![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, regarding the section of ethnic groups in the article of Mexico, on wikipedia official data is the one that must be favoured over third party sources that certainly haven't realised extensive, person-per-person studies and surveys in the country and whose estimations are based on outdated old data. Data from official census will always be more accurate, I started a discussion in the Village Pump section of wikipedia and that was the result [1]. Check this out. Aergas ( talk) 03:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Is the official census, not a random poll, i really don't think that it imply that these people aren't mexican, just like in the article for Spain people outside the "Spanish" category don't automatically become non-spaniarss, they still have citizenship, they are just outside the main ethnic group. I don't think it is really an issue but in case you consider it too much of an issue the only ethnic group recognized in Mexico that should go in the infobox would be indigenous peoples at 14.8%. Aergas ( talk) 01:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
I have the impression that you don't only care about the proportion of amerindians, but are concerned about the other "racial groups" aswell, yet you must be aware that Mexico does not work like that, it has a different way to aproach race and ethnicy than say, the United States and this makes misunderstanding very common among Mexicans and basically anybody that isn't Mexican. The biggest problem is that you haven't realised that all the information you consider racial in Mexico, including the scarce official census done in the country, and the data from which Brittanica makes it's estimations, have always been based on culture, not biological traits, the most recent and somewhat competent racial investigation done in mexico, by the University of the state of Mexico ranks the racial groups as follows: white 15%, mestizo 70%, amerindian 14%, mulato 0.5%, asian 0.5% [2], yet in the page 196 the author makes a remark that is usually omitted: in countries with a heavy mestizo culture, such as Mexico, a huge amount of racially white people identifies as having cultural traits from Europeans and Native Americans (technically speaking mestizo culture, although the term itself is not used, and rather than mestizo culture it's refered to as Mexican culture), due the strong influence of the aforementioned Mexican/mestizo culture (in the particualar case of Mexico, this culture is actively promoted by the government, and to this day it continues), this is the main reason why on Mexican Tv for example, people that is not Mexican might believe that the actors etc. are white, and that Tv is racist because it shows many whites, but in reality if asked about their race, the majority of the people that you might consider is white wouldn't know what to answer about which is their race, (In Mexico the word mestizo itself is not in use and has offensive connotations) they would just say that they are Mexican. For all this accurate, realistic racial data for Mexico doesn't exist and has never existed, that's the point of the Mexican culture, that's why the Mexican government does not ask for race. Aergas ( talk) 01:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
There is a dispute resolution on which you might be involved [3]. Aergas ( talk) 22:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello
I'm Luz Ma. Silva. Mexican. I'm not a native English speaker and I live in Mexico. I teach history of Mexico. I hope to be clear. If something is misspelled please correct it.
There are two reasons to remove the Marquis ended in 1814: 1. The Constitution of Apatzingán never ruled and if not governed, its provisions were not met. 2. Marquis exists to date.
As the article, there is the title of Marquis, not its properties in Mexico, there are so far. The properties were selling the descendants of Cortés and its administrators. As you know, the nineteenth century was very problematic in Mexico.
I'll make another correction because the lands of the Marquis covering the state of Mexico and Mexico City. They are different. The City is the capital of the state of Mexico and a neighboring entity. As Washington, DC and Virginia.
Regards
Luz María Silva Luz Maria Silva ( talk) 22:13, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Gracias Le escribo en español entonces. Vi que tiene nivel de casi nativo y una persona de 18 años habla bien, si es culta como usted.
Estoy revisando la traducción que hizo una alumna sobre el Marquesado del Valle de Oaxaca. Le quité los errores del inglés, como lo de 1814. Si usted vivió en México sabe que Morelos nunca gobernó y la Constitución de Apatzingán nunca rigió, haya dicho lo que haya dicho. ¿Cómo va a ser abolido un marquesado que aún existe, como lo muestra el propio artículo?
Hubo una época en que hubo problemas muy serios entre el Marquesado y la Corona española, pero no tuvo nada que ver con Morelos y 1814. Además ¿cómo iban a abolir algo que ellos no otorgaron? Por cierto, lo dice el artículo pero ya me había enterado (y escandalizado) el gobierno de México independiente, que era pobre de solemnidad, ¡pagaba sus derechos al Marqués del Valle de Oaxaca! porque a eso se comprometieron con España. Uff...
