![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
Thank you for your feedback on my first attempt at a Wikipedia article Draft:Joseph Bae. I am writing for more targeted advice on my references. I am writing about a finance executive who is referenced by name in three different Wikipedia articles (articles for KKR, Exor, Janice Y. K. Lee all reference Bae) and who is a public figure via his philanthropy (he might be worth listing under notable Harvard alums). In my research, I drew from the following sources: Wall Street Journal, Reuters, New York Times, Forbes, and Bloomberg, as well as the KKR website for basic biographical information. All these sources discussed Bae by name and in depth.
Should I look for more references? Or make better use of the ones I have? Or are these major news organizations not neutral enough?
Thank you in advance for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brick the golden ( talk • contribs) 17:05, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
I see you are still moving drafts from user space to draft space without leaving a redirect. Is that just an oversight, or do you have a good reason for doing it? JBW ( talk) 22:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, the page I am working on entitled "Alberto Rey" (a visual artist) was flagged as not being written from a neutral point of view. Could you please point out what language or parts of the article appear biased? I do not believe I used any "peacocking" language as the flag suggests. Any descriptions of his projects were not judgments or about the quality, success, or merit of his activities, but merely relaying the information I compiled. I apologize as this is my first article written for Wikipedia and though I have been reading through the many guidelines and help pages, this process is still somewhat confusing to me. Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time.
ArtistofWNY (
talk)
00:55, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
ArtistofWNY ( talk) 00:55, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Lord Hyeamang passes WP:NGRIDIRON per [1] [2] Joeykai ( talk) 02:59, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy,
I appreciate your reviews but I don't understand how to write the reference correctly and how to check the reliability of the source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishakha2588 ( talk • contribs) 11:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I observe you accepted Azure Data Explorer at AfC. Did you notice these edit {Diff|Talk:Azure_Data_Explorer|950131022|950054608}} [4]. There are also a lot of WP:PRIMARY sources used on the article. Its fundamentally an appropriate subject for an article, I'm just concerned about possible bias and as an administrator hopeful I'd like you to check these points out. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 11:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
hey am new in here i only have two days, and i am from Tanzania where we don't speak English fluently, so its so difficult but with your reviews am trying and i hope i will succeed to create my first article. so if there is any possibilities for you to help me on the creation please help me. i will learn. i hope one day i am gonna be a better one. all in all thank you for your comment.
( talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moses rukanima ( talk • contribs) 15:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy! I was wondering if you could give me some more sprecific suggestions on what is should add to Draft:PremjiInvest to make it suitable to publishing on Wikipedia. Thanks in advance, Usernameisentered ( talk) 16:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I don't understand what is meant by "significant coverage". Usernameisentered ( talk) 16:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Thank you for the feedback on my submission. I have reviewed and taken care of some citations that I mistakenly placed links on. I'd love to have you review it again and provide additional feedback should there be the necessity for it.
Thanks!
Loyal
04/13/2020 2:30p cst — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loyal122053 ( talk • contribs) 19:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
draft: Saqib Iqbal Sham whether I am going right or not Maizbhandariya ( talk) 20:09, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
I noticed you deal a lot with NPP. It's been forever since I made a page, and standards have tightened up significantly. Is the above still considered a good rule? Because I recently copied across and modified material for a species from vi wiki that isn't yet here, it's well sourced but it's also a very short species stub. Back in the day that would've been more than enough but if things have changed I can just G7 it (took less than 10 minutes to convert) rather than wasting anyone's time. I haven't linked the draft here because I don't want it to appear like I'm trying to prioritize my own work over the massive backlog. Spectrum{{ UV}} 2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D ( talk) 00:06, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I apologize if you felt that the discussion was getting out of hand. I do get intense in debates but I did not intend to attack you personally, that's specifically why I said I did and do think you were acting in good intentions. Speculating on possible causes of our disagreement right after didn't help that message, I could very well be wrong about your objections too. I've made a commitment to myself that I should always try and work amicably with the people here also volunteering their time. I have added a few more sources to the AFD discussion that may change your mind. If it doesn't that's ok too, there will be others that weigh in and in the end consensus is king. I won't pester you more here, and even not return if you so wish. I will tone down my responses on the page if that helps you return to the issue at hand which I believe you and I both can solve. I've provided coverage spanning almost 100 years. It covers reviews of her roles, international tour and various mentions. Adding up she may not have superstar notability but she is definitely notable, one other piece of information was that she was a manager of someone who ended up quite famous herself. Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 03:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I agree that being listed on the National Register is sufficient to establish notability. It's just that the editor, FloridaArmy, is experienced enough to submit a decent article not just a one liner. Examining the references there is enough information to expand the article, covering the issues that I raised in my comments. Dan arndt ( talk) 03:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I was deciding whether to decline it with a harsh template or to reject with a harsh template and you simply rejected it. We agree. When it was previously submitted, it was an advertisement in marketing buzzspeak. They rewrote it into standard English, and it was still an advertisement. Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I accepted it. If in doubt about the standards for a medical article, I', m one of the people you could ask. DGG ( talk ) 23:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I accepted the article. Even in the version that you saw, the context was clear enough to anyone who would be likely to be interested in the article. There are many fields I do not understand--probably including the fields for at least 3/4 of the articles submitted to WP--and I try not to review articles in them DGG ( talk ) 00:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy, Thanks for your feedback and advice. I have made my paid contributor declaration in my user page. Apology for not making this declaration in the first place. Once again, thank you, keep well and stay healthy.
~~~~ Luminosity123 ( talk) 09:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I am not paid to write any articles nor have any interest in doing any promotional writings. The website is currently co-owned by myself.
Thought I could start my Wikipedia editing with my own website first before venturing further.
Happy to remove the page if it's violating the policies.
