![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, I used to go around making changes that delinked redirects because I thought it was tider. Then an administrator dropped by and shared WP:NOTBROKEN with me. I hadn't been aware of it before, but seeing as it's an editing guideline I've tried to avoid doing it very much since then unless the redirect points to an incorrect place (and then I usually fix the redirect, actually...). Anyway it's not policy and is just a guideline, however you might want to reconsider making these kinds of edits in the future for the reasons given at WP:NOTBROKEN. Your call. Good luck, - Thibbs ( talk) 23:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
I did inform you if you bothered to look, User talk:TJ Spyke#ANI Notice. Afro Talkie Talk - Afkatk 00:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
what did Puder break then, he broke a rule, he did a real submission on Angle, when he should not have? Gregorynovella ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC).
if the match was real, why did the ref do a count despite the fact that Puder's shoulders bridged up, if the match was real, then Angle should have not won, yet, because he didn't pin Puder... Gregorynovella ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC).
I've opened up a report on StevenMario's current problematic behavior - it's at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#StevenMario if you want to weigh in... TheRealFennShysa ( talk) 19:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
The event itself was actually called Final Battle 2009, I don't know why you decided to move it. Afro ( Not a Talk Page) - Afkatk 21:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
I disagree, especially with regard to Payne, who is constantly introduced to the ring as Alex "Sugarfoot" Payne, and I would consider it part of his ring name. In this case, I feel it is best to go with the source, and the source says "Andy “Right Leg” Ridge beat Alex “Sugarfoot” Payne", which is why I originally wrote it as that, and have changed it back. ♥ Nici♥ Vampire♥ Heart♥ 02:00, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Lauren debuted at last week's tapings. She is signed to the Smackdown brand. As her manager I can confirm this information (but you can source lupoentertainment.com; my website) as well as Lauren's MySpace at myspace.com/laurenmayhew which lists her appearance dates. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicklopiccolo ( talk • contribs)
I think the Big Gold Belt image should be used on the World_Heavyweight_Championship_(WWE) since the belt is the unbranded Big Gold Belt. Gregorynovella ( talk)
Welcome to the biggest WikiCup Wikipedia has yet seen! Round one will take place over two months, and finish on February 26. There is only one pool, and the top 64 will progress. The competition will be tough, as more than half of the current competitors will not make it to round 2. Details about scoring have been finalized and are explained at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Please make sure you're familiar with the scoring rules, because any submissions made that violate these rules will be removed. Like always, the judges can be reached through the WikiCup talk pages, on their talk page, or over IRC with any issues concerning anything tied to the Cup. We will keep in contact with you via weekly newsletters; if you do not want to receive them, please remove yourself from the list here. Conversely, if a non-WikiCup participant wishes to receive the newsletters, they may add themselves to that list. Well, enough talk- get writing! Your submission's page is located here. Details on how to submit your content is located here, so be sure to check that out! Once content has been recognized, it can be added to your submissions page, from which our bot will update the main score table. Remember that only articles worked on and nominated during the competition are eligible for points. Have fun, and good luck! Garden, iMatthew, J Milburn, and The ed17 19:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
I responded on my talk page, but basically we are waiting for it to be orphaned ( holding cell). You can help if you want. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Sorry.-- Curtis23 (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
They are fan-edited, and as such, are fan sites.
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hi, can you please explain why you think the links don't fall under WP:ELNO? You'll have a better chance of getting them in if you use the talk page instead of edit summaries. -- NeilN talk to me 21:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Per Talk:The_Legend_of_Zelda:_Twilight_Princess#Links_to_wikis do you want to re-insert the link? -- NeilN talk to me 00:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
No, there has been countless discussions over format. The table that is used was agreed upon at WP:PW over a year ago and has evolved since then as well. The format used now is the same one MPJ, Truco, and myself have all had lists pass to FL status with. Hell, List of WCW World Television Champions, the most recent FL, follows the same format as I used for List of ECW Champions and will use for the other WWE FLs. All the lists I have done follow that very format in list form just with a few minor changes down the line. There is only a few minor differences in format between mine, MJP's, or Truco's. I use extra sort templates to tie up loose ends in case. Not really needed and can be taken out if there is genuinely problem with them however, they add a extra bit of sorting which is good. I know you are only trying to do what is best for the articles at times. But the article had bad coding, incorrect data, one or two unreliable refs, etc. That list was promoted on June 30, 2007, over two years ago. A few things it failed were content forking, the quick reference bypass of overlink, unreliable sources, false content, poor layout, etc. Without an update, that thing in all likeliness would of failed a review. The FL criteria has went through two discussions that had it redone since then. I am not the only one who has told you this. The format used today, is the one agreed upon as FL worthy. Most of the problems that have resulted in edit wars with you is apart of the criteria. I take each nomination as a new discussion on format. Those are lengthy discussions between several. Some have new changes, some don't. Most of the times, the only problems are in the prose. The table is agreed as FL worthy by many it seems. My current nomination IWGP Junior Heavyweight Tag Team Championship hasn't even had any problems other than difficulty with sorting vacant reigns, which as yet to be mastered anyway. This is the new format. The matches we've had problems with are even in there, because the discussion at WT:PW. Not like this is all my view. This format has been discussed to death.-- Will C 18:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
I won't revert it again, it just seemed like you missed the numbers somehow. I don't even know where you got 34 million...thing is just, the 29 million source also has 14 million listed for North America in the same source. That isn't as verifiable, since we have a newspaper source, the NY Times, saying the Genesis sold 20 Million in the US alone, and it's dated just after the Genesis 3 came out, so those sales hadn't even come back yet to tally into that. I did count in the Nomad to hit 39.70 million, so I could understand going down to 38.70 million. All sources are cited.-- Pimp Uigi 22:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Hey man. Sign into Windows Live. Save Us. Y2J 8:58, August 9 2009 (UTC)
I'll take your word for it. If it's not really needed, then why should I keep doing it? I'm not gonna waste my time anymore on doing that. Save Us. Y2J 10:42, September 5 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, it's actually a good time for it to air. I get home from school around 3:25, so I'm home just in time for Raw and SmackDown. Raw airs on Wednesdays at 3:30PM. Save Us. Y2J 11:13, September 5 2009 (UTC)
Hey. I know I've been involved in the discussion, but it's frustrating just going around and around and around like has been happening. It's drama like this that made me step away from the project for a while. I'm not going to be commenting on it anymore until it's done. Since I'm involved, please let me know if this escalates to any sort of DRV process. HAZardousMATT toxic 02:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
At the request of several other editors, I've consolidated all the "colour" →. "Color" move requests together. In the process, I reverted all of your "support" comments, as the discussion is now all in one place. If you still want to join in, it's at Template talk:American politics/party colours/Democratic. Thanks, RossPatterson ( talk) 19:21, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Why is the last edit you did, removing all of the numbers under the headding "#", not revelant to the article? I can just as well say that the numbers in the box for the Royal Rumble match for all of the Royal Rumble pages are not revelant and delete those numbers. Gibsonj338 ( talk) 01:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Basically it's all coming through WWE's two Twitter accounts WWE and WWEUniverse. I would have cited them but it looks like I can't use them as sources per WP:TWITTER so I'm hopefully waiting for a WWE.com source later today. -- Θaks ter 18:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
i need a second opinion. i read a story on lordsofpain.net that maay have confirmed 1 member of the wwe hall of fame class of 2010: stu hart. here is the link: http://www.lordsofpain.net/news/wwe/5939.html Can we put that into the article, or wait and see how it plays out?--JereMerr 14:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)--JereMerr 14:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)--JereMerr 14:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremerr ( talk • contribs)
Do you fancy starting an RFC for this? GaryColemanFan is clearly not going to drop the stick and he shows no sign of budging, I am also disinclined to budge since as far as I can tell this made-up attendance figure has never been covered by any reliable source so cannot be allowed any kind of parity with the official figures, and there seems to be some kind of forum meme pushing Metzler's wild guess as evidence of WWF falsifying the attendance figures. Guy ( Help!) 20:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
You should probably just jump the gun and nominate the page for afd now. You'll most likely have to do it eventually, and at least that way any future recreations can easily be speedily deleted. -- Scorpion 0422 21:14, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for making your points at Talk:Brüno. I was wondering, do you feel the same way about WΔZ? Or should it be at "wΔz"? I came across it not long ago and was trying to decide what could be done with it. Seems like a strange and unreachable name. Erik ( talk) 19:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