Volviendo al artículo. Recordará que Coyoacán está en el DF. En la delimitación del Marquesado está México, supongo el Estado de México, pero falta México, D.F. El Marquesado abarcó parte de ambas entidades.
Ahora lo busqué otra vez porque me costó trabajo encontrar qué parte del estado de Morelos es Acapixtla, como dice el artículo. Eso está mal. Me doy cuenta de esas cosas al hacer las ligas. Es Yecapixtla ¿algún día fue cuando vivía en México? Es la tierra de la cecina de res. Acapixtla está en Veracruz (desde luego lo acabo de aprender).
Los otros dos semestres que puse a mis alumnos a escribir en Wikipedia y algunos tradujeron, no me costó mayor trabajo, pero este semestre escogieron unos artículos larguísimos. Éste es uno. La verdad, ya lloro. Llevo tres días editándolo. No puedo permitir que tenga errores. Ya no voy a dar permiso de traducir porque aprenden mal y es más difícil corregir que si hacen el artículo ellos solos, desde la nada. De todas maneras, creo que darles la opción de escribir en Wikipedia en vez de hacer el segundo examen parcial es una buena oportunidad de aprendizaje para todos. Son alumnos del ITAM. No sé si haya oído hablar del Instituto. Tiene mucho prestigio en México.
¿Ya no viene a México? Qué bueno que vivió acá. Con razón sabe tan bien español. Yo, como habrá visto, no domino el inglés. Leo mejor que escribo y me gustan las series policiacas inglesas, así que tengo un vocabulario un poco especial. Claro, leo sociología (mi carrera) y de e-Learning, que es lo que ahora estudio. Si no leo en inglés de ambas disciplinas, me quedo en la edad de piedra :-(
Que esté muy bien
Luz Ma.
Why do you believe Thomas's date of 1551 to be controversial? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chief Red Eagle ( talk • contribs) 00:50, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The sources are: German, Italian, French and others Wikipedia. 91.127.91.214 ( talk) 19:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello there, I would like to tell you that argentinosaurus actually has the largest land weight of all creatures, even BBC themselves have said. Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diplodocus4ever ( talk • contribs) 13:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
This is not Citation Spam. Please read the book before jumping to any conclusions. Are you from the fields of political science, political philosophy, or international relations? You might want to reconsider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8388:1181:B080:A158:1060:A574:E7A6 ( talk) 21:14, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
I did not add any new information in my edit, I rearranged the sentences. I will redo my edits, if you feel there is something wrong, please discuss it before reverting good faith edits. ˥ Ǝ Ʉ H Ɔ I Ɯ ( talk) 05:55, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for thanking me for the SN1987A image. My first contribution! I was worried that some might not like the "jerkiness" of the image. Quantumcross ( talk) 04:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC) |
why is it non encyclopedic? It will be easy to remember the clinical features for medical students in one look. If the drawing is not looking good then you can let me know. Armanjain011 ( talk) 07:30, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
I have just added another definition to it which I do believe assists in improving the article. Especially for a common person who looks at it. Why did you feel that it was un-needed. Supravibhatsupravi ( talk) 18:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
So, you're saying, that even if the TMS1000 existed before the 4004, it's place in the chronology is after the 4004, due to delayed public release? Then why even the 944 is in the list? It was a secret military project, it was never released to the public. -- 188.36.12.34 ( talk • contribs) 14:20, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Trivial as the reference to More may have been in an even more trivial movie as the ill-conceived update of "The Saint", the fact remains that More's name and what he represented WAS directly relevant to its choice in the first place. However low-brow that may seem to you, it's NOT to exaggerate some Hollywood film's significance as much as to note even the pretentious attempt to "class it up" by such use. -- RRawpower ( talk • contribs) 22:07, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
As I readily indicated all but disdain for such a cinematic trifle that I just happened upon again flipping cable channels, I strongly suspect you either have not seen the flick yourself or else recall it too vaguely to know whereof you speak. For I'd made abundantly clear that MY point, however debatable the film's quality in general or dialog in particular, was that there absolutely IS direct cause for invoking More's CHARACTER and historic principles NOT at all arbitrarily when Templar ponders aloud to himself "What she wants is Thomas More". What ELSE could or would that SPOKEN reference otherwise mean?! Let alone the expository FACT cited on the film's iMDB page: "Simon Templar: My name is Thomas Moore. I was named after a saint who died for his faith." [1]
Q.E.D.
