From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The1Chosen ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked I made a mistake by re-adding edits that I shouldn’t have. I was just legitimately confused as to why the edits were being removed when they were in use on other Wikipedia pages, I’m sorry for my actions and I promise that i won’t do disruptive editing again

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please. — Daniel Case ( talk) 06:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome!

Hello, The1Chosen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Bee Gees did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  DougHill ( talk) 01:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lieutenant Governor of New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Second Spouses and Partners of New York, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq ( talk) 10:40, 4 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, The1Chosen, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Urve, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of Governors and Lieutenant Governors of New York, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Governors and Lieutenant Governors of New York.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Urve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Urve ( talk) 06:09, 9 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi Urve, thank you for writing to notify me I just wanted to let you know that the whole reason I made this article was for the list of Lieutenant Governors of New York, and I’m just gonna be frank i am not at the level to make an article that intricate I’m just a basic Wikipedia editor so if the page is deleted I would really appreciate it if a replacement list of Lieutenant Governors of New York page was made by you or someone who is a much better Wikipedia editor and creator than myself to fill in for this page possibly being deleted. Once again thank you for notifying me. The1Chosen ( talk) 07:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Urve: Hi Urve, thank you for writing to notify me I just wanted to let you know that the whole reason I made this article was for the list of Lieutenant Governors of New York, and I’m just gonna be frank i am not at the level to make an article that intricate I’m just a basic Wikipedia editor so if the page is deleted I would really appreciate it if a replacement list of Lieutenant Governors of New York page was made by you or someone who is a much better Wikipedia editor and creator than myself to fill in for this page possibly being deleted. Once again thank you for notifying me.

Sincerely, The1Chosen The1Chosen ( talk) 23:50, 9 August 2021 (UTC) reply

The1Chosen, don't worry. Deletion is not an indication of your value or who you are - it is purely about what is encyclopedic and not. You are free to make a list just for lieutenant governors if you'd like - it doesn't have to be in a table format (which is hard to make) and could instead be an actual list. If your concern is about intricacy, then no need to worry. I don't have the time currently to do it myself.
Consider using the draft process, in particular submitting any articles you make through the articles for creation process, which has someone review your work before it goes 'live'. Making articles on your own can be a very confusing process, so these guided processes -- drafts and AFC in particular -- will help you get on your feet. Urve ( talk) 02:55, 10 August 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Governors and Lieutenant Governors of New York, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Governors and Lieutenant Governors of New York until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:04, 10 August 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1970s in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Capitalisation

Please stop capitalising random words on the pages regarding the politics of South Korea. This is disruptive editing AtishT20 ( talk) 17:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi The1Chosen, please note I removed your unsourced addition of a date of birth to the India Walton article per the WP:DOB policy. Thank you, Beccaynr ( talk) 23:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Today is her birthday she posted it on Twitter. I don’t believe there are any articles stating her birth date but she wrote about it on Twitter today. The1Chosen ( talk) 01:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you for following up - I've looked at her Twitter, and it was not clear at first because she was talking about her birthday party happening earlier, but I did find this "There are 7 days until my 40th birthday" posted on June 7, 2022, and it is a verified Twitter account, so this appears to be usable as a source per the WP:DOB policy. I will restore the information and add the source. Thanks again, Beccaynr ( talk) 04:51, 15 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you for reaching out & restoring the information. The1Chosen ( talk) 06:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC) reply

July 2022

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly violating the non-free content policy.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —  JJMC89( T· C) 07:34, 25 July 2022 (UTC) reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The1Chosen ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked I made a mistake by re-adding edits that I shouldn’t have. I was just legitimately confused as to why the edits were being removed when they were in use on other Wikipedia pages, I’m sorry for my actions and I promise that i won’t do disruptive editing again

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you understand what was wrong with your edits. Yamla ( talk) 10:55, 1 August 2022 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The1Chosen ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked I made a mistake by re-adding edits that I shouldn’t have. I was just legitimately confused as to why the edits were being removed when they were in use on other Wikipedia pages, I’m sorry for my actions and I promise that i won’t do disruptive editing again

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please. — Daniel Case ( talk) 06:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome!

