Monsters
I do not want to sound rude but your recent edits are not consistent with a lot of our policies here. First of all, even though there is trivia on the page already (i.e. "Popular culture" section) trivia is frowned up here, especially when it does not add anything to the article itself (see
WP:Trivia for more info). Secondly, please do not use two separate accounts to try and put information into articles. Your first edit was under the IP address
69.***.***.** and then your second edit (which was the exact same as your first) was under
this account. This is considered
sockpuppetry and can lead to blocks or being banned. Lastly, any information added needs to be
verifiable, which means you need to add a proper source to back up your statements. I am going to revert your change based on the prior reasons. I encourage you to keep on editing, but please do not revert back to your edit, as this will put you very close to the
three revert rule which states that any editor can be blocked if they make more than 3 reverts on the same page within a 24 hours period. I also encourage you to click on and read the links I have provided you, and feel free to ask me any questions you have. Good luck editing!
Gonzo fan2007
talk ♦
contribs 00:29, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
You can't make an edit to the style guideline and use the new revision to justify your interests. A guideline is shaped by consensus, not unilateral editing. If you want to discuss user ratings, bring it up on the guideline's talk page. However, the discussion about user ratings was not too long ago, and I doubt that minds will be changed so quickly, especially considering the logic of why they are excluded. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 04:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
If you are going to be correcting "grammar," at least try to spell "grammar" correctly. Hint: it's not "grammer." Ryoung122 09:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi TheJoak, I'm glad to see that you'll be working on the Helbreath article. I recommend you examine the general notability guideline and the verifiability policy if you haven't already. If there are plenty of reliable sources, that's great (personally I couldn't find any). If there are references but no significant coverage, or only one item of significant coverage, it would be better write a shorter section about the game at Siementech. Let me know if you need any assistance. Thanks, Marasmusine ( talk) 17:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
Monsters
I do not want to sound rude but your recent edits are not consistent with a lot of our policies here. First of all, even though there is trivia on the page already (i.e. "Popular culture" section) trivia is frowned up here, especially when it does not add anything to the article itself (see
WP:Trivia for more info). Secondly, please do not use two separate accounts to try and put information into articles. Your first edit was under the IP address
69.***.***.** and then your second edit (which was the exact same as your first) was under
this account. This is considered
sockpuppetry and can lead to blocks or being banned. Lastly, any information added needs to be
verifiable, which means you need to add a proper source to back up your statements. I am going to revert your change based on the prior reasons. I encourage you to keep on editing, but please do not revert back to your edit, as this will put you very close to the
three revert rule which states that any editor can be blocked if they make more than 3 reverts on the same page within a 24 hours period. I also encourage you to click on and read the links I have provided you, and feel free to ask me any questions you have. Good luck editing!
Gonzo fan2007
talk ♦
contribs 00:29, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
You can't make an edit to the style guideline and use the new revision to justify your interests. A guideline is shaped by consensus, not unilateral editing. If you want to discuss user ratings, bring it up on the guideline's talk page. However, the discussion about user ratings was not too long ago, and I doubt that minds will be changed so quickly, especially considering the logic of why they are excluded. — Erik ( talk • contrib) - 04:18, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
If you are going to be correcting "grammar," at least try to spell "grammar" correctly. Hint: it's not "grammer." Ryoung122 09:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi TheJoak, I'm glad to see that you'll be working on the Helbreath article. I recommend you examine the general notability guideline and the verifiability policy if you haven't already. If there are plenty of reliable sources, that's great (personally I couldn't find any). If there are references but no significant coverage, or only one item of significant coverage, it would be better write a shorter section about the game at Siementech. Let me know if you need any assistance. Thanks, Marasmusine ( talk) 17:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)