|
Hi Table tennis pic!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
Any further reverts by you will result in a block. You are not reading the edit summary to fix the problems. 1) NO ALL CAPS. 2) Do references properly. A bunch of refs at the end does nothing. References need to be inline. See WP:REF on how to do this. Ask questions. Ask for help. But no more reverts and no more adding material without references. Bgwhite ( talk) 06:22, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Dear User:Bgwhite Can you please edit this page for us,Any data you want with accurate reference we will provide. Please do this for us...Thanks & Regards
Now,99.99% data deleted: Done by /info/en/?search=User:Mdann52 It is an Insult to us as Indian. Great reward by Wikipedia.
Now there is a big question about the Wikipedia's Authentication. People from India and other place should know about real the truth behind the wikipedia. Any one can edit or delete the data.
Done by /info/en/?search=User:Mdann52 It is an Insult to us as Indian. Great reward by Wikipedia.
Your recent editing history at Mouma Das shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
(Pinging
Bgwhite.) —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
06:32, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
It is not about Edit war.It is all about feelings for our National Sports person,Say example you have 20 Awards if I tell you please show only 5 Awards, or write only 5 awards in your bio-data instead of 20.Think this way then you can understand it. About blocking or deleting as a Authority of Wikipedia you can,but it is sure in India we loose trust in your site,due to this half hearted work and only 10% information,Now upto you what you want to...Thanks Dear User:Bgwhite Can you please edit this page for us,Any data you want with accurate reference we will provide. Please do this for us...Thanks & Regards
Done by /info/en/?search=User:Mdann52 It is an Insult to us as Indian. Great reward by Wikipedia.
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 18:25, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Tito Dutta ( talk) 20:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Please do not keep on adding the same text as the content you are trying to add in Mouma Das is not following Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I strongly suggest you to read these pages:
If you continue to edit-war in the article, you may be blocked from editing. -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 08:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
I know why you try to delete the original details of Mouma Das. You not want that people should know the actual data of A sports person. It is not about edit war it is all about your personal attention to hide all the records of a Sports Person from Bengal.
As your wish we will try to put attention of Indian Sports Ministry regarding this misrepresentation of a Sports person.
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Mouma Das, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. John from Idegon ( talk) 22:02, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Only add the table. Do not do anything else. Once you add the table, I'll go over it and clean it up. Do not add a huge list of external links. Bgwhite ( talk) 22:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
The book Book:Mouma Das has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
1 page book. Download as PDF feature is simpler for 1 page.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, books may be deleted for several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated book prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on the book's talk page.
Please consider improving the book to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated book prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes still exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and the
miscellany for deletion process allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ‑‑
Trialpears (
talk)
20:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
|
Hi Table tennis pic!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
Any further reverts by you will result in a block. You are not reading the edit summary to fix the problems. 1) NO ALL CAPS. 2) Do references properly. A bunch of refs at the end does nothing. References need to be inline. See WP:REF on how to do this. Ask questions. Ask for help. But no more reverts and no more adding material without references. Bgwhite ( talk) 06:22, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
Dear User:Bgwhite Can you please edit this page for us,Any data you want with accurate reference we will provide. Please do this for us...Thanks & Regards
Now,99.99% data deleted: Done by /info/en/?search=User:Mdann52 It is an Insult to us as Indian. Great reward by Wikipedia.
Now there is a big question about the Wikipedia's Authentication. People from India and other place should know about real the truth behind the wikipedia. Any one can edit or delete the data.
Done by /info/en/?search=User:Mdann52 It is an Insult to us as Indian. Great reward by Wikipedia.
Your recent editing history at Mouma Das shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
(Pinging
Bgwhite.) —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
06:32, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
It is not about Edit war.It is all about feelings for our National Sports person,Say example you have 20 Awards if I tell you please show only 5 Awards, or write only 5 awards in your bio-data instead of 20.Think this way then you can understand it. About blocking or deleting as a Authority of Wikipedia you can,but it is sure in India we loose trust in your site,due to this half hearted work and only 10% information,Now upto you what you want to...Thanks Dear User:Bgwhite Can you please edit this page for us,Any data you want with accurate reference we will provide. Please do this for us...Thanks & Regards
Done by /info/en/?search=User:Mdann52 It is an Insult to us as Indian. Great reward by Wikipedia.
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 18:25, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Tito Dutta ( talk) 20:00, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
Please do not keep on adding the same text as the content you are trying to add in Mouma Das is not following Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I strongly suggest you to read these pages:
If you continue to edit-war in the article, you may be blocked from editing. -- Tito Dutta ( talk) 08:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
I know why you try to delete the original details of Mouma Das. You not want that people should know the actual data of A sports person. It is not about edit war it is all about your personal attention to hide all the records of a Sports Person from Bengal.
As your wish we will try to put attention of Indian Sports Ministry regarding this misrepresentation of a Sports person.
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Mouma Das, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. John from Idegon ( talk) 22:02, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Only add the table. Do not do anything else. Once you add the table, I'll go over it and clean it up. Do not add a huge list of external links. Bgwhite ( talk) 22:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
The book Book:Mouma Das has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
1 page book. Download as PDF feature is simpler for 1 page.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, books may be deleted for several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated book prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on the book's talk page.
Please consider improving the book to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated book prod}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes still exist. The
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and the
miscellany for deletion process allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion. ‑‑
Trialpears (
talk)
20:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC)