![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You accuse me of having said things I have not and of holding views that I do not. Then, when confronted with your lies you blank your page. That's completely unacceptable, especially for a WMF employee, and if you persist I will certainly escalate this. Malleus Fatuorum 21:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
After adding a tag to the article on Takis Fotopoulos to let editors know that it is based on primary sources and/or sources affiliated with the subject (such as the "Democracy & Nature" and "Inclusive Democracy" publications/websites that belong to Fotopoulos), the aforementioned user has started accusing me on my Talk page of vandalism. If you have a look at his Talk page, you will see that he is a supporter of Mr. Fotopoulos and quite militant about promoting the movement started by Mr. Fotopoulos and defending it. On the Talk page of the article on Takis Fotopoulos, I saw signs of a possible violation of WP:OWN and perhaps the supporters of Mr. Fotopoulos are moving to a violation of WP:MEAT, as they keep recruiting people to "defend" Mr. Fotopoulos from what they seem to perceive as "attackers" and "enemies". It all looks a bit like what happened with the heavy editing wars that Church of Scientology members carried out here on Wikipedia. Could you please help me out? I only want to ensure that contributors - many of whom are far more knowledgeable than me - will bring out better articles, yet I get accuse of "vandalism" because of my humble efforts. Thank you. SentientContrarian ( talk) 10:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
The JSTOR signup page is up. See Wikipedia:Requests for JSTOR access Raul654 ( talk) 17:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
What a splendid way to begin Good Friday!
I am delighted with your recognition of my editing Wikipedia over the past seven months.
Thank you,
Gareth Griffith-Jones ( talk) 07:36, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
See this, in case you know the right people for this problem. It isn't really a wmf issue, but perhaps help would help. tedder ( talk) 16:22, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello and thank you (Merhaba ve teşekkürler) for barnstar. The number is very nice, but I still don't know how to put a sign that I have a message for you, so I am writing here. I will continue to add some info regarding them. Thanks again Egeymi ( talk) 19:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, appreciate it! :) -- Khanassassin ☪ 19:23, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the barnstar. Nbdelboy Nbdelboy 22.10 13 April 2012 (GMT)
D'aww, thanks! -- flying idiot 22:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
My thanks too for the Barnstar, I had no idea I was passing some sort of milestone. Torn between thinking "Gosh, that's a lot" and thinking how long it took me to get here... Skteosk ( talk) 09:17, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven
I have left a message for you at the above, and am letting you know here, as I am not sure if you watch that page. Mr little irish 10:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Wow, thanks so much, your online support means a lot to those of us working behind the scenes to make Wikipedia a quality site -- Mugregg
Errr WOW,.. thanks :D and no I was not aware of the milestone number of edits, amazing how they mount up -- Thefrood ( talk) 22:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Steven. I was about to request JSTOR access at the page for that, but decided to poke around a bit, first, to see whether one of my local public libraries provides a free gateway to the archive. I couldn't find anything at all about it on any of the websites for public library I have access to, but then found this list on the JSTOR site itself. I checked that list for the name of my public library, and found that I do indeed have access to JSTOR already, at no cost.
I went back to my library site again, and eventually found an obscure notice of that on a library subpage, along with instructions for accessing it there. If we're only getting access, via the current program, in increments of 1,000 users at a time, then it makes sense to conserve those for users who don't have access through a library, yes?
