|
We have a bit of a consistency problem. I nominated 9 articles for deletion. You rescued a few, but Power Ballads (Different Edition); Power Ballads (AUS); Power Ballads (NZ); Bigger, Better Power Ballads II ; Bigger, Better Power Ballads II (New Edition); and BIGGER, BETTER POWER BALLADS (AUS) all got deleted as spam. What makes the three you rescued worse than the six that died? Either six articles need to be resurrected, or three more need to go the way of all flesh. Kww 20:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, This has been created again. Was it AfD'd previously? Kevin 00:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Why did you delete Michael J. Alter's page? H_Johnson 15:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
It looks like you forgot to put the "User:" prefix in this page you just created: The_wub/sandbox/Altres. Since you're an administrator you can just delete it :). While you're at it, please delete How_to_create_an_operating_system as well. Thanks, Psych less 18:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
[1] — Rickyrab | Talk 16:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XVI (June 2007) | ||
|
| |
New featured articles: New A-Class articles: |
| |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Not sure what is happening. You deleted Category:Images with the same name on Wikimedia Commons as of 23 June 2007 on the 8th as empty, but I came across a couple of pictures today that claimed to be in the category. I undeleted the category and indeed it looked empty until I did null edits on the two images I'd found. I haven't done much work with the Commons categories, so I'm not sure if this is normal or not. I wanted to let you know that I'd undone your delete. If you understand what's happening and have time to explain to a relatively new admin, I'd love to learn. ~ Bigr Tex 14:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
71.61.28.212 is permantly reported on investigation for vandalizing his own talk pages and trolling wikipedians. He is a sock puppet of....TheInvisibleMachine. AYuckyMachine 00:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
I have undone your "purge" of the Wikimedia site feedback page ( [3]). I disagree that this should have been done, feedback is feedback, it should be archived as usual. Cbrown1023 talk 04:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
As you may already be aware, Category:Psuedoreligionist Wikipedians and its subcategories, Category:Discordian Wikipedians, Category:Flying Spaghetti Monsterist Wikipedians, Category:SubGenius Wikipedians, and others, have been deleted. That deletion is now up for review. If you have anything you'd like to say on the subject, now is the time. If you know of any other editors who might have something to say on the subject, pass the word. If, on the other hand, you are not interested in the slightest, feel free to delete this. — Bigwyrm watch me wake me 10:34, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
you just rved my marking of De jure for deletion. While clear no a typical rv, I'd appreciate if you took a moment to comment on this more throughly than your existing six words allowed. You might, for example, claim that the entry is encyclopedic in some way, or that there is information present that is not definitional. Pdbailey 01:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
|
We have a bit of a consistency problem. I nominated 9 articles for deletion. You rescued a few, but Power Ballads (Different Edition); Power Ballads (AUS); Power Ballads (NZ); Bigger, Better Power Ballads II ; Bigger, Better Power Ballads II (New Edition); and BIGGER, BETTER POWER BALLADS (AUS) all got deleted as spam. What makes the three you rescued worse than the six that died? Either six articles need to be resurrected, or three more need to go the way of all flesh. Kww 20:21, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, This has been created again. Was it AfD'd previously? Kevin 00:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Why did you delete Michael J. Alter's page? H_Johnson 15:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
It looks like you forgot to put the "User:" prefix in this page you just created: The_wub/sandbox/Altres. Since you're an administrator you can just delete it :). While you're at it, please delete How_to_create_an_operating_system as well. Thanks, Psych less 18:55, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
[1] — Rickyrab | Talk 16:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
The
Military history WikiProject Newsletter Issue XVI (June 2007) | ||
|
| |
New featured articles: New A-Class articles: |
| |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 22:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Not sure what is happening. You deleted Category:Images with the same name on Wikimedia Commons as of 23 June 2007 on the 8th as empty, but I came across a couple of pictures today that claimed to be in the category. I undeleted the category and indeed it looked empty until I did null edits on the two images I'd found. I haven't done much work with the Commons categories, so I'm not sure if this is normal or not. I wanted to let you know that I'd undone your delete. If you understand what's happening and have time to explain to a relatively new admin, I'd love to learn. ~ Bigr Tex 14:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
71.61.28.212 is permantly reported on investigation for vandalizing his own talk pages and trolling wikipedians. He is a sock puppet of....TheInvisibleMachine. AYuckyMachine 00:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
I have undone your "purge" of the Wikimedia site feedback page ( [3]). I disagree that this should have been done, feedback is feedback, it should be archived as usual. Cbrown1023 talk 04:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
As you may already be aware, Category:Psuedoreligionist Wikipedians and its subcategories, Category:Discordian Wikipedians, Category:Flying Spaghetti Monsterist Wikipedians, Category:SubGenius Wikipedians, and others, have been deleted. That deletion is now up for review. If you have anything you'd like to say on the subject, now is the time. If you know of any other editors who might have something to say on the subject, pass the word. If, on the other hand, you are not interested in the slightest, feel free to delete this. — Bigwyrm watch me wake me 10:34, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
you just rved my marking of De jure for deletion. While clear no a typical rv, I'd appreciate if you took a moment to comment on this more throughly than your existing six words allowed. You might, for example, claim that the entry is encyclopedic in some way, or that there is information present that is not definitional. Pdbailey 01:12, 31 July 2007 (UTC)