Thank you for uploading File:Manorama.acchi.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro (talk) 15:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
The Enforcer Office of the secret service 15:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Manorama.acchi.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from www.thiraipadam.com/images/artists/Manorama1.jpeg. As a copyright violation, File:Manorama.acchi.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Manorama.acchi.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. ShivNarayanan ( talk) 18:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.thiraipadam.com/cgi-bin/artist.pl?id=263&lang=english. As a copyright violation, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. ShivNarayanan ( talk) 18:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://l.yimg.com/t/movies/galatta/20080805/09/Tamil_cine20080731-1_1217929221_large.jpg, http://in.movies.yahoo.com/news-detail/30705/Tamil-cinema-losing-identity-Bharathi-Raja.html. As a copyright violation, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. ShivNarayanan ( talk) 18:42, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG], has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 March 11#Prominent.Kallars.JPG]|discussion]] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ShivNarayanan ( talk) 19:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC) ShivNarayanan ( talk) 19:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Heya,
I have no intention of deleting the article but I disagree that the Cholas or any of the others like Malayaman are Kallars. If you can post a source that says that the Cholas are Kallars then it'll be good. I've also broken Pallava-Chola theory as it is not true. You seem to come up short on the history of Athondai. Do you know what happened to him after karikala crowned him and left? So we can try and move forward if you can post some sources on the talk page. I will also try to dig up some sources. ShivNarayanan ( talk) 06:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I don’t know anything about attondai and can you give any reference for stating attondai As a son of Karikala in history, I am talking about Thondaiman Ilandarayan he was the first Thondaiman King who ruled thondaimandalam During Sangam period, there is lot of reference for his existence (Read Purananuru).
You keep on asking reference though I have given many, please mention for which you want reference exactly.
If Malayaman, Paluvetarayar, Melkondar or not Kallars, Please tell me anyone else using this Surnames.
Hereafter Please don’t delete anything. Mention your question (Please mention clearly exactly for what you want reference) in my talk page I will give you reference there are lot of reference available.
Your edits to Kallar page are unreasonable. I have explained my concerns on the Kallar talk page. Adding sources about Cholas or Pallavas or their marriages to other communties like "Malayaman" and insisting that you have added references makes me wonder if you are dodging the actual dispute. First provide sources that quote "the cholas are Kallars", "the Pallavas are Kallars", "the Pallavas were offshoot of Cholas", etc. This is the main dispute. ShivNarayanan ( talk) 04:57, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Kallar_(caste). Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
ShivNarayanan (
talk)
22:08, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Manorama.acchi.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro (talk) 15:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
The Enforcer Office of the secret service 15:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Manorama.acchi.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from www.thiraipadam.com/images/artists/Manorama1.jpeg. As a copyright violation, File:Manorama.acchi.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Manorama.acchi.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. ShivNarayanan ( talk) 18:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.thiraipadam.com/cgi-bin/artist.pl?id=263&lang=english. As a copyright violation, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. ShivNarayanan ( talk) 18:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://l.yimg.com/t/movies/galatta/20080805/09/Tamil_cine20080731-1_1217929221_large.jpg, http://in.movies.yahoo.com/news-detail/30705/Tamil-cinema-losing-identity-Bharathi-Raja.html. As a copyright violation, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. ShivNarayanan ( talk) 18:42, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG], has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 March 11#Prominent.Kallars.JPG]|discussion]] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ShivNarayanan ( talk) 19:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC) ShivNarayanan ( talk) 19:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Heya,
I have no intention of deleting the article but I disagree that the Cholas or any of the others like Malayaman are Kallars. If you can post a source that says that the Cholas are Kallars then it'll be good. I've also broken Pallava-Chola theory as it is not true. You seem to come up short on the history of Athondai. Do you know what happened to him after karikala crowned him and left? So we can try and move forward if you can post some sources on the talk page. I will also try to dig up some sources. ShivNarayanan ( talk) 06:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I don’t know anything about attondai and can you give any reference for stating attondai As a son of Karikala in history, I am talking about Thondaiman Ilandarayan he was the first Thondaiman King who ruled thondaimandalam During Sangam period, there is lot of reference for his existence (Read Purananuru).
You keep on asking reference though I have given many, please mention for which you want reference exactly.
If Malayaman, Paluvetarayar, Melkondar or not Kallars, Please tell me anyone else using this Surnames.
Hereafter Please don’t delete anything. Mention your question (Please mention clearly exactly for what you want reference) in my talk page I will give you reference there are lot of reference available.
Your edits to Kallar page are unreasonable. I have explained my concerns on the Kallar talk page. Adding sources about Cholas or Pallavas or their marriages to other communties like "Malayaman" and insisting that you have added references makes me wonder if you are dodging the actual dispute. First provide sources that quote "the cholas are Kallars", "the Pallavas are Kallars", "the Pallavas were offshoot of Cholas", etc. This is the main dispute. ShivNarayanan ( talk) 04:57, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Kallar_(caste). Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
ShivNarayanan (
talk)
22:08, 20 March 2009 (UTC)