and to do it as soon as possible. If it isn't, delete (or archive) that debate. Edwy ( talk) 22:54, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick response to the alert. The user in Wisconsin is playing a live trivia contest and is trying to sabotage the other teams by providing false information. The contest started 6 pm CDT yesterday and will run until midnight CDT 09 April Jafree 00:37, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
As you can notice, Avg ( [8], [9], [10]) supported by two Greek editors Edwy and NikoSilver ( [11], [12], [13]) continued with using insulting terms like Fyromians, FYROM nationals etc. Is there any way to stop this madness? Bitola 15:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that a download of VandalProof has recently been made available. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 09:51, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
About your vote on
my RFA... I am totally cool with you opposing because of edit summaries, etc. Still, I hadn't yet had a chance to answer the additional questions placed there before you voted, and I would like to request that you take a look there, and then decide if your oppose vote should stand. Many of your objections have been answered (though not "explained away"--there's no excuse for most of the things you brought up.) (By the way, I really am impressed that you were able to oppose me after careful consideration (instead of rubber-stamp support) even though I supported your RFA. If this sounds sarcastic to you, it shouldn't--that's really, really cool of you to have the integrity to do that.
) In any case, thanks a bundle for your time and obvious consideration of my RFA. Happy editing!
Matt Yeager
♫ (
Talk?)
03:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, this is Matt Yeager. I wanted to thank you for your vote on my request for adminship. The count was something like was 14/20/5 when I decided to withdraw the request. My decision was based on the fact that there are enough things wasting people's time on the Internet that doomed RFA's shouldn't be kept up for voters to have to think about. Regardless of the rationale behind your vote, I hope you will read this note for an extended note and discussion on what will happen before I make another try at adminship (I didn't want to clog up your userpage with drivel that you might not be interested in reading). Thank you very, very much for your vote and your time and consideration of my credentials--regardless of whether you voted support, nuetral, or oppose. Happy editing! Matt Yeager ♫ ( Talk?) 01:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Speedy tags:
Perhaps instead of another chorus of "Every Sperm is Sacred", you could turn it into an actual stub? And if you don't care enough about the subject to do so, leave it red-linked so someone who does care will know to write an actual stub or article? -- Calton | Talk 04:13, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
-- Calton | Talk 05:19, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Greetings TigerShark, please in the future when a user does repetitive and extremely evident vandalizing and breaks WP:3RR as was done on Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy, just block straight away. Netscott 12:30, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
If you look here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_investigation/Archives/2006/04 you will see that i posted this on the Wikipedia:Requests for investigation and was told that if it contiunes I should report it. Also this person has done this same thing so many times and on such a scale that it could be confused bym content despute. But almos all his edits are always reverted in the high trafic pages but it is the small ones that are the problems, where people dont travle so often there his acts of sneaky vandalism are untuched. I will post 10 times in 10 diffrent articles to prove that he is a sneaky vandal if that is no enough I can post 100 links to show that he is a sneaky vandal and if there is still doubt I can post 200 links. The removal of sourced figures without one self stateing a source is sneaky vandalism. The spreading of missinformation and removal of key paragraphs is sneaky vandalism.
As you can see this is not a matter of content dispute but a clear act of sneaky vandalism. He changes sourced numbers, he removes key paragraphs and he alters sometimes the whole content of an article. And if this is not enough I can give an even more detailed account of his action. One should also take note that his edits almost always get reverted but he contiunes for such a long time that sooner or later people just leave that article.( Deng 14:28, 14 April 2006 (UTC))
Greetings TigerShark,
I created the article because it was linked to in John 3:16 and didn't know of the existence of the information in separate, more detailed articles. Now that I do, I see no reason to keep the article that I started.
Thank you for your concern,
Grumpy Troll (talk) 16:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC).
Happy Easter to all of you, and I hope that this version may fix your current problems and perhaps provide you with a few useful new tools. You can download version 1.1 at User:AmiDaniel/VandalProof. Let me warn you, however, to please be extremely careful when using the new Rollback All Contributions feature, as, aside from the excessive server lag it would cause if everyone began using it at once, it could seriously aggitate several editors to have their contributions reverted. If you would like to experiment with it, though, I'd be more than happy to use my many sockpuppets to create some "vandalism" for you to revert. If you have any problems downloading, installing, or otherwise, please tell me about them at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs and I will do my best to help you. Thanks. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 06:51, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
By chance I noticed that you had jumped on vandalism by User:GeniusMaster on a talk page. Good work! Cje 15:27, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Nice work on the HENFREE page, thanks. Vint 01:28, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
I put this article up for deletion after your speedy was removed. You can see the vote at the link above. Thanks. -- Strothra 02:15, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Well TigerShark, where have I bumped into you before ;)? Thanks for your support at my recent RfA. As usual, if you have any questions or comments, I can be contacted here. Cheers, Jay( Reply) 00:35, 18 April 2006 (UTC).
You don't really need to do too much except post a note when you can connect using an open proxy (or my test script shows it to be true) - if you have any huge lists of open proxies you find just post 'em on the mass proxy scan list and my proxycheck bot will take a look and if they're open block em on mass. Welcome to the project BTW -- Tawker 06:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:TheFreak.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:11, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
OK, i listen your advice to remove it. Thanks. BUT i blur of how to remove it, of course you can be my assistance. Aleenf1 11:49, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Hey you gave me a message on my talk page User talk:86.2.28.16 im sorry but i forgot to log in first before i lefted that warning, please get back to me on my discussion page User:Becky-RE-fan Thanks 01:06, 23 April 2006
TigerShark, I wanted to inform you as a courtesy that I unblocked the above user to apply a longer block. You had blocked them for 24 hours, and as their edits show they are likely a sockpuppet account of VaughanWatch ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) I wanted to close down their possible avenues of vandalism. :) -- Syrthiss 02:36, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I see you blocked this editor for a month; I protected his talk page due to abuse, when do you think it can be unprotected? CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 06:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I noticed that you recently reverted an anonymous user's deletion of information from the Jo Ann Emerson article. Following your reversion, another incident of the same occured, which I reverted. I logged on today to find out that the same info was deleted by the same anonymous user, who also deleted the relevant discussion from the Talk page, which I reverted. How do we deal with this problem, without violating any Wikipedia policies, including but not limited to the three revert rule? -- TommyBoy 01:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
I never even look at the edit history of my userpage, but I just noticed that some prick had been vandalizing and that you reverted it several times. Thank you very much. I appreciate that. Ryu Kaze 18:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for voting at my RFA. Even though you did not vote for me, your counsel was appreciated. In the next few months, I intend to work on expanding my involvement in other namespaces and try a few different subjects than in the past. - CTSWyneken Talk |
I am presently coordinating a team of advocates re: my RfC for harassment by user:woggly. I welcome you to be one. Simply read the RFC lodged against me by user:woggly and the RFC which I have filed against her. It's really simple stuff when all of her harassment and my (and others) various attempts to resolve any issues are in black and white. Please also view the talks pages where Woggly admits to harassment and infers that she will not cease. Thank you for your consideration. Best wishes, IsraelBeach 19:44, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you. :)
Moe Epsilon is saying on the RfA page that I was blocked for "POV violations". First for vandalism, then for POV violations...It would be very good if you could set him straight...
-- VKokielov 23:19, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
I beg to differ. I think TigerShark has just opened up a new door for me. I will remove the comment. (If VKokielov hasn't already removed it). And in addition to my coment being removed I am going to remove myself from Wikipedia. You can all thank VKokielov for his contribution in making me leave. -- Moe ε 00:06, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for catching that vandalism on my user page. An old fashioned blanking, eh? I do prefer a rude comment from my vandals, I must say. Flower party☀ 14:21, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the note during the Scottish stereotypes revert war. What you really meant was i'd like my version here, not yours, and don't even think of adding to it.-- 87.82.26.178 23:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my userpage.-- Isotope23 00:37, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, you reverted my edit on "Peat", where I changed the description of the picture from "Netherland" to "Germany". If you click at the image you'll see that it is namend "Torfabbau" which is German for "peat exploitation". The description from the author of the picture says: "Description: Peat exploitation in the nature conservation area (!) of "Ewiges Meer" ("Eternal lake"), a big moor lake in East Frisia, NW Germany." "Ewiges Meer" is a German term. East Frisia is a region in north west Germany and it even says that it is in Germany. The author is named "Fischer" which is a German name. I think therefore that my edit was correct and your's wasn't.
Dear TigerShark/Talk Archive 22nd May 2006,
I have requested an received a History Purge involving the removal of some edits made during an edits you made to my talk page The result in the page history is [15]. Just letting you know why a random out of place message is attached to your message in the edit history. User_talk:Yskyflyer#History_Purges.-- E-Bod 04:22, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
TigerShark, nice to meet you. You wrote to User_talk:Ptmccain "Please do not remove notices", therefore, you may be interested in the following response:
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Ptmccain&diff=49673739&oldid=49669078 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Ptmccain&oldid=51612804 http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Ptmccain&action=history
Regards, Doright 22:21, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 22:47, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you, TigerShark, for voting in my RFA. It closed with a final result of 75/1/0. Now that I am an administrator here, I will continue to improve this encyclopedia, using my new tools to revert vandalism, block persistent vandals, protect pages that have been vandalized intensively, and close AFD discussions. Any questions? Please contact me by adding a new section on my talk page. Again, thanks to all of you who participated!!! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:21, 20 May 2006 (UTC) |