RRawpower ( talk) 23:37, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
References
Thank for the revert, well spotted. In response to your question I am slowly translating the article into Spanish on es.wikipedia. I have no idea how that got there other than that, but I do work on both "article" at the same time. I need to start using the preview changes button for live changes of this sort. ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 02:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Western scholars are limited in their understanding of Sephardic heritage, which has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with a long-standing tradition of scientific learning. Niels Bohr came from a very old line of Spanish Jews who arrived in Denmark some time after the Expulsion of the Jews of Spain. The distinction has little to do with his atheism and more to do with the community from which he outcropped -- a 300-year old tradition of Danish-born Sephardic Jews centered in Glucksberg and later Copenhagen would surely have influenced his interest in science, as Sephardic learning had an emphasis on scientific learning even beginning with the writings of Maimonides, who integrated medical science with philosophy. There is a general prejudice among Western communities which purports Sephardic Jews as Middle Eastern and highly religious. This is a misconception which should not influence or limit the statement of his Sephardic heritage, lest his achievements be misappropriated by any other group, Jewish or non-Jewish. Understanding the context of his Jewishness would be a priori to any statement per his Jewishness, and between the Ashkenazic and Sephardic communities of Denmark there are marked differences in context, timeline, and culture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SephardicScholar ( talk • contribs) 03:12, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi - why is it not "meaningfully notable enough" to add a red link to Tanna (film), an award-winning film, to an article on the island which shares the film's name and is the location for the film? -- 211.30.17.74 ( talk) 08:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm disinclined to remove redlinks on the chance somebody will create the page. If you want to delete them, I won't fight about it. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 23:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
It's not just “that some people slur the words together.” In no ordinary Mexican Spanish enunciation is the particle de distinguished as a separate phonetic entity before a vowel; a similar phenomenon to how words like peatón or campeón, in theory trisyllabic, are pronounced as having two syllables except in consciously careful pronunciation. It seems to me that closed notation should reflect such phenomena, but by all means have it your way. — Koszmonaut ( talk / contribs) 01:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but your multiple sentences in multiple different comments were too hard for me to understand. I have removed them instead. 87.254.85.56 ( talk) 21:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Minor Barnstar |
Thanks for the work you do, as it shows in Talk:La Malinche. "Wikignomes are often-overlooked, but make essential contributions to the Wikipedia. The Minor Barnstar is awarded for making minor edits of the utmost quality." words by Blooded Edge. Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 14:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC) |
Hey after our productive discussion over at Drop bear. What do you think of Gunni? I just started a discussion on its talk page - doesn't seem notable at all.-- ZayZayEM ( talk) 13:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
FYI: This IP 69.86.6.150, already has an established account which he's still using. SW3 5DL ( talk) 19:42, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi Tarl, What do you think should be the status of the NPOV tag on Space Elevator? I'd really like to make it go away. I imagine that since IP69 posted it and because he's banned, that it could be removed summarily as the work of a banned editor. I'd prefer not to do that though. I'd rather there be some agreement. Have you had a chance to review the "will" --> "would" changes? Skyway ( talk) 20:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, it's hard to say. Skyway ( talk) 00:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
I Was just letting you know about your change of the alpha centuri page. You said if you click on the it says billion years but when I click on it I get but or Gregorian year. What you are talking about is ga which equals 1 billion years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.50.145.186 ( talk) 17:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Please take the time to read my explanation of why I made the edit to Template: New England Patriots roster that I did on its associated talk page. I hope you'll understand the logic behind it. 143.229.237.46 ( talk) 15:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Hey there. Maybe your simple math is right, but given that the source doesn't appear to do the multiplication, isn't it WP:OR? Diff [7] I updated that article and the related list. The claim was a gigantic one, in my opinion, (most chromosomes of any known organism) and the source didn't support it, did it? Best. Biosthmors ( talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{ U}}) while signing a reply, thx 16:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Here's why I removed the piping.
