Welcome!
Hello, Sudar123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Please read this before editing.
Pharaoh of the Wizards (
talk)
06:21, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Widespread chronic edit warring. Thank you. Swarm X 05:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi sudar I am an ethnic Sinhalese, and I see that you have been working with people of european decent even quoting them. I simply wish to inform you that our cultures and beliefs are far closer to each others than europeans or whites in general. I personally believe tamils to be extremely intelligent people and that dravidians in general are a superior race to any white race please stop working against Sinhalese people and work with us to build peace and economic growth for all of south asia so that we may now dominate the world as whites have for the past 400 years. Though they dominated through enslaving us and stealing our wealth. I love the hindu religion though I am a buddhist. Do not seek to distance yourselves from your own south asian brothers and do not align your self with those that separated us in the first place. South Asians have the highest gdp per capita in america Our ascent has begun. Archetypex07 ( talk)
Please edit the above mentioned article as you wish but if you dont follow the neutral point of view and use facts from reliable sources as opposed to just Tamil nationalistic centric sources, then the article will never be acceptable to all. If you can balance the opinion of all and write good article, then we will be all winners. DishanMudalige ( talk) 15:14, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Why is it that you find it ideal to call apron users Intoronto1125, Sodabottle, Obi2canibe, Kanatonian to support you for a ArbCom against me. Is it that you require the wight of numbers of numbers to help you in your quest ? Cossde ( talk) 10:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " British Ceylon or Ceylon". Thank you.-- obi2canibe talk contr 19:02, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Looks like you like to hide the facts that there may have been war crimes and that mass return of refugees may subject them to torture. Why are you trying to hide it? these are cited or citable facts with neutral langauge. 124.43.77.238 ( talk) 13:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Battle of Aanandapuram. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nowhere in the Alleged war crimes during the Sri Lankan Civil War article, it is stated that war crimes were committed during the Battle of Aanandapuram. Not even the name Aanandapuram is mentioned there. You must address the concerns regarding your edit, before getting into an edit war. Astronomyinertia ( talk) 06:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Your addition to
Lies Agreed Upon has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. The newly added sections are verbatim copies of these articles
[1]
[2]
[3] and is a blatant violation of Wikipedia copyrights policy. Read
WP:COPYVIO.
Astronomyinertia (
talk) 14:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Astronomyinertia (
talk)
14:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Astronomyinertia ( talk) 14:45, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Please go through copyright policy.I can see that you do not understand it.Please understand you are not supposed leave copyright works on the page even for a minute.Please go through Copyright regarding any doubt regarding copyright. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 14:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Kanatonian ( talk) 16:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
The Chola invasion and occupation is a well known event and a very central point in the Sri Lankan history. If you do not know that please read up. If you just scroll down to the bottom of the article there are many references there too. And if you are really interested in references and not some other agenda, there are over 2000 results for the search occupation "sri lanka" ceylon in Google books. Take your pick.
Just until a couple of days ago another editor with the same kind of views as yours, have been reverting the article asking for references to the word island, and continued reverting even when references were given. We can't be giving references for each and every word in the article, nor can we stuff the article with references after each word. Just read the whole article and the references already in the article or click on the link given above. An occupation by invaders cannot be passed off as legitimate rule.
If you revert my edit I will make a complaint on you for disruptive editing and edit waring. I am writing this in your userpage because it is required that the user is notified, prior to filing/posting the complaint. -- SriSuren ( talk) 16:00, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
(You can take out the reflist tag when the discussion is over if u do not the references around)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is " Report of the Secretary-General's Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! -- obi2canibe talk contr 13:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
I would not recommend engaging in further discussion with Himesh84. He is clearly trying to wear other editors out with his filibustering. You have done the right thing in reporting this to ANI.
Also, don't engage in edit wars either, it doesn't matter if a version of the article with Himesh84's OR on it is there for a day or two. Wait and see what happens at ANI. Thanks.-- obi2canibe talk contr 17:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Nations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Petrie ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
I just wanted to make sure you know that the procedure is WP:RFC/U, which is the set of steps to request comment on a user. WP:RFC is for comments about article content. Feel free to read up on the procedure, and, of course, notify me if/when you file. Note that I'll be busy on and off for the next ten days or so, so if I don't respond immediately, please don't think I'm ignoring you. Qwyrxian ( talk) 15:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
I tend to be rather thorough, and when I say I have glanced at the Sri Lanka talk page, that actually means I have read the entire dispute, including your claim that Qwy is involved, and that several admins and non-admins asked to comment concur that he is uninvolved. I will review your diffs and give you my honest opinion about this matter when I can. It does not help Intoronto to export that dispute to his talk page, unless the case is extremely convincing. I am trying to provide Intoronto with help that gives him a chance at least of being unblocked, confusing the issue will discourage diligent admins from considering the unblock, since they then need to look at so much more material.
Rich
Farmbrough,
05:12, 1 January 2013 (UTC).
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Saudi Arabia. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 04:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
You failed to notify me about the thread you opened at ANI. You are required by the rules to do so - the fact it got kicked out within a few hours is irrelevant. The consensus on the Talk:Saudi Arabia clearly supports what I've been trying to tell you, but if you try to take it to any other noticeboard, as you appear to say you will do, you will have the same notification obligation. DeCausa ( talk) 08:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
You were given a final warning last year about copyright violations. I have just looked at your recent contributions, and find that despite the warnings virtually every single addition you have made to articles during the last months has been a direct copy-and-paste or a very close paraphrase of copyrighted text. Since this is obviously a persistent issue with you and not just a one-off mistake, I have blocked you indefinitely. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:48, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Sudar123 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have added content on those pages on the believe that they qualify under Fair Use. I acted in the good faith of expanding the encyclopedia.
Decline reason:
As long as you're going to be as tendentious and combative as you are in the above discussion, Wikipedia is well-served by this block regardless of whether you're right or not. — Daniel Case ( talk) 16:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sudar123 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I ask to be unblocked, as I had reason to believe that the contents in questions were in FairUse and there was no intent by me to violate Wikipedia's copyright policies. I promise not to do so again and do wish to continue my participation and ongoing deletion discussion of Rizana's Image, where I also promise to keep my own comments brief, neutral, and policy based. After Eraserhead1 pointed out, I think I am wrong and understand I have violated copyright issues; I will be careful in the future to not add content which violates Copyright policy... and IF I have any doubts, I will neutrally seek advice and input from other, more experienced editors, and will heed such advice. I had wrong understanding on "Fair Use" and "Indirect Quotation" until I read Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. I am now clear of the Wikipedia requirement of content creation and expansion. I will be more careful in content creation and will write in my own words to the maximum.
Decline reason:
This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of copyright violations and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
= [[Article title]] =
) and save the page before you improve it.If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{ helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 13:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sudar123 sent me e-mail, asking me to help him get unblocked. I feel I need to turn down this request decline to get involved — in part because I have been significantly
WP:INVOLVED with him in the past in connection with the Sri Lankan conflict topic, and also because I am unwilling to reverse the actions of two administrators (Future Perfect at Sunrise and Daniel Case) without an overwhelmingly clear reason. In my opinion, if Sudar123 is unable to get his block rescinded via his second unblock request, his best (and probably only) recourse would be to make his case to ArbCom's
Ban Appeals Subcommittee. —
Rich
wales (no relation to Jimbo)
18:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC) 22:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Sudar also emailed me. Sudar, you cannot be oppressed by a single admin, because your unblock appeal will always be considered by a different one; but equally you will not get unblocked by emailing all the admins you can find, and maintaining that you have done nothing wrong. Copyright is a very serious issue for Wikipedia. To be unblocked, you will need to convince an administrator that you have read Wikipedia:Copy-paste, Wikipedia:Quotations, Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing, Wikipedia:Fair use, and understand why your edits were a problem, and explain what you will do differently if you are unblocked. JohnCD ( talk) 22:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
I've asked the blocking and declined unblocking admins to look at this again. Hopefully they will respond within the next few days - otherwise Arbcom it is :/ -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 15:14, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Congratulations for making it as difficult and bureaucratic as possible for this editor to follow your directions. -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 18:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Sudar123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Please read this before editing.
Pharaoh of the Wizards (
talk)
06:21, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Widespread chronic edit warring. Thank you. Swarm X 05:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi sudar I am an ethnic Sinhalese, and I see that you have been working with people of european decent even quoting them. I simply wish to inform you that our cultures and beliefs are far closer to each others than europeans or whites in general. I personally believe tamils to be extremely intelligent people and that dravidians in general are a superior race to any white race please stop working against Sinhalese people and work with us to build peace and economic growth for all of south asia so that we may now dominate the world as whites have for the past 400 years. Though they dominated through enslaving us and stealing our wealth. I love the hindu religion though I am a buddhist. Do not seek to distance yourselves from your own south asian brothers and do not align your self with those that separated us in the first place. South Asians have the highest gdp per capita in america Our ascent has begun. Archetypex07 ( talk)
Please edit the above mentioned article as you wish but if you dont follow the neutral point of view and use facts from reliable sources as opposed to just Tamil nationalistic centric sources, then the article will never be acceptable to all. If you can balance the opinion of all and write good article, then we will be all winners. DishanMudalige ( talk) 15:14, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Why is it that you find it ideal to call apron users Intoronto1125, Sodabottle, Obi2canibe, Kanatonian to support you for a ArbCom against me. Is it that you require the wight of numbers of numbers to help you in your quest ? Cossde ( talk) 10:12, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is " British Ceylon or Ceylon". Thank you.-- obi2canibe talk contr 19:02, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Looks like you like to hide the facts that there may have been war crimes and that mass return of refugees may subject them to torture. Why are you trying to hide it? these are cited or citable facts with neutral langauge. 124.43.77.238 ( talk) 13:34, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Battle of Aanandapuram. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Nowhere in the Alleged war crimes during the Sri Lankan Civil War article, it is stated that war crimes were committed during the Battle of Aanandapuram. Not even the name Aanandapuram is mentioned there. You must address the concerns regarding your edit, before getting into an edit war. Astronomyinertia ( talk) 06:13, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Your addition to
Lies Agreed Upon has been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing. The newly added sections are verbatim copies of these articles
[1]
[2]
[3] and is a blatant violation of Wikipedia copyrights policy. Read
WP:COPYVIO.
Astronomyinertia (
talk) 14:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Astronomyinertia (
talk)
14:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Astronomyinertia ( talk) 14:45, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Please go through copyright policy.I can see that you do not understand it.Please understand you are not supposed leave copyright works on the page even for a minute.Please go through Copyright regarding any doubt regarding copyright. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 14:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Kanatonian ( talk) 16:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
The Chola invasion and occupation is a well known event and a very central point in the Sri Lankan history. If you do not know that please read up. If you just scroll down to the bottom of the article there are many references there too. And if you are really interested in references and not some other agenda, there are over 2000 results for the search occupation "sri lanka" ceylon in Google books. Take your pick.
Just until a couple of days ago another editor with the same kind of views as yours, have been reverting the article asking for references to the word island, and continued reverting even when references were given. We can't be giving references for each and every word in the article, nor can we stuff the article with references after each word. Just read the whole article and the references already in the article or click on the link given above. An occupation by invaders cannot be passed off as legitimate rule.
If you revert my edit I will make a complaint on you for disruptive editing and edit waring. I am writing this in your userpage because it is required that the user is notified, prior to filing/posting the complaint. -- SriSuren ( talk) 16:00, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
(You can take out the reflist tag when the discussion is over if u do not the references around)
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is " Report of the Secretary-General's Panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! -- obi2canibe talk contr 13:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
I would not recommend engaging in further discussion with Himesh84. He is clearly trying to wear other editors out with his filibustering. You have done the right thing in reporting this to ANI.
