![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hello Sulfurboy,
I have tried to correct the page, based on your inputs. Thank you for the reviewing of it. Please, can you help with the editing of the info box? I've looked around Wikipedia to learn how to do it, but I didn't find it.
Best regards,
Oliver.D-56 ( talk) 02:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
{{SAFESUBST:Void|
Hello Sulfurboy, I don't understand why you have declined my request for "Maharan Frozenfar" Wikipedia page. I have added multiply sources about his career and his important rule in the Israeli Defence Forces. I have added various sources from: DefenseNews, Jerusalem Post, Reuters, Globes, Haaretz and more, and information taken from his offical website - All of these sources confirm that all the information is currect, and represet his notablity. Furthermore, Maharan already has a page in Wikipedia in Hebrew and in Persian, that consider the same content: https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%9E%D7%94%D7%A8%D7%9F_%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%96%D7%A0%D7%A4%D7%A8 https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86_%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B2%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%81%D8%B1
Please consider approve the request.
Thank you,
Omeradam1993 (
talk)
13:34, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for reviewing the article. To be honest I am a bit disappointed it didn't meet the criteria since I read all the rules and spent quite a bit of time on the life chat making sure it stands a chance of being published.
The first time I submitted, I was told that the references weren't strong enough, so I replaced them with independent media ones compared to blogger references. I though media such as 'The Telegraph' and the 'Independent' are fairly strong testimonials. I am really confused of why they are still not good.
In terms of the writing style, I used other, similar articles as a guide and I thought that the language is neutral. However I will review it again to make sure there isn't any promotional voice.
Please could you give me some more guidance on these points so I can edit them and resubmit the article. Your support is much appreciated.
Best, Dorotea
89.145.233.90 ( talk) 08:25, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for reviewing the article. To be honest I am a bit disappointed it didn't meet the criteria since I read all the rules and spent quite a bit of time on the life chat making sure it stands a chance of being published.
The first time I submitted, I was told that the references weren't strong enough, so I replaced them with independent media ones compared to blogger references. I though media such as 'The Telegraph' and the 'Independent' are fairly strong testimonials. I am really confused of why they are still not good.
In terms of the writing style, I used other, similar articles as a guide and I thought that the language is neutral. However I will review it again to make sure there isn't any promotional voice.
Please could you give me some more guidance on these points so I can edit them and resubmit the article. Your support is much appreciated.
Best, Dorotea
ps. I am referring to the article: Personal Oversea Development /info/en/?search=Draft:Personal_Overseas_Development#Pod_Volunteer
89.145.233.90 ( talk) 08:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
50.246.212.53 ( talk) 14:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
My submission was recently declined because it does not show the subjects notability. I was just curious what I could add to improve it because currently it includes articles from INC 500, Bloomberg, and Boulderopolis.
Thank you!
Hello,
You posted on /info/en/?search=Draft:Road_Recovery that the comments about Gene Bowen need to be sourced and cited. All information about Gene Bowen was written by the man himself. How am I supposed to cite that?
Thank you
Roadrecovery ( talk) 15:53, 22 July 2015 (UTC) That's fine just use the same source to cite each statement. Sulfurboy ( talk) 20:46, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
How should I cite word of mouth? Roadrecovery ( talk) 15:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy - I'm fairly new to article writing here. Please can you let me know what areas need further work on the Ari Norman article. All information is correct, so wondered which areas still need citations. Many thanks Shark
Sharktrager442 (
talk) 19:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Sharktrager442 (
talk)
19:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sulpurboy,
When an new article is submitted in draft, does it present for review automatically, or do I have to do something? Please see the below link for my new article, for review. Also, since I am sure there are many persons performing reviews for Wikipedia, I was wondering if there was a way to have you review this article, since you have previous experience specific to CMM, from your previous reviews of articles of this nature. /info/en/?search=Draft:Capability_Maturity_Model_Cybersecurity CMM Cybersecurity
Thank you in advance, Sean Connors -- Sean p connors ( talk) 17:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sulfurboy,
Thank you for your message about the page I've tried to create for Janus Pannonius Poetry Prize. I have some copyright issues, I fully understand why it is problematic; however, I would like to ask whether it is possible to leave the page and its contents as it is now if I have the written support of the Hungarian PEN Club that proves that I can use the booklet and its contents to create the site? I can attach the letter for you to read anytime you wish! The link: /info/en/?search=Draft:Janus_Pannonius_Grand_Prize_for_Poetry Thank you again in advance, Franciska78 ( talk)Franciska78
Hkb ( talk) 13:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback. In terms of notability, Ros Schwartz has been awarded Legion d'honneur (from the French government) and various national prizes (UK), and I have put references to all of these. In terms of her contribution to the field, the best way to show this is by her publications and representation in important organisations.
You have thoroughly convinced me that this proposed article should be a paragraph in the already published piece on SR16! However, I hesitate to edit the piece as much as it would need to include the paragraph. And I'm not exactly sure how to do the inclusion - must it be in the same form as an original article with the references included in the body? I would sincerely appreciate your help!
TCVCJ (
talk) 13:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
TCVCJ (
talk)
13:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear reviewer,
I already added independant references to our wiki article. Can you please be more specific and tell me exactly which references should i edit/add.
Kind regards
DSI EH ( talk) 10:50, 27 July 2015 (UTC) EH
DSI EH ( talk) 10:50, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
I think I have made the required improvements for this article. Could you please review again. Thanks. Gomach ( talk) 08:51, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Greetings, I should like an additional opinion based on the Fun School series at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fun School 6 . You may wish to examine the articles what with the recent edits I made to establish notability. Any concrete suggestions you can give would be highly appreciated. Deltasim ( talk) 08:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments about the submission. We are revising the submission and deleted unnecessary sentences. It would be great if you can advise us further in this process.
Also, do Wikipedia usually accept submission about industry collaboration project, like this one? Such initiative is beneficial to industry participants.
Milkeung ( talk) 00:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC) Who is we? Wikipedia accounts should not be shared in the manner you seem to be suggesting by what you said. Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Hippychickali. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Miloš Milovanović, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Hippychick ( talk) 22:17, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
A page you accepted at AFC, Kim Nam-joon, is currently up for deletion at AfD, in case you're interested. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Namjoon. Joseph2302 ( talk) 23:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my draft (twice) at
I'm trying to establish, whether I should keep working on it or not. Basically, I've read the
notability criteria for musicians and ensembles and asked for advice at the
Teahouse (my question) and I'm still not sure.
As far as I can see, the subject of my draft meets (at least) the criteria defined in sections 1, 2 and 11. Would you agree with this and is it enough in terms of notability?
As for the sources, I think the ones used in the article are some of the most independent and reliable in the Finnish and Swedish context. Was the lack of sources in English(?) the/a primary reason for the rejection? Anything else that contributed to that decision?
Thank you, have a good day! :) Reaason ( talk) 18:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy - Thanks for looking at the article draft on Creative Mobile The article was not accepted due to This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability
I've made some edits and included more reference citations, can you review and make any further comments on how to improve the article for approval?
I believe everything should qualify for approval in comparison to articles for similar game studios: Halfbrick Studios, Kiloo, Backflip Studios, Rovio Entertainment
Thanks! User:RadRacer20xx 13:27, 28 July 2015
Hi, Sulfurboy.
Thanks for your kindly review of the article, please share me more information about what kind of the references do we need to provide to verify the information, or can you tell me more about which information do we need to add reference to verify.
Thanks in advance!
Rye Giggs (
talk) 07:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Reviews by software review sites aren't really considered to show notability, as they are routine and done for any piece of software. We need to see independent coverage of the impact of the software and why it is notable and important enough to be in an encyclopedia.
Sulfurboy (
talk)
13:48, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
CinaedThePict ( talk) 14:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Can you clarify what 'Please clarify between the references and sources so we can confirm this custom.' means? This isn't readily evident - I can assure you (as a Scot), it's a long established custom, and I'm very happy to link to additional video footage if needbe.
Hi Sulfurboy, Thank you for reviewing my page /info/en/?search=Draft:David_Richter. As the person aboved me has requested, do you mind specifically telling me what's wrong with my inline citations? I ask just so I know I am doing the write thing before I go through the process of adding and editing again. The facts (awards, education, ect.) are backed up by the citations I have, so when you get a chance please let me know the mistake I've made. Thanks, Keelsh01 ( talk) 19:46, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sulfur Boy.thank you for reviewing but please help me in publishing my article. Drphanichalla
I am confused as to how our references are unacceptable, as they are all links with credible postings from third parties outside of the company. I would like to know what we can do to improve the page. Thanks.
Cary.tanaka (
talk)
15:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand why the notability or verification of this person has been declined, they are an elected politician with a number of controversial actions which have all bee linked, including the link to offical counil pages to verify: http://committees.westminster.gov.uk/mgUserInfo.aspx?UID=152
195.110.76.194 (
talk)
16:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Afternoon Sulfurboy. I got some help from the Wiki community and made a good amount of edits on the RW3 Technologies page. Looking forward to your comments.
/info/en/?search=Draft:RW3_Technologies
Cheers,
Thank you for publishing my article on the
North Central RTD! Here's a kitten for you, because kittens are amazing.
P.S. It looks like this is showing up on your talk page, and I can't figure out how to send it to your user page instead. I'm new to this. Sorry.
Imagine Dragonflies (
talk)
17:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hey,
I wanted to know how many citations I need to get an article on Wikipedia. I sent 3 citations, two of them from India's leading national dailies- The Hindu and Deccan Herald. I haven't made any huge claims without citing. How much more is required?
Gautamrajeev (
talk) 17:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Gautamrajeev (
talk)
17:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Ruffsl ( talk) 17:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Just like to ask for some aid the revision for the draft Draf tGazebo_simulator.
My goal is to keep the article short and factual similar in style to existing example open source articles:
If you have detailed specifics on this matter, or know of an editor knowledgeable in the subject, please do not hesitate to inform.
Thanks Ruffsl ( talk) 17:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your very helpful comments to improve Amazingrace Coffeehouse. So far I have been able to add the InfoBox and extend links. Will tackle formatting next, if you can just specify for me which aspects you feel are not in the proper Wikipedia style.
VerySeldom (
talk)
17:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
please, I have made my "Lakshitha Wikramage" article with every steps INCLUDING REFERENCE catogory also. I requested 3 times to accept my page. please accept it. I have done it taking my valuable time. please..!
