Hi Daybot. Since I came across you helping out at WP:AIV, it feels bad to have to do this, but your username may be inappropriate under our username policy. We don't usually allow names that could make people think that the user is a bot account, e.g. names with "Bot", "Robot", "Daemon" etc. Do you think you could consider changing your username? I've raised the issue on Requests for comment/User names. Thanks. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 19:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
If you remove links from a "dictionary of religious leaders" you must provide reasons on the talk. Arbusto 23:53, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
The guy must have had something against ducks, huh? -- RoySmith (talk) 01:55, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
I didn't delete it. I merely moved it to the "hemophilia" page. Random the Scrambled 15:53, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia:Community Justice. Please take part in our meeting. Computerjoe 's talk 18:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for asking for my input. I will reply ASAP. In the meantime, I need help regarding Nescio who has a punative RFC regarding Rationales to impeach George W. Bush, which I feel is unwarranted. Please go there right away and comment at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Merecat. Thanks. Merecat 18:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
As Wikipedia:Community Justice has over 30 members, we are beginning the elections process.
If you are interested in becoming the chairman, the chief executive or councillor please add yourself, and a statement, to Wikipedia:Community Justice/Elections.
Voting shall begin on April 24th, and end on May 1st. To see if you are eligible for a vote, please see Wikipedia:Community Justice/Elections.
Thank you,
Computerjoe 's talk 20:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Bro you just cannot revert a page you first got to discuss it on the talk page. It is not cool to just make some changes without first discussing it on the talk page. So please next time to revert or edit any page make sure to discuss the stuff on talk page first.
And regarding this "Hi, thanks for your edit to Sakina bint Hussain. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia and as such cannot cite religious opinion as fact, Christian or otherwise. For this reason, I have reverted your edit to Sakina bint Hussain - for the part "Allah blessed him with..." Feel free to put the edit back with a neutral stance." If you find out some tings that are not making the article neutral then just change that section or that sentence, and make it neutral. Don't revert the article, change the article and make it neutral. I will however try my best to check to make sure that the article neutral. I am shi’a and I always say SAW and AS after the names of prophet Muhammad and family members names. I am so used to it that when I am writing articles I type that in too. Thank You Salman
Followup: I made an entry in the discussion page and your edit has been reverted by another user. T. J. Day 18:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for volunteering to perform as backup election staff! There has been recent controversy as to whether you will be allowed to vote. As active election staff, I have made a ruling here as to this issue. Please read it before voting. If you have any questions, please contact me via my talk page. Thanks, zappa.jak e ( talk) 02:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you, missed that! :p, feel free to let me know if there is anything else that needs fixing Masssiveego 04:32, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry TJ, but I wasn't really focusing on spelling errors, it seemed like a large battle between two users was going on, and I was attempting to return the article moon for sale to a semblance of order. However, moments later another user did the same thing, and I've sinced un-reverted my own topic.
Sorry for the mistakes to have offended you, but I did not write any of them.
Sincerely, Logical2u 21:37, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
From us admins and non-admins, welcome! Will ( E@) T 20:53, 20 April 2006 (UTC) |
and thank you for your willingness, re: editing the spelling errors on my user page. Terryeo 01:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
According to the administrator noticeboard, there is officially nothing wrong with editing out comments from other users from your personal talk page. Refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Nlu for details. Please stop reverting others talk page. Thank you-- Freestyle.king The discussion has recently been archived. Well my point was User:Nlu frequently delete comments and/or criticism from other users regarding his own conducts in order to cover up his lack up civility toward other users. I brought his conduct to the attention of the noticeboard and they said there is officially nothing I can do about it.-- Freestyle.king
Hi TJDay,
thanks for your kind words. Normally in essays type-articles it is customary to give references at the end in the form of listing or large annotated bibliography as is done in the britannica encyclopedia . However, with many vested interests and people intent on making business, now editing the wikipedia, it has become a necessity to cite references in the manner of a scientific article in a scientific journal. In this manner a new unique pattern is slowly but steadily emerging in the wikipedia inorder to counter pov and edit wars. This might emerge as a stark feature of wikipedia articles in the long run. thanks once again Robin klein 04:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Not good at writing encyclopedically, so it's probably a good thing you cleaned up the mess I made on the aperture page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebbi ( talk • contribs) 14:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi Daybot. Since I came across you helping out at WP:AIV, it feels bad to have to do this, but your username may be inappropriate under our username policy. We don't usually allow names that could make people think that the user is a bot account, e.g. names with "Bot", "Robot", "Daemon" etc. Do you think you could consider changing your username? I've raised the issue on Requests for comment/User names. Thanks. -- Sam Blanning (talk) 19:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
If you remove links from a "dictionary of religious leaders" you must provide reasons on the talk. Arbusto 23:53, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
The guy must have had something against ducks, huh? -- RoySmith (talk) 01:55, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
I didn't delete it. I merely moved it to the "hemophilia" page. Random the Scrambled 15:53, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia:Community Justice. Please take part in our meeting. Computerjoe 's talk 18:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for asking for my input. I will reply ASAP. In the meantime, I need help regarding Nescio who has a punative RFC regarding Rationales to impeach George W. Bush, which I feel is unwarranted. Please go there right away and comment at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Merecat. Thanks. Merecat 18:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
As Wikipedia:Community Justice has over 30 members, we are beginning the elections process.
