![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Thanks for uploading Image:Donuts.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Donuts.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the article.)
{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the article.)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Spartacus: Blood and Sand (Motion Comic), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 07:55, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Terrorist96. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Spartacus: Blood and Sand (Motion Comic).
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Spartacus: Blood and Sand (Motion Comic)}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 20:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Terrorist96. Concerns have been raised that your username may be incompatible with
policy. You can contribute to the discussion about it
at the page for requests for comment on usernames. Alternatively, if you agree that your username may be problematic and are willing to change it, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name. Simply request a new name at
Wikipedia:Changing username following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account. Thank you. --
1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (
talk)
20:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --
Joy [shallot] (
talk)
16:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.The alleged micronation of Liberland is located on territory being disputed between Croatia and Serbia. It is clearly in the Balkans so it falls under WP:ARBMAC. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 18:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
--
Joy [shallot] (
talk)
13:53, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
[1] I'm not going to unblock your account. I agree with the administrator which has blocked you - that username was unacceptable. -- Bonč ( talk) 00:02, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
How is [2] a valid revert? I linked a term that I had restored to show that it is the term that is normally used. That's clearly not vandalism. If we don't need the link then just remove it, but don't revert it without an explanation. Meters ( talk) 18:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Nbastater24 ( talk) 18:50, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Please see: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Can_we_file_states_only_by_.2Ahighest.2A_category_in_Template:Cannabis_in_the_United_States.3F. 06:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney ( talk • contribs)
Please see here: Talk:Initiative_71#Rename_to_Cannabis_in_Washington.2C_D._C..2C_split_off.2C_or_what.3F
Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney ( talk) 23:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
This article is the most-viewed page for cannabis issues in the US (~1,500 views/day). I think we can streamline it to make it less clunky and more intuitive for readers, especially now that we have state-specific articles for all US states. Your feedback is invited: Talk:Legality_of_cannabis_by_U.S._jurisdiction#Changes_to_chart.3F. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney ( talk) 19:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Terrorist96. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate
your contributions, including your edits to
Stand-your-ground law, but we cannot accept
original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -
Mr
X
19:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
WP:OR does not allow an editor to read some bare statistics and then draw a conclusion like "This does not prove that "stand your ground" led to a lower violent crime rate, however, it also does not show "stand your ground" to cause an increase in violent crime rate either.". Please read the policy, ask questions, and use the article talk page. Please do not add your own analysis, no matter how certain you are that it is true.- Mr X 19:48, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
LOL, the name!!! This did not violate WP:Username?
Rev. John, ULC ( talk) 23:45, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Green-Star-Map-05-Feb-14.png, which you've attributed to http://www.nysaferesolutions.com/resolutions/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber ( Leave a message) 16:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Just a gentle reminder that the " minor edit" tag is not supposed to be used unless "only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, formatting and presentational changes, and rearrangements of text without modification of its content." Anything that changes content is not a minor edit.
Reminder is made because of some edits made to the Constitutional carry page. (The rearrangement of the New Hampshire section was fine, but content was also changed in the Missouri section on the last edit, making it non-minor.)
Mdak06 ( talk) 21:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Greetings, Terrorist96. You're right, that Alaska map has less consistency with the other maps, but I still think it's way preferable for the article, because of how it shows where Alaska is in relation to the continental United States. And the same for the Hawaii map, let's put that one back too please. I also preferred the previous map for Rhode Island, though of the three I have the least strong opinion about that one. — Mudwater ( Talk) 00:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
WP:OTHERSTUFF is about deletion discussions, the but reasoning applies well in discussions about content, too. I suggest that your arguments would carry more weight of reason if they cited our content guidelines and policies. Regards! VQuakr ( talk) 02:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Khan Shaykhun chemical attack shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You broke the 1RR here:
1,
2. Focus on the talk page, please.
VQuakr (
talk)
02:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
You're special, you! Thank you so much comrade. RaRaRasputin ( talk) 01:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC) |
This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current Dispute Resolution Noticeboard case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties, please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Resolved". If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input. Yashovardhan ( talk) 05:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Hey. This and this are technically a 1RR violation. The second revert is so obviously beneficial that I can't find it in myself to chide you much. Consider this more of heads-up just to be a bit more careful. Pinging Volunteer Marek to self-revert the tag here would have been better. I'm sure he would have done so since the issue he pointed out was resolved. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:25, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, I didn't realize it was being updated since first posted. For any such map constantly subject to change, wouldn't it be useful to add "as of [date]" to the caption at the same time the map is changed, so readers wouldn't wonder about it? Milkunderwood ( talk) 05:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Terrorist96. I saw your important contributions in the Khan Sheikhoun page. The organization Swedish Doctors for Human Rights (SWEDHR) claims in the new published "Statement on deletion attempts in Wikipedia articles on SWEDHR and its representatives" [3], that the Syrian ambassador mentioned a SWEDHR report (that analyzed a couple of White Helmets propaganda videos), in the UNSC session of April 12, which debated the alleged attack. Has this been mentioned in the discussion? Brgds, Inkerifi ( talk) 02:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
I like you.
Jetro ( talk) 19:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Please see the "List of Orange Is the New Black episodes (talk page)" Thank you 82.44.112.108 ( talk) 21:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
What went on at Black supremacy and Template:Racism topics? Administrator Malik Shabazz (!) reverted you when you added the template to the article and any link to it from that template because "no sources" (!) So "White supremacy" is racism (no sources needed there) but "Black supremacy" is not. I'm trying to understand if this is just the hilarious yet tiresome "there is no such thing as Black racism/Blacks can not be racists" I've heard a million times (maybe you have too) in yet another guise or if there is something else? Just trying to understand how things work around here. Thanks. Cheers, Basemetal 00:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Of course you are right. The definition of the term says so. 2+2=4 is a revolutionary statement nowadays... Zezen ( talk) 19:08, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
TheSandDoctor ( talk) 15:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I recently added a map on the page Zoophilia and the law in the United States but you reverted it with no explanation. Can you please tell me why you decided to revert it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akartoshi ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, As you can tell, I'm pretty new at wikipedia, I didn't know how to update an existing file, thus I just decided to make a new one. I will make an SVG now.
Also, I do have sources, that were already included in the page. I didn't just blindly make those changes. Akartoshi ( talk) 12:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Terrorist96. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:28, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Intussusception (blood vessel growth), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intussusception ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Greetings, Terrorist96. Thank you for your sustained work on improving and enhancing the "Gun laws in [name of state]" articles. Your efforts are appreciated. — Mudwater ( Talk) 23:48, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Greetings: Please do not revert or change an edits of others when you are reverted, as you have done in the
Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution article. Instead of reverting to your reverted text, please use the
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
BRD for how this is done. Thanks.
Drdpw (
talk)
21:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20180321/nra-backed-self-defense-bill-becomes-law-in-idaho
Idaho becomes a Stand Your Ground state on July 1, 2018! 173.169.18.165 ( talk) 05:38, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Texas 99/Grand Parkway in Harris county was recently bumped up to 75 without much fanfare apparently; I haven't checked the segment between 45-59/69 that jogs into Montgomery County, but it was posted at 70 the last time I drove on it. -- Thegunkid ( talk) 11:16, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Well It's passed, just waiting for the Governor's ink now; Which kinda angers me as a Texan that we let those damn landthieves beat us to constitutional carry. Remember Greer County!-- Thegunkid ( talk) 11:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
I reverted your addition to X about Selfish Ledger. As far as I can tell, this isn't a formal project, so it doesn't belong in the list. Do you have other information than the leaked video of a discussion? Tarl N. ( discuss) 23:47, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
“We understand if this is disturbing -- it is designed to be. This is a thought-experiment by the Design team from years ago that uses a technique known as ‘speculative design’ to explore uncomfortable ideas and concepts in order to provoke discussion and debate. It’s not related to any current or future products.”Terrorist96 ( talk) 00:12, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 11:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I thought we had an in-depth conversation about their gun laws on the Open Carry page, and established that their law actually only prohibits concealed carry of lawfully owned firearms despite ownership of handguns and centerfire rifles being illegal. Thegunkid ( talk) 00:09, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
So today surprisingly it was not California to die on this hill; but the state of Hawaii. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-guns-court/us-appeals-court-upholds-right-to-carry-gun-in-public-idUSKBN1KE28C
Thegunkid ( talk) 22:53, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Check what you revert, in the material I removed Liberland themself was the only source for the claim about co-operation with Somaliland, the sources you mentioned in your edit summary had nothing to do with that claim but were about Somaliland as such. Making the vital claim in the section sourced to Liberland only, which isn't allowed here (per WP:SELFPUB). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 14:11, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Terrorist96,
In this edit, you reverted my revert of a sentence that now reads, "Incumbent Democratic Senator Martin Heinrich is running for reelection to a second term. His opponents are Republican nominee Mick Rich, a businessman, and Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson, a two-term Republican Governor of New Mexico and two time candidate for President of the United States." You've reverted to a version which says "Gary Johnson and Gary Johnson" are running. This is clearly a mistake. 67.1.248.214 ( talk) 02:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Terrorist96. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
My apologies for the revert of your edit on the List of federal judges appointed by Donald Trump page. I thought that District of Columbia simply redirected to Washington, D.C. instead of actually being a disambiguation page. – JocularJellyfish Talk Contribs 03:10, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
You're not an authority on what is an what is not allowed. So please refrain from WP:IDONTLIKEIT edits on the right to work page. Thanks. Quidster4040 ( talk) 02:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on various iterations of the "ACA Medicaid expansion by state" photos - between you and Bad Graphics Ghost it's been very helpful. Nosebagbear ( talk) 14:25, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for engaging on this. Coordinates for the village listed in the Qush article match the location of Kukh (northeast of Kuçuk Ağrı Dağı, near the road from Iğdır into Nakhchivan). Are the coords wrong, or is this actually the same village listed under a variant transliteration? Rupert Clayton ( talk) 06:21, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Hey man, when South Dakota is added on the Constitutional Carry. Could you add that no permit is needed to Open Carry as a resident or non resident as well as Concealed Carry. I do feel that is an important note to add in the ones that are already listed that no permit is needed to Open Carry as well as Concealed Carry except in North Dakota(which should be noted no permit is required to open carry an unloaded handgun with a loaded magazine in your pocket). As well as I see that Virginia is listed in the partial Constitutional Carry States for being allowed to carry in the vehicle without a permit. Wouldn't South Carolina, Florida, Texas, and Tennesssee be added for that reason as well? Due to them not needing a permit to carry it in the vehicle. The disctintion that no permit is required for Open Carry or Concealed carry for both resident and non resident should be listed as well like is done with Idaho and Wyoming. GermanicSoutherner15 ( talk) 17:28, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
First off, I'd like to say that your edit summary undoing my edit was rude. Second, your addition is in error, because the addition you made of South Dakota to the list of constitutional carry states is contrary to the fact that that law does not go into effect until July 1st, it is not effective at the moment. -- MrThunderbolt1000T ( talk) 00:12, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Terrorist96!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk)
04:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
|
They passed it again and the new governor signed it this time.
https://www.koco.com/amp/article/oklahoma-senate-to-vote-on-constitutional-carry-bill/26556161 Thegunkid ( talk) 23:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 18:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Thanks for uploading Image:Donuts.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading
Image:Donuts.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a
claim of fair use. However, it is currently
orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed.
You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see
our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:49, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the article.)
{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the article.)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Spartacus: Blood and Sand (Motion Comic), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 07:55, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Hello Terrorist96. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Spartacus: Blood and Sand (Motion Comic).
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Spartacus: Blood and Sand (Motion Comic)}}
, paste it in the edit box at
this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot ( talk) 20:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Terrorist96. Concerns have been raised that your username may be incompatible with
policy. You can contribute to the discussion about it
at the page for requests for comment on usernames. Alternatively, if you agree that your username may be problematic and are willing to change it, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name. Simply request a new name at
Wikipedia:Changing username following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account. Thank you. --
1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (
talk)
20:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --
Joy [shallot] (
talk)
16:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.The alleged micronation of Liberland is located on territory being disputed between Croatia and Serbia. It is clearly in the Balkans so it falls under WP:ARBMAC. Thank you, EdJohnston ( talk) 18:46, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:37, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
--
Joy [shallot] (
talk)
13:53, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
[1] I'm not going to unblock your account. I agree with the administrator which has blocked you - that username was unacceptable. -- Bonč ( talk) 00:02, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
How is [2] a valid revert? I linked a term that I had restored to show that it is the term that is normally used. That's clearly not vandalism. If we don't need the link then just remove it, but don't revert it without an explanation. Meters ( talk) 18:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Nbastater24 ( talk) 18:50, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
Please see: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cannabis#Can_we_file_states_only_by_.2Ahighest.2A_category_in_Template:Cannabis_in_the_United_States.3F. 06:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney ( talk • contribs)
Please see here: Talk:Initiative_71#Rename_to_Cannabis_in_Washington.2C_D._C..2C_split_off.2C_or_what.3F
Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney ( talk) 23:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
This article is the most-viewed page for cannabis issues in the US (~1,500 views/day). I think we can streamline it to make it less clunky and more intuitive for readers, especially now that we have state-specific articles for all US states. Your feedback is invited: Talk:Legality_of_cannabis_by_U.S._jurisdiction#Changes_to_chart.3F. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney ( talk) 19:47, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Terrorist96. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate
your contributions, including your edits to
Stand-your-ground law, but we cannot accept
original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -
Mr
X
19:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
WP:OR does not allow an editor to read some bare statistics and then draw a conclusion like "This does not prove that "stand your ground" led to a lower violent crime rate, however, it also does not show "stand your ground" to cause an increase in violent crime rate either.". Please read the policy, ask questions, and use the article talk page. Please do not add your own analysis, no matter how certain you are that it is true.- Mr X 19:48, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
LOL, the name!!! This did not violate WP:Username?
Rev. John, ULC ( talk) 23:45, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Green-Star-Map-05-Feb-14.png, which you've attributed to http://www.nysaferesolutions.com/resolutions/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber ( Leave a message) 16:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
Just a gentle reminder that the " minor edit" tag is not supposed to be used unless "only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, formatting and presentational changes, and rearrangements of text without modification of its content." Anything that changes content is not a minor edit.
Reminder is made because of some edits made to the Constitutional carry page. (The rearrangement of the New Hampshire section was fine, but content was also changed in the Missouri section on the last edit, making it non-minor.)
Mdak06 ( talk) 21:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Greetings, Terrorist96. You're right, that Alaska map has less consistency with the other maps, but I still think it's way preferable for the article, because of how it shows where Alaska is in relation to the continental United States. And the same for the Hawaii map, let's put that one back too please. I also preferred the previous map for Rhode Island, though of the three I have the least strong opinion about that one. — Mudwater ( Talk) 00:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
WP:OTHERSTUFF is about deletion discussions, the but reasoning applies well in discussions about content, too. I suggest that your arguments would carry more weight of reason if they cited our content guidelines and policies. Regards! VQuakr ( talk) 02:18, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Khan Shaykhun chemical attack shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You broke the 1RR here:
1,
2. Focus on the talk page, please.
VQuakr (
talk)
02:39, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
You're special, you! Thank you so much comrade. RaRaRasputin ( talk) 01:00, 23 April 2017 (UTC) |
This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current Dispute Resolution Noticeboard case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties, please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Resolved". If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input. Yashovardhan ( talk) 05:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Hey. This and this are technically a 1RR violation. The second revert is so obviously beneficial that I can't find it in myself to chide you much. Consider this more of heads-up just to be a bit more careful. Pinging Volunteer Marek to self-revert the tag here would have been better. I'm sure he would have done so since the issue he pointed out was resolved. ~ Rob13 Talk 21:25, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, I didn't realize it was being updated since first posted. For any such map constantly subject to change, wouldn't it be useful to add "as of [date]" to the caption at the same time the map is changed, so readers wouldn't wonder about it? Milkunderwood ( talk) 05:18, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Terrorist96. I saw your important contributions in the Khan Sheikhoun page. The organization Swedish Doctors for Human Rights (SWEDHR) claims in the new published "Statement on deletion attempts in Wikipedia articles on SWEDHR and its representatives" [3], that the Syrian ambassador mentioned a SWEDHR report (that analyzed a couple of White Helmets propaganda videos), in the UNSC session of April 12, which debated the alleged attack. Has this been mentioned in the discussion? Brgds, Inkerifi ( talk) 02:32, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
I like you.
Jetro ( talk) 19:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Please see the "List of Orange Is the New Black episodes (talk page)" Thank you 82.44.112.108 ( talk) 21:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
What went on at Black supremacy and Template:Racism topics? Administrator Malik Shabazz (!) reverted you when you added the template to the article and any link to it from that template because "no sources" (!) So "White supremacy" is racism (no sources needed there) but "Black supremacy" is not. I'm trying to understand if this is just the hilarious yet tiresome "there is no such thing as Black racism/Blacks can not be racists" I've heard a million times (maybe you have too) in yet another guise or if there is something else? Just trying to understand how things work around here. Thanks. Cheers, Basemetal 00:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Of course you are right. The definition of the term says so. 2+2=4 is a revolutionary statement nowadays... Zezen ( talk) 19:08, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
TheSandDoctor ( talk) 15:38, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I recently added a map on the page Zoophilia and the law in the United States but you reverted it with no explanation. Can you please tell me why you decided to revert it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akartoshi ( talk • contribs) 17:15, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, As you can tell, I'm pretty new at wikipedia, I didn't know how to update an existing file, thus I just decided to make a new one. I will make an SVG now.
Also, I do have sources, that were already included in the page. I didn't just blindly make those changes. Akartoshi ( talk) 12:59, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Terrorist96. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:28, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Intussusception (blood vessel growth), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intussusception ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 12:32, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Greetings, Terrorist96. Thank you for your sustained work on improving and enhancing the "Gun laws in [name of state]" articles. Your efforts are appreciated. — Mudwater ( Talk) 23:48, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
Greetings: Please do not revert or change an edits of others when you are reverted, as you have done in the
Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution article. Instead of reverting to your reverted text, please use the
talk page to work toward making a version that represents
consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
BRD for how this is done. Thanks.
Drdpw (
talk)
21:55, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20180321/nra-backed-self-defense-bill-becomes-law-in-idaho
Idaho becomes a Stand Your Ground state on July 1, 2018! 173.169.18.165 ( talk) 05:38, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Texas 99/Grand Parkway in Harris county was recently bumped up to 75 without much fanfare apparently; I haven't checked the segment between 45-59/69 that jogs into Montgomery County, but it was posted at 70 the last time I drove on it. -- Thegunkid ( talk) 11:16, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Well It's passed, just waiting for the Governor's ink now; Which kinda angers me as a Texan that we let those damn landthieves beat us to constitutional carry. Remember Greer County!-- Thegunkid ( talk) 11:17, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
I reverted your addition to X about Selfish Ledger. As far as I can tell, this isn't a formal project, so it doesn't belong in the list. Do you have other information than the leaked video of a discussion? Tarl N. ( discuss) 23:47, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
“We understand if this is disturbing -- it is designed to be. This is a thought-experiment by the Design team from years ago that uses a technique known as ‘speculative design’ to explore uncomfortable ideas and concepts in order to provoke discussion and debate. It’s not related to any current or future products.”Terrorist96 ( talk) 00:12, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 11:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Hey, I thought we had an in-depth conversation about their gun laws on the Open Carry page, and established that their law actually only prohibits concealed carry of lawfully owned firearms despite ownership of handguns and centerfire rifles being illegal. Thegunkid ( talk) 00:09, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
So today surprisingly it was not California to die on this hill; but the state of Hawaii. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-guns-court/us-appeals-court-upholds-right-to-carry-gun-in-public-idUSKBN1KE28C
Thegunkid ( talk) 22:53, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello. Check what you revert, in the material I removed Liberland themself was the only source for the claim about co-operation with Somaliland, the sources you mentioned in your edit summary had nothing to do with that claim but were about Somaliland as such. Making the vital claim in the section sourced to Liberland only, which isn't allowed here (per WP:SELFPUB). - Tom | Thomas.W talk 14:11, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi Terrorist96,
In this edit, you reverted my revert of a sentence that now reads, "Incumbent Democratic Senator Martin Heinrich is running for reelection to a second term. His opponents are Republican nominee Mick Rich, a businessman, and Libertarian nominee Gary Johnson, a two-term Republican Governor of New Mexico and two time candidate for President of the United States." You've reverted to a version which says "Gary Johnson and Gary Johnson" are running. This is clearly a mistake. 67.1.248.214 ( talk) 02:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Terrorist96. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
My apologies for the revert of your edit on the List of federal judges appointed by Donald Trump page. I thought that District of Columbia simply redirected to Washington, D.C. instead of actually being a disambiguation page. – JocularJellyfish Talk Contribs 03:10, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
You're not an authority on what is an what is not allowed. So please refrain from WP:IDONTLIKEIT edits on the right to work page. Thanks. Quidster4040 ( talk) 02:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your work on various iterations of the "ACA Medicaid expansion by state" photos - between you and Bad Graphics Ghost it's been very helpful. Nosebagbear ( talk) 14:25, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for engaging on this. Coordinates for the village listed in the Qush article match the location of Kukh (northeast of Kuçuk Ağrı Dağı, near the road from Iğdır into Nakhchivan). Are the coords wrong, or is this actually the same village listed under a variant transliteration? Rupert Clayton ( talk) 06:21, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Hey man, when South Dakota is added on the Constitutional Carry. Could you add that no permit is needed to Open Carry as a resident or non resident as well as Concealed Carry. I do feel that is an important note to add in the ones that are already listed that no permit is needed to Open Carry as well as Concealed Carry except in North Dakota(which should be noted no permit is required to open carry an unloaded handgun with a loaded magazine in your pocket). As well as I see that Virginia is listed in the partial Constitutional Carry States for being allowed to carry in the vehicle without a permit. Wouldn't South Carolina, Florida, Texas, and Tennesssee be added for that reason as well? Due to them not needing a permit to carry it in the vehicle. The disctintion that no permit is required for Open Carry or Concealed carry for both resident and non resident should be listed as well like is done with Idaho and Wyoming. GermanicSoutherner15 ( talk) 17:28, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
First off, I'd like to say that your edit summary undoing my edit was rude. Second, your addition is in error, because the addition you made of South Dakota to the list of constitutional carry states is contrary to the fact that that law does not go into effect until July 1st, it is not effective at the moment. -- MrThunderbolt1000T ( talk) 00:12, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Terrorist96!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Robert McClenon (
talk)
04:23, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
|
They passed it again and the new governor signed it this time.
https://www.koco.com/amp/article/oklahoma-senate-to-vote-on-constitutional-carry-bill/26556161 Thegunkid ( talk) 23:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Legacypac ( talk) 18:00, 3 March 2019 (UTC)