Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23.
[1] [2] OMGWTFBBQ! I can't believe I actually edit conflicted you, and we were both saying saying "forgive and forget, that's the way Wikipedia works". That's just awesome. And actually, I imagined you to be older. Don't worry, it makes no difference, I still Wikilove you! -- Deskana (For Great Justice!) 21:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Thats great! DarkLoki 09:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your warm welcome. Exactly because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it must contain all kinds of information. Correct me if I'm wrong. I don't see anything bad in adding links to example keyloggers to "external links" section. This is an EXAMPLE. Or would it be appropriate to add only freeware keylogger examples, as they are not considered "commercial"? However, this is also and ad of those software companies, even if they post the link to free applications. There had been a discussion, a long one, on adding commercial links, and we still haven't reached the consensus. It is not bad to add links to keylogger examples. Just as you deleted my additions, you will also delete additions of others, even if we create a special page, devoted to software keyloggers and software keylogger vendors, you will surely delete it, too. I don't see your point. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, I agree. But adding corresponding links, that carry lots of information is important. Correct me if I'm wrong. $pider 10:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)$pider
It's been a long day, fixed now, thanks. Canadian- Bacon 22:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I reverted the revert you made to Spyware; it took a while for me to understand what he was saying when I first saw it myself, odd construction but he seems to be correct. I'm wondering if you would consider rescinding the vandalism warning you placed on his page ( User talk:128.59.197.165 ). Thanks. -- CliffC 05:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks so much for supporting my recent RFA. A number of editors considered that I wasn't ready for the mop yet and unfortunately the RFA did not succeed (69/26/11). There are a number of areas which I will be working on (including changing my username) in the next few months in order to allay the fears of those who opposed my election to administrator.
I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you sincerely for your support over the past week. I've been blown away by the level of interest taken in my RFA and appreciate the time and energy dedicated by all the editors who have contributed to it, support, oppose and neutral alike. I hope to bump into you again soon and look forward to serving you and Wikipedia in any way I can. Cheers! The Rambling Man 18:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC) (the non-admin, formerly known as Budgiekiller)
What's been going on? Sd31415 called a sockpuppet? Surely not. ;) Yuser31415 20:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh yes, I briefly read the above comments after posting and understood what had happened - which was a misunderstanding :). It's good to see you back! Yuser31415 23:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Do not add vandalism to an article. There are rules and regulations to be followed. Velten 03:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry. Velten 03:51, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello Yuser. I've reviewed this vandal's edits and decided to decline your request. Blocks are not to be punitive, and his misbehavior was not atypical of a vandal who's to be blocked for 24 hours. First blocks usually consist of 24 hours, a week is rarely given as a first block. When the vandalism is extreme, such as when the vandal inserts profanity, hate remarks or personal attacks, then I usually block 31 or 48 hours. But again, never a week as a first block. Don't worry, if this IP continues to vandalize Wikipedia after the current block expires, his/her next blocks will get longer and longer. Regards,-- Hús ö nd 04:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Yuser. Sorry if it was too complicated though. I guess we Dragon Ball fans will take it from here. Cheers! (
Me |
The Article)
04:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep up the good work. -- Deskana (request backup) 11:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Am I able to have everything on my user page moved to my user talk page and then have my user page deleted (having it as a red link that is)? That would be great because then I could only stick to one page and not have to concentrate on the both of them. What do ya think? ( Me | The Article) 18:29, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23.
[1] [2] OMGWTFBBQ! I can't believe I actually edit conflicted you, and we were both saying saying "forgive and forget, that's the way Wikipedia works". That's just awesome. And actually, I imagined you to be older. Don't worry, it makes no difference, I still Wikilove you! -- Deskana (For Great Justice!) 21:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Thats great! DarkLoki 09:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your warm welcome. Exactly because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, it must contain all kinds of information. Correct me if I'm wrong. I don't see anything bad in adding links to example keyloggers to "external links" section. This is an EXAMPLE. Or would it be appropriate to add only freeware keylogger examples, as they are not considered "commercial"? However, this is also and ad of those software companies, even if they post the link to free applications. There had been a discussion, a long one, on adding commercial links, and we still haven't reached the consensus. It is not bad to add links to keylogger examples. Just as you deleted my additions, you will also delete additions of others, even if we create a special page, devoted to software keyloggers and software keylogger vendors, you will surely delete it, too. I don't see your point. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, I agree. But adding corresponding links, that carry lots of information is important. Correct me if I'm wrong. $pider 10:06, 10 January 2007 (UTC)$pider
It's been a long day, fixed now, thanks. Canadian- Bacon 22:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
I reverted the revert you made to Spyware; it took a while for me to understand what he was saying when I first saw it myself, odd construction but he seems to be correct. I'm wondering if you would consider rescinding the vandalism warning you placed on his page ( User talk:128.59.197.165 ). Thanks. -- CliffC 05:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey, thanks so much for supporting my recent RFA. A number of editors considered that I wasn't ready for the mop yet and unfortunately the RFA did not succeed (69/26/11). There are a number of areas which I will be working on (including changing my username) in the next few months in order to allay the fears of those who opposed my election to administrator.
I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you sincerely for your support over the past week. I've been blown away by the level of interest taken in my RFA and appreciate the time and energy dedicated by all the editors who have contributed to it, support, oppose and neutral alike. I hope to bump into you again soon and look forward to serving you and Wikipedia in any way I can. Cheers! The Rambling Man 18:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC) (the non-admin, formerly known as Budgiekiller)
What's been going on? Sd31415 called a sockpuppet? Surely not. ;) Yuser31415 20:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Oh yes, I briefly read the above comments after posting and understood what had happened - which was a misunderstanding :). It's good to see you back! Yuser31415 23:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Do not add vandalism to an article. There are rules and regulations to be followed. Velten 03:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry. Velten 03:51, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello Yuser. I've reviewed this vandal's edits and decided to decline your request. Blocks are not to be punitive, and his misbehavior was not atypical of a vandal who's to be blocked for 24 hours. First blocks usually consist of 24 hours, a week is rarely given as a first block. When the vandalism is extreme, such as when the vandal inserts profanity, hate remarks or personal attacks, then I usually block 31 or 48 hours. But again, never a week as a first block. Don't worry, if this IP continues to vandalize Wikipedia after the current block expires, his/her next blocks will get longer and longer. Regards,-- Hús ö nd 04:01, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks Yuser. Sorry if it was too complicated though. I guess we Dragon Ball fans will take it from here. Cheers! (
Me |
The Article)
04:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Keep up the good work. -- Deskana (request backup) 11:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Am I able to have everything on my user page moved to my user talk page and then have my user page deleted (having it as a red link that is)? That would be great because then I could only stick to one page and not have to concentrate on the both of them. What do ya think? ( Me | The Article) 18:29, 13 January 2007 (UTC)