See, I didn't ask you to use your sole opinion as consensus. I asked you to explain where the consensus exists that the ESRB ratings should be counted in light of the several discussions that resulted in a consensus otherwise. Give me one good reason why we're allowed to speculate as to what a rating means from the ESRB. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 04:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your note about the "publisher" and "work" Cite parameters. I have a long list of articles linking to The Sun which I'm processing, and many of them use various Cite templates. While the documentation for {{ Cite news}} makes it clear that The Sun should not be listed as the "publisher", for other Cite templates it's not so obvious. It appears to me that The Sun should, indeed, be the "publisher" for items such as {{ Cite web}} and {{ Cite video}}. Do you agree, or do you have another interpretation? Thanks, MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 09:06, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, can you revisit this FLC when you get the chance? Thanks, Dabomb87 ( talk) 16:27, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
I hope I am doing this write. I'd like to talk to you about the WWE Home Video page. What is your e-mail address? User_talk:Whoiswith32
Tyw7 has eaten your {{
cookie}}! The cookie made them
happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{
cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{ subst:munch}}!
-- Tyw7 ( Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 02:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Having amended a page with the latest WON awards bit without noticing an edit by you beforehand, would you rather wait for that info to be released on their site publicly without premiums? For the convenience of citing, in any case. Papacha ( talk) 04:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello TJ Spyke,
as an helpful hand who fixed one of my incomplete anti-vandalism recovery, I listed you in my success and failure log.
Heracles31 ( talk) 16:01, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your message, but I've been contributing to Wikipedia for a few years. There are no clear-cut conventions on citations in infoboxes. The only passage that mentions guidelines that could apply are to be found in the Manual of Style for lead sections which says "The verifiability policy advises that material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, and quotations, should be cited." As creator credits are usually very easy to verify and thus unlikely to be challenged, I think that they do not need to be cited, unless they are not mentioned in the most obvious sources (e.g., the game's ending staff credits or the manual). Especially since citing a source for every single person mentioned in an infobox is more cumbersome than helpful. If you think this topic needs further discussion, bring it to attention at the talk page for the Manual of Style. In any case, please don't revert information so easily verifiable as legit but instead add a citation needed template. Just removing it causes more work to Wikipedia contributors than need be. Thank you. Prime Blue ( talk) 00:26, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
When you replied to me on the Womens Championship reign lengths you sounded quite disrescpectful and rude. I'm sure your not usauly like this just you gave of quite an rude image which i hope was a one off!. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.107.55.214 ( talk) 15:48, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Good day, my good man. I am well aware of what you said on Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/Huggle, Sweden is not true. The Wiki doesn't even HAVE guidlines for populated places. Regards, Belugaboy535136 contribs 23:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. We've had some shakeups regarding late entries, flag changes and early dropouts, but the competition is now established- there will be no more flag changes or new competitors. Congratulations to
Sasata (
submissions), our current leader, who, at the time of writing, has more listed points than
Hunter Kahn (
submissions) and
TonyTheTiger (
submissions) (second and third place respectively) combined. A special well done also goes to
Fetchcomms (
submissions)- his artcle
Jewel Box (St. Louis, Missouri) was the first content to score points in the competition.
Around half of competitors are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. 64 of the 149 current competitors will advance to round 2- if you currently have no points, do not worry, as over half of the current top 64 have under 50 points. Everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places in round 2! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! J Milburn, Garden, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot ( talk) at 00:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
At the time that I reverted the IP I didn't know for sure but after i checked I still left it reverted for the fact that it's notable.-- Steam Iron 10:00, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I created it as a redirect. Jeff Silvers chose to create the article. It would be simpler if it were redirected again.-- Unquestionable Truth-- 05:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
How is it vandalism when it was actually correct... —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRatedRKOLegendKiller ( talk • contribs) 15:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Source: http://www.wrestleview.com/news2009/1265300865.php?style=dark 201.40.157.248 ( talk) 20:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hi, I used to go around making changes that delinked redirects because I thought it was tider. Then an administrator dropped by and shared WP:NOTBROKEN with me. I hadn't been aware of it before, but seeing as it's an editing guideline I've tried to avoid doing it very much since then unless the redirect points to an incorrect place (and then I usually fix the redirect, actually...). Anyway it's not policy and is just a guideline, however you might want to reconsider making these kinds of edits in the future for the reasons given at WP:NOTBROKEN. Your call. Good luck, - Thibbs ( talk) 23:28, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
I did inform you if you bothered to look, User talk:TJ Spyke#ANI Notice. Afro Talkie Talk - Afkatk 00:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
what did Puder break then, he broke a rule, he did a real submission on Angle, when he should not have? Gregorynovella ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:51, 21 December 2009 (UTC).