Hello, The1Chosen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Bee Gees did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  DougHill ( talk) 01:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lieutenant Governor of New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 05:58, 1 August 2021 (UTC) reply

An article you recently created, Second Spouses and Partners of New York, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. ( ?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed ( verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq ( talk) 10:40, 4 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Hello, The1Chosen, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Urve, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of Governors and Lieutenant Governors of New York, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Governors and Lieutenant Governors of New York.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Urve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Urve ( talk) 06:09, 9 August 2021 (UTC) reply

Hi Urve, thank you for writing to notify me I just wanted to let you know that the whole reason I made this article was for the list of Lieutenant Governors of New York, and I’m just gonna be frank i am not at the level to make an article that intricate I’m just a basic Wikipedia editor so if the page is deleted I would really appreciate it if a replacement list of Lieutenant Governors of New York page was made by you or someone who is a much better Wikipedia editor and creator than myself to fill in for this page possibly being deleted. Once again thank you for notifying me. The1Chosen ( talk) 07:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC) reply

@ Urve: Hi Urve, thank you for writing to notify me I just wanted to let you know that the whole reason I made this article was for the list of Lieutenant Governors of New York, and I’m just gonna be frank i am not at the level to make an article that intricate I’m just a basic Wikipedia editor so if the page is deleted I would really appreciate it if a replacement list of Lieutenant Governors of New York page was made by you or someone who is a much better Wikipedia editor and creator than myself to fill in for this page possibly being deleted. Once again thank you for notifying me.

Sincerely, The1Chosen The1Chosen ( talk) 23:50, 9 August 2021 (UTC) reply

The1Chosen, don't worry. Deletion is not an indication of your value or who you are - it is purely about what is encyclopedic and not. You are free to make a list just for lieutenant governors if you'd like - it doesn't have to be in a table format (which is hard to make) and could instead be an actual list. If your concern is about intricacy, then no need to worry. I don't have the time currently to do it myself.
Consider using the draft process, in particular submitting any articles you make through the articles for creation process, which has someone review your work before it goes 'live'. Making articles on your own can be a very confusing process, so these guided processes -- drafts and AFC in particular -- will help you get on your feet. Urve ( talk) 02:55, 10 August 2021 (UTC) reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Governors and Lieutenant Governors of New York, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Governors and Lieutenant Governors of New York until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot ( talk) 01:04, 10 August 2021 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1970s in music, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thriller.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC) reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{ NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Capitalisation

Please stop capitalising random words on the pages regarding the politics of South Korea. This is disruptive editing AtishT20 ( talk) 17:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC) reply

Hi The1Chosen, please note I removed your unsourced addition of a date of birth to the India Walton article per the WP:DOB policy. Thank you, Beccaynr ( talk) 23:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Today is her birthday she posted it on Twitter. I don’t believe there are any articles stating her birth date but she wrote about it on Twitter today. The1Chosen ( talk) 01:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you for following up - I've looked at her Twitter, and it was not clear at first because she was talking about her birthday party happening earlier, but I did find this "There are 7 days until my 40th birthday" posted on June 7, 2022, and it is a verified Twitter account, so this appears to be usable as a source per the WP:DOB policy. I will restore the information and add the source. Thanks again, Beccaynr ( talk) 04:51, 15 June 2022 (UTC) reply

Thank you for reaching out & restoring the information. The1Chosen ( talk) 06:59, 15 June 2022 (UTC) reply

July 2022

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly violating the non-free content policy.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —  JJMC89( T· C) 07:34, 25 July 2022 (UTC) reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

The1Chosen ( block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser ( log))


Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked I made a mistake by re-adding edits that I shouldn’t have. I was just legitimately confused as to why the edits were being removed when they were in use on other Wikipedia pages, I’m sorry for my actions and I promise that i won’t do disruptive editing again

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you understand what was wrong with your edits. Yamla ( talk) 10:55, 1 August 2022 (UTC) reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook