thank you for coming to talk, you seem to be the only one doing so. ive responded why i think it should be there and is not bias as is. (although i understand why others may see it appears so right now) Lihaas ( talk) 19:11, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
I agree that there's no mention of it being satire, but that's pretty much a case of the sky being blue. It's obvious.
Anyway, the whole paragraph about Roger Ramjet is unsourced. Which rule is more important? HiLo48 ( talk) 00:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thank you for coming to talk, you seem to be the only one doing so. ive responded why i think it should be there and is not bias as is. (although i understand why others may see it appears so right now) Lihaas ( talk) 19:11, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
I agree that there's no mention of it being satire, but that's pretty much a case of the sky being blue. It's obvious.
Anyway, the whole paragraph about Roger Ramjet is unsourced. Which rule is more important? HiLo48 ( talk) 00:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)