|
Hi TelevisionMan13! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
You are invited to return to the AFD and look at the results of a diligent search for sources. Per WP:NRVE... notability is dependent upon sources being available, and not upon whether or not they are used in the article. THAT is an issue for regular editing. Cheers, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
The Bushranger
One ping only
17:37, 17 May 2013 (UTC) |
Nomination of Phillip Sheppard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phillip Sheppard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Sheppard (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gloss • talk 18:50, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Phillip Sheppard for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Sheppard (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
|
|
Hi TelevisionMan13! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
You are invited to return to the AFD and look at the results of a diligent search for sources. Per WP:NRVE... notability is dependent upon sources being available, and not upon whether or not they are used in the article. THAT is an issue for regular editing. Cheers, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
|
| This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
The Bushranger
One ping only
17:37, 17 May 2013 (UTC) |
Nomination of Phillip Sheppard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phillip Sheppard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Sheppard (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gloss • talk 18:50, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Phillip Sheppard for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Sheppard (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.