Hi Sulfurboy, I would appreciate elaboration. I wrote the article because I found that the wikipedia backlog regarding requested articles included the subject. see /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Business_and_economics#Business. The issue of notability is derived from there. As a side note, during the research for the article, I've come to see it as notable. Its a major award in the Canadian business landscape, and companies are above proud to receive it. Moreover, candidacy for it requires the companies to undergo tedious coaching and other burdens, only to be considered.
Regarding the tone - please clarify - I have not gave any synthesized statements and have expressed zero opinion. Pratat ( talk) 14:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Dear Sulfurboy, you rejected the draft on Ricardo Eichmann and linked the criteria for notability for academics. So far in the article I only mentioned that Eichmann is a professor, would it suffice if I mention that he's the director of the Orient department at the German Archaeological Institute? It seems to me that that would suffice the academics notability criteria (specifically point 6 "highest-level elected or appointed administrative post"). Maltimore ( talk) 16:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
I am confused as to how I can make the subject seem more noteworthy. I used appropriate articles as references that were published (not blogs nor social media) which discuss the works that the subject has contributed to and how these have had huge impacts on the community and how important it is. I am mainly confused because I looked at other Wikipedia articles as an example (or "template") to base myself off of, and it seems quite subjective to determine that this subject is not noteworthy, whereas other published and acceptable articles I have read are of the same caliber.
ChristinaL.P. ( talk) 02:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Apologies if this message is not properly transmitted, I am unsure of how to use this properly. What I mean is what is it that is the issue with the notability? Is it just that the work itself is not worthwhile (an issue with the article or the way it is writen), or is it specifically that the references I used do not properly demonstrate that it is noteworthy? I am asking because I have pages worth of various sources I used to write the article, and chose the ones that seemed the most credible to me (peer reviewed, etc.), but if this is not the case, I can change to other references. If the issue is with the content of the article, unfortunately, there isn't much I can change about that.
ChristinaL.P. ( talk) 02:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
HI Sulfurboy, thank you for your kindly Suggestion. I have modified the citation style recently. Actually, I take IPFS as the reference, including writing neutrally and finding the citation and reference to create this article. I think the citation and reference are enough to support the article, if not, could you please tell me where or how should I improve this. Really appreciate your help!
here is the link: /info/en/?search=Draft:New_Kind_of_Network Maxchangyuchih ( talk) 03:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
I added that Big Rick Daniels is now syndicated on Sun Broadcast Group. That was one of the suggestions from moderators to resubmit with.
He did not win the ACM award, but just being a nominee is pretty notable. Its a part of country music history.
The article has citing from trade publications, that provide in depth coverage of the subject. There are also cites that show local and national coverage that are more than just passing mentions.
There are other articles with FAR LESS coverage, notability that have been allowed to be published, example: /info/en/?search=The_Smiley_Morning_Show
I would ask you to reconsider this article please.
Smokethatskinwagon ( talk) 13:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Jasonreed1828 ( talk) 15:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, you just declined my new page - /info/en/?search=Draft:1828_(website)
First, I have no financial interest to disclose - I'm Deputy Editor of 1828, but I'm not an employee. It's a voluntary position. I'm a full-time student.
Second, it says in the comment that the page has too many citations - last time it was declined for not having enough citations?
Thanks
I have declined this draft again and have requested a topic-ban against the paid editor. Johnson probably should have a BLP; she appears to satisfy academic notability. But she won't get a neutral article as long as her flack is sending stupid fluff down the AFC pipe. Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thanks Behrouz asbahi sis ( talk) 22:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC) |
Hi I try editing Wikipedia persian or farsi but managers block my function on site for 30 days . Because I say one joke for one admins or manager and tell me you can not say joke in Wikipedia ! I accept and for 30 day can not edit in Wikipedia!!! 😯 Behrouz asbahi sis ( talk) 22:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC) Sulfurboy
Block me = taranet gharouni Behrouz asbahi sis ( talk) 22:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Please tell Wikipedia manager this subject for known Behrouz asbahi sis ( talk) 22:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Ok thanks I accept Wikipedia farsi dictators manager 😂🙏🙏 Behrouz asbahi sis ( talk) 22:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy! Thank you for taking the time to review the draft for The Doo Wop Shop. Regarding notability among a cappella groups, although it is a niche audience, the a cappella community is quite a large one. Achievements such as the CARAs are like the "Grammys of A Cappella", as cheesy as it sounds. And although achievements of The Doo Wop Shop are mostly covered by local news sources, being invited to Radio City Music Hall's Christmas Spectacular and the White House Holiday Reception for service staff, as well as America's Got Talent's auditions and The Sing Off (The Sing Off was a nationally televised A Cappella program featuring top professional and scholastic groups, and was where Pentatonix got their start) is a reflection of The Doo Wop Shop's notability beyond "Boston" (the specifics of those events aren't publicized by those entities for various reasons). Obviously we aren't touting popularity that rivals Ariana Grande or other chart-topping musical artists, but I disagree that we are not notable within a large audience of people. I understand that since it is a niche audience and we don't have a large number of national references, it may seem like we lack notability, but your review was based on your limited and subjective understanding of a cappella as a community and its reaches. Would it help to add a list of notable alumni? I can reference sources that display their notability but it is difficult to find more recent sources directly pertaining to The Doo Wop Shop's recent achievements. Compared to many a cappella groups that have existing wikipedia articles, however, it seems like we exceed the standards for being a reputable a cappella group, although the a cappella community may collectively fail to meet "general notability standards". That being said, again I understand the standards that are applied to all incoming articles and I apologize if some of the above statements come off as a little charged. Can you please let me know a little bit more about what qualifies as notable, or specifically which a cappella-related sources may be useful to cite? Thank you again for your time! Patricknie7359 ( talk) 8:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
I'd like to delete this and continue with the Mark St John Lewis draft - how do I do this, please?
Thanks
Claireatwaves (
talk)
12:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
I see you rejected Draft:Carlos Cruchaga for lacking in-line citations. While that was certainly true, it was obvious it was somebody posting their resume, and in fact an earwig search quickly found it was a total copy-paste from their faculty page. You might want to routinely run an earwig check on everything you review :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy,
Thanks for taking a look at this:
/info/en/?search=Draft:Nacsport
Re: Your comment. I don't believe anybody has previously asked me to disclose anything, unless I missed it. I actually put a disclaimer in the Nacsport Talk page but I now realise this should have gone in my own user page, which I have now done. I repeat that disclaimer here for you:
I want to make it clear that I am not being paid to write this article. That being said, I have done some paid copywriting for this company in the past. This article is simply a way for me to pass time during the Corona Virus crisis here in Spain where the whole country is on lockdown. I'm trying to learn a new writing skill.
I chose this subject to write about because they are one of the few companies in the Canary Islands which has a presence on the global stage. I also wanted to write about something which is close to home (Gran Canaria, Spain) and something which hasn't previously been written about. I've spoken to Nacsport about this and they gave me the green light to write this, and I did make them aware of wikipedia policies about objectivity (although I'm learning a lot about this too during the writing process!), etc.''
Can you advise me if this is sufficient a disclaimer to allow me to continue with the article?
Thanks in advance,
DuncRitchie ( talk) 14:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Duncan Ritchie
Thanks in advance,
DuncRitchie ( talk) 15:15, 17 April 2020 (UTC)DuncRitchie
DuncRitchie ( talk) 16:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)DuncRitchie
I don't know what I'm doing but a kitten?
RMJ13 (
talk)
23:22, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hola, Sulfurboy!
My article just got declined for peacock language. The bot didn't like the use of the word "landmark." There are probably a few other peacocks in there, too.
The subject is a medical doctor who wrote a landmark article on Pneumonias in 1938, which is part of the reason he is notable. A landmark article in medicine is the first time a subject is discussed in a peer-reviewed publication. Reimann's was viral pneumonias, which had not been described prior to 1938.
How should I edit this article so it doesn't get bounced for that particular word?
I'll have a look for other language that might be an issue, but I think that's the one (it gets repeated a couple of times in discussion/reference to that article) that's causing the main issue.
Thanks! (the ever mildly problematic-- Sicklemoon ( talk) 23:25, 17 April 2020 (UTC) )
Okay, I deleted the word "renowned" from the first paragraph. Should I resubmit, or wait? What about the possibly redundant usage of the word "Landmark"? Sicklemoon ( talk) 23:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy! I wrote an article since February about a Tunisian champion cyclist became paratriathlete to a road accident . Could you submit this draft. Best Regards -- Chdondon1990 ( talk) 00:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC) /info/en/?search=Draft:Mohamed_Islam_Bouglia
Hi there, I noticed that my draft was declined due to the lack of reliable references but I am a little confused because, the sources I had given was off the university's courses page and the news paper company Khaleej Times here in Dubai, which has a Wikipedia page. I also noticed that Murdoch University Dubai had passed the review with only one reference from another UAE based news agency like Khaleej Times. If you could tell me what needs to be done or maybe reconsider the decision, it would be really appreciated thank you!. ( Delta fiver ( talk) (UTC) 08:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC))
/info/en/?search=Draft:Joey_Gonzalez
Hey, thanks for reviewing the page. A lot of editors have looked at it over the months, but it keeps getting rejected. The subject is well-known and has been written about a lot, so I just don't understand what I'm dong wrong. I've added a wide variety of sources and I've written in a neutral tone. I'm happy to delete areas or re-work things, but I just don't understand. The post is not an ad; it's not "Executive LinkedIn," as one reviewer put it. I feel like it's written thoughtfully and that the subject is worthy of an article. Any advice you have is much appreciated. Thanks. Djb2183 ( talk) 13:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Futureoflearning ( talk) 14:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC) Thank you so much for creating the page MIT Open Learning!
Can you help me understand how to get this article published? I am trying to get Wiki's posted about local political folks (I enjoy politics). You mentioned that I only used passing references on the subject, but there were 20 articles on this person. Not sure how that is not sufficient?
Thanks.
Tnpoliticofan ( talk) 16:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Kosmos 214 is my first article and I can't write the references I know. I really need your help. Cordially. CRS-20 ( talk) 02:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Approve this article Mohammed aquib k ( talk) 03:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
FYI I fixed up the Sandbox article on Edna Mosher and moved it to draft space. The user had posted at women in Red asking for help. Mosher seems very notable, now that more refs have been found. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 04:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy:
I am glad to inform, that all your observations are now incorporated in the short Biography Draft:Hermann_Hess_Helfenstein
Please, I will appreciate if you could delete the tags containing your declination.
Thanks for understanding and helping.
Regards, Ciete007
Hello Sulfurboy,
You've rejected our page submission because our artist topic is not relevant to you, I am writing to please reconsider our submission.
The artist we are writing about has been around for 20 years, toured the globe and will be releasing it's 10th album this summer.
We can provide you a number of instances of other similar artist's Wikipedia pages that have not been around as long, not released as many albums, and have only references to interviews and album reviews, all of which you mentioned have been issues that caused our rejection.
Currently Google Play (and other outlets) curate their artist information from Wikipedia. Without a Wikipedia entry, the artist looks unprofessional. Also in Google search, past members are shown as being in the band, when founding and current are not. Google search is in most cases the first introduction to information about the artist.
In our first attempt to post a page our formatting did not follow Wikipedia guidelines. We learned from that experience and have not provided correct formatting, citing relevant references.
If you can please reconsider and re-review our submission I would appreciate it. Again, without a Wikipedia page the group's professional appearance is hindered, and is causing confusion with current and past fans of the artist.
Please advise.
Thank you
Greetings, in creating my first article for WIKIPEDIA, thank you for the recommendations for editing - I will work and resubmit. As far as references of significance, I can include others, however, when surfing related figures in the area I came across one Wiki entry that I found had no references and seemed less notable to me, however, was published. RE: /info/en/?search=Blaine_Stewart - can you give me some guidance as to what this article contains on the subject that the one I submitted does not? Thanks for your input. I hope to continue articles on people in the media and different programs that I find widely known and covered in my area. Again, thanks for your time and help.
