Hi, I was curious what topics of mathematics and physics are you most interested in? Rschwieb ( talk) 15:23, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- For mathematics there is no focus for me, only things that I need and stumble over. In physics I would say I am focused on Nonlinear dynamical systems (at the moment). At the moment I am writing the german version of
numerical continuation. But that will take some time. The last article I wrote was about
minimal coupling ->
de:minimale Kopplung. In the
lebesgue integration-article I am only involved because I drew the figure b) and was wondering why the en:WP changed the picture.--
Svebert (
talk)
09:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- It sounds like there is a school of thought (possibly certain European schools) that thinks of it as picture a), but I agree with you that the slab picture does not describe the characteristic definition. I like the new version of b) now: it looks like a good compromise.
- I'm trained in ring and module theory, and I'm interested in the applications of the stuff to mechanics/electromagnetics/relativity. Sounds like our interests are not very close, but that's fine. We still might have an excuse to work together! Rschwieb ( talk) 13:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 14:34, Tuesday, July 2, 2024 ( UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Hi, I was curious what topics of mathematics and physics are you most interested in? Rschwieb ( talk) 15:23, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- For mathematics there is no focus for me, only things that I need and stumble over. In physics I would say I am focused on Nonlinear dynamical systems (at the moment). At the moment I am writing the german version of
numerical continuation. But that will take some time. The last article I wrote was about
minimal coupling ->
de:minimale Kopplung. In the
lebesgue integration-article I am only involved because I drew the figure b) and was wondering why the en:WP changed the picture.--
Svebert (
talk)
09:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- It sounds like there is a school of thought (possibly certain European schools) that thinks of it as picture a), but I agree with you that the slab picture does not describe the characteristic definition. I like the new version of b) now: it looks like a good compromise.
- I'm trained in ring and module theory, and I'm interested in the applications of the stuff to mechanics/electromagnetics/relativity. Sounds like our interests are not very close, but that's fine. We still might have an excuse to work together! Rschwieb ( talk) 13:21, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 14:34, Tuesday, July 2, 2024 ( UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |