Hello, Stingray86, and
welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for
your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Philip Baird Shearer ( talk) 09:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
please adress the issue on the proper talk page section before removing info again. Jaakobou Chalk Talk 09:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Can you support your assertion, in the comment field to your unlawful combatant edit, that the right to self defense is guaranteed by international law? According to this 2006 document by the UN council on human rights, self defense is NOT a right, but at most an extenuating circumstance to be used in a criminal defense. scot ( talk) 01:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
-- Stingray86 ( talk) 06:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
You have reverted unlawful combatant 3 times in 24 hours please read the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule -- Philip Baird Shearer ( talk) 09:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
I am stumped as to why you reverted Jaakobou's edit to Pierre Rehov. Despite the former's edit summary, he actually pretty much returned the article to its original state, with some minor tweaks. The material was sourced, and the seemingly imbalanced part was an indirect quote from Pierre Rehov (this was clearly stated in the artlce), making it relevant. Please point out the exact reason why you disagreed with Jaakobou's edit. -- Ynhockey ( Talk) 17:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Stingray86, and
welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for
your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Philip Baird Shearer ( talk) 09:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
please adress the issue on the proper talk page section before removing info again. Jaakobou Chalk Talk 09:39, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Can you support your assertion, in the comment field to your unlawful combatant edit, that the right to self defense is guaranteed by international law? According to this 2006 document by the UN council on human rights, self defense is NOT a right, but at most an extenuating circumstance to be used in a criminal defense. scot ( talk) 01:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
-- Stingray86 ( talk) 06:09, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
You have reverted unlawful combatant 3 times in 24 hours please read the Wikipedia:Three-revert rule -- Philip Baird Shearer ( talk) 09:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
I am stumped as to why you reverted Jaakobou's edit to Pierre Rehov. Despite the former's edit summary, he actually pretty much returned the article to its original state, with some minor tweaks. The material was sourced, and the seemingly imbalanced part was an indirect quote from Pierre Rehov (this was clearly stated in the artlce), making it relevant. Please point out the exact reason why you disagreed with Jaakobou's edit. -- Ynhockey ( Talk) 17:23, 30 January 2008 (UTC)