This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Did you not see the multiple secondary sources I included in the RFC connecting the dots?
Gaijin42 ( talk) 19:42, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Nobody is proposing to say (in wikipedia's voice) Hamas has admitted to using shields. The current text in the article says that(paraphrase) " as part of their allegation of use of human shields, Israel points to quote X" . You objection to Wapo is noted, but there are a great number more sources. In anay case, I am more than open to suggestions as to the right way to present this quote, but when this many RS have discussed it, specifically in the context of human shields, it seems like WP:OR objections about what the quote really means, and that it must not be mentioned at all should give way to following the sources?
Gaijin42 ( talk) 19:59, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
I was adding this article to AfD at the same time and as a result created a second AfD discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titles related to socialist cults of personality. I'm not sure what to do. I've never discussed to articles for deletion at the same time. Tchaliburton ( talk) 20:05, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Judging by your recent participation in very similar discussions (in fact equivalent, but for another country), you may be interested in these: Talk:South_Yemen#Its_name, Talk:China#Single-party_state_too_socialist_republic.2Fstate Talk:North_Korea#Rfc:Is_north_korea_a_single_party_state_and_should_it_be_described_as_such.3F. Regards. Zozs ( talk) 21:37, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Did you not see the multiple secondary sources I included in the RFC connecting the dots?
Gaijin42 ( talk) 19:42, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Nobody is proposing to say (in wikipedia's voice) Hamas has admitted to using shields. The current text in the article says that(paraphrase) " as part of their allegation of use of human shields, Israel points to quote X" . You objection to Wapo is noted, but there are a great number more sources. In anay case, I am more than open to suggestions as to the right way to present this quote, but when this many RS have discussed it, specifically in the context of human shields, it seems like WP:OR objections about what the quote really means, and that it must not be mentioned at all should give way to following the sources?
Gaijin42 ( talk) 19:59, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
I was adding this article to AfD at the same time and as a result created a second AfD discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titles related to socialist cults of personality. I'm not sure what to do. I've never discussed to articles for deletion at the same time. Tchaliburton ( talk) 20:05, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Judging by your recent participation in very similar discussions (in fact equivalent, but for another country), you may be interested in these: Talk:South_Yemen#Its_name, Talk:China#Single-party_state_too_socialist_republic.2Fstate Talk:North_Korea#Rfc:Is_north_korea_a_single_party_state_and_should_it_be_described_as_such.3F. Regards. Zozs ( talk) 21:37, 24 August 2014 (UTC)