Welcome!
Hello, Th302, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
PDCook (
talk)
22:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
RC has been a controversial movement and it's right that the controversies should be reported here. The article also gives a fair view of RC theory and practice. We don't take sides and it is not the job of an encyclopaedia to decide whether criticisms are fair or not; if they're notable, we report them. RC has a long history, and the fact that some of these controversies are 30 years old is not a reason to omit them. RC's website is given as a source for many of the statements in the article, and anyone going to it can read the official RC position. Hope that helps. Pelarmian ( talk) 10:09, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ExxonMobil may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Th302, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
PDCook (
talk)
22:52, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
RC has been a controversial movement and it's right that the controversies should be reported here. The article also gives a fair view of RC theory and practice. We don't take sides and it is not the job of an encyclopaedia to decide whether criticisms are fair or not; if they're notable, we report them. RC has a long history, and the fact that some of these controversies are 30 years old is not a reason to omit them. RC's website is given as a source for many of the statements in the article, and anyone going to it can read the official RC position. Hope that helps. Pelarmian ( talk) 10:09, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to ExxonMobil may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 16:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)