if the match was real, why did the ref do a count despite the fact that Puder's shoulders bridged up, if the match was real, then Angle should have not won, yet, because he didn't pin Puder... Gregorynovella ( talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC).
I've opened up a report on StevenMario's current problematic behavior - it's at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#StevenMario if you want to weigh in... TheRealFennShysa ( talk) 19:27, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
The event itself was actually called Final Battle 2009, I don't know why you decided to move it. Afro ( Not a Talk Page) - Afkatk 21:39, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
I disagree, especially with regard to Payne, who is constantly introduced to the ring as Alex "Sugarfoot" Payne, and I would consider it part of his ring name. In this case, I feel it is best to go with the source, and the source says "Andy “Right Leg” Ridge beat Alex “Sugarfoot” Payne", which is why I originally wrote it as that, and have changed it back. ♥ Nici♥ Vampire♥ Heart♥ 02:00, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Lauren debuted at last week's tapings. She is signed to the Smackdown brand. As her manager I can confirm this information (but you can source lupoentertainment.com; my website) as well as Lauren's MySpace at myspace.com/laurenmayhew which lists her appearance dates. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicklopiccolo ( talk • contribs)
I think the Big Gold Belt image should be used on the World_Heavyweight_Championship_(WWE) since the belt is the unbranded Big Gold Belt. Gregorynovella ( talk)
Welcome to the biggest WikiCup Wikipedia has yet seen! Round one will take place over two months, and finish on February 26. There is only one pool, and the top 64 will progress. The competition will be tough, as more than half of the current competitors will not make it to round 2. Details about scoring have been finalized and are explained at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Please make sure you're familiar with the scoring rules, because any submissions made that violate these rules will be removed. Like always, the judges can be reached through the WikiCup talk pages, on their talk page, or over IRC with any issues concerning anything tied to the Cup. We will keep in contact with you via weekly newsletters; if you do not want to receive them, please remove yourself from the list here. Conversely, if a non-WikiCup participant wishes to receive the newsletters, they may add themselves to that list. Well, enough talk- get writing! Your submission's page is located here. Details on how to submit your content is located here, so be sure to check that out! Once content has been recognized, it can be added to your submissions page, from which our bot will update the main score table. Remember that only articles worked on and nominated during the competition are eligible for points. Have fun, and good luck! Garden, iMatthew, J Milburn, and The ed17 19:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
I responded on my talk page, but basically we are waiting for it to be orphaned ( holding cell). You can help if you want. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:33, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Sorry.-- Curtis23 (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
They are fan-edited, and as such, are fan sites.
