To answer your question on Moonriddengirl's talk page, to find out why an article was deleted, you should look at the article's deletion log. In this case, the reason the article was deleted because it was an expired proposed deletion. Basically, someone placed a tag on the page saying why they thought it should be deleted. No one contested the PROD tag (meaning, no one removed the tag) within five days, so the article was deleted.
Hope that helps. J.delanoy gabs adds 02:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, J. :) In addition, let me note that the specific concerns here were verifiability, as it seems the tagger found no sources for this other than a primary source, and notability. These can be addressed by demonstrating with reliable sources how the band meets that notability guidelines. It is customary with articles "PROD"ded to restore them if requested (so just let me know at my talk page if you want it back), but if you do decide to develop it further, please be sure that you can meet these criteria. That will help you avoid the article's being brought up for deletion debate. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
To answer your question on Moonriddengirl's talk page, to find out why an article was deleted, you should look at the article's deletion log. In this case, the reason the article was deleted because it was an expired proposed deletion. Basically, someone placed a tag on the page saying why they thought it should be deleted. No one contested the PROD tag (meaning, no one removed the tag) within five days, so the article was deleted.
Hope that helps. J.delanoy gabs adds 02:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, J. :) In addition, let me note that the specific concerns here were verifiability, as it seems the tagger found no sources for this other than a primary source, and notability. These can be addressed by demonstrating with reliable sources how the band meets that notability guidelines. It is customary with articles "PROD"ded to restore them if requested (so just let me know at my talk page if you want it back), but if you do decide to develop it further, please be sure that you can meet these criteria. That will help you avoid the article's being brought up for deletion debate. -- Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:54, 29 June 2008 (UTC)