Thanks for uploading Image:Srp4.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the spelling correction. It will be done.
See reply. → AA ( talk) — 16:53, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Based on your and another editor's input on Talk:Robert B. Wray, I have removed the PROD tag from Robert B. Wray, thereby removing it from the deletion process. It remains subject to consideration at WP:AFD. Please endeavor to wikify the article at your earliest convenience and create appropriate cross-references to the article in other articles (to de-orphanize it). --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 02:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
| |||||||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This newsletter is automatically delivered by TinucherianBot ( talk) 07:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Hemchandra Kanugo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Anshuk (
talk)
07:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
∗ \ / { talk} 03:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 11:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Can you please address the issues I tagged on that article you created. I am tagging in the hope that you can improve the article (so someone doesn't delete it for not having references). Thank you. Calaka ( talk) 14:26, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Do not feel bad. I am rather appreciating your act. It is community development. Thanks once again. Keep in touch. sumir
A tag has been placed on Ambikagiri Raychoudhury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Rmosler |
●
23:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Apropos, I do not think that it qualifies under Section A7. First of all the people who have already substantiated it, made the significance of the personality stand out for itself. Secondly, Ambikagiri Raychoudhury's role in freedom struggle of India is mentioned by numerous historians of repute. The only thing required is to substantiate the biography with verifiable facts. I repeat that it is not about a person or group merely to promote the name. He is a historic person. sumir
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. Delivered automatically by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 15:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 16:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Noted. Sumir 16:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Sumir Sharma--Sumir 16:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 14:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
I thank you once again. It is being noted to me again. I regret that I missed it. Today I have made dozen of edits but in case of this particular edit, I just missed it. I will remain attentive and particular about signing the edits. Thanks once again for reminding me. Sumir--Sumir 14:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 14:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC) Oh Sorry again. I missed it in this case. I have learned my lesson but I just missed it. Now I click it here atleast. --Sumir 14:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 08:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Barq-andaaz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
A Stop at Willoughby (
talk)
22:46, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
With reference to your comments on talk:Jahangir, regarding the merger/deletion of the article Mughal empire after akbar. May I point out that, contrary to your belief, Wikipedia is not a historian or a platform for novel ideas. Original research is a criterion for deletion. So, if you think the article is "novel", then as per Wikipedia policy, it should be deleted. Reading WP:NOT will be helpful. Geeteshgadkari ( talk) 01:01, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 02:56, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
Looking forward to more contributions from you!
|
---|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by User:Od Mishehu AWB, operated by עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:30, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.
As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.
If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.
You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.
ssriram_mt ( talk) & AshLin ( talk) (Drive coordinators)
Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. The Helpful Bot 01:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Muhrat. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Muhurta. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Muhurta – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Supdiop ( talk) 09:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
The article Peshawar Conspiracy Cases has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Totally not referenced article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof?
21:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Srp4.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the spelling correction. It will be done.
See reply. → AA ( talk) — 16:53, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Based on your and another editor's input on Talk:Robert B. Wray, I have removed the PROD tag from Robert B. Wray, thereby removing it from the deletion process. It remains subject to consideration at WP:AFD. Please endeavor to wikify the article at your earliest convenience and create appropriate cross-references to the article in other articles (to de-orphanize it). --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me) 02:15, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This newsletter is automatically delivered by TinucherianBot ( talk) 07:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Hemchandra Kanugo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Anshuk (
talk)
07:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
∗ \ / { talk} 03:34, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 11:44, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Hello! Can you please address the issues I tagged on that article you created. I am tagging in the hope that you can improve the article (so someone doesn't delete it for not having references). Thank you. Calaka ( talk) 14:26, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Do not feel bad. I am rather appreciating your act. It is community development. Thanks once again. Keep in touch. sumir
A tag has been placed on Ambikagiri Raychoudhury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
Rmosler |
●
23:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Apropos, I do not think that it qualifies under Section A7. First of all the people who have already substantiated it, made the significance of the personality stand out for itself. Secondly, Ambikagiri Raychoudhury's role in freedom struggle of India is mentioned by numerous historians of repute. The only thing required is to substantiate the biography with verifiable facts. I repeat that it is not about a person or group merely to promote the name. He is a historic person. sumir
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. Delivered automatically by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 15:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 16:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. Noted. Sumir 16:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Sumir Sharma--Sumir 16:10, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 14:17, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
I thank you once again. It is being noted to me again. I regret that I missed it. Today I have made dozen of edits but in case of this particular edit, I just missed it. I will remain attentive and particular about signing the edits. Thanks once again for reminding me. Sumir--Sumir 14:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 14:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC) Oh Sorry again. I missed it in this case. I have learned my lesson but I just missed it. Now I click it here atleast. --Sumir 14:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 08:00, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Barq-andaaz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.
A Stop at Willoughby (
talk)
22:46, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
With reference to your comments on talk:Jahangir, regarding the merger/deletion of the article Mughal empire after akbar. May I point out that, contrary to your belief, Wikipedia is not a historian or a platform for novel ideas. Original research is a criterion for deletion. So, if you think the article is "novel", then as per Wikipedia policy, it should be deleted. Reading WP:NOT will be helpful. Geeteshgadkari ( talk) 01:01, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 02:56, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
|
|
|
|
Looking forward to more contributions from you!
|
---|
|
This newsletter is automatically delivered by User:Od Mishehu AWB, operated by עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:30, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello friends, we are a number of editors from WikiProject India have got together to assess the many thousands of articles under the stewardship of the project, and we'd love to have you, a fellow member, join us. These articles require assessment, that is, the addition of a WikiProject template to the talk page of an article, assessing it for quality and importance and adding a few extra parameters to it.
As of March 11, 2012, 07:00 UTC, WikiProject India has 95,998 articles under its stewardship. Of these 13,980 articles are completely unassessed (both for class and importance) and another 42,415 articles are unassessed for importance only. Accordingly, a Tag & Assess 2012 drive-cum-contest has begun from March 01, 2012 to last till May 31, 2012.
If you are new to assessment, you can learn the minimum about how to evaluate from Part One of the Assessment Guide. Part Two of the Guide will help you learn to employ the full functionality of the talk page template, should you choose to do so.
You can sign up on the Tag & Assess page. There are a number of awards to be given in recognition of your efforts. Come & join us to take part in this exciting new venture. You'll learn more about India in this way.
ssriram_mt ( talk) & AshLin ( talk) (Drive coordinators)
Delivered per request on Wikipedia:Bot requests. The Helpful Bot 01:40, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Muhrat. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Muhurta. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Muhurta – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Supdiop ( talk) 09:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
The article Peshawar Conspiracy Cases has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Totally not referenced article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
...William, is the complaint department really on
the roof?
21:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)