The names of venues tend to change because of sponsorship deals with naming rights. A redirect provides a simple way to ensure that all links to an old name will go to the article under the current name. Piping an old name to the current name is pointless because if the name changes again, as it surely will when the current sponsorship deal comes to an end, the piped name will itself become a redirect and the already trivial benefit of a direct link will be lost. (The additional runtime cost of processing a click on a redirect is trivial, and even then is rarely incurred as most links are accessed only rather infrequently.)
Here are some relevant extracts from guides to best practice in piping and redirects:
renaimg Colonies Chris ( talk) 20:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
My concern is exactly the possibility of a rename. By going through a redirect, if the article itself is moved because of a rename, we now have a double redirect, which won't work. E.g., right now you are referencing Sullivan Stadium, which is a redirect to Foxboro Stadium. If Foxboro Stadium gets moved (unlikely at this time, granted, because it's a no-longer existent stadium), the reference to Sullivan Stadium to Foxboro Stadium to (whatever the new name is) won't work. I'm aware that sentiment on redirects vs pipes has gone back and forth over the years, it seems the MOS now favors going ahead with the redirects and letting them break on the next move. C'est la vie. Tarl.Neustaedter ( talk) 21:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
The US-NATO led invasion of Libya tremendously destroyed the fabric and stability of the country, and the move has been determined to be motivated primarily due to economic and political considerations. How is my view "strongly non-neutral" ? Kindly elaborate before reverting any edits.
Adeel.shams ( talk) 22:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Shams
You need to self-revert your edit or you face being blocked for reverting a sanctionable page. Your edit is contentious and the page is currently under sanctions. I am giving you to courtesy notice to self-revert. Sir Joseph (talk) 18:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Test colorized signature, make it easier to find my own comments on talk pages. Tarl N. ( talk) 23:23, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
I apologize for editing your home page. I mistook it for the discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AquilaXIII ( talk • contribs) 22:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
To quote from the discovery paper page 10: Habitable zone range [AU] ∼ 0.0423 – 0.0816 and Habitable zone periods [days] ∼ 9.1–24.5. Why are you reverting this? [9] Quantanew ( talk) 04:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry about missing the dot. I pinged you again, just to see if it works this time. Did it? Dondervogel 2 ( talk) 17:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Last month an IP left two bogus templated warnings on my talk page and then stamped your sig to them. I don't care myself as i have essentially been retired from WP for about a year and a half. Just thought I should let you know. RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 22:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
@ Racerx11: Thanks for the notification. That's pretty obnoxious. The text is a warning I left on a persistent ip-hopping vandal's talk page. Someone whom I caught vandalizing other pages, and on following back his earlier actions found to be persistently deleting images from that article. If you don't mind, I'll delete that piece of text from your talk page. Regards Tarl N. ( discuss) 01:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes Tarl N that's fine. Thank you. RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 03:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
I removed the "He is a 2x NBA All-Star (2015 and 2016)". Why you reverted my edit? Seriesphile ( talk · ctb) 22:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes, Eric has warned me of a move of the catalog. He's still Chair but has left Rochester to join NASA. Apparently, it's going to be moved to a permanent location on the IAU website or similar in the next few weeks. I like your idea, but I've done most of the articles already, and I'd probably update the link to the new location in any event (the IAU seems to be very slow in updating its webpages). It's a straightforward, if a little tedious, cut & 240xpaste job! (We could do with a reference bank, like the image bank, so you could just amend the reference once and it would carry forward into all articles using it. I might suggest it!) However, thanks for taking the time to warn me of the problem and suggest a solution! :) Cuddlyopedia ( talk) 07:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
