We have 3 different official sonic sites, and each states different bits of info. We can't play favoritism and selectively note only one source and use that over another. Also I reverted your edit because of grammar, not the actual information.-- Neofcon ( talk) 01:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
If you don't like my grammar then rewrite the sentence as it should be. User:Super Knuckles 01:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
It's not about liking it. It's about presentation.-- Neofcon ( talk) 01:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok then, I was just trying to improve the article with this "new" info. User:Super Knuckles 01:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Though I will admit, I did revert the whole thing, sorry.-- Neofcon ( talk) 01:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, Super Knuckles. And I did realize that you were looking to restore, moderate, and even compromise on the article. Afterwards, I realize I should have said something other than "guys"! Publik ( talk) 16:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry but the Re division did exist as such, because it was made mainly from warriors that came from Heliopolis whose patron god was Re. Egyptzo ( talk) 17:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
No, it was called P're, that is the same as Re, even if the meaning is the same the original meaning is P're. User:Super Knuckles 18:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
There seem to be no documents supporting your claim. Most modern scolars call it Re, although it is indeed sometimes but rarely called P're. Even the article about Ramesses II calls it Re! Egyptzo ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Thats because most people don't know that P're also means Re, but the article as redirect link from P're to Re, so I don't see what your problem is. In fact the Seth division should also be called Sutekh. User:Super Knuckles 19:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
So why not write something that is more commonly used. So are you going to call, for example Shoshenk - Ššnk because it is like that written in hyroglyphs or Ramesses- Ramss because of the same reason. Egyptzo ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, I will try to do my best. Cheers! Egyptzo ( talk) 07:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Super Knuckles. I knew that it was Egyptzo, rather than yourself, who had added the content (again). Sorry if the sequence of edits made it appear that I was addressing anything you had done. I didn't revert it (again) for the same reason as yourself - it would just get added back in and start an edit war. Thanks for trying to take some steps to change it into original wording. I'm not sure it should be in there at all, since it is speculation on the part of the original author, but it has been "published", so is therefore legitimate by ikipedia standards, as much as I may think it goes beyond the original sources. Cheers. Publik ( talk) 15:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Battle of Kadesh. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
Woody (
talk)
13:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll keep an eye out for it. Publik ( talk) 00:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
I'll definitely be voting for your version. -- Taiwan boi ( talk) 03:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
What tags did I take away? Yes, the battle section is far too short, but I didn't see any way to get rid of stuff that was copyright without going back to a version that had none of it. We can quickly put back some stuff, eg the table of Hittite allies, and anything that had a reference to something other than historynet. The Healy book looked interesting, I was searching it earlier today. But we need to show where different sources disagree, does he do that? Doug Weller ( talk) 17:26, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
The book you got is mentioned here, which has a ton of resources most hard to get: http://history.memphis.edu/pbrand/handout_Ramesside_Military.pdf Why did you mention Hyksos and Fifteenth Dynasty? Doug Weller ( talk) 18:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
File:Hereimage.png | ||
Dear Super Knuckles, we think you would make a great member of The Sega Project!!!. Fairfieldfencer FFF 11:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks a lot, I will gladly join you. Super Knuckles ( talk) 11:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Sega/Newsletter/Issue1
Wikipedia:WikiProject Sega/Newsletter/Issue2
Wikipedia:WikiProject Sega/Newsletter/Issue3
Wikipedia:WikiProject Sega/Newsletter/Issue4
The Sega Task Force Newsletter | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The information doesn't belong in the characteristics section of the Knuckles the Echidna page because it only appears once. Knuckles in Sonic 2 and Sonic 3 is only achieved thru lock on with Sonic & Knuckles so really only Sonic & Knuckles has the transformation (Sonic 3 and Sonic & Knuckles were even supposed to be one game). There is no argument being made that it didn't exist or whatever but Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed nor is it a crystal ball trying to predict the future. One offhand remark in a second game doesn't constitute another occurrence or guarantee that it will recur. However elements that aren't recurring can go into the article for the game in which they are important (a description of Super/Hyper Knuckles, Hyper Sonic and Super Tails could go into Sonic & Knuckles, Darkspine in Sonic and the Secret Rings, Werehog in Sonic Unleashed, King Arthur in Sonic and the Black Knight, etc). CIGraphix ( talk) 17:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Dear WikiProject Video games member,
You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{ User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.
The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.
All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
I know Cigraphix just doesn't understand that there is a Super and Hyper Knuckles and etc,but just ask SEGA on their facebook account,they will give you an answer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.52.26 ( talk) 21:57, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
What did you ask on SEGA's facebook? Knuckles super form is called Super Knuckles, he had a hyper fomr, but we don't know if it still canon. Feel free to prove us otherwie. Super Knuckles ( talk) 23:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Nothing,I'm telling you to.
I'm sorry I didn't notice your posting on my Talk page earlier than this, I haven't been on Wikipedia that much recently. CIGraphix ( talk) 04:36, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of
edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on
Knuckles the Echidna. Users are expected to
collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yunshui 雲 水 14:55, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
I've openened a talkpage thread to discuss the issue here. Please get consensus before repeating your edits. Yunshui 雲 水 15:01, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Sega Task Force Roll Call! | |
Member of the Sega Task Force of WikiProject Video games, are you active and editing Sega articles? If so, please answer the roll call at WT:SEGA! Make sure to check out the Sega Task Force's pages and utilize its pages, including the community talk page, review department, and free image gallery, all of which can help you with your article writing! Happy editing! | ||
Roll call initiated by Red Phoenix build the future... remember the past... on 03:14, 3 November 2013 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Super Knuckles. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Super Knuckles. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Super Knuckles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
We have 3 different official sonic sites, and each states different bits of info. We can't play favoritism and selectively note only one source and use that over another. Also I reverted your edit because of grammar, not the actual information.-- Neofcon ( talk) 01:05, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
If you don't like my grammar then rewrite the sentence as it should be. User:Super Knuckles 01:09, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
It's not about liking it. It's about presentation.-- Neofcon ( talk) 01:10, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Ok then, I was just trying to improve the article with this "new" info. User:Super Knuckles 01:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Though I will admit, I did revert the whole thing, sorry.-- Neofcon ( talk) 01:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, Super Knuckles. And I did realize that you were looking to restore, moderate, and even compromise on the article. Afterwards, I realize I should have said something other than "guys"! Publik ( talk) 16:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry but the Re division did exist as such, because it was made mainly from warriors that came from Heliopolis whose patron god was Re. Egyptzo ( talk) 17:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
No, it was called P're, that is the same as Re, even if the meaning is the same the original meaning is P're. User:Super Knuckles 18:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
There seem to be no documents supporting your claim. Most modern scolars call it Re, although it is indeed sometimes but rarely called P're. Even the article about Ramesses II calls it Re! Egyptzo ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Thats because most people don't know that P're also means Re, but the article as redirect link from P're to Re, so I don't see what your problem is. In fact the Seth division should also be called Sutekh. User:Super Knuckles 19:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
So why not write something that is more commonly used. So are you going to call, for example Shoshenk - Ššnk because it is like that written in hyroglyphs or Ramesses- Ramss because of the same reason. Egyptzo ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 19:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, I will try to do my best. Cheers! Egyptzo ( talk) 07:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, Super Knuckles. I knew that it was Egyptzo, rather than yourself, who had added the content (again). Sorry if the sequence of edits made it appear that I was addressing anything you had done. I didn't revert it (again) for the same reason as yourself - it would just get added back in and start an edit war. Thanks for trying to take some steps to change it into original wording. I'm not sure it should be in there at all, since it is speculation on the part of the original author, but it has been "published", so is therefore legitimate by ikipedia standards, as much as I may think it goes beyond the original sources. Cheers. Publik ( talk) 15:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Battle of Kadesh. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
Woody (
talk)
13:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I'll keep an eye out for it. Publik ( talk) 00:54, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
I'll definitely be voting for your version. -- Taiwan boi ( talk) 03:52, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
What tags did I take away? Yes, the battle section is far too short, but I didn't see any way to get rid of stuff that was copyright without going back to a version that had none of it. We can quickly put back some stuff, eg the table of Hittite allies, and anything that had a reference to something other than historynet. The Healy book looked interesting, I was searching it earlier today. But we need to show where different sources disagree, does he do that? Doug Weller ( talk) 17:26, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
The book you got is mentioned here, which has a ton of resources most hard to get: http://history.memphis.edu/pbrand/handout_Ramesside_Military.pdf Why did you mention Hyksos and Fifteenth Dynasty? Doug Weller ( talk) 18:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
File:Hereimage.png | ||
Dear Super Knuckles, we think you would make a great member of The Sega Project!!!. Fairfieldfencer FFF 11:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks a lot, I will gladly join you. Super Knuckles ( talk) 11:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Sega/Newsletter/Issue1
Wikipedia:WikiProject Sega/Newsletter/Issue2
Wikipedia:WikiProject Sega/Newsletter/Issue3
Wikipedia:WikiProject Sega/Newsletter/Issue4
The Sega Task Force Newsletter | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
The information doesn't belong in the characteristics section of the Knuckles the Echidna page because it only appears once. Knuckles in Sonic 2 and Sonic 3 is only achieved thru lock on with Sonic & Knuckles so really only Sonic & Knuckles has the transformation (Sonic 3 and Sonic & Knuckles were even supposed to be one game). There is no argument being made that it didn't exist or whatever but Wikipedia is not a directory of everything that exists or has existed nor is it a crystal ball trying to predict the future. One offhand remark in a second game doesn't constitute another occurrence or guarantee that it will recur. However elements that aren't recurring can go into the article for the game in which they are important (a description of Super/Hyper Knuckles, Hyper Sonic and Super Tails could go into Sonic & Knuckles, Darkspine in Sonic and the Secret Rings, Werehog in Sonic Unleashed, King Arthur in Sonic and the Black Knight, etc). CIGraphix ( talk) 17:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Dear WikiProject Video games member,
You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{ User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in recent months.
The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.
All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
I know Cigraphix just doesn't understand that there is a Super and Hyper Knuckles and etc,but just ask SEGA on their facebook account,they will give you an answer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.52.26 ( talk) 21:57, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
What did you ask on SEGA's facebook? Knuckles super form is called Super Knuckles, he had a hyper fomr, but we don't know if it still canon. Feel free to prove us otherwie. Super Knuckles ( talk) 23:55, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
Nothing,I'm telling you to.
I'm sorry I didn't notice your posting on my Talk page earlier than this, I haven't been on Wikipedia that much recently. CIGraphix ( talk) 04:36, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of
edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on
Knuckles the Echidna. Users are expected to
collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing
disruptively.
Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yunshui 雲 水 14:55, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
I've openened a talkpage thread to discuss the issue here. Please get consensus before repeating your edits. Yunshui 雲 水 15:01, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Sega Task Force Roll Call! | |
Member of the Sega Task Force of WikiProject Video games, are you active and editing Sega articles? If so, please answer the roll call at WT:SEGA! Make sure to check out the Sega Task Force's pages and utilize its pages, including the community talk page, review department, and free image gallery, all of which can help you with your article writing! Happy editing! | ||
Roll call initiated by Red Phoenix build the future... remember the past... on 03:14, 3 November 2013 (UTC) |
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Super Knuckles. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Hello, Super Knuckles. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Super Knuckles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)