Hi Sulfurboy! Thank you for taking the time to review my draft article Draft:Subrata Roy (Scientist) and providing feedback. I am writing this message for clarification on the reason you provided for article rejection (not written from a neutral point of view). Since the rejection, I've made an effort to remove peacock and flowery language (except where it is part of a formal title, e.g. "Distinguished" in "Distinguished Fellow") and I've provided citations for my claims. Did I address all your concerns for the article, or is there more work to be done? Thank you so much.
Sincerely, Cpor
Hello, you accepted my article Luke Swann earlier this week (very grateful thank you). You mentioned that it's been classified as a 'start-class" article and that is mentioned in the talk section, however after looking I couldn't see where it says that? Only asking as I am going to work hard to improve the article and wanted to keep an eye on its classification. Many thanks for your help. Pegs50 ( talk) 17:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
That's very helpful thank you very much again. Pegs50 ( talk) 06:56, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
I this's avinav yadav I want to create a wikipedia page so please suggest me Avinav yadav 02:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Holland ( talk • contribs)
Hello, SulfurBoy. Thank you again for your feedback. I am following up about my article as it relates to Jason George, the television producer and creator of Into the Night. As you’ve suggested, the link to my article is here: /info/en/?search=Draft:Jason_George_(writer) I’ve revised the page off your other suggestions, including more citations that are not just “passing mentions” and made sure those citations are from “published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.” I am learning, and welcome learning more, if I have again fallen short in my composition. Thank you again. / John/
Hi, I had a comment on the article I produced /info/en/?search=Draft:Carl_Reader which had too many citations. I have reduced these significantly as I found a page referencing his work. Is this more suitable now? If so, would you kindly be able to mark the WP Bombard comment as fixed - if not, please suggest or make any more required edits?
Hi , My page has been sent for resubmission after the feedback that there is a person with that name already. To clarify you on that ,these two are two different people working in same industry. You are confused with name "Amulya".Amulya is actress in Kannada film Industry.Nisha Ravikrishnan is an actress in Kannada film industry who protrays role of Amulya in daily soap.
So, two distinct actresses working in same industry. My article has been moved to draft : Amulya. /info/en/?search=Draft:Amulya Please help me publish with name : Nisha Ravikrishnan Much thanks
Hi Sulfurboy,
Thought it might be useful to talk through the thinking behind my last edit in response to your comments.
In trying to make a list of things that Smart Design has created, my intention was to catalog rather than advertise, but I wasn't sure what to call the cataloging, especially as the catalog is very incomplete (as only products that have been written about and that have had some legacy, are included).
Looking at other people or companies that have created a body of work, I came across the term "selected works". I thought that this might be the most appropriate for Smart Design, implying that it is not the full body of work, and not saying that it is special in any way.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks,
NYStrat (
talk)
01:56, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
NYStrat ( talk) 01:56, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Not sure if this will help to advance matters, but much of the work referred to can be found in the Library of Congress, and other notable institutions around the globe. I'll type a link as one example. Stay safe - and wash your hands!
https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/holdingsInfo?searchId=55889&recCount=25&recPointer=7&bibId=14492108
Dear Sulfurboy,
First of all, I'd like to thank you for your time and effort with the review process with the biography-article on Prof. Serafim Kalliadasis However, I'd like to have some further advice on how to make this draft a publishable article. I've tried to add as much reference to external sources as I could, e.g. links the official articles pages, links to Imperial College London website and the professional Imperial College's site of Prof. S. Kalliadasis. I was one of his alumni and was trying to publish some short biography purely based on the official website (link). I'll be very happy should you have any comments that really help me to improve the draft and get it published.
Thanks again for your time and effort and, Best regards
Hello Sulfurboy, I'm new to wikipedia.I'm not understanding why my contibution /info/en/?search=Draft:Swagat_Thorat is rejected . Swagat Thorat is called Braille Man of India he is the first person to start magazine for blind ,His name is there in Limca book of records .His work is noteworthy for Blind ,I have also given references of news papers like Indian Express ,Hindu . Please guide me .
Hi Sulfurboy,
I read your review on the page for Matthew. I included several top newspaper articles on him, names of journals, there are more that is waiting to be published, however COVID-19 has taken hit from it and several references to his reserchgate page,
But you declined it very quickly?
He is a young academic and is on his way to being a top researcher and this page is to help increase his reach as a researcher, what can be done to get his page accepted, as I am a little but stuck on what can be done
Link to page - /info/en/?search=Draft:Matthew_D._Webster
Thanks
Thanks for the comments, the whole point of having a page for him is to inform people properly of the research, who he is and what he does. I don't know him I have seen some of his stuff online, I never mentioned I knew the researcher.
So can you tell me that my page got declined because I don't have references on the page that shows who he is? or what he is doing?
Thanks
Thank you Sulfurboy. I find your approach - and that of another reviewer's - to reviewing more balanced but I find another one is chronically dismissive. He is only into speedy deletion nomination? Wikipedia itself as a foundation recommends that newcomers be given a helping hand but what to say. All the best for the good effort and endeavor that Wikipedia is. Thanks. SGMKnowledge ( talk) 17:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
SGMKnowledge (
talk)
17:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy,
You recently moved the Draft:NAVGTR Award for Lighting/Texturing to draftspace. I understand that notability requires secondary sources but I think in this case it warrants an article based on the announcements from the NAVGTR website since they regulate the awards. It constitutes as fact. I am trying to clean up the main NAVGTR Awards page as the awards list grows longer and longer each year. It'll be more manageable. Please let me know what do you think of my arguement? Burair7 ( talk) 18:11, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | → | Archive 25 |
Thank you for your feedback on my first attempt at a Wikipedia article Draft:Joseph Bae. I am writing for more targeted advice on my references. I am writing about a finance executive who is referenced by name in three different Wikipedia articles (articles for KKR, Exor, Janice Y. K. Lee all reference Bae) and who is a public figure via his philanthropy (he might be worth listing under notable Harvard alums). In my research, I drew from the following sources: Wall Street Journal, Reuters, New York Times, Forbes, and Bloomberg, as well as the KKR website for basic biographical information. All these sources discussed Bae by name and in depth.
Should I look for more references? Or make better use of the ones I have? Or are these major news organizations not neutral enough?
Thank you in advance for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brick the golden ( talk • contribs) 17:05, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
I see you are still moving drafts from user space to draft space without leaving a redirect. Is that just an oversight, or do you have a good reason for doing it? JBW ( talk) 22:24, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, the page I am working on entitled "Alberto Rey" (a visual artist) was flagged as not being written from a neutral point of view. Could you please point out what language or parts of the article appear biased? I do not believe I used any "peacocking" language as the flag suggests. Any descriptions of his projects were not judgments or about the quality, success, or merit of his activities, but merely relaying the information I compiled. I apologize as this is my first article written for Wikipedia and though I have been reading through the many guidelines and help pages, this process is still somewhat confusing to me. Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks for your time.
ArtistofWNY (
talk)
00:55, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
ArtistofWNY ( talk) 00:55, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Lord Hyeamang passes WP:NGRIDIRON per [1] [2] Joeykai ( talk) 02:59, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy,
I appreciate your reviews but I don't understand how to write the reference correctly and how to check the reliability of the source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishakha2588 ( talk • contribs) 11:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I observe you accepted Azure Data Explorer at AfC. Did you notice these edit {Diff|Talk:Azure_Data_Explorer|950131022|950054608}} [4]. There are also a lot of WP:PRIMARY sources used on the article. Its fundamentally an appropriate subject for an article, I'm just concerned about possible bias and as an administrator hopeful I'd like you to check these points out. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 11:59, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
hey am new in here i only have two days, and i am from Tanzania where we don't speak English fluently, so its so difficult but with your reviews am trying and i hope i will succeed to create my first article. so if there is any possibilities for you to help me on the creation please help me. i will learn. i hope one day i am gonna be a better one. all in all thank you for your comment.
( talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moses rukanima ( talk • contribs) 15:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy! I was wondering if you could give me some more sprecific suggestions on what is should add to Draft:PremjiInvest to make it suitable to publishing on Wikipedia. Thanks in advance, Usernameisentered ( talk) 16:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I don't understand what is meant by "significant coverage". Usernameisentered ( talk) 16:10, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi! Thank you for the feedback on my submission. I have reviewed and taken care of some citations that I mistakenly placed links on. I'd love to have you review it again and provide additional feedback should there be the necessity for it.
Thanks!
Loyal
04/13/2020 2:30p cst — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loyal122053 ( talk • contribs) 19:30, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
draft: Saqib Iqbal Sham whether I am going right or not Maizbhandariya ( talk) 20:09, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
I noticed you deal a lot with NPP. It's been forever since I made a page, and standards have tightened up significantly. Is the above still considered a good rule? Because I recently copied across and modified material for a species from vi wiki that isn't yet here, it's well sourced but it's also a very short species stub. Back in the day that would've been more than enough but if things have changed I can just G7 it (took less than 10 minutes to convert) rather than wasting anyone's time. I haven't linked the draft here because I don't want it to appear like I'm trying to prioritize my own work over the massive backlog. Spectrum{{ UV}} 2604:2000:8FC0:4:68BA:3B32:8613:8B6D ( talk) 00:06, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I apologize if you felt that the discussion was getting out of hand. I do get intense in debates but I did not intend to attack you personally, that's specifically why I said I did and do think you were acting in good intentions. Speculating on possible causes of our disagreement right after didn't help that message, I could very well be wrong about your objections too. I've made a commitment to myself that I should always try and work amicably with the people here also volunteering their time. I have added a few more sources to the AFD discussion that may change your mind. If it doesn't that's ok too, there will be others that weigh in and in the end consensus is king. I won't pester you more here, and even not return if you so wish. I will tone down my responses on the page if that helps you return to the issue at hand which I believe you and I both can solve. I've provided coverage spanning almost 100 years. It covers reviews of her roles, international tour and various mentions. Adding up she may not have superstar notability but she is definitely notable, one other piece of information was that she was a manager of someone who ended up quite famous herself. Hell in a Bucket ( talk) 03:25, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I agree that being listed on the National Register is sufficient to establish notability. It's just that the editor, FloridaArmy, is experienced enough to submit a decent article not just a one liner. Examining the references there is enough information to expand the article, covering the issues that I raised in my comments. Dan arndt ( talk) 03:36, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I was deciding whether to decline it with a harsh template or to reject with a harsh template and you simply rejected it. We agree. When it was previously submitted, it was an advertisement in marketing buzzspeak. They rewrote it into standard English, and it was still an advertisement. Robert McClenon ( talk) 20:52, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I accepted it. If in doubt about the standards for a medical article, I', m one of the people you could ask. DGG ( talk ) 23:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I accepted the article. Even in the version that you saw, the context was clear enough to anyone who would be likely to be interested in the article. There are many fields I do not understand--probably including the fields for at least 3/4 of the articles submitted to WP--and I try not to review articles in them DGG ( talk ) 00:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy, Thanks for your feedback and advice. I have made my paid contributor declaration in my user page. Apology for not making this declaration in the first place. Once again, thank you, keep well and stay healthy.
~~~~ Luminosity123 ( talk) 09:32, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi,
I am not paid to write any articles nor have any interest in doing any promotional writings. The website is currently co-owned by myself.
Thought I could start my Wikipedia editing with my own website first before venturing further.
Happy to remove the page if it's violating the policies.
Hi Sulfurboy, I would appreciate elaboration. I wrote the article because I found that the wikipedia backlog regarding requested articles included the subject. see /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Business_and_economics#Business. The issue of notability is derived from there. As a side note, during the research for the article, I've come to see it as notable. Its a major award in the Canadian business landscape, and companies are above proud to receive it. Moreover, candidacy for it requires the companies to undergo tedious coaching and other burdens, only to be considered.
