Hi TRHmTivl! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing!
Also, when you edit, use Help:Edit summary. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 11:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop adding photos to Saint Thomas Christians. If they want to see more, they can click on the Wikipedia Commons link and browse. commons:Category:Saint_Thomas_Christians Thank you Adakiko ( talk) 09:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Jesus. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko ( talk) 10:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Saint Thomas Christians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Repeated failure to engage in the discussion process and violation of 3RR will often result in a disciplinary action. Please refer to
Talk:Saint Thomas Christians and undo your violating edit. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
22:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
19:59, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
20:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Benedict Gregorios, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ...
discospinster
talk
03:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. ...
discospinster
talk
03:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Ganesha, you may be
blocked from editing. —
DaxServer (
t ·
m ·
c)
14:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Semen.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
08:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Para Brahman, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you. --
WikiLinuz {
talk} 🍁
04:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, TRHmTivl!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
HenryTemplo (
talk)
15:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
|
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
02:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop distruptive edits in Kollanoor page and take consensus in Talk page before distruptive editing Thank you. LNThampi ( talk) 03:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
— DaxServer ( t · m · c) 14:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_user_continuing_to_be_disruptive Dronebogus ( talk) 08:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Lol1VNIO. I noticed that in
this edit to
Semen, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. ~~
lol1VNIO (I made a mistake?
talk to me •
contribs)
08:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Semen. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. See
wp:NOTCENSORED. If it bothers you, I would suggest avoiding such topics.
Adakiko (
talk)
08:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced or
original content, as you did with
this edit to
Baselios Cleemis. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Serols (
talk)
15:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
I have moved this to draft as there are no referenced or citations and the information can not be verified. Please improve the article before returning to Mainspace. Slywriter ( talk) 01:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kizhakkevila Mathunny Panicker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kizhakkevila-Thundil Family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.
An article you recently created,
Kizhakkevila-Thundil Family, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
12:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Hi TRHmTivl! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing!
Also, when you edit, use Help:Edit summary. Gråbergs Gråa Sång ( talk) 11:28, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop adding photos to Saint Thomas Christians. If they want to see more, they can click on the Wikipedia Commons link and browse. commons:Category:Saint_Thomas_Christians Thank you Adakiko ( talk) 09:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Jesus. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko ( talk) 10:56, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Saint Thomas Christians shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Repeated failure to engage in the discussion process and violation of 3RR will often result in a disciplinary action. Please refer to
Talk:Saint Thomas Christians and undo your violating edit. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
22:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
19:59, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
20:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a
Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in
Benedict Gregorios, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ...
discospinster
talk
03:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. ...
discospinster
talk
03:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to add
unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at
Ganesha, you may be
blocked from editing. —
DaxServer (
t ·
m ·
c)
14:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Semen.
tgeorgescu (
talk)
08:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Para Brahman, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you. --
WikiLinuz {
talk} 🍁
04:24, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, TRHmTivl!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
HenryTemplo (
talk)
15:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
|
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
02:53, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Please stop distruptive edits in Kollanoor page and take consensus in Talk page before distruptive editing Thank you. LNThampi ( talk) 03:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{
Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the
guidance on discretionary sanctions and the
Arbitration Committee's decision
here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
— DaxServer ( t · m · c) 14:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_user_continuing_to_be_disruptive Dronebogus ( talk) 08:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Lol1VNIO. I noticed that in
this edit to
Semen, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. ~~
lol1VNIO (I made a mistake?
talk to me •
contribs)
08:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to
Semen. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. See
wp:NOTCENSORED. If it bothers you, I would suggest avoiding such topics.
Adakiko (
talk)
08:21, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Please do not add
unsourced or
original content, as you did with
this edit to
Baselios Cleemis. Doing so violates Wikipedia's
verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Serols (
talk)
15:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
I have moved this to draft as there are no referenced or citations and the information can not be verified. Please improve the article before returning to Mainspace. Slywriter ( talk) 01:25, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kizhakkevila Mathunny Panicker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Kizhakkevila-Thundil Family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.
An article you recently created,
Kizhakkevila-Thundil Family, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Liz
Read!
Talk!
02:49, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Bbb23 (
talk)
12:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)