If you are interested in becoming the chairman, the chief executive or councillor please add yourself, and a statement, to Wikipedia:Community Justice/Elections.
Voting shall begin on April 24th, and end on May 1st. To see if you are eligible for a vote, please see Wikipedia:Community Justice/Elections.
Thank you,
Computerjoe 's talk 20:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Bro you just cannot revert a page you first got to discuss it on the talk page. It is not cool to just make some changes without first discussing it on the talk page. So please next time to revert or edit any page make sure to discuss the stuff on talk page first.
And regarding this "Hi, thanks for your edit to Sakina bint Hussain. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia and as such cannot cite religious opinion as fact, Christian or otherwise. For this reason, I have reverted your edit to Sakina bint Hussain - for the part "Allah blessed him with..." Feel free to put the edit back with a neutral stance." If you find out some tings that are not making the article neutral then just change that section or that sentence, and make it neutral. Don't revert the article, change the article and make it neutral. I will however try my best to check to make sure that the article neutral. I am shi’a and I always say SAW and AS after the names of prophet Muhammad and family members names. I am so used to it that when I am writing articles I type that in too. Thank You Salman
Followup: I made an entry in the discussion page and your edit has been reverted by another user. T. J. Day 18:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for volunteering to perform as backup election staff! There has been recent controversy as to whether you will be allowed to vote. As active election staff, I have made a ruling here as to this issue. Please read it before voting. If you have any questions, please contact me via my talk page. Thanks, zappa.jak e ( talk) 02:59, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Thank you, missed that! :p, feel free to let me know if there is anything else that needs fixing Masssiveego 04:32, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry TJ, but I wasn't really focusing on spelling errors, it seemed like a large battle between two users was going on, and I was attempting to return the article moon for sale to a semblance of order. However, moments later another user did the same thing, and I've sinced un-reverted my own topic.
Sorry for the mistakes to have offended you, but I did not write any of them.
Sincerely, Logical2u 21:37, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
From us admins and non-admins, welcome! Will ( E@) T 20:53, 20 April 2006 (UTC) |
and thank you for your willingness, re: editing the spelling errors on my user page. Terryeo 01:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
According to the administrator noticeboard, there is officially nothing wrong with editing out comments from other users from your personal talk page. Refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Nlu for details. Please stop reverting others talk page. Thank you-- Freestyle.king The discussion has recently been archived. Well my point was User:Nlu frequently delete comments and/or criticism from other users regarding his own conducts in order to cover up his lack up civility toward other users. I brought his conduct to the attention of the noticeboard and they said there is officially nothing I can do about it.-- Freestyle.king
Hi TJDay,
thanks for your kind words. Normally in essays type-articles it is customary to give references at the end in the form of listing or large annotated bibliography as is done in the britannica encyclopedia . However, with many vested interests and people intent on making business, now editing the wikipedia, it has become a necessity to cite references in the manner of a scientific article in a scientific journal. In this manner a new unique pattern is slowly but steadily emerging in the wikipedia inorder to counter pov and edit wars. This might emerge as a stark feature of wikipedia articles in the long run. thanks once again Robin klein 04:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Not good at writing encyclopedically, so it's probably a good thing you cleaned up the mess I made on the aperture page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebbi ( talk • contribs) 14:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)