![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 |
Hi: I am of course perfectly ok with you following the IP around for a while and engaging with him/her on talk pages, and you're right, s/he has acquired a bad reputation and will be under extra scrutiny for a while - including the problem of being automatically reverted by people who don't realize s/he's not still blocked. But having told him/her to step back from the personal attacks, it would be unfair of me not to also ask you to stop rubbing his/her nose in that reputation, particularly on other users' talk pages. Assuming someone is vandalizing is pretty bad, even when it may arise from confusion between vandalism and block evasion. Thanks for spending the time to discuss the "best known for" and allision issues; Wikipedia will be better off for these disagreements having been aired and different solutions considered, even if we don't get a consensus on either; even if all we achieve is a useful new definitional link and a reduced incidence of churning by people of differing viewpoints on the two issues. But please keep it as un-snide and un-goading as possible, since sitting down together with cups of tea and coffee is not actually available as a calm-down option. (I suspect the three of us might get along pretty well if it were.) Yngvadottir ( talk) 20:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
It seems I really stepped in it at User talk:Matt200055 and User talk:AntiMatt200055. Upon seeing the new User:AntiMatt200055 I hastily created a sock investigation, under the mistaken impression that Matt200055. Yikes. In trying to put this right, I CSD'ed the sock case and asked for an explanation on the user's talk pages. He has given a rather strange response, which might require a brief explanation to the user. Not too horrible yet.
Unfortunately, another user has removed the CSD from the sock case and the discussion at User talk:Matt200055 seems to be going south. Can someone step in? - SummerPhD ( talk) 05:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
this poster is also harrasing me and wont give me an actual reason for why, he says its for discussion about the topic, well it is, and he keeps saying the same thing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mapsfly ( talk • contribs) 15:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Why did you erase Applejack on the tattletale frog? -- 24.170.75.206 ( talk) 22:25, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
24.170.75.206 has been blocked for one week for vandalism. - SummerPhD ( talk) 21:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Are you going to blocked me again? -- 24.170.75.206 ( talk) 02:52, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
(Not blocked "for infinite" yet, but the IP was blocked for 48 hours on September 5, 2014; 72 hours on September 27, 2014; 1 week on October 29, 2014 and 1 month on November 21, 2014.)
{...and for 3 months December 28, 2014.)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you
assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on
User talk:DanQuigley. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. For templating someone when a google search would have proved notability.
...William
12:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--
Jeffro77 (
talk)
00:52, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello SummerPhD. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.
The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.
If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)
If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.
Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.
I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).
Sent via-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
we really need your help to add Levon Telian to the list of notable Armenians named Levon.... sorry we're not tech savy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friendsofstretch ( talk • contribs)
Thanks, I am struggling here because I rarely edit a wiki page. I am confused as to why you have twice removed the link that I added to the Eton College page. It seems to me to be a reasonable link to an alternative view of Eton College. I am perplexed as to why you have taken so much trouble to repeatedly remove the link. Do you have an association with Eton or are you paid to monitor the site?. If not why do you think you have a greater right than me to censor an open source encyclopedia. I have been a long time financial supporter of wiki and I always assumed it was open and unbiased. Why are you doing this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delsmith444 ( talk • contribs) 15:41, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi SummerPhD,
You recently reverted one of my edits on the 'Gregory House' page and cited "Needs coverage from an independent source". Can you please clarify to what you mean by this comment?
Thanks,
SR — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slickroger ( talk • contribs) 22:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
I recently updated a reference that is showing as a dead link on the Veganarchism reference 16 that you are stating is not a dead link. After checking the link again I am directed to a page not found. Is this not a dead link? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chriscctx ( talk • contribs) 01:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks I have just found your explanation re removal of Eton blog, external link. and I accept it. I found it difficult to follow up the editing process and consequently caused a nuisance, apologies for that. But expert editors do expect a lot from elderly novices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delsmith444 ( talk • contribs) 10:29, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
It wouldn't let me reference the rotten tomatoes page, it was trying to. It features information that backs me up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tunaboy45 ( talk • contribs) 23:47, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello SummerPHD, I'm Zucat. I'm the creator of the artical entitled List of Stuart Little characters. I couldn't help help but notice that you edited the artical by fixing the grammer and spelling, and by removing some uneeded information. I thank you for being concerned about my articals errors and for fixing them. However i couldn't help but notice that some content you added does not seem to add up or make sense. For example. You added that Geena Davis VOICED Eleanor in Stuart Little 2. Stuart Little 2 is NOT an animated film. Geena Davis played Eleanor in live action. And second, you added a scene in the Martha Little section, that I'm not sure that happened ANYWHERE in the series. (WHERE in the Stuart Little Media media franchise did Eleanor try to get Martha to say Juice!!!!?, a deleted scene? an outtake?. ECT). And lastly you removed minor words about the events of the Main Characters of the series. Wikipedia is a website for SPECIFIC information about wikis. I'm NOT mad at you for changing the Artical, I'm just saying that there is some minor content in it that I want other users to know about. So unfortunately I'm gonna have to edit some parts of the artical so that way it displays the info I want it to do so. But don't worry I will NOT get rid of the edits YOU made. So anyway.... I thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zucat ( talk • contribs) 21:41, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi a while ago you opened a case at SPI against a user name Troydevinny545. Well he has created tons of accounts since then and now it's harder to track what he does on Wikipedia. I found some of his new accounts and re-opened your case at SPI. I have a feeling that he might target your account as you were the one to notice his disrputive behaviors for the first time. I also created a new thread at AN/I. Just wanted to let you know. Cheers!-- Chamith (talk) 17:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm not really sure how this works but here it goes.
My name is Dennis Stehr (p.k.a. Mr. Probz) and I just read your feedback on why you've changed the page back to how it was. The reason I've updated it was because of way too many inaccuracies and false facts and it frustrated me for some time now and forced me to do a little reasearch and finally try doing it myself. You can easily look up any of the facts stated in my new bio (which I haven't written myself but hired a writer for) and verify them. When I said it was my page I meant the content not the page itself. You said it had to be a neutral point of view and that's exactly what I I tried to uphold. If there's anything specific in the story you can point out that's out of line I'll be happy to fix it.
Best,
Dennis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 00:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
So in the meantime I have to sit back and watch how most of the stuff that's on the current page is false? That's my own personal information which people will take as the truth because it's posted here! I've asked you to show me what it is that's not acceptable and I would try to fix it myself. I just don't want to keep staring at a long list of lies anymore. You can throw a big stop sign at me or help me fix the problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 00:43, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Sorry but I don't know what that means. To change everything that's on there now is way too much work. Someone helped me make the page that I copy/pasted in the textbox and that's as far as it goes for me. The info in the update contains all the correct info of the previous content. I don't know how this works I just want to fix the page or rather not have one at all. This is me saying that whatever is on the page now is unreliable but then you tell me the more specific and extended info is a conflict of interest? You just changed my whole view on Wikipedia. I normally go here to do my research but have to find out like this that it's nothing more than a website based on opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 01:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm not saying everything is wrong. I didn't write the new bio but only supplied the right info. Indeed, some of the facts that were in the old page are true but I've let them be added to the new one. It's only about the bio but also songs that are in the discography that were released online without my permission. Legal action is still pending with some of these titles. It also says that I'm signed to Repblic (which I'm not). If you take a look at the updated post you can see that all the chart info is linked to sources and more elaborate. If you tell me what to remove from the bio I think it be way more efficient than taking a hundred steps back. I still would like to have a wiki page with more than just 2 paragraphs and a train of charts or discogs that are incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 01:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
We're already talking so what would diference would that make? You're the one that keeps making the changes and this is your page.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 02:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
I understand that but all it would do is give the people that added all the static more fun if they see it only adds to my frustration. All I'm trying to do is eliminate the chance that I'll be correcting stuff in interviews where info has been taken from this page like I have been doing for the past year. You don't know how annoying this can be, believe me. Can't we just post the update and build from there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 03:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Did you just put it back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 04:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
What's your problem? All I was trying to do was correct the page.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 04:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi SummerPhD. Whilst I'm quite sure that you can 'fight your own battles', I noticed the above as your Talk page is on my watchlist as a result of recent actions by another editor. Since this IP editor is engaged in the same behaviour as I dealt with previously, I felt it would not be fair to the earlier editor to not also advise this editor of the same problem. :) -- Jeffro77 ( talk) 04:08, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
As previously advised at User_talk:Jeffro77#Careful, much of your User page (the first eight sections) appear to fall within the scope of WP:POLEMIC. If you need to maintain these lists, you should probably do so in a separate document on your own computer.-- Jeffro77 ( talk) 03:45, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hey Summer, I've filed RPPs on four Ben 10 articles to hopefully stop that IP-hopping loon from adding that unsourced marathon stuff: Ben 10 (TV series), Ben 10: Ultimate Alien, Ben 10: Omniverse, Ben 10: Alien Force. I may not have gotten them all, so if you spy any more, lemme know and I'll file them. I'm asking for a 30 day protection on all, which should get us through the alleged airdate. Seems better to do them all at once so we don't have to worry about staggered protection. La la! Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 16:32, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
I have blocked that IP for another six months, so we should be OK through summer. If they start using other IPs or register accounts, then it's time to open an SPI. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Can you comment on Talk:Echosmith#Genre please to solve a genre dispute? -- Joseph Prasad ( talk) 01:43, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi SummerPHD. I'm Zucat, the creator of the article entitled List of Stuart Little characters. I would like to thank you for your recent editing to my Article. This was the first Wikipedia article I ever created and I would like to thank you for helping me keep it. Your frequent collaboration with the page really helped me. I am now finished with the Article and adding the characters to it. My only request is that you don't edit the article anymore, but let me know how I can improve it (anymore characters I missed?, should I add a photo?, put more references? Etc.) Your past edits really helped me get the article to Wikipedia standards and encolpedia friendly standards. So with that said, I once again thank you. Zucat ( talk) 17:03, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Holidays! |
Hi, SummerPhD! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year! Holiday cheers, -- Discographer ( talk) 18:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
Happy Holidays... |
and may the coming year bring peaceful melody accompanied by joyous harmony. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 19:39, 24 December 2014 (UTC) |
It might take a while but eventually you'll get what's coming to you if you continue with your ridiculous campaign. 82.33.71.205 ( talk) 00:29, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
As you've probably noticed, I rewrote the lead, which somebody wanted done in April 2013, and that seems to have stopped the argument. Can I just politely advise that this edit probably causes more harm than good, I'm afraid. If you sincerely feel somebody is a troll, don't feed them. I've had the odd unpleasantry posted on my talk page, but I don't think I've reverted anything on it ever. Just ignore it and read some of the good articles we have on here. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:40, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!! |
Hello SummerPhD, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of {{U| Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list
Here are two links to his date of birth. First is from IMDB [16] Second is from his Twitter when he thanked fans for birthday wishes [17] Hope these can be of help. Mikepellerin talk 06:23, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm gonna say this in the nicest way possible, you are going a little insane with the references. Not every fucking line and every fucking date needs to be referenced or else the page gets cluttered with blue numbers. I added the reference you asked for on Meek Mill discography, but every person I know that edits here say they get shit from you about stupid references. I personally have never added false or unconfirmed information to this site, and I also understand that some people add false information. But when I change the stupid date from 2014 to 2015 when anyone with a brain knows that it won't come out in that time. It's literally impossible to distribute CD's to retailers in less than a weeks time. If you choose to be all anal and crazy about the references that's fine (weird, but not my business) but I don't wan't to hear about it again. Don't write on my talk page. This is not a demand, this is a man telling another human being that I don't want to be bothered by you when I've done nothing wrong and you have no authority over me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkatastic ( talk • contribs) 01:59, December 28, 2014
Funkatastic: The "nicest possible way" would not include calling me "crazy", "a little insane", "all anal and crazy", "weird" and question whether I have a brain. Please
do not make personal attacks.
Let's assume it is impossible for CDs to make it to retailers in under a week. Does that prove the album isn't coming out on Tuesday? (Yeah, I know: You know everything and would know if it were.) Perhaps with the delay due to his imprisonment, it will be a 'net only release. Maybe it won't be released at all (popular music is littered with albums derailed from a scheduled release that never saw the light of day). How do we sort out the absolute bullshit added by random vandals from facts? We call it
verifiability. It's kind of a big deal here.
As with others who have warned you about unsourced additions, I will notify you as necessary when there is a problem with your edits. That's part of accountability on a cooperative project.
You are correct that I do not have authority over you. You are not correct that you have "done nothing wrong". You made a mistake, I requested a cite, you provided one. That is how the project works. -
SummerPhD (
talk)
03:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 20 | ← | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 |
Hi: I am of course perfectly ok with you following the IP around for a while and engaging with him/her on talk pages, and you're right, s/he has acquired a bad reputation and will be under extra scrutiny for a while - including the problem of being automatically reverted by people who don't realize s/he's not still blocked. But having told him/her to step back from the personal attacks, it would be unfair of me not to also ask you to stop rubbing his/her nose in that reputation, particularly on other users' talk pages. Assuming someone is vandalizing is pretty bad, even when it may arise from confusion between vandalism and block evasion. Thanks for spending the time to discuss the "best known for" and allision issues; Wikipedia will be better off for these disagreements having been aired and different solutions considered, even if we don't get a consensus on either; even if all we achieve is a useful new definitional link and a reduced incidence of churning by people of differing viewpoints on the two issues. But please keep it as un-snide and un-goading as possible, since sitting down together with cups of tea and coffee is not actually available as a calm-down option. (I suspect the three of us might get along pretty well if it were.) Yngvadottir ( talk) 20:09, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page. |
It seems I really stepped in it at User talk:Matt200055 and User talk:AntiMatt200055. Upon seeing the new User:AntiMatt200055 I hastily created a sock investigation, under the mistaken impression that Matt200055. Yikes. In trying to put this right, I CSD'ed the sock case and asked for an explanation on the user's talk pages. He has given a rather strange response, which might require a brief explanation to the user. Not too horrible yet.
Unfortunately, another user has removed the CSD from the sock case and the discussion at User talk:Matt200055 seems to be going south. Can someone step in? - SummerPhD ( talk) 05:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
this poster is also harrasing me and wont give me an actual reason for why, he says its for discussion about the topic, well it is, and he keeps saying the same thing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mapsfly ( talk • contribs) 15:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Why did you erase Applejack on the tattletale frog? -- 24.170.75.206 ( talk) 22:25, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
24.170.75.206 has been blocked for one week for vandalism. - SummerPhD ( talk) 21:39, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Are you going to blocked me again? -- 24.170.75.206 ( talk) 02:52, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
(Not blocked "for infinite" yet, but the IP was blocked for 48 hours on September 5, 2014; 72 hours on September 27, 2014; 1 week on October 29, 2014 and 1 month on November 21, 2014.)
{...and for 3 months December 28, 2014.)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would ask that you
assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on
User talk:DanQuigley. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. For templating someone when a google search would have proved notability.
...William
12:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--
Jeffro77 (
talk)
00:52, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello SummerPhD. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.
The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.
If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)
If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.
Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.
I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards-- Fuhghettaboutit ( talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).
Sent via-- MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
we really need your help to add Levon Telian to the list of notable Armenians named Levon.... sorry we're not tech savy! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friendsofstretch ( talk • contribs)
Thanks, I am struggling here because I rarely edit a wiki page. I am confused as to why you have twice removed the link that I added to the Eton College page. It seems to me to be a reasonable link to an alternative view of Eton College. I am perplexed as to why you have taken so much trouble to repeatedly remove the link. Do you have an association with Eton or are you paid to monitor the site?. If not why do you think you have a greater right than me to censor an open source encyclopedia. I have been a long time financial supporter of wiki and I always assumed it was open and unbiased. Why are you doing this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delsmith444 ( talk • contribs) 15:41, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi SummerPhD,
You recently reverted one of my edits on the 'Gregory House' page and cited "Needs coverage from an independent source". Can you please clarify to what you mean by this comment?
Thanks,
SR — Preceding unsigned comment added by Slickroger ( talk • contribs) 22:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
I recently updated a reference that is showing as a dead link on the Veganarchism reference 16 that you are stating is not a dead link. After checking the link again I am directed to a page not found. Is this not a dead link? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chriscctx ( talk • contribs) 01:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks I have just found your explanation re removal of Eton blog, external link. and I accept it. I found it difficult to follow up the editing process and consequently caused a nuisance, apologies for that. But expert editors do expect a lot from elderly novices. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delsmith444 ( talk • contribs) 10:29, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
It wouldn't let me reference the rotten tomatoes page, it was trying to. It features information that backs me up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tunaboy45 ( talk • contribs) 23:47, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello SummerPHD, I'm Zucat. I'm the creator of the artical entitled List of Stuart Little characters. I couldn't help help but notice that you edited the artical by fixing the grammer and spelling, and by removing some uneeded information. I thank you for being concerned about my articals errors and for fixing them. However i couldn't help but notice that some content you added does not seem to add up or make sense. For example. You added that Geena Davis VOICED Eleanor in Stuart Little 2. Stuart Little 2 is NOT an animated film. Geena Davis played Eleanor in live action. And second, you added a scene in the Martha Little section, that I'm not sure that happened ANYWHERE in the series. (WHERE in the Stuart Little Media media franchise did Eleanor try to get Martha to say Juice!!!!?, a deleted scene? an outtake?. ECT). And lastly you removed minor words about the events of the Main Characters of the series. Wikipedia is a website for SPECIFIC information about wikis. I'm NOT mad at you for changing the Artical, I'm just saying that there is some minor content in it that I want other users to know about. So unfortunately I'm gonna have to edit some parts of the artical so that way it displays the info I want it to do so. But don't worry I will NOT get rid of the edits YOU made. So anyway.... I thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zucat ( talk • contribs) 21:41, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi a while ago you opened a case at SPI against a user name Troydevinny545. Well he has created tons of accounts since then and now it's harder to track what he does on Wikipedia. I found some of his new accounts and re-opened your case at SPI. I have a feeling that he might target your account as you were the one to notice his disrputive behaviors for the first time. I also created a new thread at AN/I. Just wanted to let you know. Cheers!-- Chamith (talk) 17:27, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I'm not really sure how this works but here it goes.
My name is Dennis Stehr (p.k.a. Mr. Probz) and I just read your feedback on why you've changed the page back to how it was. The reason I've updated it was because of way too many inaccuracies and false facts and it frustrated me for some time now and forced me to do a little reasearch and finally try doing it myself. You can easily look up any of the facts stated in my new bio (which I haven't written myself but hired a writer for) and verify them. When I said it was my page I meant the content not the page itself. You said it had to be a neutral point of view and that's exactly what I I tried to uphold. If there's anything specific in the story you can point out that's out of line I'll be happy to fix it.
Best,
Dennis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 00:05, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
So in the meantime I have to sit back and watch how most of the stuff that's on the current page is false? That's my own personal information which people will take as the truth because it's posted here! I've asked you to show me what it is that's not acceptable and I would try to fix it myself. I just don't want to keep staring at a long list of lies anymore. You can throw a big stop sign at me or help me fix the problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 00:43, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Sorry but I don't know what that means. To change everything that's on there now is way too much work. Someone helped me make the page that I copy/pasted in the textbox and that's as far as it goes for me. The info in the update contains all the correct info of the previous content. I don't know how this works I just want to fix the page or rather not have one at all. This is me saying that whatever is on the page now is unreliable but then you tell me the more specific and extended info is a conflict of interest? You just changed my whole view on Wikipedia. I normally go here to do my research but have to find out like this that it's nothing more than a website based on opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 01:06, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm not saying everything is wrong. I didn't write the new bio but only supplied the right info. Indeed, some of the facts that were in the old page are true but I've let them be added to the new one. It's only about the bio but also songs that are in the discography that were released online without my permission. Legal action is still pending with some of these titles. It also says that I'm signed to Repblic (which I'm not). If you take a look at the updated post you can see that all the chart info is linked to sources and more elaborate. If you tell me what to remove from the bio I think it be way more efficient than taking a hundred steps back. I still would like to have a wiki page with more than just 2 paragraphs and a train of charts or discogs that are incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 01:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
We're already talking so what would diference would that make? You're the one that keeps making the changes and this is your page.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 02:54, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
I understand that but all it would do is give the people that added all the static more fun if they see it only adds to my frustration. All I'm trying to do is eliminate the chance that I'll be correcting stuff in interviews where info has been taken from this page like I have been doing for the past year. You don't know how annoying this can be, believe me. Can't we just post the update and build from there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 03:41, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Did you just put it back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 04:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
What's your problem? All I was trying to do was correct the page.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DStehr ( talk • contribs) 04:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi SummerPhD. Whilst I'm quite sure that you can 'fight your own battles', I noticed the above as your Talk page is on my watchlist as a result of recent actions by another editor. Since this IP editor is engaged in the same behaviour as I dealt with previously, I felt it would not be fair to the earlier editor to not also advise this editor of the same problem. :) -- Jeffro77 ( talk) 04:08, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
As previously advised at User_talk:Jeffro77#Careful, much of your User page (the first eight sections) appear to fall within the scope of WP:POLEMIC. If you need to maintain these lists, you should probably do so in a separate document on your own computer.-- Jeffro77 ( talk) 03:45, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Hey Summer, I've filed RPPs on four Ben 10 articles to hopefully stop that IP-hopping loon from adding that unsourced marathon stuff: Ben 10 (TV series), Ben 10: Ultimate Alien, Ben 10: Omniverse, Ben 10: Alien Force. I may not have gotten them all, so if you spy any more, lemme know and I'll file them. I'm asking for a 30 day protection on all, which should get us through the alleged airdate. Seems better to do them all at once so we don't have to worry about staggered protection. La la! Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 16:32, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
I have blocked that IP for another six months, so we should be OK through summer. If they start using other IPs or register accounts, then it's time to open an SPI. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Can you comment on Talk:Echosmith#Genre please to solve a genre dispute? -- Joseph Prasad ( talk) 01:43, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi SummerPHD. I'm Zucat, the creator of the article entitled List of Stuart Little characters. I would like to thank you for your recent editing to my Article. This was the first Wikipedia article I ever created and I would like to thank you for helping me keep it. Your frequent collaboration with the page really helped me. I am now finished with the Article and adding the characters to it. My only request is that you don't edit the article anymore, but let me know how I can improve it (anymore characters I missed?, should I add a photo?, put more references? Etc.) Your past edits really helped me get the article to Wikipedia standards and encolpedia friendly standards. So with that said, I once again thank you. Zucat ( talk) 17:03, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Happy Holidays! |
Hi, SummerPhD! Have a happy and safe season, and a blessed new year! Holiday cheers, -- Discographer ( talk) 18:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
Happy Holidays... |
and may the coming year bring peaceful melody accompanied by joyous harmony. 78.26 ( spin me / revolutions) 19:39, 24 December 2014 (UTC) |
It might take a while but eventually you'll get what's coming to you if you continue with your ridiculous campaign. 82.33.71.205 ( talk) 00:29, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
As you've probably noticed, I rewrote the lead, which somebody wanted done in April 2013, and that seems to have stopped the argument. Can I just politely advise that this edit probably causes more harm than good, I'm afraid. If you sincerely feel somebody is a troll, don't feed them. I've had the odd unpleasantry posted on my talk page, but I don't think I've reverted anything on it ever. Just ignore it and read some of the good articles we have on here. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 18:40, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!! |
Hello SummerPhD, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this
seasonal occasion. Spread the
WikiLove by wishing another user a
Merry Christmas and a
Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{ subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of {{U| Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list
Here are two links to his date of birth. First is from IMDB [16] Second is from his Twitter when he thanked fans for birthday wishes [17] Hope these can be of help. Mikepellerin talk 06:23, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm gonna say this in the nicest way possible, you are going a little insane with the references. Not every fucking line and every fucking date needs to be referenced or else the page gets cluttered with blue numbers. I added the reference you asked for on Meek Mill discography, but every person I know that edits here say they get shit from you about stupid references. I personally have never added false or unconfirmed information to this site, and I also understand that some people add false information. But when I change the stupid date from 2014 to 2015 when anyone with a brain knows that it won't come out in that time. It's literally impossible to distribute CD's to retailers in less than a weeks time. If you choose to be all anal and crazy about the references that's fine (weird, but not my business) but I don't wan't to hear about it again. Don't write on my talk page. This is not a demand, this is a man telling another human being that I don't want to be bothered by you when I've done nothing wrong and you have no authority over me.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Funkatastic ( talk • contribs) 01:59, December 28, 2014
Funkatastic: The "nicest possible way" would not include calling me "crazy", "a little insane", "all anal and crazy", "weird" and question whether I have a brain. Please
do not make personal attacks.
Let's assume it is impossible for CDs to make it to retailers in under a week. Does that prove the album isn't coming out on Tuesday? (Yeah, I know: You know everything and would know if it were.) Perhaps with the delay due to his imprisonment, it will be a 'net only release. Maybe it won't be released at all (popular music is littered with albums derailed from a scheduled release that never saw the light of day). How do we sort out the absolute bullshit added by random vandals from facts? We call it
verifiability. It's kind of a big deal here.
As with others who have warned you about unsourced additions, I will notify you as necessary when there is a problem with your edits. That's part of accountability on a cooperative project.
You are correct that I do not have authority over you. You are not correct that you have "done nothing wrong". You made a mistake, I requested a cite, you provided one. That is how the project works. -
SummerPhD (
talk)
03:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)