This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Just wanted to drop in and say "thank you" for your informed opinion on Libertarianism. I hate to say it, but I think you are the only editor there who isn't completely blinded by personal bias, and it is much appreciated. I agree with your latest statement on the Talk page that there is an important line of continuity between anarchism and modern American libertarianism that needs to be included in the article; however, I feel that the abundance of content detailing libertarian socialism violates WP:DUE WEIGHT. In any case, I just wanted to thank you for your balanced perspective and calm, rational comments. You are a valuable asset to this site! — MisterDub ( talk | contribs) 20:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
You previously voted, opined, commented, or otherwise took part, at Template talk:Succession box#RfC. Please see a related discussion at Template talk:Infobox officeholder#RfC Congressmen's tenures in infobox. Kraxler ( talk) 15:12, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
I've accepted to mediate this case and we are ready to begin. Please join on the case talk page Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/United States. Sunray ( talk) 23:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Have you seen this change [1] or you had missed it? Bladesmulti ( talk) 07:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
FWIW, I think we are done with that "author" <g>. Thanks for questioning the possible validity of his work. Collect ( talk) 20:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Well no, in general, I agree. However, where the mad monk is involved ... Pdfpdf ( talk) 12:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Just wanted to drop in and say "thank you" for your informed opinion on Libertarianism. I hate to say it, but I think you are the only editor there who isn't completely blinded by personal bias, and it is much appreciated. I agree with your latest statement on the Talk page that there is an important line of continuity between anarchism and modern American libertarianism that needs to be included in the article; however, I feel that the abundance of content detailing libertarian socialism violates WP:DUE WEIGHT. In any case, I just wanted to thank you for your balanced perspective and calm, rational comments. You are a valuable asset to this site! — MisterDub ( talk | contribs) 20:45, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
You previously voted, opined, commented, or otherwise took part, at Template talk:Succession box#RfC. Please see a related discussion at Template talk:Infobox officeholder#RfC Congressmen's tenures in infobox. Kraxler ( talk) 15:12, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
I've accepted to mediate this case and we are ready to begin. Please join on the case talk page Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/United States. Sunray ( talk) 23:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Have you seen this change [1] or you had missed it? Bladesmulti ( talk) 07:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
FWIW, I think we are done with that "author" <g>. Thanks for questioning the possible validity of his work. Collect ( talk) 20:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
Well no, in general, I agree. However, where the mad monk is involved ... Pdfpdf ( talk) 12:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)