That was the first time I ever tried to edit a page. I thought I inserted the source. Maybe I did it wrong. Are you saying the source was not a good source or that it was not there? Gbybee ( talk) 17:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, regarding the section of ethnic groups in the article of Mexico, on wikipedia official data is the one that must be favoured over third party sources that certainly haven't realised extensive, person-per-person studies and surveys in the country and whose estimations are based on outdated old data. Data from official census will always be more accurate, I started a discussion in the Village Pump section of wikipedia and that was the result [1]. Check this out. Aergas ( talk) 03:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Is the official census, not a random poll, i really don't think that it imply that these people aren't mexican, just like in the article for Spain people outside the "Spanish" category don't automatically become non-spaniarss, they still have citizenship, they are just outside the main ethnic group. I don't think it is really an issue but in case you consider it too much of an issue the only ethnic group recognized in Mexico that should go in the infobox would be indigenous peoples at 14.8%. Aergas ( talk) 01:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
I have the impression that you don't only care about the proportion of amerindians, but are concerned about the other "racial groups" aswell, yet you must be aware that Mexico does not work like that, it has a different way to aproach race and ethnicy than say, the United States and this makes misunderstanding very common among Mexicans and basically anybody that isn't Mexican. The biggest problem is that you haven't realised that all the information you consider racial in Mexico, including the scarce official census done in the country, and the data from which Brittanica makes it's estimations, have always been based on culture, not biological traits, the most recent and somewhat competent racial investigation done in mexico, by the University of the state of Mexico ranks the racial groups as follows: white 15%, mestizo 70%, amerindian 14%, mulato 0.5%, asian 0.5% [2], yet in the page 196 the author makes a remark that is usually omitted: in countries with a heavy mestizo culture, such as Mexico, a huge amount of racially white people identifies as having cultural traits from Europeans and Native Americans (technically speaking mestizo culture, although the term itself is not used, and rather than mestizo culture it's refered to as Mexican culture), due the strong influence of the aforementioned Mexican/mestizo culture (in the particualar case of Mexico, this culture is actively promoted by the government, and to this day it continues), this is the main reason why on Mexican Tv for example, people that is not Mexican might believe that the actors etc. are white, and that Tv is racist because it shows many whites, but in reality if asked about their race, the majority of the people that you might consider is white wouldn't know what to answer about which is their race, (In Mexico the word mestizo itself is not in use and has offensive connotations) they would just say that they are Mexican. For all this accurate, realistic racial data for Mexico doesn't exist and has never existed, that's the point of the Mexican culture, that's why the Mexican government does not ask for race. Aergas ( talk) 01:44, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
There is a dispute resolution on which you might be involved [3]. Aergas ( talk) 22:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello
I'm Luz Ma. Silva. Mexican. I'm not a native English speaker and I live in Mexico. I teach history of Mexico. I hope to be clear. If something is misspelled please correct it.
There are two reasons to remove the Marquis ended in 1814: 1. The Constitution of Apatzingán never ruled and if not governed, its provisions were not met. 2. Marquis exists to date.
As the article, there is the title of Marquis, not its properties in Mexico, there are so far. The properties were selling the descendants of Cortés and its administrators. As you know, the nineteenth century was very problematic in Mexico.
I'll make another correction because the lands of the Marquis covering the state of Mexico and Mexico City. They are different. The City is the capital of the state of Mexico and a neighboring entity. As Washington, DC and Virginia.
Regards
Luz María Silva Luz Maria Silva ( talk) 22:13, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Gracias Le escribo en español entonces. Vi que tiene nivel de casi nativo y una persona de 18 años habla bien, si es culta como usted.
Estoy revisando la traducción que hizo una alumna sobre el Marquesado del Valle de Oaxaca. Le quité los errores del inglés, como lo de 1814. Si usted vivió en México sabe que Morelos nunca gobernó y la Constitución de Apatzingán nunca rigió, haya dicho lo que haya dicho. ¿Cómo va a ser abolido un marquesado que aún existe, como lo muestra el propio artículo?
Hubo una época en que hubo problemas muy serios entre el Marquesado y la Corona española, pero no tuvo nada que ver con Morelos y 1814. Además ¿cómo iban a abolir algo que ellos no otorgaron? Por cierto, lo dice el artículo pero ya me había enterado (y escandalizado) el gobierno de México independiente, que era pobre de solemnidad, ¡pagaba sus derechos al Marqués del Valle de Oaxaca! porque a eso se comprometieron con España. Uff...
