|
A bit early, and you'll probably read this late, but still:
Hope your exams worked out! -- Anna512 ( talk • contribs) 08:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
On your day, I wish for you I wish you fine and simple pleasures. Happy birthday, dear Wub! |
Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 14:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-- Destructo Talk to me 23:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Break a leg, sweetie! (not literally, of course!) We miss you over here, but exams are a must, so best of luck with it - we're keeping you a seat ;) Have a beautiful weekend! Love, Phaedriel - 18:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Why did you remove the [hang on]tag from the above article? I want to contest the deletion as it has ben improved since whoever wrote the original article. Thanks Jack1956 12:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
OOps! Sorry...didn't know that Jack1956 12:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
You removed the speedy tag so it's up on AfD now. I'm just letting you know in case you would like to discuss on the article's AfD page. -- Javit 23:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:FGAndTheWienerIs.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() Issue XV (May 2007) | ||
|
| |
New featured articles:
New A-Class articles: |
| |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 16:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
I suppose that depends on one's definition of nonsense. -- User:RandomHumanoid( talk) 00:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Kelly Cross would appear to have been authored by someone connected with him. That is why I tagged it {NPOV}. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RandomHumanoid ( talk • contribs)
Many thanks for correcting the format, :) sbandrews ( t) 16:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello I was looking at Westwood Collge and trying doing a revert back to the your changes. It is not letting me do this. The reason I wish to go back to your version is because someone wrote a message about tightening up graphics as the title of the page. Can you please revert it back. Thank you.
Guy-next-last 22:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Guy-next-last
Hi. Could you possibly explain to me as delicately as possible why this image qualifies under fair use? I was told by a couple of admins that any image lifted from a website is strictly prohibited because when you click "upload file" in a red box Wikipedia specifically says "Do not upload images found on websites or on an image search engine. They will be deleted."
I would like to know why this image is exempted as soon as is possible. Thank you. Nja247 ( talk • contribs) 21:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I know the category was previously deleted but there is enough content in other articles for Hilary Duff to have her own category. I am kindly asking you if it's okay to re-created this category once more. Quasy Boy 16:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Wasn't the result was in favour of Australian footballers instead of Australian soccer players? Kingjeff 20:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm afraid I did not see that discussion and I wonder just how many of the regular contributors on Scotland saw it. I can't see any regular names that I know of. Could I just say how silly I think the new title of "Houses in Scotland" is and how utterly meaningless a phrase that is. You might direct me to the appropriate noticeboard whereby I can ask for this to be looked at again. Thanks. David Lauder 21:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, W. I was surprised to see this National Trust mansion 'demoted' by you to a mere house. I visited there last month and was amazed by the 18th-19th century facilities and artefacts which have lain there untouched for many decades before being revived and placed on public view. So I have started to expand the stub at Llanerchaeron. Can I ask you to check out what is taking shape, and maybe undo your verdict? Or is there some categorisation principle of which I'm blissfully unaware? Cheers -- Aeronian 14:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Fine, thanks! Aeronian 12:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'll defer to your opinion here, but the Non-Partisan League merged with the ND Democratic party and still carries equal billing in the party's title.
Does this qualify as defunct? TSauer 17:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Based on the arguments, I was just wondering why you chose no consensus instead of keep. Shsilver 12:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
|
A bit early, and you'll probably read this late, but still:
Hope your exams worked out! -- Anna512 ( talk • contribs) 08:01, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
On your day, I wish for you I wish you fine and simple pleasures. Happy birthday, dear Wub! |
Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 14:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-- Destructo Talk to me 23:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Break a leg, sweetie! (not literally, of course!) We miss you over here, but exams are a must, so best of luck with it - we're keeping you a seat ;) Have a beautiful weekend! Love, Phaedriel - 18:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Why did you remove the [hang on]tag from the above article? I want to contest the deletion as it has ben improved since whoever wrote the original article. Thanks Jack1956 12:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
OOps! Sorry...didn't know that Jack1956 12:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
You removed the speedy tag so it's up on AfD now. I'm just letting you know in case you would like to discuss on the article's AfD page. -- Javit 23:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:FGAndTheWienerIs.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:46, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
![]() Issue XV (May 2007) | ||
|
| |
New featured articles:
New A-Class articles: |
| |
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 16:42, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
I suppose that depends on one's definition of nonsense. -- User:RandomHumanoid( talk) 00:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Kelly Cross would appear to have been authored by someone connected with him. That is why I tagged it {NPOV}. —Preceding unsigned comment added by RandomHumanoid ( talk • contribs)
Many thanks for correcting the format, :) sbandrews ( t) 16:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello I was looking at Westwood Collge and trying doing a revert back to the your changes. It is not letting me do this. The reason I wish to go back to your version is because someone wrote a message about tightening up graphics as the title of the page. Can you please revert it back. Thank you.
Guy-next-last 22:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Guy-next-last
Hi. Could you possibly explain to me as delicately as possible why this image qualifies under fair use? I was told by a couple of admins that any image lifted from a website is strictly prohibited because when you click "upload file" in a red box Wikipedia specifically says "Do not upload images found on websites or on an image search engine. They will be deleted."
I would like to know why this image is exempted as soon as is possible. Thank you. Nja247 ( talk • contribs) 21:21, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, I know the category was previously deleted but there is enough content in other articles for Hilary Duff to have her own category. I am kindly asking you if it's okay to re-created this category once more. Quasy Boy 16:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Wasn't the result was in favour of Australian footballers instead of Australian soccer players? Kingjeff 20:30, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm afraid I did not see that discussion and I wonder just how many of the regular contributors on Scotland saw it. I can't see any regular names that I know of. Could I just say how silly I think the new title of "Houses in Scotland" is and how utterly meaningless a phrase that is. You might direct me to the appropriate noticeboard whereby I can ask for this to be looked at again. Thanks. David Lauder 21:05, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi there, W. I was surprised to see this National Trust mansion 'demoted' by you to a mere house. I visited there last month and was amazed by the 18th-19th century facilities and artefacts which have lain there untouched for many decades before being revived and placed on public view. So I have started to expand the stub at Llanerchaeron. Can I ask you to check out what is taking shape, and maybe undo your verdict? Or is there some categorisation principle of which I'm blissfully unaware? Cheers -- Aeronian 14:50, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Fine, thanks! Aeronian 12:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I'll defer to your opinion here, but the Non-Partisan League merged with the ND Democratic party and still carries equal billing in the party's title.
Does this qualify as defunct? TSauer 17:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
Based on the arguments, I was just wondering why you chose no consensus instead of keep. Shsilver 12:01, 30 June 2007 (UTC)