Lakshitha Chathuranga Wikramage ( talk) 19:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Cleaver37 ( talk) 19:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC) Hi not sure how to reference my article. I am the founder of the club.... ( Cleaver37 ( talk) 19:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC))
Hi Sulfurboy,
When you need a break from new page patrol, can you please advise me on how to better improve my draft? I took your recommendation and created a sandbox draft for it: /info/en/?search=User:Sjane214/sandbox
If you have free time, can you please let me know how to better improve it? Sjane214 ( talk) 19:09, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
To start, you need independent, reliable sources that show substantial coverage of the center. Also, remove the external links within the article and either add them to an exlinks section if they're directly relevant, or otherwise just scrap them. Sulfurboy ( talk) 19:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the response Sulfurboy! I have created an External Links section and found sources. Here is the link to my draft: /info/en/?search=Draft:The_Center_for_Healthcare_Innovation Once again, if you have time, can you please let me know if I fixed the link/reference/any other type of problem? I know you don't have to review this draft so thank you for the first response! Sjane214 ( talk) 20:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello there, would it be possible to give me some assistance with this ? Can you give me an example of where "The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. " so that I can understand where I have gone wrong with my first article?
Many thanks for your help. Tim
Tim B Haigh ( talk) 21:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you once again for the recommendations:) I have incorporated the exlinks section and added additional sources. Is there's anything else I can fix before I re-submit my draft so it can become an article once more?
Here's the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:The_Center_for_Healthcare_Innovation&redirect=no
Sjane214 ( talk) 21:19, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy. I added the awards that Monica Brown has received and two additional sources to try to prove her notability. Before I put in further edits, could you point me in the right direction? Do you need quotes from and links to book reviews from industry periodicals (Kirkus/PW)? I don't want to keep barking up the wrong tree, but I do think that Brown is a notable author.
Aabbott ( talk) 20:20, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Can you advice me on the page Eric Joris? It has correct references and sources. No abuse of copyright and correct information.
Valery De Smedt (
talk)
22:25, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Régis_Hauser You asked me to improve the sources and to try to ass categories. I've done it. Is that right? (few information exist about him so the sources are few too). — Preceding unsigned comment added by HyperionMaxis ( talk • contribs) 23:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
I am wondering if there is any other source of reference I can include besides press release? Because I guess it should be the most credible source? Kindly advise for that! Thanks!
Cht0620 ( talk) 02:31, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy, thanks for your comments. I have been working on making the Wiki page for the book and used content from the book website. As I am the author I thought it would be Ok to use content from there. I have been working hard to make the page neutral, but didn't expect a copyright issue to occur. Do you suggest I change the language on the Wiki page slightly in order to ensure the system doesn't think there is a copyright issue?
I did try to source and link any word-for-word language whenever I used it from Amazon or the book website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KJacobi1121 ( talk • contribs) 01:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Many thanks for your help through this process
/info/en/?search=Draft:Going_with_the_Pitch
Ken wiki: KJacobi1121
24.184.216.47 ( talk) 01:34, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
hi Graham, Bothering you again with an AFC (this being my second article if selected). Please have a look as and when feasible. Thanks in advance. Devopam ( talk) 05:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, we want to create Wikipedia page for our company HeadHonchos.com (an online search engine portal). After much editing and submissions, we are not getting the final approval on the submitted work . I request you to please specify the areas where we can apply scope of change or improvement. Also, the references used are taken from the verified sources. We have used online sources in support to content/information in regard to HeadHonchos.com as a product/company. Need help so that we can improve on the areas asap. Thank you.
Charushr89 (
talk)
09:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
I have to say, this is a bit worrying; I've seen your name pop up in two rather disparate topic areas (reality television and American politics) because of AfCs you've marked as passing. The first was Big Brother 18 (U.S.), a future season of a current series that are routinely left as redirects until actual sources exist to say more than "it will air". I had to take it to AfD to enforce a redirect against serial revert-warring IPs and SPAs The second, today, is Alleged Clinton Controversies (also at AfD, where most of the input so far is to speedy delete because it is so egregiously policy-violating). I'm sorry, but, what the hell? You just allowed a POV-pushing single-purpose-account to jam a fringe conspiracy nut-loving, BLP coatrack mess into article-space. Did you even read it? Like the part where there is a sub-header titled "Alleged Enemies List", which deceptively links to a "main article" that is actually a low-grade partisan novel titled HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton? Tarc ( talk) 01:39, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy, could you please elaborate why the included footnotes do not meet the minimal standard for inline citations. Please not that there is also a general publications list in the article, but the citations to support the claims made in the article are provided as footnotes in the References section.
195.169.108.143 (
talk)
13:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy,
Thank you for reviewing draft article Draft:Dimitris Paraskevas. If possible, would you be able to elaborate on the reason for rejecting the submission? In my opinion the inline citation is adequate and proves the statements made. Could you please help me understand the problem? Specifically, can you please point out an example of an inadequate citation or a statement that needs to be footnoted? Thanks for your time and cooperation! Angelamarc ( talk) 12:47, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I have been working on this article for a while now and have had numerous comments regarding notability and references. If it wouldn't be a bother for you (and really only if it isn't), could you advise me on how I could get the article up to Wikipedia standard? With regards to notability, I have added all I can regarding his work etc. but can't reference anything other than the work on Emmerdale as all articles I can find on him now relate to the show as it's so popular and his most present work... I have been told I can't link to Wikipedia or the IMDb and when I referenced RottenTomatoes (which I believe to be independent and reliable), I was told it was only a mere name-drop and nothing else so was irrelevant though I only referenced the page to prove the role he played in the movie/series. Many thanks... Article -> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ryan_Hawley JoshDunn98 ( talk) 15:33, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:Rockville_2069:_A_Rock_Musical
Based on your previous comment, the story and character breakdown were edited. Do you recommend that it is further condensed? Is there anything else in the article that should also be condensed?
Your kind assistance would be appreciated.
154.69.162.175 ( talk) 15:38, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy, my name is Metalworker14. I was asked to create the article that I really knew nothing about. I've never heard of or listened to Serianna. I was just asked by The Cross Bearer to do and decided to help him out with it. --Metalworker14 (Yo) 16:22, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
One thing that helped me a very great deal when I was starting out in the AFC project was watching, then contributing to the AFC Helpdesk. I found that there were areas I expected to be clear to the editor I reviewed that were obviously not, judging by their reaction and cries for help. I'm still learning
I am cordially inviting you to come and join in there. And you may be there already. Your reviewing skills will improve and improve as you play there. Fiddle Faddle 16:32, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thnak you Eytankey ( talk) 17:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC) |
RE: /info/en/?search=Matching_Sweaters
You mentioned that this article needs additional citations for verification. I have added another from the band's webpage... not sure what else is needed (I am kind of a rookie). I built the page based on the others before it and I thought I had everything that was needed.
If something else is needed it would be great if you could direct me as to what that might be.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theflash95 ( talk • contribs) 17:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
I have a question about your review of this page:
/info/en/?search=Draft:Thom_Serafin
These are your reasons for rejection: External links should be removed from the article and either added to an exlink section or scraped. Other accomplishments should be made into a prose form and reduced to what is most relevant. Article should be formal and neutral, with all puffery removed.
I've fixed the first two, and I hope I've addressed the third, about puffery & neutrality. But, as a total noob, I'm not sure I've done an adequate job. For example, I (among other edits) replaced "kickstarting his career" with "beginning his career," removed information about some awards that he has won, and removed the name of another Hart spokesman as it's not relevant. Is that the sort of thing you're talking about or did I miss the mark?
HayMerchant (
talk)
16:56, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy, I currently have four sources that are more or less profiles of him, do you suggest that I rewrite the article to rely more on these?
Also, thank you for the quick attention.
HayMerchant ( talk) 17:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm wondering what needs to be changed in the Christian Lopez Band wikipedia draft. I'm not sure if I need to change the subject material or just worry about finding other sources. The sources I have used, I feel are reliable, but please let me know what I need to specifically work on. Thank you!
Elizabethwood4 ( talk) 17:55, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy, thanks for taking a look at Draft:Michael_Elliott. I'm quite surprised you declined as WP:FAILN, however.
Are you seriously suggesting that this fails WP:42, specifically The Guardian 2007 and 2010, [1] [2] Huffington Post 2010, [3] New York Post 2011, [4] Politico 2011, [5] independent.co.uk 2015, [6] and NPR 2015. [7]
There are plenty of sources, with a range of many years, and considerable depth in terms of word-count / specificity / etc. I thought this was WP:SNOW for speedy-accept. Which refs do you dispute? 75.108.94.227 ( talk) 20:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
I need assistance as I believe the sources that I cited are reliable published sources and I do not have other sources to reference and I would really like to publish this article. I have read over Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and I don't see why these sources do not work. I have gone ahead and added more sources to the article. Please let me know your help is truly appreciated.
InstaSD ( talk) 20:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
I have found that it is better use of my time to try very hard to review the same draft once only. This does, of course, increase the backlog if few other reviewers are active, but it provides a better experience for the new editor. One can also argue that further eyes provide a better review. I moved to, mostly offering comments rather than reviews when I'd reviewed a draft previously. Fiddle Faddle 19:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I saw your COI tag on this article. Please see Denawaka Ganga Mini Hydro Power Project. I believe their may be a COI too. I am concerned about the images as well. One is a Google image which is certainly copyrighted. The schematics are suspicious as well. It seems this author was heavily involved in the project and may be using their company or firm's information for the articles. I asked the author on their talk but no response.-- NortyNort (Holla) 21:14, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Just trying to get feedback on what didn't work within the article. Does any of it work? We're trying to build a historical perspective on what the hotel has been within the community as centuries have passed. Can you please provide some feedback and perhaps some advice?
Dreafea ( talk) 21:55, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
@ Metalworker14: I recommended it to him to create their profile, and I addressed concerns with my edits to show GNG. The Cross Bearer ( talk) 02:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi again Re 1st Australian Civil Affairs Unit General Peter Gration Peter Gration, one of our Unit's former commanding officers, has suggested some changes to our article. I have made the edits to the main body but do not know how to edit one of the footnotes you created for us. Would you please either (a) tell me how to do it, or (b) make the edits for us. If the latter, the requested edits are to Footnote 3. Firstly, delete "construction" between "engineer" and "squadrons". Secondly, replace "within" with "throughout" before "1 ATF". Thanks again for all your help with this project. Don Limn (aka 1acau) 1acau ( talk) 00:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hello Sulfurboy,
I have tried to correct the page, based on your inputs. Thank you for the reviewing of it. Please, can you help with the editing of the info box? I've looked around Wikipedia to learn how to do it, but I didn't find it.
Best regards,
Oliver.D-56 ( talk) 02:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
{{SAFESUBST:Void|
Hello Sulfurboy, I don't understand why you have declined my request for "Maharan Frozenfar" Wikipedia page. I have added multiply sources about his career and his important rule in the Israeli Defence Forces. I have added various sources from: DefenseNews, Jerusalem Post, Reuters, Globes, Haaretz and more, and information taken from his offical website - All of these sources confirm that all the information is currect, and represet his notablity. Furthermore, Maharan already has a page in Wikipedia in Hebrew and in Persian, that consider the same content: https://he.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D7%9E%D7%94%D7%A8%D7%9F_%D7%A4%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%96%D7%A0%D7%A4%D7%A8 https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D9%87%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86_%D9%81%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B2%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%81%D8%B1
Please consider approve the request.
Thank you,
Omeradam1993 (
talk)
13:34, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for reviewing the article. To be honest I am a bit disappointed it didn't meet the criteria since I read all the rules and spent quite a bit of time on the life chat making sure it stands a chance of being published.
The first time I submitted, I was told that the references weren't strong enough, so I replaced them with independent media ones compared to blogger references. I though media such as 'The Telegraph' and the 'Independent' are fairly strong testimonials. I am really confused of why they are still not good.
In terms of the writing style, I used other, similar articles as a guide and I thought that the language is neutral. However I will review it again to make sure there isn't any promotional voice.
Please could you give me some more guidance on these points so I can edit them and resubmit the article. Your support is much appreciated.
Best, Dorotea
89.145.233.90 ( talk) 08:25, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for reviewing the article. To be honest I am a bit disappointed it didn't meet the criteria since I read all the rules and spent quite a bit of time on the life chat making sure it stands a chance of being published.
The first time I submitted, I was told that the references weren't strong enough, so I replaced them with independent media ones compared to blogger references. I though media such as 'The Telegraph' and the 'Independent' are fairly strong testimonials. I am really confused of why they are still not good.
In terms of the writing style, I used other, similar articles as a guide and I thought that the language is neutral. However I will review it again to make sure there isn't any promotional voice.
Please could you give me some more guidance on these points so I can edit them and resubmit the article. Your support is much appreciated.
Best, Dorotea
ps. I am referring to the article: Personal Oversea Development /info/en/?search=Draft:Personal_Overseas_Development#Pod_Volunteer
89.145.233.90 ( talk) 08:27, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
50.246.212.53 ( talk) 14:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
My submission was recently declined because it does not show the subjects notability. I was just curious what I could add to improve it because currently it includes articles from INC 500, Bloomberg, and Boulderopolis.
Thank you!
Hello,
You posted on /info/en/?search=Draft:Road_Recovery that the comments about Gene Bowen need to be sourced and cited. All information about Gene Bowen was written by the man himself. How am I supposed to cite that?
Thank you
Roadrecovery ( talk) 15:53, 22 July 2015 (UTC) That's fine just use the same source to cite each statement. Sulfurboy ( talk) 20:46, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
How should I cite word of mouth? Roadrecovery ( talk) 15:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy - I'm fairly new to article writing here. Please can you let me know what areas need further work on the Ari Norman article. All information is correct, so wondered which areas still need citations. Many thanks Shark
Sharktrager442 (
talk) 19:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Sharktrager442 (
talk)
19:49, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sulpurboy,
When an new article is submitted in draft, does it present for review automatically, or do I have to do something? Please see the below link for my new article, for review. Also, since I am sure there are many persons performing reviews for Wikipedia, I was wondering if there was a way to have you review this article, since you have previous experience specific to CMM, from your previous reviews of articles of this nature. /info/en/?search=Draft:Capability_Maturity_Model_Cybersecurity CMM Cybersecurity
Thank you in advance, Sean Connors -- Sean p connors ( talk) 17:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear Sulfurboy,
Thank you for your message about the page I've tried to create for Janus Pannonius Poetry Prize. I have some copyright issues, I fully understand why it is problematic; however, I would like to ask whether it is possible to leave the page and its contents as it is now if I have the written support of the Hungarian PEN Club that proves that I can use the booklet and its contents to create the site? I can attach the letter for you to read anytime you wish! The link: /info/en/?search=Draft:Janus_Pannonius_Grand_Prize_for_Poetry Thank you again in advance, Franciska78 ( talk)Franciska78
Hkb ( talk) 13:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback. In terms of notability, Ros Schwartz has been awarded Legion d'honneur (from the French government) and various national prizes (UK), and I have put references to all of these. In terms of her contribution to the field, the best way to show this is by her publications and representation in important organisations.
You have thoroughly convinced me that this proposed article should be a paragraph in the already published piece on SR16! However, I hesitate to edit the piece as much as it would need to include the paragraph. And I'm not exactly sure how to do the inclusion - must it be in the same form as an original article with the references included in the body? I would sincerely appreciate your help!
TCVCJ (
talk) 13:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
TCVCJ (
talk)
13:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Dear reviewer,
I already added independant references to our wiki article. Can you please be more specific and tell me exactly which references should i edit/add.
Kind regards
DSI EH ( talk) 10:50, 27 July 2015 (UTC) EH
DSI EH ( talk) 10:50, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
I think I have made the required improvements for this article. Could you please review again. Thanks. Gomach ( talk) 08:51, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Greetings, I should like an additional opinion based on the Fun School series at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fun School 6 . You may wish to examine the articles what with the recent edits I made to establish notability. Any concrete suggestions you can give would be highly appreciated. Deltasim ( talk) 08:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments about the submission. We are revising the submission and deleted unnecessary sentences. It would be great if you can advise us further in this process.
Also, do Wikipedia usually accept submission about industry collaboration project, like this one? Such initiative is beneficial to industry participants.
Milkeung ( talk) 00:42, 25 July 2015 (UTC) Who is we? Wikipedia accounts should not be shared in the manner you seem to be suggesting by what you said. Sulfurboy ( talk) 00:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Hippychickali. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Miloš Milovanović, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Hippychick ( talk) 22:17, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
A page you accepted at AFC, Kim Nam-joon, is currently up for deletion at AfD, in case you're interested. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Namjoon. Joseph2302 ( talk) 23:01, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for reviewing my draft (twice) at
I'm trying to establish, whether I should keep working on it or not. Basically, I've read the
notability criteria for musicians and ensembles and asked for advice at the
Teahouse (my question) and I'm still not sure.
As far as I can see, the subject of my draft meets (at least) the criteria defined in sections 1, 2 and 11. Would you agree with this and is it enough in terms of notability?
As for the sources, I think the ones used in the article are some of the most independent and reliable in the Finnish and Swedish context. Was the lack of sources in English(?) the/a primary reason for the rejection? Anything else that contributed to that decision?
Thank you, have a good day! :) Reaason ( talk) 18:28, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy - Thanks for looking at the article draft on Creative Mobile The article was not accepted due to This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability
I've made some edits and included more reference citations, can you review and make any further comments on how to improve the article for approval?
I believe everything should qualify for approval in comparison to articles for similar game studios: Halfbrick Studios, Kiloo, Backflip Studios, Rovio Entertainment
Thanks! User:RadRacer20xx 13:27, 28 July 2015
Hi, Sulfurboy.
Thanks for your kindly review of the article, please share me more information about what kind of the references do we need to provide to verify the information, or can you tell me more about which information do we need to add reference to verify.
Thanks in advance!
Rye Giggs (
talk) 07:56, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Reviews by software review sites aren't really considered to show notability, as they are routine and done for any piece of software. We need to see independent coverage of the impact of the software and why it is notable and important enough to be in an encyclopedia.
Sulfurboy (
talk)
13:48, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
CinaedThePict ( talk) 14:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Can you clarify what 'Please clarify between the references and sources so we can confirm this custom.' means? This isn't readily evident - I can assure you (as a Scot), it's a long established custom, and I'm very happy to link to additional video footage if needbe.
Hi Sulfurboy, Thank you for reviewing my page /info/en/?search=Draft:David_Richter. As the person aboved me has requested, do you mind specifically telling me what's wrong with my inline citations? I ask just so I know I am doing the write thing before I go through the process of adding and editing again. The facts (awards, education, ect.) are backed up by the citations I have, so when you get a chance please let me know the mistake I've made. Thanks, Keelsh01 ( talk) 19:46, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sulfur Boy.thank you for reviewing but please help me in publishing my article. Drphanichalla
I am confused as to how our references are unacceptable, as they are all links with credible postings from third parties outside of the company. I would like to know what we can do to improve the page. Thanks.
Cary.tanaka (
talk)
15:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand why the notability or verification of this person has been declined, they are an elected politician with a number of controversial actions which have all bee linked, including the link to offical counil pages to verify: http://committees.westminster.gov.uk/mgUserInfo.aspx?UID=152
195.110.76.194 (
talk)
16:32, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Afternoon Sulfurboy. I got some help from the Wiki community and made a good amount of edits on the RW3 Technologies page. Looking forward to your comments.
/info/en/?search=Draft:RW3_Technologies
Cheers,
Thank you for publishing my article on the
North Central RTD! Here's a kitten for you, because kittens are amazing.
P.S. It looks like this is showing up on your talk page, and I can't figure out how to send it to your user page instead. I'm new to this. Sorry.
Imagine Dragonflies (
talk)
17:11, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hey,
I wanted to know how many citations I need to get an article on Wikipedia. I sent 3 citations, two of them from India's leading national dailies- The Hindu and Deccan Herald. I haven't made any huge claims without citing. How much more is required?
Gautamrajeev (
talk) 17:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Gautamrajeev (
talk)
17:16, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Ruffsl ( talk) 17:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Just like to ask for some aid the revision for the draft Draf tGazebo_simulator.
My goal is to keep the article short and factual similar in style to existing example open source articles:
If you have detailed specifics on this matter, or know of an editor knowledgeable in the subject, please do not hesitate to inform.
Thanks Ruffsl ( talk) 17:28, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your very helpful comments to improve Amazingrace Coffeehouse. So far I have been able to add the InfoBox and extend links. Will tackle formatting next, if you can just specify for me which aspects you feel are not in the proper Wikipedia style.
VerySeldom (
talk)
17:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
please, I have made my "Lakshitha Wikramage" article with every steps INCLUDING REFERENCE catogory also. I requested 3 times to accept my page. please accept it. I have done it taking my valuable time. please..!
Lakshitha Chathuranga Wikramage ( talk) 19:01, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Cleaver37 ( talk) 19:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC) Hi not sure how to reference my article. I am the founder of the club.... ( Cleaver37 ( talk) 19:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC))
Hi Sulfurboy,
When you need a break from new page patrol, can you please advise me on how to better improve my draft? I took your recommendation and created a sandbox draft for it: /info/en/?search=User:Sjane214/sandbox
If you have free time, can you please let me know how to better improve it? Sjane214 ( talk) 19:09, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
To start, you need independent, reliable sources that show substantial coverage of the center. Also, remove the external links within the article and either add them to an exlinks section if they're directly relevant, or otherwise just scrap them. Sulfurboy ( talk) 19:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for the response Sulfurboy! I have created an External Links section and found sources. Here is the link to my draft: /info/en/?search=Draft:The_Center_for_Healthcare_Innovation Once again, if you have time, can you please let me know if I fixed the link/reference/any other type of problem? I know you don't have to review this draft so thank you for the first response! Sjane214 ( talk) 20:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello there, would it be possible to give me some assistance with this ? Can you give me an example of where "The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. " so that I can understand where I have gone wrong with my first article?
Many thanks for your help. Tim
Tim B Haigh ( talk) 21:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you once again for the recommendations:) I have incorporated the exlinks section and added additional sources. Is there's anything else I can fix before I re-submit my draft so it can become an article once more?
Here's the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Draft:The_Center_for_Healthcare_Innovation&redirect=no
Sjane214 ( talk) 21:19, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy. I added the awards that Monica Brown has received and two additional sources to try to prove her notability. Before I put in further edits, could you point me in the right direction? Do you need quotes from and links to book reviews from industry periodicals (Kirkus/PW)? I don't want to keep barking up the wrong tree, but I do think that Brown is a notable author.
Aabbott ( talk) 20:20, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Can you advice me on the page Eric Joris? It has correct references and sources. No abuse of copyright and correct information.
Valery De Smedt (
talk)
22:25, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Régis_Hauser You asked me to improve the sources and to try to ass categories. I've done it. Is that right? (few information exist about him so the sources are few too). — Preceding unsigned comment added by HyperionMaxis ( talk • contribs) 23:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
I am wondering if there is any other source of reference I can include besides press release? Because I guess it should be the most credible source? Kindly advise for that! Thanks!
Cht0620 ( talk) 02:31, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy, thanks for your comments. I have been working on making the Wiki page for the book and used content from the book website. As I am the author I thought it would be Ok to use content from there. I have been working hard to make the page neutral, but didn't expect a copyright issue to occur. Do you suggest I change the language on the Wiki page slightly in order to ensure the system doesn't think there is a copyright issue?
I did try to source and link any word-for-word language whenever I used it from Amazon or the book website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KJacobi1121 ( talk • contribs) 01:45, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Many thanks for your help through this process
/info/en/?search=Draft:Going_with_the_Pitch
Ken wiki: KJacobi1121
24.184.216.47 ( talk) 01:34, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
hi Graham, Bothering you again with an AFC (this being my second article if selected). Please have a look as and when feasible. Thanks in advance. Devopam ( talk) 05:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, we want to create Wikipedia page for our company HeadHonchos.com (an online search engine portal). After much editing and submissions, we are not getting the final approval on the submitted work . I request you to please specify the areas where we can apply scope of change or improvement. Also, the references used are taken from the verified sources. We have used online sources in support to content/information in regard to HeadHonchos.com as a product/company. Need help so that we can improve on the areas asap. Thank you.
Charushr89 (
talk)
09:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
I have to say, this is a bit worrying; I've seen your name pop up in two rather disparate topic areas (reality television and American politics) because of AfCs you've marked as passing. The first was Big Brother 18 (U.S.), a future season of a current series that are routinely left as redirects until actual sources exist to say more than "it will air". I had to take it to AfD to enforce a redirect against serial revert-warring IPs and SPAs The second, today, is Alleged Clinton Controversies (also at AfD, where most of the input so far is to speedy delete because it is so egregiously policy-violating). I'm sorry, but, what the hell? You just allowed a POV-pushing single-purpose-account to jam a fringe conspiracy nut-loving, BLP coatrack mess into article-space. Did you even read it? Like the part where there is a sub-header titled "Alleged Enemies List", which deceptively links to a "main article" that is actually a low-grade partisan novel titled HRC: State Secrets and the Rebirth of Hillary Clinton? Tarc ( talk) 01:39, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy, could you please elaborate why the included footnotes do not meet the minimal standard for inline citations. Please not that there is also a general publications list in the article, but the citations to support the claims made in the article are provided as footnotes in the References section.
195.169.108.143 (
talk)
13:58, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy,
Thank you for reviewing draft article Draft:Dimitris Paraskevas. If possible, would you be able to elaborate on the reason for rejecting the submission? In my opinion the inline citation is adequate and proves the statements made. Could you please help me understand the problem? Specifically, can you please point out an example of an inadequate citation or a statement that needs to be footnoted? Thanks for your time and cooperation! Angelamarc ( talk) 12:47, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi, I have been working on this article for a while now and have had numerous comments regarding notability and references. If it wouldn't be a bother for you (and really only if it isn't), could you advise me on how I could get the article up to Wikipedia standard? With regards to notability, I have added all I can regarding his work etc. but can't reference anything other than the work on Emmerdale as all articles I can find on him now relate to the show as it's so popular and his most present work... I have been told I can't link to Wikipedia or the IMDb and when I referenced RottenTomatoes (which I believe to be independent and reliable), I was told it was only a mere name-drop and nothing else so was irrelevant though I only referenced the page to prove the role he played in the movie/series. Many thanks... Article -> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ryan_Hawley JoshDunn98 ( talk) 15:33, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
/info/en/?search=Draft:Rockville_2069:_A_Rock_Musical
Based on your previous comment, the story and character breakdown were edited. Do you recommend that it is further condensed? Is there anything else in the article that should also be condensed?