Volviendo al artículo. Recordará que Coyoacán está en el DF. En la delimitación del Marquesado está México, supongo el Estado de México, pero falta México, D.F. El Marquesado abarcó parte de ambas entidades.
Ahora lo busqué otra vez porque me costó trabajo encontrar qué parte del estado de Morelos es Acapixtla, como dice el artículo. Eso está mal. Me doy cuenta de esas cosas al hacer las ligas. Es Yecapixtla ¿algún día fue cuando vivía en México? Es la tierra de la cecina de res. Acapixtla está en Veracruz (desde luego lo acabo de aprender).
Los otros dos semestres que puse a mis alumnos a escribir en Wikipedia y algunos tradujeron, no me costó mayor trabajo, pero este semestre escogieron unos artículos larguísimos. Éste es uno. La verdad, ya lloro. Llevo tres días editándolo. No puedo permitir que tenga errores. Ya no voy a dar permiso de traducir porque aprenden mal y es más difícil corregir que si hacen el artículo ellos solos, desde la nada. De todas maneras, creo que darles la opción de escribir en Wikipedia en vez de hacer el segundo examen parcial es una buena oportunidad de aprendizaje para todos. Son alumnos del ITAM. No sé si haya oído hablar del Instituto. Tiene mucho prestigio en México.
¿Ya no viene a México? Qué bueno que vivió acá. Con razón sabe tan bien español. Yo, como habrá visto, no domino el inglés. Leo mejor que escribo y me gustan las series policiacas inglesas, así que tengo un vocabulario un poco especial. Claro, leo sociología (mi carrera) y de e-Learning, que es lo que ahora estudio. Si no leo en inglés de ambas disciplinas, me quedo en la edad de piedra :-(
Que esté muy bien
Luz Ma.
Why do you believe Thomas's date of 1551 to be controversial? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chief Red Eagle ( talk • contribs) 00:50, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
The sources are: German, Italian, French and others Wikipedia. 91.127.91.214 ( talk) 19:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Hello there, I would like to tell you that argentinosaurus actually has the largest land weight of all creatures, even BBC themselves have said. Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Diplodocus4ever ( talk • contribs) 13:58, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
This is not Citation Spam. Please read the book before jumping to any conclusions. Are you from the fields of political science, political philosophy, or international relations? You might want to reconsider. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8388:1181:B080:A158:1060:A574:E7A6 ( talk) 21:14, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
I did not add any new information in my edit, I rearranged the sentences. I will redo my edits, if you feel there is something wrong, please discuss it before reverting good faith edits. ˥ Ǝ Ʉ H Ɔ I Ɯ ( talk) 05:55, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for thanking me for the SN1987A image. My first contribution! I was worried that some might not like the "jerkiness" of the image. Quantumcross ( talk) 04:07, 28 April 2015 (UTC) |
why is it non encyclopedic? It will be easy to remember the clinical features for medical students in one look. If the drawing is not looking good then you can let me know. Armanjain011 ( talk) 07:30, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
I have just added another definition to it which I do believe assists in improving the article. Especially for a common person who looks at it. Why did you feel that it was un-needed. Supravibhatsupravi ( talk) 18:10, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
So, you're saying, that even if the TMS1000 existed before the 4004, it's place in the chronology is after the 4004, due to delayed public release? Then why even the 944 is in the list? It was a secret military project, it was never released to the public. -- 188.36.12.34 ( talk • contribs) 14:20, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Trivial as the reference to More may have been in an even more trivial movie as the ill-conceived update of "The Saint", the fact remains that More's name and what he represented WAS directly relevant to its choice in the first place. However low-brow that may seem to you, it's NOT to exaggerate some Hollywood film's significance as much as to note even the pretentious attempt to "class it up" by such use. -- RRawpower ( talk • contribs) 22:07, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
As I readily indicated all but disdain for such a cinematic trifle that I just happened upon again flipping cable channels, I strongly suspect you either have not seen the flick yourself or else recall it too vaguely to know whereof you speak. For I'd made abundantly clear that MY point, however debatable the film's quality in general or dialog in particular, was that there absolutely IS direct cause for invoking More's CHARACTER and historic principles NOT at all arbitrarily when Templar ponders aloud to himself "What she wants is Thomas More". What ELSE could or would that SPOKEN reference otherwise mean?! Let alone the expository FACT cited on the film's iMDB page: "Simon Templar: My name is Thomas Moore. I was named after a saint who died for his faith." [1]
Q.E.D.