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hi, can you please explain why you think the links don't fall under WP:ELNO? You'll have a better chance of getting them in if you use the talk page instead of edit summaries. -- NeilN talk to me 21:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Per Talk:The_Legend_of_Zelda:_Twilight_Princess#Links_to_wikis do you want to re-insert the link? -- NeilN talk to me 00:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
No, there has been countless discussions over format. The table that is used was agreed upon at WP:PW over a year ago and has evolved since then as well. The format used now is the same one MPJ, Truco, and myself have all had lists pass to FL status with. Hell, List of WCW World Television Champions, the most recent FL, follows the same format as I used for List of ECW Champions and will use for the other WWE FLs. All the lists I have done follow that very format in list form just with a few minor changes down the line. There is only a few minor differences in format between mine, MJP's, or Truco's. I use extra sort templates to tie up loose ends in case. Not really needed and can be taken out if there is genuinely problem with them however, they add a extra bit of sorting which is good. I know you are only trying to do what is best for the articles at times. But the article had bad coding, incorrect data, one or two unreliable refs, etc. That list was promoted on June 30, 2007, over two years ago. A few things it failed were content forking, the quick reference bypass of overlink, unreliable sources, false content, poor layout, etc. Without an update, that thing in all likeliness would of failed a review. The FL criteria has went through two discussions that had it redone since then. I am not the only one who has told you this. The format used today, is the one agreed upon as FL worthy. Most of the problems that have resulted in edit wars with you is apart of the criteria. I take each nomination as a new discussion on format. Those are lengthy discussions between several. Some have new changes, some don't. Most of the times, the only problems are in the prose. The table is agreed as FL worthy by many it seems. My current nomination IWGP Junior Heavyweight Tag Team Championship hasn't even had any problems other than difficulty with sorting vacant reigns, which as yet to be mastered anyway. This is the new format. The matches we've had problems with are even in there, because the discussion at WT:PW. Not like this is all my view. This format has been discussed to death.-- Will C 18:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
I won't revert it again, it just seemed like you missed the numbers somehow. I don't even know where you got 34 million...thing is just, the 29 million source also has 14 million listed for North America in the same source. That isn't as verifiable, since we have a newspaper source, the NY Times, saying the Genesis sold 20 Million in the US alone, and it's dated just after the Genesis 3 came out, so those sales hadn't even come back yet to tally into that. I did count in the Nomad to hit 39.70 million, so I could understand going down to 38.70 million. All sources are cited.-- Pimp Uigi 22:22, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Hey man. Sign into Windows Live. Save Us. Y2J 8:58, August 9 2009 (UTC)
I'll take your word for it. If it's not really needed, then why should I keep doing it? I'm not gonna waste my time anymore on doing that. Save Us. Y2J 10:42, September 5 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, it's actually a good time for it to air. I get home from school around 3:25, so I'm home just in time for Raw and SmackDown. Raw airs on Wednesdays at 3:30PM. Save Us. Y2J 11:13, September 5 2009 (UTC)
Hey. I know I've been involved in the discussion, but it's frustrating just going around and around and around like has been happening. It's drama like this that made me step away from the project for a while. I'm not going to be commenting on it anymore until it's done. Since I'm involved, please let me know if this escalates to any sort of DRV process. HAZardousMATT toxic 02:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
At the request of several other editors, I've consolidated all the "colour" →. "Color" move requests together. In the process, I reverted all of your "support" comments, as the discussion is now all in one place. If you still want to join in, it's at Template talk:American politics/party colours/Democratic. Thanks, RossPatterson ( talk) 19:21, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Why is the last edit you did, removing all of the numbers under the headding "#", not revelant to the article? I can just as well say that the numbers in the box for the Royal Rumble match for all of the Royal Rumble pages are not revelant and delete those numbers. Gibsonj338 ( talk) 01:19, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Basically it's all coming through WWE's two Twitter accounts WWE and WWEUniverse. I would have cited them but it looks like I can't use them as sources per WP:TWITTER so I'm hopefully waiting for a WWE.com source later today. -- Θaks ter 18:52, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
i need a second opinion. i read a story on lordsofpain.net that maay have confirmed 1 member of the wwe hall of fame class of 2010: stu hart. here is the link: http://www.lordsofpain.net/news/wwe/5939.html Can we put that into the article, or wait and see how it plays out?--JereMerr 14:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)--JereMerr 14:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC)--JereMerr 14:37, 17 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremerr ( talk • contribs)
Do you fancy starting an RFC for this? GaryColemanFan is clearly not going to drop the stick and he shows no sign of budging, I am also disinclined to budge since as far as I can tell this made-up attendance figure has never been covered by any reliable source so cannot be allowed any kind of parity with the official figures, and there seems to be some kind of forum meme pushing Metzler's wild guess as evidence of WWF falsifying the attendance figures. Guy ( Help!) 20:50, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
