ThatChemist25 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hi, I have just releaizesd that I am banned for some reason, but this seems odd; I have only made one edit, correcting outdated info on Halogen. I think there may be some IP conflicts, if this is the case could I get this ban lifted? I know these may allow bad actors in, but I think that this IP ban is rather old. Thank You! IP: 67.240.185.115 ThatChemist25 ( talk) 21:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I have granted you WP:IPBE for ten days. Your edits during this time should give us enough information to determine if you qualify for an extension of IPBE once those ten days are up. You are free to make a new request for an extension in ten days and we'll re-review your edit history at that time. Happy editing! Yamla ( talk) 22:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
67.240.185.11 is not blocked. If you've been using a proxy or VPN, note that you must wait a full 24 hours after disabling it, in order for the block to clear. -- Yamla ( talk) 22:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC) @ Yamla:, updated
Hello ThatChemist25 and thanks a lot for taking the time to do the GA review of Arithmetic! In it's current form, the review states that the article passes every criterion but it does not explain how you came to that conclusion. This might make it difficult for other editors to understand why the article fulfills these criteria. It would be helpful if you could add a short text to describe how these criteria were checked. For example, in regard to the first criterion, you could explain in what sense it is "reasonably well written" by describing how your reading experience was in terms of style, grammar, and understandability. In regard to the sources, it would be good to add a short spot-check by picking a few claims in the article and assessing whether the references given in the article support them (see the first point at WP:GAN/I#R3). Phlsph7 ( talk) 13:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. |
Yamla ( talk) 11:20, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
ThatChemist25 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Not trying to contest the idea that I am a sock, as it would impossible. But, is there any proccess by which some future accounts wouldn't be considered socks. How much time before the "sock" charge is lifted? Thank You! ThatChemist25 ( talk) 17:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You need to go to your original account to request an unblock there RickinBaltimore ( talk) 19:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
No. You personally are blocked. Each account you create will be found and blocked, until such a time as you successfully contest the block on your original account. Additionally, your continued inappropriate edits with each sockpuppet account will strongly count against you. -- Yamla ( talk) 17:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
As Yamla mentioned, you would need to go to your original account and request an WP:UNBLOCK that followed WP:STANDARDOFFER. Sergecross73 msg me 18:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
ThatChemist25 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Hi, I have just releaizesd that I am banned for some reason, but this seems odd; I have only made one edit, correcting outdated info on Halogen. I think there may be some IP conflicts, if this is the case could I get this ban lifted? I know these may allow bad actors in, but I think that this IP ban is rather old. Thank You! IP: 67.240.185.115 ThatChemist25 ( talk) 21:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Accept reason:
I have granted you WP:IPBE for ten days. Your edits during this time should give us enough information to determine if you qualify for an extension of IPBE once those ten days are up. You are free to make a new request for an extension in ten days and we'll re-review your edit history at that time. Happy editing! Yamla ( talk) 22:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
67.240.185.11 is not blocked. If you've been using a proxy or VPN, note that you must wait a full 24 hours after disabling it, in order for the block to clear. -- Yamla ( talk) 22:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC) @ Yamla:, updated
Hello ThatChemist25 and thanks a lot for taking the time to do the GA review of Arithmetic! In it's current form, the review states that the article passes every criterion but it does not explain how you came to that conclusion. This might make it difficult for other editors to understand why the article fulfills these criteria. It would be helpful if you could add a short text to describe how these criteria were checked. For example, in regard to the first criterion, you could explain in what sense it is "reasonably well written" by describing how your reading experience was in terms of style, grammar, and understandability. In regard to the sources, it would be good to add a short spot-check by picking a few claims in the article and assessing whether the references given in the article support them (see the first point at WP:GAN/I#R3). Phlsph7 ( talk) 13:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban
may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by first reading the
guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. |
Yamla ( talk) 11:20, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
ThatChemist25 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Not trying to contest the idea that I am a sock, as it would impossible. But, is there any proccess by which some future accounts wouldn't be considered socks. How much time before the "sock" charge is lifted? Thank You! ThatChemist25 ( talk) 17:42, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You need to go to your original account to request an unblock there RickinBaltimore ( talk) 19:13, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
No. You personally are blocked. Each account you create will be found and blocked, until such a time as you successfully contest the block on your original account. Additionally, your continued inappropriate edits with each sockpuppet account will strongly count against you. -- Yamla ( talk) 17:50, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
As Yamla mentioned, you would need to go to your original account and request an WP:UNBLOCK that followed WP:STANDARDOFFER. Sergecross73 msg me 18:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)