RRawpower ( talk) 23:37, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
References
Thank for the revert, well spotted. In response to your question I am slowly translating the article into Spanish on es.wikipedia. I have no idea how that got there other than that, but I do work on both "article" at the same time. I need to start using the preview changes button for live changes of this sort. ♫ SqueakBox talk contribs 02:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Western scholars are limited in their understanding of Sephardic heritage, which has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with a long-standing tradition of scientific learning. Niels Bohr came from a very old line of Spanish Jews who arrived in Denmark some time after the Expulsion of the Jews of Spain. The distinction has little to do with his atheism and more to do with the community from which he outcropped -- a 300-year old tradition of Danish-born Sephardic Jews centered in Glucksberg and later Copenhagen would surely have influenced his interest in science, as Sephardic learning had an emphasis on scientific learning even beginning with the writings of Maimonides, who integrated medical science with philosophy. There is a general prejudice among Western communities which purports Sephardic Jews as Middle Eastern and highly religious. This is a misconception which should not influence or limit the statement of his Sephardic heritage, lest his achievements be misappropriated by any other group, Jewish or non-Jewish. Understanding the context of his Jewishness would be a priori to any statement per his Jewishness, and between the Ashkenazic and Sephardic communities of Denmark there are marked differences in context, timeline, and culture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SephardicScholar ( talk • contribs) 03:12, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi - why is it not "meaningfully notable enough" to add a red link to Tanna (film), an award-winning film, to an article on the island which shares the film's name and is the location for the film? -- 211.30.17.74 ( talk) 08:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
I'm disinclined to remove redlinks on the chance somebody will create the page. If you want to delete them, I won't fight about it. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 23:21, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
It's not just “that some people slur the words together.” In no ordinary Mexican Spanish enunciation is the particle de distinguished as a separate phonetic entity before a vowel; a similar phenomenon to how words like peatón or campeón, in theory trisyllabic, are pronounced as having two syllables except in consciously careful pronunciation. It seems to me that closed notation should reflect such phenomena, but by all means have it your way. — Koszmonaut ( talk / contribs) 01:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but your multiple sentences in multiple different comments were too hard for me to understand. I have removed them instead. 87.254.85.56 ( talk) 21:21, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
The Minor Barnstar |
Thanks for the work you do, as it shows in Talk:La Malinche. "Wikignomes are often-overlooked, but make essential contributions to the Wikipedia. The Minor Barnstar is awarded for making minor edits of the utmost quality." words by Blooded Edge. Caballero/Historiador ⎌ 14:03, 18 January 2016 (UTC) |
Hey after our productive discussion over at Drop bear. What do you think of Gunni? I just started a discussion on its talk page - doesn't seem notable at all.-- ZayZayEM ( talk) 13:19, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
FYI: This IP 69.86.6.150, already has an established account which he's still using. SW3 5DL ( talk) 19:42, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi Tarl, What do you think should be the status of the NPOV tag on Space Elevator? I'd really like to make it go away. I imagine that since IP69 posted it and because he's banned, that it could be removed summarily as the work of a banned editor. I'd prefer not to do that though. I'd rather there be some agreement. Have you had a chance to review the "will" --> "would" changes? Skyway ( talk) 20:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Yeah, it's hard to say. Skyway ( talk) 00:32, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
I Was just letting you know about your change of the alpha centuri page. You said if you click on the it says billion years but when I click on it I get but or Gregorian year. What you are talking about is ga which equals 1 billion years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.50.145.186 ( talk) 17:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
Please take the time to read my explanation of why I made the edit to Template: New England Patriots roster that I did on its associated talk page. I hope you'll understand the logic behind it. 143.229.237.46 ( talk) 15:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Hey there. Maybe your simple math is right, but given that the source doesn't appear to do the multiplication, isn't it WP:OR? Diff [7] I updated that article and the related list. The claim was a gigantic one, in my opinion, (most chromosomes of any known organism) and the source didn't support it, did it? Best. Biosthmors ( talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{ U}}) while signing a reply, thx 16:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Here's why I removed the piping.