With that motivation I've boldly edited the intro text to the JSTOR access requests page in this edit. Feel free to revert or modify it if my action puts a spanner in the works for some reason I'm unaware of, e.g. relations with JSTOR. I've posted this same message to Mark's talk, as well. Thanks very much for your work on this. Cheers, – OhioStandard ( talk) 03:49, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven, I left a question for you here in case you missed it. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
I appreciate it. Wa3frp ( talk) 21:39, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar |
to all of the contributors to the April 30, 2012 Recent Research report in the Signpost for the good work there! Pine (talk) 07:50, 2 May 2012 (UTC) |
Hi Steven, and a great word of thanks from me for your barnstar! I feel very happy for this award is very dear to me. I hope I can contact you in case I need help with some articles.-- Sainsf <^> (talk) 07:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Maybe you get tired of hearing, but thank you for the barnstar. Esc2003 ( talk) 20:30, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven. Thanks for your vote of confidence. Its good to know somebody reads my stuff. Early C19 biography and encyclopaedias are very esoteric areas of knowledge, I suggest. Now I've retired I want to get as much on WP as I can. Kind regards, Apwoolrich ( talk) 19:07, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much,for Barnstar Star.Best Regards! Knightserbia ( talk) 19:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I did a lot of edits on it.wiki, but really didn't know having reached 1k edit also here. Thanks a lot for your message!-- F Ceragioli ( talk) 17:00, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven, I've been looking at this - very interesting stuff. The thought occurs that some time in the autumn we shall be hitting 4 million pages on the English WP if the present rate of growth of new pages keeps up. There is sure to be much media interest, and this could be the time to put the word out about getting new editors. Kind regards Apwoolrich ( talk) 06:21, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
→TSU tp* 04:16, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
I've recently noticed a significant increase in the number of IP editors who, much to my surprise, are making constructive edits to areas that I watch. Perhaps you could investigate if this is part of a broader trend and how these editors could be encouraged to stay as a part of the editor engagement efforts. Pine ✉ 21:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Pine ✉ 10:16, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks I learned something new today (I guess I can go to sleep now). I didn't even know there was a such a thing as a Research namespace. Do you have a list of all the name spaces? I would be interested to know if there are others that have excaped my attention. Kumioko ( talk) 19:33, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven, in addition to Wikipedia:E3 emailing users who last edited X number of days ago to invite them to return, has there been any consideration of emailing "exit surveys" to Wikipedians who put Retired notices on their talk pages, as mentioned here? Pine ✉ 06:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
About a month ago I responded to an editor who said he was leaving Wikipedia. The editor was making quality contributions and hadn't been contacted by other editors (other than the welcome template left on his talk page). It appears that the issue concerning the editor was the red warning displayed when there are unbalanced ref tags. Do you think you, or some group at WMF could take a look at alternatives that would still be noticeable enough for a change to be made? A possible alternative could be the blue superscripted hyperlink. It might also make sense to include a hidden category like Category:articles with unbalanced ref tags. It is an easy fix to make, and it would ensure that instances of that don't get missed. Ryan Vesey Review me! 03:57, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
That's the new messages feed (very cool) which is being developed together with the LiquidThreads successor, right? And when is that projected to be finished? (Sorry for pestering you, Jorm.) David 1217 What I've done 03:07, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
I wanted to inform you of a possible trademark violation by a mirror website being discussed on the Village Pump. Chris857 ( talk) 00:06, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Sue the ExecDir sent me to you, because you are very involved in deletionism. One of my two goals at Wikimania is to get a abdiscussion about the problem, and perhaps some tweaking of the standards. I plan to start a session at the Unconference about the issue. I would welcome your attendance and support.-- DThomsen8 ( talk) 15:57, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Beeblebrox ( talk) 17:50, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven, and Oliver suggested we talk to you about it. When you get a chance would you mind having a look at them, they're at User:Callanecc/sandbox/AFT5. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 06:26, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Bonjour Steven
The Projet:Aide et accueil is currently debating about the new features (the AFT and the visual editor), and how we can participate to the testing period. I'll try to drive the discussion and lead it to a Q&A list for you and the team of both projects, before september.
Please answer me back on my FR talk page. :)
Thank you ! Trizek here or on wpfr 11:35, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven,
Here I made some suggestions for some very simple Wikipedia search interface improvements that would surely result in more Wikipedia volunteers, and your name was mentioned as someone who might be interested. (Please scroll down to the bottom of that post for a very brief summary of the essentials of my suggestion).
You must be very busy, but I believe that this would surely make everybody's job easier by:
Best regards LittleBen ( talk) 02:39, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven. I see you that you reverted Maryana at {{ uw-vandalism1}} while she was attempting to implement the consensus of the user warnings RFC. I'm sure there was a good reason... but what exactly needs to be tested before implementation? — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven! (I see you used to be a fellow Oregonian—cool!) Is there anyway I can opt-in to seeing the post-edit feedback feature you've been working on? I know it says that this will only be for new users, but sometimes I work with newbies, and I'd like to see how the feature works. If there is no technical way, that's okay. Thanks, David 1217 What I've done 03:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
mw.experiments.showFeedback('Your edit has been saved.')
and hit enter. That should force the post-edit feedback message to appear for its normal few seconds.Hello again Steven! I saw that more post-edit feedback is on its way. Could I have the code to see the new messages? Thanks, David 1217 What I've done 22:29, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
mw.e3.pef.showFeedback( { bucketName: 'historical', editCount: number, messages: { historical: { number: "Text!" } } } )
, replacing number
with 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, or 100. If you want to see what they look like without using a console, there are screenshots
here.
Steven Walling (WMF) •
talk 22:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)a-oooo-gah!-- Jorm (WMF) ( talk) 20:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been sentenced to the Village Stocks | |
For being the WMF's scapegoat after Wikipedia was told to refuse traffic from the entire world. Ryan Vesey 21:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC) |
I'm sure you're probably watching the page, but here's a note to inform you or ask you to pop by or something because you're kind of involved in the matter about this uw1 thing. Yes. Please. Thanks. Something. Cake?
But seriously, any light you could shed on the matter would be appreciated. -— Isarra ༆ 18:20, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven, you helped out a few weeks ago with creating user warning templates for AFT5. I've pretty much started from scratch so they will be different to what you helped with. Would you mind having a look? Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 08:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven I've made some more changes, would you mind having a look for me. I planning for this to be a final draft before I ask for comments at WT:AFT5 so any help or advice you have would be appreciated. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 08:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Template:Uw-vandalism0 is broken, and I'm going blind trying to understand why. If you boldly change something you don't like, please be careful not to break it. Here's what it does:
Hello, I'm
Lexein. I wanted to let you know that at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Barbie, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. If you wish to discuss this, you can do so here, or at my Talk page. Thank you.
--
Lexein (
talk) 01:03, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Before, it was dumping template code. What was that? Nevermind. -- Lexein ( talk) 01:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
After reading the latest topic on the pertaining talk-page, I think the feedback dashboard does not really work well, at least at the moment. Would it be feasible (I am not tech-savvy enough to know) to introduce some possibility for users to mark feedbacks as unhelpful or simply not worthy answering (I do that now with hiding the feedbacks from time to time, but I am admin)? Lectonar ( talk) 09:44, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven, I left you a note here in case you miss it. Many thanks for the advice about how to go about restoring my font. All the best, SlimVirgin (talk) 17:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
AdBlock Plus allows me to hide it with the following rule:
piramido.wmflabs.org##DIV#postedit-container
They ( talk) 23:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Just thought I would let you know I linked to your talk page as an example. - jc37 04:09, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Regarding the blog post "Fix this broken workflow, and help thousands of Wikipedians" on blog.wikimedia: Are you aware that the Article Creation Workflow team has been working on the same idea? Sure, according to the project status, it is on hold, but still. I am getting the feeling that the WMF is duplicating it´s efforts by having two teams on this.-- Snaevar ( talk) 02:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You accuse me of having said things I have not and of holding views that I do not. Then, when confronted with your lies you blank your page. That's completely unacceptable, especially for a WMF employee, and if you persist I will certainly escalate this. Malleus Fatuorum 21:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
After adding a tag to the article on Takis Fotopoulos to let editors know that it is based on primary sources and/or sources affiliated with the subject (such as the "Democracy & Nature" and "Inclusive Democracy" publications/websites that belong to Fotopoulos), the aforementioned user has started accusing me on my Talk page of vandalism. If you have a look at his Talk page, you will see that he is a supporter of Mr. Fotopoulos and quite militant about promoting the movement started by Mr. Fotopoulos and defending it. On the Talk page of the article on Takis Fotopoulos, I saw signs of a possible violation of WP:OWN and perhaps the supporters of Mr. Fotopoulos are moving to a violation of WP:MEAT, as they keep recruiting people to "defend" Mr. Fotopoulos from what they seem to perceive as "attackers" and "enemies". It all looks a bit like what happened with the heavy editing wars that Church of Scientology members carried out here on Wikipedia. Could you please help me out? I only want to ensure that contributors - many of whom are far more knowledgeable than me - will bring out better articles, yet I get accuse of "vandalism" because of my humble efforts. Thank you. SentientContrarian ( talk) 10:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
The JSTOR signup page is up. See Wikipedia:Requests for JSTOR access Raul654 ( talk) 17:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
What a splendid way to begin Good Friday!
I am delighted with your recognition of my editing Wikipedia over the past seven months.
Thank you,
Gareth Griffith-Jones ( talk) 07:36, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
See this, in case you know the right people for this problem. It isn't really a wmf issue, but perhaps help would help. tedder ( talk) 16:22, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Hello and thank you (Merhaba ve teşekkürler) for barnstar. The number is very nice, but I still don't know how to put a sign that I have a message for you, so I am writing here. I will continue to add some info regarding them. Thanks again Egeymi ( talk) 19:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, appreciate it! :) -- Khanassassin ☪ 19:23, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the barnstar. Nbdelboy Nbdelboy 22.10 13 April 2012 (GMT)
D'aww, thanks! -- flying idiot 22:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
My thanks too for the Barnstar, I had no idea I was passing some sort of milestone. Torn between thinking "Gosh, that's a lot" and thinking how long it took me to get here... Skteosk ( talk) 09:17, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven
I have left a message for you at the above, and am letting you know here, as I am not sure if you watch that page. Mr little irish 10:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Wow, thanks so much, your online support means a lot to those of us working behind the scenes to make Wikipedia a quality site -- Mugregg
Errr WOW,.. thanks :D and no I was not aware of the milestone number of edits, amazing how they mount up -- Thefrood ( talk) 22:36, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Steven. I was about to request JSTOR access at the page for that, but decided to poke around a bit, first, to see whether one of my local public libraries provides a free gateway to the archive. I couldn't find anything at all about it on any of the websites for public library I have access to, but then found this list on the JSTOR site itself. I checked that list for the name of my public library, and found that I do indeed have access to JSTOR already, at no cost.
I went back to my library site again, and eventually found an obscure notice of that on a library subpage, along with instructions for accessing it there. If we're only getting access, via the current program, in increments of 1,000 users at a time, then it makes sense to conserve those for users who don't have access through a library, yes?
With that motivation I've boldly edited the intro text to the JSTOR access requests page in this edit. Feel free to revert or modify it if my action puts a spanner in the works for some reason I'm unaware of, e.g. relations with JSTOR. I've posted this same message to Mark's talk, as well. Thanks very much for your work on this. Cheers, – OhioStandard ( talk) 03:49, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven, I left a question for you here in case you missed it. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
I appreciate it. Wa3frp ( talk) 21:39, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Teamwork Barnstar |
to all of the contributors to the April 30, 2012 Recent Research report in the Signpost for the good work there! Pine (talk) 07:50, 2 May 2012 (UTC) |
Hi Steven, and a great word of thanks from me for your barnstar! I feel very happy for this award is very dear to me. I hope I can contact you in case I need help with some articles.-- Sainsf <^> (talk) 07:34, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Maybe you get tired of hearing, but thank you for the barnstar. Esc2003 ( talk) 20:30, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven. Thanks for your vote of confidence. Its good to know somebody reads my stuff. Early C19 biography and encyclopaedias are very esoteric areas of knowledge, I suggest. Now I've retired I want to get as much on WP as I can. Kind regards, Apwoolrich ( talk) 19:07, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much,for Barnstar Star.Best Regards! Knightserbia ( talk) 19:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes, I did a lot of edits on it.wiki, but really didn't know having reached 1k edit also here. Thanks a lot for your message!-- F Ceragioli ( talk) 17:00, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven, I've been looking at this - very interesting stuff. The thought occurs that some time in the autumn we shall be hitting 4 million pages on the English WP if the present rate of growth of new pages keeps up. There is sure to be much media interest, and this could be the time to put the word out about getting new editors. Kind regards Apwoolrich ( talk) 06:21, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
→TSU tp* 04:16, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
I've recently noticed a significant increase in the number of IP editors who, much to my surprise, are making constructive edits to areas that I watch. Perhaps you could investigate if this is part of a broader trend and how these editors could be encouraged to stay as a part of the editor engagement efforts. Pine ✉ 21:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Pine ✉ 10:16, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks I learned something new today (I guess I can go to sleep now). I didn't even know there was a such a thing as a Research namespace. Do you have a list of all the name spaces? I would be interested to know if there are others that have excaped my attention. Kumioko ( talk) 19:33, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven, in addition to Wikipedia:E3 emailing users who last edited X number of days ago to invite them to return, has there been any consideration of emailing "exit surveys" to Wikipedians who put Retired notices on their talk pages, as mentioned here? Pine ✉ 06:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
About a month ago I responded to an editor who said he was leaving Wikipedia. The editor was making quality contributions and hadn't been contacted by other editors (other than the welcome template left on his talk page). It appears that the issue concerning the editor was the red warning displayed when there are unbalanced ref tags. Do you think you, or some group at WMF could take a look at alternatives that would still be noticeable enough for a change to be made? A possible alternative could be the blue superscripted hyperlink. It might also make sense to include a hidden category like Category:articles with unbalanced ref tags. It is an easy fix to make, and it would ensure that instances of that don't get missed. Ryan Vesey Review me! 03:57, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
That's the new messages feed (very cool) which is being developed together with the LiquidThreads successor, right? And when is that projected to be finished? (Sorry for pestering you, Jorm.) David 1217 What I've done 03:07, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
I wanted to inform you of a possible trademark violation by a mirror website being discussed on the Village Pump. Chris857 ( talk) 00:06, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Sue the ExecDir sent me to you, because you are very involved in deletionism. One of my two goals at Wikimania is to get a abdiscussion about the problem, and perhaps some tweaking of the standards. I plan to start a session at the Unconference about the issue. I would welcome your attendance and support.-- DThomsen8 ( talk) 15:57, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Beeblebrox ( talk) 17:50, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven, and Oliver suggested we talk to you about it. When you get a chance would you mind having a look at them, they're at User:Callanecc/sandbox/AFT5. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 06:26, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Bonjour Steven
The Projet:Aide et accueil is currently debating about the new features (the AFT and the visual editor), and how we can participate to the testing period. I'll try to drive the discussion and lead it to a Q&A list for you and the team of both projects, before september.
Please answer me back on my FR talk page. :)
Thank you ! Trizek here or on wpfr 11:35, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven,
Here I made some suggestions for some very simple Wikipedia search interface improvements that would surely result in more Wikipedia volunteers, and your name was mentioned as someone who might be interested. (Please scroll down to the bottom of that post for a very brief summary of the essentials of my suggestion).
You must be very busy, but I believe that this would surely make everybody's job easier by:
Best regards LittleBen ( talk) 02:39, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven. I see you that you reverted Maryana at {{ uw-vandalism1}} while she was attempting to implement the consensus of the user warnings RFC. I'm sure there was a good reason... but what exactly needs to be tested before implementation? — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:36, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven! (I see you used to be a fellow Oregonian—cool!) Is there anyway I can opt-in to seeing the post-edit feedback feature you've been working on? I know it says that this will only be for new users, but sometimes I work with newbies, and I'd like to see how the feature works. If there is no technical way, that's okay. Thanks, David 1217 What I've done 03:26, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
mw.experiments.showFeedback('Your edit has been saved.')
and hit enter. That should force the post-edit feedback message to appear for its normal few seconds.Hello again Steven! I saw that more post-edit feedback is on its way. Could I have the code to see the new messages? Thanks, David 1217 What I've done 22:29, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
mw.e3.pef.showFeedback( { bucketName: 'historical', editCount: number, messages: { historical: { number: "Text!" } } } )
, replacing number
with 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, or 100. If you want to see what they look like without using a console, there are screenshots
here.
Steven Walling (WMF) •
talk 22:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)a-oooo-gah!-- Jorm (WMF) ( talk) 20:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been sentenced to the Village Stocks | |
For being the WMF's scapegoat after Wikipedia was told to refuse traffic from the entire world. Ryan Vesey 21:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC) |
I'm sure you're probably watching the page, but here's a note to inform you or ask you to pop by or something because you're kind of involved in the matter about this uw1 thing. Yes. Please. Thanks. Something. Cake?
But seriously, any light you could shed on the matter would be appreciated. -— Isarra ༆ 18:20, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven, you helped out a few weeks ago with creating user warning templates for AFT5. I've pretty much started from scratch so they will be different to what you helped with. Would you mind having a look? Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 08:07, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven I've made some more changes, would you mind having a look for me. I planning for this to be a final draft before I ask for comments at WT:AFT5 so any help or advice you have would be appreciated. Thanks, Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 08:10, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Template:Uw-vandalism0 is broken, and I'm going blind trying to understand why. If you boldly change something you don't like, please be careful not to break it. Here's what it does:
Hello, I'm
Lexein. I wanted to let you know that at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
Barbie, appears to have been inappropriate, and has been reverted. If you wish to discuss this, you can do so here, or at my Talk page. Thank you.
--
Lexein (
talk) 01:03, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Before, it was dumping template code. What was that? Nevermind. -- Lexein ( talk) 01:27, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
After reading the latest topic on the pertaining talk-page, I think the feedback dashboard does not really work well, at least at the moment. Would it be feasible (I am not tech-savvy enough to know) to introduce some possibility for users to mark feedbacks as unhelpful or simply not worthy answering (I do that now with hiding the feedbacks from time to time, but I am admin)? Lectonar ( talk) 09:44, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Steven, I left you a note here in case you miss it. Many thanks for the advice about how to go about restoring my font. All the best, SlimVirgin (talk) 17:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
AdBlock Plus allows me to hide it with the following rule:
piramido.wmflabs.org##DIV#postedit-container
They ( talk) 23:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Just thought I would let you know I linked to your talk page as an example. - jc37 04:09, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Regarding the blog post "Fix this broken workflow, and help thousands of Wikipedians" on blog.wikimedia: Are you aware that the Article Creation Workflow team has been working on the same idea? Sure, according to the project status, it is on hold, but still. I am getting the feeling that the WMF is duplicating it´s efforts by having two teams on this.-- Snaevar ( talk) 02:56, 26 October 2012 (UTC)