This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Foodfacts, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.foodfacts.com/public/about.cfm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 17:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your
disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a
spam link, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites
blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on
Wikipedia.
OhNoitsJamie
Talk
15:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
We have been on the internet for over 10 years and have never SPAM anyone I believe at one time Wikipedia ask us to add to their web site at that time we were just starting ourselves Now we have data and try to make Wikipedia better and were called spamer
stan@foodfacts president TheEatery ( talk) 14:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
It appears that we are blocked
We were putting in ingredients in food products such as tident gum, pepsi, and other products. We put our name in so the information we are putting in is correct. How can we do this without it being spam? Stan18:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.103.121.164 ( talk)
OK not worth our time to inprove your site
thanks anyway
stan 98.221.229.127 ( talk) 19:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Help me
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheEatery for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. McGeddon ( talk) 15:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Help me please
Jamie when we try to talk to you you blacklisted us what did we do now
this is very unfair
Stan 108.110.236.205 ( talk) 17:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Well back again this is what on the first page of the wikipedia intoduction
How can I contribute?
Don't be afraid to edit — anyone can edit almost any page, and we encourage you to be bold! Find something that can be improved and make it better - for example, spelling, grammar, rewriting for readability, or removing unconstructive edits. If you wish to add new facts, please provide references so they may be verified, or suggest them on the article's discussion page. Changes to controversial topics and Wikipedia's main pages should usually be discussed first.
Remember - you can't break Wikipedia; all edits can be reversed, fixed or improved later. So go ahead, edit an article and help make Wikipedia the best information source on the Internet!
it is saying one thing and your saying something else
Stan 108.110.236.205 ( talk) 15:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
==
Jamie
at 70 years old I don't get it, I in no way tryed to get you made at us me I never tryed doing this on wikipedia I see it is to much for me to handle so sorry for getting you upset
Stan TheEatery ( talk) 18:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Blocked ==
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first. This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Foodfacts, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.foodfacts.com/public/about.cfm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot ( talk) 17:35, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your
disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a
spam link, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. Spammers may have their websites
blacklisted as well, preventing their websites from appearing on
Wikipedia.
OhNoitsJamie
Talk
15:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
We have been on the internet for over 10 years and have never SPAM anyone I believe at one time Wikipedia ask us to add to their web site at that time we were just starting ourselves Now we have data and try to make Wikipedia better and were called spamer
stan@foodfacts president TheEatery ( talk) 14:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
It appears that we are blocked
We were putting in ingredients in food products such as tident gum, pepsi, and other products. We put our name in so the information we are putting in is correct. How can we do this without it being spam? Stan18:26, 8 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.103.121.164 ( talk)
OK not worth our time to inprove your site
thanks anyway
stan 98.221.229.127 ( talk) 19:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Help me
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. Vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:56, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheEatery for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. McGeddon ( talk) 15:59, 8 February 2010 (UTC) Help me please
Jamie when we try to talk to you you blacklisted us what did we do now
this is very unfair
Stan 108.110.236.205 ( talk) 17:30, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Well back again this is what on the first page of the wikipedia intoduction
How can I contribute?
Don't be afraid to edit — anyone can edit almost any page, and we encourage you to be bold! Find something that can be improved and make it better - for example, spelling, grammar, rewriting for readability, or removing unconstructive edits. If you wish to add new facts, please provide references so they may be verified, or suggest them on the article's discussion page. Changes to controversial topics and Wikipedia's main pages should usually be discussed first.
Remember - you can't break Wikipedia; all edits can be reversed, fixed or improved later. So go ahead, edit an article and help make Wikipedia the best information source on the Internet!
it is saying one thing and your saying something else
Stan 108.110.236.205 ( talk) 15:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
==
Jamie
at 70 years old I don't get it, I in no way tryed to get you made at us me I never tryed doing this on wikipedia I see it is to much for me to handle so sorry for getting you upset
Stan TheEatery ( talk) 18:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Blocked ==
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.