This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
Film Fan (
talk ·
contribs ·
global contribs ·
page moves ·
user creation ·
block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Shirik (
Questions or Comments?) 00:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC) |
Thebestfeet ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet. Please dig deeper... check behavior more closely, IPs, etc... what else can I say? There is no evidence because my previous wiki experience was as unregistered. Furthermore, I edit exclusively constructively, avoid edit wars, I'm polite in conversation, respect other contributors, etc etc, all of which appears to be quite different than Film fan. Thebestfeet ( talk) 01:08, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I've read the investigation and poked around some more. The behavioral evidence alone is convincing, much less the "likely" result form the checkuser. Significant overlap in obscure articles, jumping in to the same old debates, and revisions like this. Please, I would strongly urge you look at WP:OFFER; wait a while without socking and make a coherent unblock request with your old account. This kind of behavior is just silly. Kuru (talk) 02:01, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thebestfeet ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Film fan is one of numerous users whose contribs I took a nosey at. Others include sohambanerjee, infamousprince, lugnuts, Quentin X, Betty Logan, etc. I am not Film fan and I share my IP with nobody. Thebestfeet ( talk) 16:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This doesn't answer the question (much like you did everything you could to evade answering reasonable and relevant queries at the SPI) and frankly if we took people's word that they weren't socks we might as well not have a sockpuppetry policy at all. — Daniel Case ( talk) 03:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thebestfeet ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet. Thebestfeet ( talk) 10:44 pm, Yesterday (UTC+0)
Decline reason:
And I am not a dog, but I can't prove it. Simply claiming something doesn't make it true. Yunshui 雲 水 13:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lugnuts, what is the reason for edits like this? Thebestfeet ( talk) 19:17, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet of
Film Fan (
talk ·
contribs ·
global contribs ·
page moves ·
user creation ·
block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Shirik (
Questions or Comments?) 00:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC) |
Thebestfeet ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet. Please dig deeper... check behavior more closely, IPs, etc... what else can I say? There is no evidence because my previous wiki experience was as unregistered. Furthermore, I edit exclusively constructively, avoid edit wars, I'm polite in conversation, respect other contributors, etc etc, all of which appears to be quite different than Film fan. Thebestfeet ( talk) 01:08, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I've read the investigation and poked around some more. The behavioral evidence alone is convincing, much less the "likely" result form the checkuser. Significant overlap in obscure articles, jumping in to the same old debates, and revisions like this. Please, I would strongly urge you look at WP:OFFER; wait a while without socking and make a coherent unblock request with your old account. This kind of behavior is just silly. Kuru (talk) 02:01, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thebestfeet ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Film fan is one of numerous users whose contribs I took a nosey at. Others include sohambanerjee, infamousprince, lugnuts, Quentin X, Betty Logan, etc. I am not Film fan and I share my IP with nobody. Thebestfeet ( talk) 16:58, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This doesn't answer the question (much like you did everything you could to evade answering reasonable and relevant queries at the SPI) and frankly if we took people's word that they weren't socks we might as well not have a sockpuppetry policy at all. — Daniel Case ( talk) 03:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thebestfeet ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet. Thebestfeet ( talk) 10:44 pm, Yesterday (UTC+0)
Decline reason:
And I am not a dog, but I can't prove it. Simply claiming something doesn't make it true. Yunshui 雲 水 13:01, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Lugnuts, what is the reason for edits like this? Thebestfeet ( talk) 19:17, 3 November 2013 (UTC)