Your kind assistance would be appreciated.
154.69.162.175 ( talk) 15:38, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy, my name is Metalworker14. I was asked to create the article that I really knew nothing about. I've never heard of or listened to Serianna. I was just asked by The Cross Bearer to do and decided to help him out with it. --Metalworker14 (Yo) 16:22, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
One thing that helped me a very great deal when I was starting out in the AFC project was watching, then contributing to the AFC Helpdesk. I found that there were areas I expected to be clear to the editor I reviewed that were obviously not, judging by their reaction and cries for help. I'm still learning
I am cordially inviting you to come and join in there. And you may be there already. Your reviewing skills will improve and improve as you play there. Fiddle Faddle 16:32, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thnak you Eytankey ( talk) 17:17, 29 July 2015 (UTC) |
RE: /info/en/?search=Matching_Sweaters
You mentioned that this article needs additional citations for verification. I have added another from the band's webpage... not sure what else is needed (I am kind of a rookie). I built the page based on the others before it and I thought I had everything that was needed.
If something else is needed it would be great if you could direct me as to what that might be.
Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theflash95 ( talk • contribs) 17:26, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
I have a question about your review of this page:
/info/en/?search=Draft:Thom_Serafin
These are your reasons for rejection: External links should be removed from the article and either added to an exlink section or scraped. Other accomplishments should be made into a prose form and reduced to what is most relevant. Article should be formal and neutral, with all puffery removed.
I've fixed the first two, and I hope I've addressed the third, about puffery & neutrality. But, as a total noob, I'm not sure I've done an adequate job. For example, I (among other edits) replaced "kickstarting his career" with "beginning his career," removed information about some awards that he has won, and removed the name of another Hart spokesman as it's not relevant. Is that the sort of thing you're talking about or did I miss the mark?
HayMerchant (
talk)
16:56, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi Sulfurboy, I currently have four sources that are more or less profiles of him, do you suggest that I rewrite the article to rely more on these?
Also, thank you for the quick attention.
HayMerchant ( talk) 17:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
I'm wondering what needs to be changed in the Christian Lopez Band wikipedia draft. I'm not sure if I need to change the subject material or just worry about finding other sources. The sources I have used, I feel are reliable, but please let me know what I need to specifically work on. Thank you!
Elizabethwood4 ( talk) 17:55, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello Sulfurboy, thanks for taking a look at Draft:Michael_Elliott. I'm quite surprised you declined as WP:FAILN, however.
Are you seriously suggesting that this fails WP:42, specifically The Guardian 2007 and 2010, [1] [2] Huffington Post 2010, [3] New York Post 2011, [4] Politico 2011, [5] independent.co.uk 2015, [6] and NPR 2015. [7]
There are plenty of sources, with a range of many years, and considerable depth in terms of word-count / specificity / etc. I thought this was WP:SNOW for speedy-accept. Which refs do you dispute? 75.108.94.227 ( talk) 20:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
I need assistance as I believe the sources that I cited are reliable published sources and I do not have other sources to reference and I would really like to publish this article. I have read over Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and I don't see why these sources do not work. I have gone ahead and added more sources to the article. Please let me know your help is truly appreciated.
InstaSD ( talk) 20:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
I have found that it is better use of my time to try very hard to review the same draft once only. This does, of course, increase the backlog if few other reviewers are active, but it provides a better experience for the new editor. One can also argue that further eyes provide a better review. I moved to, mostly offering comments rather than reviews when I'd reviewed a draft previously. Fiddle Faddle 19:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I saw your COI tag on this article. Please see Denawaka Ganga Mini Hydro Power Project. I believe their may be a COI too. I am concerned about the images as well. One is a Google image which is certainly copyrighted. The schematics are suspicious as well. It seems this author was heavily involved in the project and may be using their company or firm's information for the articles. I asked the author on their talk but no response.-- NortyNort (Holla) 21:14, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi! Just trying to get feedback on what didn't work within the article. Does any of it work? We're trying to build a historical perspective on what the hotel has been within the community as centuries have passed. Can you please provide some feedback and perhaps some advice?
Dreafea ( talk) 21:55, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
@ Metalworker14: I recommended it to him to create their profile, and I addressed concerns with my edits to show GNG. The Cross Bearer ( talk) 02:47, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi again Re 1st Australian Civil Affairs Unit General Peter Gration Peter Gration, one of our Unit's former commanding officers, has suggested some changes to our article. I have made the edits to the main body but do not know how to edit one of the footnotes you created for us. Would you please either (a) tell me how to do it, or (b) make the edits for us. If the latter, the requested edits are to Footnote 3. Firstly, delete "construction" between "engineer" and "squadrons". Secondly, replace "within" with "throughout" before "1 ATF". Thanks again for all your help with this project. Don Limn (aka 1acau) 1acau ( talk) 00:11, 30 July 2015 (UTC)