Regarding the tone - please clarify - I have not gave any synthesized statements and have expressed zero opinion. Pratat ( talk) 14:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Dear Sulfurboy, you rejected the draft on Ricardo Eichmann and linked the criteria for notability for academics. So far in the article I only mentioned that Eichmann is a professor, would it suffice if I mention that he's the director of the Orient department at the German Archaeological Institute? It seems to me that that would suffice the academics notability criteria (specifically point 6 "highest-level elected or appointed administrative post"). Maltimore ( talk) 16:38, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
I am confused as to how I can make the subject seem more noteworthy. I used appropriate articles as references that were published (not blogs nor social media) which discuss the works that the subject has contributed to and how these have had huge impacts on the community and how important it is. I am mainly confused because I looked at other Wikipedia articles as an example (or "template") to base myself off of, and it seems quite subjective to determine that this subject is not noteworthy, whereas other published and acceptable articles I have read are of the same caliber.
ChristinaL.P. ( talk) 02:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Apologies if this message is not properly transmitted, I am unsure of how to use this properly. What I mean is what is it that is the issue with the notability? Is it just that the work itself is not worthwhile (an issue with the article or the way it is writen), or is it specifically that the references I used do not properly demonstrate that it is noteworthy? I am asking because I have pages worth of various sources I used to write the article, and chose the ones that seemed the most credible to me (peer reviewed, etc.), but if this is not the case, I can change to other references. If the issue is with the content of the article, unfortunately, there isn't much I can change about that.
ChristinaL.P. ( talk) 02:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
HI Sulfurboy, thank you for your kindly Suggestion. I have modified the citation style recently. Actually, I take IPFS as the reference, including writing neutrally and finding the citation and reference to create this article. I think the citation and reference are enough to support the article, if not, could you please tell me where or how should I improve this. Really appreciate your help!
here is the link: /info/en/?search=Draft:New_Kind_of_Network Maxchangyuchih ( talk) 03:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
I added that Big Rick Daniels is now syndicated on Sun Broadcast Group. That was one of the suggestions from moderators to resubmit with.
He did not win the ACM award, but just being a nominee is pretty notable. Its a part of country music history.
The article has citing from trade publications, that provide in depth coverage of the subject. There are also cites that show local and national coverage that are more than just passing mentions.
There are other articles with FAR LESS coverage, notability that have been allowed to be published, example: /info/en/?search=The_Smiley_Morning_Show
I would ask you to reconsider this article please.
Smokethatskinwagon ( talk) 13:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Jasonreed1828 ( talk) 15:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi, you just declined my new page - /info/en/?search=Draft:1828_(website)
First, I have no financial interest to disclose - I'm Deputy Editor of 1828, but I'm not an employee. It's a voluntary position. I'm a full-time student.
Second, it says in the comment that the page has too many citations - last time it was declined for not having enough citations?
Thanks
I have declined this draft again and have requested a topic-ban against the paid editor. Johnson probably should have a BLP; she appears to satisfy academic notability. But she won't get a neutral article as long as her flack is sending stupid fluff down the AFC pipe. Robert McClenon ( talk) 16:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
Thanks Behrouz asbahi sis ( talk) 22:07, 16 April 2020 (UTC) |
Hi I try editing Wikipedia persian or farsi but managers block my function on site for 30 days . Because I say one joke for one admins or manager and tell me you can not say joke in Wikipedia ! I accept and for 30 day can not edit in Wikipedia!!! 😯 Behrouz asbahi sis ( talk) 22:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC) Sulfurboy
Block me = taranet gharouni Behrouz asbahi sis ( talk) 22:28, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Please tell Wikipedia manager this subject for known Behrouz asbahi sis ( talk) 22:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Ok thanks I accept Wikipedia farsi dictators manager 😂🙏🙏 Behrouz asbahi sis ( talk) 22:46, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy! Thank you for taking the time to review the draft for The Doo Wop Shop. Regarding notability among a cappella groups, although it is a niche audience, the a cappella community is quite a large one. Achievements such as the CARAs are like the "Grammys of A Cappella", as cheesy as it sounds. And although achievements of The Doo Wop Shop are mostly covered by local news sources, being invited to Radio City Music Hall's Christmas Spectacular and the White House Holiday Reception for service staff, as well as America's Got Talent's auditions and The Sing Off (The Sing Off was a nationally televised A Cappella program featuring top professional and scholastic groups, and was where Pentatonix got their start) is a reflection of The Doo Wop Shop's notability beyond "Boston" (the specifics of those events aren't publicized by those entities for various reasons). Obviously we aren't touting popularity that rivals Ariana Grande or other chart-topping musical artists, but I disagree that we are not notable within a large audience of people. I understand that since it is a niche audience and we don't have a large number of national references, it may seem like we lack notability, but your review was based on your limited and subjective understanding of a cappella as a community and its reaches. Would it help to add a list of notable alumni? I can reference sources that display their notability but it is difficult to find more recent sources directly pertaining to The Doo Wop Shop's recent achievements. Compared to many a cappella groups that have existing wikipedia articles, however, it seems like we exceed the standards for being a reputable a cappella group, although the a cappella community may collectively fail to meet "general notability standards". That being said, again I understand the standards that are applied to all incoming articles and I apologize if some of the above statements come off as a little charged. Can you please let me know a little bit more about what qualifies as notable, or specifically which a cappella-related sources may be useful to cite? Thank you again for your time! Patricknie7359 ( talk) 8:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
I'd like to delete this and continue with the Mark St John Lewis draft - how do I do this, please?
