From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


RSN and NPOVN threads

TFD, please look at WP:FORUMSHOP. In two instances you are taking the talk page discussions to the Notice Boards while the basic discussion is underway. In the case of the NPOVN we had just started the discussion. Thanks. – S. Rich ( talk) 00:14, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Please avoid personal attacks. These are actually two different issues, what weight to give criticism of the SPLC by a controversial blogger and whether we should accept a description of an advertisement which is clearly false. I am surprised by the way on your position on this. You know that weight requires when explaining opinions we should mention their degree of support. Your edit on the FRC falsely presents the opinions of the blogger as mainstream. Furthermore, it is disingenuous to ignore what an ad actually says. I am sure that you would not have accepted that type of evidence in your courtroom. TFD ( talk) 00:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The 
request for formal mediation concerning Talk:Nigel Farage, to which you were listed as a party, has been 
declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the 
mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the 
Chairman of the Committee, or to the 
mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see 
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan ( TALK) 21:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


RSN and NPOVN threads

TFD, please look at WP:FORUMSHOP. In two instances you are taking the talk page discussions to the Notice Boards while the basic discussion is underway. In the case of the NPOVN we had just started the discussion. Thanks. – S. Rich ( talk) 00:14, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Please avoid personal attacks. These are actually two different issues, what weight to give criticism of the SPLC by a controversial blogger and whether we should accept a description of an advertisement which is clearly false. I am surprised by the way on your position on this. You know that weight requires when explaining opinions we should mention their degree of support. Your edit on the FRC falsely presents the opinions of the blogger as mainstream. Furthermore, it is disingenuous to ignore what an ad actually says. I am sure that you would not have accepted that type of evidence in your courtroom. TFD ( talk) 00:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The 
request for formal mediation concerning Talk:Nigel Farage, to which you were listed as a party, has been 
declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the 
mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the 
Chairman of the Committee, or to the 
mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see 
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan ( TALK) 21:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook