Suburban99 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There was no intent for malevolent vandalism. I made a goofy edit due to the fact that the article was already ridiculous. I am not associated with the original authors of the article, and since it was already ridiculous, I made an additional edit, all in jest. I respectly submit my request for an unblock and hope you remove the block. I apologize for any inconvience that this may have caused and will refrain from any future improper actions. Suburban99 ( talk) 16:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
For my money, you are either one of the authors (or the author) of the article, or you are just a vandal. You'll have to come up with some better reasons, and tell us what you plan to do that is not improper. Peridon ( talk) 17:38, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Suburban99 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I understand your point and it is valid. I do want to address your concerns. First, I am not an original author of the page. My user information is accurate, google me and see if the addresses add up and so forth. If you want further information if I am exactly who I say I am, I will provide that information upon request. As far as why I was blocked, I now better understand the reasons for blocking users. I understand that it prevents vandalism of pages and keeps the current articles as accurate as possible. People who misbehave can destroy this site's reputation and have dire consequences on its user base and reliability. I understand that this site rarely gives second chances, and I understand if you don't want to give one to me. Although if you do grant me a second chance, I promise to never act outside of the acceptable lines and rules of Wikipedia. I will say this in closing. I am sorry. Truly sorry. I regret what I did and I will agree that if I ever violate the rules again, you can ban me or whatever else you choose. However, I can tell you know that this user name will never come across an admin's page again. I would like to help expand the knowledge base of the world and would appreciate a second chance to do so. Thank you for your time and consideration. Submitted with my most sincere regards: Suburban99 ( talk) 02:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per comments below, request was withdrawn. Kuru (talk) 12:13, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Admins: this whole process has become tiresome and no longer worth the effort. I appreciate DQ and his efforts in addressing my request. However this constant smear of me and who I am, combined with getting emails all day long regarding who posted a message where...summarily this whole situation has frustrated me. Ohnoitsjamie, you can decline my unblock request once more, I respectfully withdraw my request and no longer wish to be a member of this community. I appreciate the work you all do to protect the integrity of this site, and wish you all the best health and luck in the future. My highest regards, Suburban99 ( talk) 02:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
I know my word doesn't mean anything, but I've resurrected my old Wikipedia account to come say this. I made this account over five years ago, and I've changed a lot since then and no longer edit Wikipedia. However, I am a real-life associate of Suburban99, and can vouch for what he says. He's telling the truth when it comes to RASSF5 and his research. I personally can't comment on the Luxembourg story because I know nothing about that. However, I dearly wish you would give him a chance to contribute and unblock him. Thank you for your time. -- KirbyManiac ( talk) 22:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
Suburban99 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
There was no intent for malevolent vandalism. I made a goofy edit due to the fact that the article was already ridiculous. I am not associated with the original authors of the article, and since it was already ridiculous, I made an additional edit, all in jest. I respectly submit my request for an unblock and hope you remove the block. I apologize for any inconvience that this may have caused and will refrain from any future improper actions. Suburban99 ( talk) 16:54, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
For my money, you are either one of the authors (or the author) of the article, or you are just a vandal. You'll have to come up with some better reasons, and tell us what you plan to do that is not improper. Peridon ( talk) 17:38, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Suburban99 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I understand your point and it is valid. I do want to address your concerns. First, I am not an original author of the page. My user information is accurate, google me and see if the addresses add up and so forth. If you want further information if I am exactly who I say I am, I will provide that information upon request. As far as why I was blocked, I now better understand the reasons for blocking users. I understand that it prevents vandalism of pages and keeps the current articles as accurate as possible. People who misbehave can destroy this site's reputation and have dire consequences on its user base and reliability. I understand that this site rarely gives second chances, and I understand if you don't want to give one to me. Although if you do grant me a second chance, I promise to never act outside of the acceptable lines and rules of Wikipedia. I will say this in closing. I am sorry. Truly sorry. I regret what I did and I will agree that if I ever violate the rules again, you can ban me or whatever else you choose. However, I can tell you know that this user name will never come across an admin's page again. I would like to help expand the knowledge base of the world and would appreciate a second chance to do so. Thank you for your time and consideration. Submitted with my most sincere regards: Suburban99 ( talk) 02:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Per comments below, request was withdrawn. Kuru (talk) 12:13, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Admins: this whole process has become tiresome and no longer worth the effort. I appreciate DQ and his efforts in addressing my request. However this constant smear of me and who I am, combined with getting emails all day long regarding who posted a message where...summarily this whole situation has frustrated me. Ohnoitsjamie, you can decline my unblock request once more, I respectfully withdraw my request and no longer wish to be a member of this community. I appreciate the work you all do to protect the integrity of this site, and wish you all the best health and luck in the future. My highest regards, Suburban99 ( talk) 02:56, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
I know my word doesn't mean anything, but I've resurrected my old Wikipedia account to come say this. I made this account over five years ago, and I've changed a lot since then and no longer edit Wikipedia. However, I am a real-life associate of Suburban99, and can vouch for what he says. He's telling the truth when it comes to RASSF5 and his research. I personally can't comment on the Luxembourg story because I know nothing about that. However, I dearly wish you would give him a chance to contribute and unblock him. Thank you for your time. -- KirbyManiac ( talk) 22:14, 11 July 2014 (UTC)