Thanks
Claireatwaves (
talk)
12:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
I see you rejected Draft:Carlos Cruchaga for lacking in-line citations. While that was certainly true, it was obvious it was somebody posting their resume, and in fact an earwig search quickly found it was a total copy-paste from their faculty page. You might want to routinely run an earwig check on everything you review :-) -- RoySmith (talk) 14:48, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy,
Thanks for taking a look at this:
/info/en/?search=Draft:Nacsport
Re: Your comment. I don't believe anybody has previously asked me to disclose anything, unless I missed it. I actually put a disclaimer in the Nacsport Talk page but I now realise this should have gone in my own user page, which I have now done. I repeat that disclaimer here for you:
I want to make it clear that I am not being paid to write this article. That being said, I have done some paid copywriting for this company in the past. This article is simply a way for me to pass time during the Corona Virus crisis here in Spain where the whole country is on lockdown. I'm trying to learn a new writing skill.
I chose this subject to write about because they are one of the few companies in the Canary Islands which has a presence on the global stage. I also wanted to write about something which is close to home (Gran Canaria, Spain) and something which hasn't previously been written about. I've spoken to Nacsport about this and they gave me the green light to write this, and I did make them aware of wikipedia policies about objectivity (although I'm learning a lot about this too during the writing process!), etc.''
Can you advise me if this is sufficient a disclaimer to allow me to continue with the article?
Thanks in advance,
DuncRitchie ( talk) 14:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Duncan Ritchie
Thanks in advance,
DuncRitchie ( talk) 15:15, 17 April 2020 (UTC)DuncRitchie
DuncRitchie ( talk) 16:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)DuncRitchie
I don't know what I'm doing but a kitten?
RMJ13 (
talk)
23:22, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hola, Sulfurboy!
My article just got declined for peacock language. The bot didn't like the use of the word "landmark." There are probably a few other peacocks in there, too.
The subject is a medical doctor who wrote a landmark article on Pneumonias in 1938, which is part of the reason he is notable. A landmark article in medicine is the first time a subject is discussed in a peer-reviewed publication. Reimann's was viral pneumonias, which had not been described prior to 1938.
How should I edit this article so it doesn't get bounced for that particular word?
I'll have a look for other language that might be an issue, but I think that's the one (it gets repeated a couple of times in discussion/reference to that article) that's causing the main issue.
Thanks! (the ever mildly problematic-- Sicklemoon ( talk) 23:25, 17 April 2020 (UTC) )
Okay, I deleted the word "renowned" from the first paragraph. Should I resubmit, or wait? What about the possibly redundant usage of the word "Landmark"? Sicklemoon ( talk) 23:31, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy! I wrote an article since February about a Tunisian champion cyclist became paratriathlete to a road accident . Could you submit this draft. Best Regards -- Chdondon1990 ( talk) 00:39, 18 April 2020 (UTC) /info/en/?search=Draft:Mohamed_Islam_Bouglia
Hi there, I noticed that my draft was declined due to the lack of reliable references but I am a little confused because, the sources I had given was off the university's courses page and the news paper company Khaleej Times here in Dubai, which has a Wikipedia page. I also noticed that Murdoch University Dubai had passed the review with only one reference from another UAE based news agency like Khaleej Times. If you could tell me what needs to be done or maybe reconsider the decision, it would be really appreciated thank you!. ( Delta fiver ( talk) (UTC) 08:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC))
/info/en/?search=Draft:Joey_Gonzalez
Hey, thanks for reviewing the page. A lot of editors have looked at it over the months, but it keeps getting rejected. The subject is well-known and has been written about a lot, so I just don't understand what I'm dong wrong. I've added a wide variety of sources and I've written in a neutral tone. I'm happy to delete areas or re-work things, but I just don't understand. The post is not an ad; it's not "Executive LinkedIn," as one reviewer put it. I feel like it's written thoughtfully and that the subject is worthy of an article. Any advice you have is much appreciated. Thanks. Djb2183 ( talk) 13:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Futureoflearning ( talk) 14:01, 18 April 2020 (UTC) Thank you so much for creating the page MIT Open Learning!
Can you help me understand how to get this article published? I am trying to get Wiki's posted about local political folks (I enjoy politics). You mentioned that I only used passing references on the subject, but there were 20 articles on this person. Not sure how that is not sufficient?
Thanks.
Tnpoliticofan ( talk) 16:05, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Kosmos 214 is my first article and I can't write the references I know. I really need your help. Cordially. CRS-20 ( talk) 02:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Approve this article Mohammed aquib k ( talk) 03:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
FYI I fixed up the Sandbox article on Edna Mosher and moved it to draft space. The user had posted at women in Red asking for help. Mosher seems very notable, now that more refs have been found. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 04:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy:
I am glad to inform, that all your observations are now incorporated in the short Biography Draft:Hermann_Hess_Helfenstein
Please, I will appreciate if you could delete the tags containing your declination.
Thanks for understanding and helping.
Regards, Ciete007
Hello Sulfurboy,
You've rejected our page submission because our artist topic is not relevant to you, I am writing to please reconsider our submission.
The artist we are writing about has been around for 20 years, toured the globe and will be releasing it's 10th album this summer.
We can provide you a number of instances of other similar artist's Wikipedia pages that have not been around as long, not released as many albums, and have only references to interviews and album reviews, all of which you mentioned have been issues that caused our rejection.
Currently Google Play (and other outlets) curate their artist information from Wikipedia. Without a Wikipedia entry, the artist looks unprofessional. Also in Google search, past members are shown as being in the band, when founding and current are not. Google search is in most cases the first introduction to information about the artist.
In our first attempt to post a page our formatting did not follow Wikipedia guidelines. We learned from that experience and have not provided correct formatting, citing relevant references.
If you can please reconsider and re-review our submission I would appreciate it. Again, without a Wikipedia page the group's professional appearance is hindered, and is causing confusion with current and past fans of the artist.
Please advise.
Thank you
Greetings, in creating my first article for WIKIPEDIA, thank you for the recommendations for editing - I will work and resubmit. As far as references of significance, I can include others, however, when surfing related figures in the area I came across one Wiki entry that I found had no references and seemed less notable to me, however, was published. RE: /info/en/?search=Blaine_Stewart - can you give me some guidance as to what this article contains on the subject that the one I submitted does not? Thanks for your input. I hope to continue articles on people in the media and different programs that I find widely known and covered in my area. Again, thanks for your time and help.
