Well, you're partly correct. I deleted Endicott Studio, but it was a merely a redirect to The Endicott Studio Journal of Mythic Arts, which was also deleted today and is probably the real article you are looking for. I won't restore the article for you, however, I can cut and paste the text on your talk page (or I can create a subpage from your user page for you and paste it there). Quite honestly, as it stands, I can see why it was deleted. It doesn't really assert notability, and has absolutely no verifiable sources. You are more than welcome to recreate it yourself, however, it'll need to be improved, or it's very likely to be deleted again. Let me know how you would like to proceed. Jauerback dude?/ dude. 01:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
I've undeleted the article per your request since there were approximately 14 hours of time between the deletions/restoration by User:JIP that the prod could have been contested. I've tagged the article with {{oldprod}} to avoid further confusion by other admins, please do not remove this tag. Regards – Zedla ( talk) 17:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for these edits ( [1] and [2])... It was good you restored the links, since the Gary Lynch article has been restored after other editors gave it the referencing it needed. However I would like to point out that your use of the term "inappropriate" in the edit summaries was not correct. It is long standing policy that the closing admin for a deleted article should remove redlinks from articles that reference the deleted article, so the edits were appropriate. ++ Lar: t/ c 23:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for bringing Qworty's abusive behavior to the attention of the BLP Noticeboard. 72.241.103.218 ( talk) 15:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Please don't remove prods unless you actually believe the article should be kept. The comment you made here makes it sound like you removed this due to some disagreement with another editor. We should never allow personal disputes between editors to interfere with doing what is best for the actual content of the encyclopedia. Our articles are way more important than some dispute between editors. Friday (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, The Enchantress Of Florence, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
I may be wrong, but it looks like you were never welcomed to the project, so welcome! Cheers, Cirt ( talk) 00:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Apparently I am officiously required to notify myself when I open an arbitration case. Done. The Enchantress Of Florence ( talk) 01:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Lee Kirksey, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Kirksey. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Crusio ( talk) 18:56, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments such as this "Note to closing admin: posted by dishonest stalker who has posted uncivl displays of public animosity toward me for comments elsewhere." are not acceptable. Especially as I don't know what you're referring to.:) "Uncivl"? Show me any comment of mine towards you that was uncivl (sic) it strikes me that your comment was a clear violation of WP:CIV and WP:NPA and I'm so not your "stalker" that I've only noticed commennts by you about twice on wiki. Plus, what have I done that's "dishonest"? You can disagree with someone's interpretation of the facts, that doesn't make that person "dishonest" as they probably believe what they say. Sticky Parkin 14:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
I've opened up a DRV of the Ginger Jolie deletion, which can be seen here. Tabercil ( talk) 03:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
File:DiamondWarning.png Now you've reverted a lot of another editor's edits, with edit summaries such as this- [7] someone taking a look at your contribs isn't stalking. If you keep having a go at other editors like this I worry you will get a block from editing. I see your comments towards User:Lar and other editors further up the page, which contain similar levels of personal attack. I would like to inform you that we have a policy against this, WP:NPA, in case you were unaware of it. Sticky Parkin 19:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Well, you're partly correct. I deleted Endicott Studio, but it was a merely a redirect to The Endicott Studio Journal of Mythic Arts, which was also deleted today and is probably the real article you are looking for. I won't restore the article for you, however, I can cut and paste the text on your talk page (or I can create a subpage from your user page for you and paste it there). Quite honestly, as it stands, I can see why it was deleted. It doesn't really assert notability, and has absolutely no verifiable sources. You are more than welcome to recreate it yourself, however, it'll need to be improved, or it's very likely to be deleted again. Let me know how you would like to proceed. Jauerback dude?/ dude. 01:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
I've undeleted the article per your request since there were approximately 14 hours of time between the deletions/restoration by User:JIP that the prod could have been contested. I've tagged the article with {{oldprod}} to avoid further confusion by other admins, please do not remove this tag. Regards – Zedla ( talk) 17:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for these edits ( [1] and [2])... It was good you restored the links, since the Gary Lynch article has been restored after other editors gave it the referencing it needed. However I would like to point out that your use of the term "inappropriate" in the edit summaries was not correct. It is long standing policy that the closing admin for a deleted article should remove redlinks from articles that reference the deleted article, so the edits were appropriate. ++ Lar: t/ c 23:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for bringing Qworty's abusive behavior to the attention of the BLP Noticeboard. 72.241.103.218 ( talk) 15:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
Please don't remove prods unless you actually believe the article should be kept. The comment you made here makes it sound like you removed this due to some disagreement with another editor. We should never allow personal disputes between editors to interfere with doing what is best for the actual content of the encyclopedia. Our articles are way more important than some dispute between editors. Friday (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, The Enchantress Of Florence, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
I may be wrong, but it looks like you were never welcomed to the project, so welcome! Cheers, Cirt ( talk) 00:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Apparently I am officiously required to notify myself when I open an arbitration case. Done. The Enchantress Of Florence ( talk) 01:32, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Lee Kirksey, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Kirksey. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Crusio ( talk) 18:56, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments such as this "Note to closing admin: posted by dishonest stalker who has posted uncivl displays of public animosity toward me for comments elsewhere." are not acceptable. Especially as I don't know what you're referring to.:) "Uncivl"? Show me any comment of mine towards you that was uncivl (sic) it strikes me that your comment was a clear violation of WP:CIV and WP:NPA and I'm so not your "stalker" that I've only noticed commennts by you about twice on wiki. Plus, what have I done that's "dishonest"? You can disagree with someone's interpretation of the facts, that doesn't make that person "dishonest" as they probably believe what they say. Sticky Parkin 14:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
I've opened up a DRV of the Ginger Jolie deletion, which can be seen here. Tabercil ( talk) 03:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
File:DiamondWarning.png Now you've reverted a lot of another editor's edits, with edit summaries such as this- [7] someone taking a look at your contribs isn't stalking. If you keep having a go at other editors like this I worry you will get a block from editing. I see your comments towards User:Lar and other editors further up the page, which contain similar levels of personal attack. I would like to inform you that we have a policy against this, WP:NPA, in case you were unaware of it. Sticky Parkin 19:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)