Also, don't engage in edit wars either, it doesn't matter if a version of the article with Himesh84's OR on it is there for a day or two. Wait and see what happens at ANI. Thanks.-- obi2canibe talk contr 17:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United Nations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Petrie ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
I just wanted to make sure you know that the procedure is WP:RFC/U, which is the set of steps to request comment on a user. WP:RFC is for comments about article content. Feel free to read up on the procedure, and, of course, notify me if/when you file. Note that I'll be busy on and off for the next ten days or so, so if I don't respond immediately, please don't think I'm ignoring you. Qwyrxian ( talk) 15:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
I tend to be rather thorough, and when I say I have glanced at the Sri Lanka talk page, that actually means I have read the entire dispute, including your claim that Qwy is involved, and that several admins and non-admins asked to comment concur that he is uninvolved. I will review your diffs and give you my honest opinion about this matter when I can. It does not help Intoronto to export that dispute to his talk page, unless the case is extremely convincing. I am trying to provide Intoronto with help that gives him a chance at least of being unblocked, confusing the issue will discourage diligent admins from considering the unblock, since they then need to look at so much more material.
Rich
Farmbrough,
05:12, 1 January 2013 (UTC).
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Saudi Arabia. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — Crisco 1492 ( talk) 04:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
You failed to notify me about the thread you opened at ANI. You are required by the rules to do so - the fact it got kicked out within a few hours is irrelevant. The consensus on the Talk:Saudi Arabia clearly supports what I've been trying to tell you, but if you try to take it to any other noticeboard, as you appear to say you will do, you will have the same notification obligation. DeCausa ( talk) 08:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
You were given a final warning last year about copyright violations. I have just looked at your recent contributions, and find that despite the warnings virtually every single addition you have made to articles during the last months has been a direct copy-and-paste or a very close paraphrase of copyrighted text. Since this is obviously a persistent issue with you and not just a one-off mistake, I have blocked you indefinitely. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:48, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Sudar123 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have added content on those pages on the believe that they qualify under Fair Use. I acted in the good faith of expanding the encyclopedia.
Decline reason:
As long as you're going to be as tendentious and combative as you are in the above discussion, Wikipedia is well-served by this block regardless of whether you're right or not. — Daniel Case ( talk) 16:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sudar123 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I ask to be unblocked, as I had reason to believe that the contents in questions were in FairUse and there was no intent by me to violate Wikipedia's copyright policies. I promise not to do so again and do wish to continue my participation and ongoing deletion discussion of Rizana's Image, where I also promise to keep my own comments brief, neutral, and policy based. After Eraserhead1 pointed out, I think I am wrong and understand I have violated copyright issues; I will be careful in the future to not add content which violates Copyright policy... and IF I have any doubts, I will neutrally seek advice and input from other, more experienced editors, and will heed such advice. I had wrong understanding on "Fair Use" and "Indirect Quotation" until I read Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. I am now clear of the Wikipedia requirement of content creation and expansion. I will be more careful in content creation and will write in my own words to the maximum.
Decline reason:
This request for unblocking has been declined due to your history of copyright violations and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:
= [[Article title]] =
) and save the page before you improve it.If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{ helpme|your question here}}" to your talk page. Thank you. ( ✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 13:17, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sudar123 sent me e-mail, asking me to help him get unblocked. I feel I need to turn down this request decline to get involved — in part because I have been significantly
WP:INVOLVED with him in the past in connection with the Sri Lankan conflict topic, and also because I am unwilling to reverse the actions of two administrators (Future Perfect at Sunrise and Daniel Case) without an overwhelmingly clear reason. In my opinion, if Sudar123 is unable to get his block rescinded via his second unblock request, his best (and probably only) recourse would be to make his case to ArbCom's
Ban Appeals Subcommittee. —
Rich
wales (no relation to Jimbo)
18:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC) 22:22, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Sudar also emailed me. Sudar, you cannot be oppressed by a single admin, because your unblock appeal will always be considered by a different one; but equally you will not get unblocked by emailing all the admins you can find, and maintaining that you have done nothing wrong. Copyright is a very serious issue for Wikipedia. To be unblocked, you will need to convince an administrator that you have read Wikipedia:Copy-paste, Wikipedia:Quotations, Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing, Wikipedia:Fair use, and understand why your edits were a problem, and explain what you will do differently if you are unblocked. JohnCD ( talk) 22:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
I've asked the blocking and declined unblocking admins to look at this again. Hopefully they will respond within the next few days - otherwise Arbcom it is :/ -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 15:14, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Congratulations for making it as difficult and bureaucratic as possible for this editor to follow your directions. -- Eraserhead1 < talk> 18:21, 5 February 2013 (UTC)