Welcome!
Hello Tharakan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
-- Pamri • Talk 16:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
[ Field Marshal K.M. Cariappa isnt this a copyright issue. -- Aravind Parvatikar 10:27, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
I wasn't sure where to write about 'permissions' (so I had written it as a footnote along with Cariappa's Image). I asked Seetal (Admin of bharat-rakshak.com) specifically for permission which was granted willingly. So unless I get a reversal on that, this shouldn't be an issue. -- Robins 08:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Postgres does not support bitmap indexes in any released version, contrary to your . Bitmap index scans (supported since 8.1) and on-disk bitmap indexes have very little in common. Neilc 06:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Wealth Insight, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any
citations from
reliable sources to ensure that the article will be
verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -
Tiswas(
t)
17:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Image:Kodandera Madappa Cariappa.jpg, by
Venu62, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Image:Kodandera Madappa Cariappa.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Image:Kodandera Madappa Cariappa.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Image:Kodandera Madappa Cariappa.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Mutual Fund Insight, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Mutual Fund Insight is blatant
advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Mutual Fund Insight, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.
CSDWarnBot
18:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:ValueResearchOnline.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:India Gate at night.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 02:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kutumb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kutumb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 12:56, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Value Research is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Value Research until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 12:57, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello Tharakan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
-- Pamri • Talk 16:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
[ Field Marshal K.M. Cariappa isnt this a copyright issue. -- Aravind Parvatikar 10:27, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
I wasn't sure where to write about 'permissions' (so I had written it as a footnote along with Cariappa's Image). I asked Seetal (Admin of bharat-rakshak.com) specifically for permission which was granted willingly. So unless I get a reversal on that, this shouldn't be an issue. -- Robins 08:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Postgres does not support bitmap indexes in any released version, contrary to your . Bitmap index scans (supported since 8.1) and on-disk bitmap indexes have very little in common. Neilc 06:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Wealth Insight, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any
citations from
reliable sources to ensure that the article will be
verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -
Tiswas(
t)
17:28, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Image:Kodandera Madappa Cariappa.jpg, by
Venu62, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Image:Kodandera Madappa Cariappa.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Image:Kodandera Madappa Cariappa.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate
Image:Kodandera Madappa Cariappa.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the
bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --
Android Mouse Bot 2
01:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Mutual Fund Insight, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Mutual Fund Insight is blatant
advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Mutual Fund Insight, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.
CSDWarnBot
18:31, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:ValueResearchOnline.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:46, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:India Gate at night.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 ( talk) 02:13, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kutumb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kutumb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 12:56, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Value Research is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Value Research until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, KC Velaga ✉ 12:57, 12 August 2016 (UTC)