You should probably just jump the gun and nominate the page for afd now. You'll most likely have to do it eventually, and at least that way any future recreations can easily be speedily deleted. -- Scorpion 0422 21:14, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for making your points at Talk:Brüno. I was wondering, do you feel the same way about WΔZ? Or should it be at "wΔz"? I came across it not long ago and was trying to decide what could be done with it. Seems like a strange and unreachable name. Erik ( talk) 19:37, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
See, I didn't ask you to use your sole opinion as consensus. I asked you to explain where the consensus exists that the ESRB ratings should be counted in light of the several discussions that resulted in a consensus otherwise. Give me one good reason why we're allowed to speculate as to what a rating means from the ESRB. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 04:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for your note about the "publisher" and "work" Cite parameters. I have a long list of articles linking to The Sun which I'm processing, and many of them use various Cite templates. While the documentation for {{ Cite news}} makes it clear that The Sun should not be listed as the "publisher", for other Cite templates it's not so obvious. It appears to me that The Sun should, indeed, be the "publisher" for items such as {{ Cite web}} and {{ Cite video}}. Do you agree, or do you have another interpretation? Thanks, MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 09:06, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Hi, can you revisit this FLC when you get the chance? Thanks, Dabomb87 ( talk) 16:27, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
I hope I am doing this write. I'd like to talk to you about the WWE Home Video page. What is your e-mail address? User_talk:Whoiswith32
Tyw7 has eaten your {{
cookie}}! The cookie made them
happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{
cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{ subst:munch}}!
-- Tyw7 ( Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 02:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Having amended a page with the latest WON awards bit without noticing an edit by you beforehand, would you rather wait for that info to be released on their site publicly without premiums? For the convenience of citing, in any case. Papacha ( talk) 04:12, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello TJ Spyke,
as an helpful hand who fixed one of my incomplete anti-vandalism recovery, I listed you in my success and failure log.
Heracles31 ( talk) 16:01, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your message, but I've been contributing to Wikipedia for a few years. There are no clear-cut conventions on citations in infoboxes. The only passage that mentions guidelines that could apply are to be found in the Manual of Style for lead sections which says "The verifiability policy advises that material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, and quotations, should be cited." As creator credits are usually very easy to verify and thus unlikely to be challenged, I think that they do not need to be cited, unless they are not mentioned in the most obvious sources (e.g., the game's ending staff credits or the manual). Especially since citing a source for every single person mentioned in an infobox is more cumbersome than helpful. If you think this topic needs further discussion, bring it to attention at the talk page for the Manual of Style. In any case, please don't revert information so easily verifiable as legit but instead add a citation needed template. Just removing it causes more work to Wikipedia contributors than need be. Thank you. Prime Blue ( talk) 00:26, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
When you replied to me on the Womens Championship reign lengths you sounded quite disrescpectful and rude. I'm sure your not usauly like this just you gave of quite an rude image which i hope was a one off!. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.107.55.214 ( talk) 15:48, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Good day, my good man. I am well aware of what you said on Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/Huggle, Sweden is not true. The Wiki doesn't even HAVE guidlines for populated places. Regards, Belugaboy535136 contribs 23:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. We've had some shakeups regarding late entries, flag changes and early dropouts, but the competition is now established- there will be no more flag changes or new competitors. Congratulations to
Sasata (
submissions), our current leader, who, at the time of writing, has more listed points than
Hunter Kahn (
submissions) and
TonyTheTiger (
submissions) (second and third place respectively) combined. A special well done also goes to
Fetchcomms (
submissions)- his artcle
Jewel Box (St. Louis, Missouri) was the first content to score points in the competition.
Around half of competitors are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. 64 of the 149 current competitors will advance to round 2- if you currently have no points, do not worry, as over half of the current top 64 have under 50 points. Everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places in round 2! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! J Milburn, Garden, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot ( talk) at 00:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
At the time that I reverted the IP I didn't know for sure but after i checked I still left it reverted for the fact that it's notable.-- Steam Iron 10:00, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I created it as a redirect. Jeff Silvers chose to create the article. It would be simpler if it were redirected again.-- Unquestionable Truth-- 05:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
How is it vandalism when it was actually correct... —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheRatedRKOLegendKiller ( talk • contribs) 15:44, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Source: http://www.wrestleview.com/news2009/1265300865.php?style=dark 201.40.157.248 ( talk) 20:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)