The names of venues tend to change because of sponsorship deals with naming rights. A redirect provides a simple way to ensure that all links to an old name will go to the article under the current name. Piping an old name to the current name is pointless because if the name changes again, as it surely will when the current sponsorship deal comes to an end, the piped name will itself become a redirect and the already trivial benefit of a direct link will be lost. (The additional runtime cost of processing a click on a redirect is trivial, and even then is rarely incurred as most links are accessed only rather infrequently.)
Here are some relevant extracts from guides to best practice in piping and redirects:
renaimg Colonies Chris ( talk) 20:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
My concern is exactly the possibility of a rename. By going through a redirect, if the article itself is moved because of a rename, we now have a double redirect, which won't work. E.g., right now you are referencing Sullivan Stadium, which is a redirect to Foxboro Stadium. If Foxboro Stadium gets moved (unlikely at this time, granted, because it's a no-longer existent stadium), the reference to Sullivan Stadium to Foxboro Stadium to (whatever the new name is) won't work. I'm aware that sentiment on redirects vs pipes has gone back and forth over the years, it seems the MOS now favors going ahead with the redirects and letting them break on the next move. C'est la vie. Tarl.Neustaedter ( talk) 21:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
The US-NATO led invasion of Libya tremendously destroyed the fabric and stability of the country, and the move has been determined to be motivated primarily due to economic and political considerations. How is my view "strongly non-neutral" ? Kindly elaborate before reverting any edits.
Adeel.shams ( talk) 22:28, 28 May 2016 (UTC)Shams
You need to self-revert your edit or you face being blocked for reverting a sanctionable page. Your edit is contentious and the page is currently under sanctions. I am giving you to courtesy notice to self-revert. Sir Joseph (talk) 18:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Test colorized signature, make it easier to find my own comments on talk pages. Tarl N. ( talk) 23:23, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
I apologize for editing your home page. I mistook it for the discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AquilaXIII ( talk • contribs) 22:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
To quote from the discovery paper page 10: Habitable zone range [AU] ∼ 0.0423 – 0.0816 and Habitable zone periods [days] ∼ 9.1–24.5. Why are you reverting this? [9] Quantanew ( talk) 04:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
Sorry about missing the dot. I pinged you again, just to see if it works this time. Did it? Dondervogel 2 ( talk) 17:25, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Last month an IP left two bogus templated warnings on my talk page and then stamped your sig to them. I don't care myself as i have essentially been retired from WP for about a year and a half. Just thought I should let you know. RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 22:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
@ Racerx11: Thanks for the notification. That's pretty obnoxious. The text is a warning I left on a persistent ip-hopping vandal's talk page. Someone whom I caught vandalizing other pages, and on following back his earlier actions found to be persistently deleting images from that article. If you don't mind, I'll delete that piece of text from your talk page. Regards Tarl N. ( discuss) 01:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes Tarl N that's fine. Thank you. RacerX11 Talk to me Stalk me 03:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
I removed the "He is a 2x NBA All-Star (2015 and 2016)". Why you reverted my edit? Seriesphile ( talk · ctb) 22:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
Yes, Eric has warned me of a move of the catalog. He's still Chair but has left Rochester to join NASA. Apparently, it's going to be moved to a permanent location on the IAU website or similar in the next few weeks. I like your idea, but I've done most of the articles already, and I'd probably update the link to the new location in any event (the IAU seems to be very slow in updating its webpages). It's a straightforward, if a little tedious, cut & 240xpaste job! (We could do with a reference bank, like the image bank, so you could just amend the reference once and it would carry forward into all articles using it. I might suggest it!) However, thanks for taking the time to warn me of the problem and suggest a solution! :) Cuddlyopedia ( talk) 07:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
That was the first time I ever tried to edit a page. I thought I inserted the source. Maybe I did it wrong. Are you saying the source was not a good source or that it was not there? Gbybee ( talk) 17:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)