Hi Sulfurboy! Thank you for taking the time to review my draft article Draft:Subrata Roy (Scientist) and providing feedback. I am writing this message for clarification on the reason you provided for article rejection (not written from a neutral point of view). Since the rejection, I've made an effort to remove peacock and flowery language (except where it is part of a formal title, e.g. "Distinguished" in "Distinguished Fellow") and I've provided citations for my claims. Did I address all your concerns for the article, or is there more work to be done? Thank you so much.
Sincerely, Cpor
Hello, you accepted my article Luke Swann earlier this week (very grateful thank you). You mentioned that it's been classified as a 'start-class" article and that is mentioned in the talk section, however after looking I couldn't see where it says that? Only asking as I am going to work hard to improve the article and wanted to keep an eye on its classification. Many thanks for your help. Pegs50 ( talk) 17:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
That's very helpful thank you very much again. Pegs50 ( talk) 06:56, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
I this's avinav yadav I want to create a wikipedia page so please suggest me Avinav yadav 02:47, 27 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by James Holland ( talk • contribs)
Hello, SulfurBoy. Thank you again for your feedback. I am following up about my article as it relates to Jason George, the television producer and creator of Into the Night. As you’ve suggested, the link to my article is here: /info/en/?search=Draft:Jason_George_(writer) I’ve revised the page off your other suggestions, including more citations that are not just “passing mentions” and made sure those citations are from “published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject.” I am learning, and welcome learning more, if I have again fallen short in my composition. Thank you again. / John/
Hi, I had a comment on the article I produced /info/en/?search=Draft:Carl_Reader which had too many citations. I have reduced these significantly as I found a page referencing his work. Is this more suitable now? If so, would you kindly be able to mark the WP Bombard comment as fixed - if not, please suggest or make any more required edits?
Hi , My page has been sent for resubmission after the feedback that there is a person with that name already. To clarify you on that ,these two are two different people working in same industry. You are confused with name "Amulya".Amulya is actress in Kannada film Industry.Nisha Ravikrishnan is an actress in Kannada film industry who protrays role of Amulya in daily soap.
So, two distinct actresses working in same industry. My article has been moved to draft : Amulya. /info/en/?search=Draft:Amulya Please help me publish with name : Nisha Ravikrishnan Much thanks
Hi Sulfurboy,
Thought it might be useful to talk through the thinking behind my last edit in response to your comments.
In trying to make a list of things that Smart Design has created, my intention was to catalog rather than advertise, but I wasn't sure what to call the cataloging, especially as the catalog is very incomplete (as only products that have been written about and that have had some legacy, are included).
Looking at other people or companies that have created a body of work, I came across the term "selected works". I thought that this might be the most appropriate for Smart Design, implying that it is not the full body of work, and not saying that it is special in any way.
Please let me know your thoughts.
Thanks,
NYStrat (
talk)
01:56, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
NYStrat ( talk) 01:56, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Hi. Not sure if this will help to advance matters, but much of the work referred to can be found in the Library of Congress, and other notable institutions around the globe. I'll type a link as one example. Stay safe - and wash your hands!
https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/holdingsInfo?searchId=55889&recCount=25&recPointer=7&bibId=14492108
Dear Sulfurboy,
First of all, I'd like to thank you for your time and effort with the review process with the biography-article on Prof. Serafim Kalliadasis However, I'd like to have some further advice on how to make this draft a publishable article. I've tried to add as much reference to external sources as I could, e.g. links the official articles pages, links to Imperial College London website and the professional Imperial College's site of Prof. S. Kalliadasis. I was one of his alumni and was trying to publish some short biography purely based on the official website (link). I'll be very happy should you have any comments that really help me to improve the draft and get it published.
Thanks again for your time and effort and, Best regards
Hello Sulfurboy, I'm new to wikipedia.I'm not understanding why my contibution /info/en/?search=Draft:Swagat_Thorat is rejected . Swagat Thorat is called Braille Man of India he is the first person to start magazine for blind ,His name is there in Limca book of records .His work is noteworthy for Blind ,I have also given references of news papers like Indian Express ,Hindu . Please guide me .
Hi Sulfurboy,
I read your review on the page for Matthew. I included several top newspaper articles on him, names of journals, there are more that is waiting to be published, however COVID-19 has taken hit from it and several references to his reserchgate page,
But you declined it very quickly?
He is a young academic and is on his way to being a top researcher and this page is to help increase his reach as a researcher, what can be done to get his page accepted, as I am a little but stuck on what can be done
Link to page - /info/en/?search=Draft:Matthew_D._Webster
Thanks
Thanks for the comments, the whole point of having a page for him is to inform people properly of the research, who he is and what he does. I don't know him I have seen some of his stuff online, I never mentioned I knew the researcher.
So can you tell me that my page got declined because I don't have references on the page that shows who he is? or what he is doing?
Thanks
Thank you Sulfurboy. I find your approach - and that of another reviewer's - to reviewing more balanced but I find another one is chronically dismissive. He is only into speedy deletion nomination? Wikipedia itself as a foundation recommends that newcomers be given a helping hand but what to say. All the best for the good effort and endeavor that Wikipedia is. Thanks. SGMKnowledge ( talk) 17:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
SGMKnowledge (
talk)
17:37, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy,
You recently moved the Draft:NAVGTR Award for Lighting/Texturing to draftspace. I understand that notability requires secondary sources but I think in this case it warrants an article based on the announcements from the NAVGTR website since they regulate the awards. It constitutes as fact. I am trying to clean up the main NAVGTR Awards page as the awards list grows longer and longer each year. It'll be more manageable. Please let me know what do you think of my arguement? Burair7 ( talk) 18:11, 20 April 2020 (UTC)