|
Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines; they are
not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See
here for more information. Thank you.
EvergreenFir
(talk)
02:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Improving the article, you say? You are one of the many people that think the big bang theory is fact, I see. Have you ever looked up the mysteries of the universe? Do you know how many there are? Do you know what dark matter is? Dark energy? Do you know why scientists just found 100 stars that completely disappeared? Don't you realize that the big bang theory needs so much improving that it is ridiculous? Please allow me to help in order to help the many scientists on this Earth that look into space cannot decipher what they see. Look up the word "conventionalism" on wiki. You will find that the big bang theory is defined by this word. Science cannot continue on this path forever. Hopefully you would agree just as so many scientists have as they try to unravel what they see in space. Please respond. I'm looking forward to your response. Thenewbigbang ( talk) 07:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Ian.thomson ( talk) 11:38, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Maybe a part of wiki should be dedicated to articles in which scientists admit confusuin as to what they observe in space. If this website continues to back the big bang theory, it is causing a disservice to the public in general. Thanks for your advice. Thenewbigbang ( talk) 11:44, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
I use this site a lot. It is an excellent site. However, the lambda CDM model is not working. I was trying to help the problem. The people that edit my suggestions do not understand what they are editting like I do. The world asks me many questions everyday related to the universe because they do not get what they need from Wikipedia. Maybe, if these editors will let me help, the general public will be satisfied with what they are not currently getting. It is no big deal if I'm rejected. I've seen it in the past. It is because the big bang is a form of conventionalism. That means the world has been forced to believe in a theory that has major flaws. The only way to rectify this is to understand and realize the mysteries of the universe. People once thought the Earth was the center of the universe. Now, people think the universe came from nothing. That is conventionalism. A website like this should not promote it. Thanks. Thenewbigbang ( talk) 12:08, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
|
Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on
reliable sources and the project
policies and guidelines; they are
not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting
our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See
here for more information. Thank you.
EvergreenFir
(talk)
02:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Improving the article, you say? You are one of the many people that think the big bang theory is fact, I see. Have you ever looked up the mysteries of the universe? Do you know how many there are? Do you know what dark matter is? Dark energy? Do you know why scientists just found 100 stars that completely disappeared? Don't you realize that the big bang theory needs so much improving that it is ridiculous? Please allow me to help in order to help the many scientists on this Earth that look into space cannot decipher what they see. Look up the word "conventionalism" on wiki. You will find that the big bang theory is defined by this word. Science cannot continue on this path forever. Hopefully you would agree just as so many scientists have as they try to unravel what they see in space. Please respond. I'm looking forward to your response. Thenewbigbang ( talk) 07:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Ian.thomson ( talk) 11:38, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Maybe a part of wiki should be dedicated to articles in which scientists admit confusuin as to what they observe in space. If this website continues to back the big bang theory, it is causing a disservice to the public in general. Thanks for your advice. Thenewbigbang ( talk) 11:44, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
I use this site a lot. It is an excellent site. However, the lambda CDM model is not working. I was trying to help the problem. The people that edit my suggestions do not understand what they are editting like I do. The world asks me many questions everyday related to the universe because they do not get what they need from Wikipedia. Maybe, if these editors will let me help, the general public will be satisfied with what they are not currently getting. It is no big deal if I'm rejected. I've seen it in the past. It is because the big bang is a form of conventionalism. That means the world has been forced to believe in a theory that has major flaws. The only way to rectify this is to understand and realize the mysteries of the universe. People once thought the Earth was the center of the universe. Now, people think the universe came from nothing. That is conventionalism. A website like this should not promote it. Thanks. Thenewbigbang ( talk) 12:08, 20 February 2020 (UTC)