Welcome!
Hello, Sterencio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Mak
(talk)
15:25, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Greetings! It's good to see someone else familiar with, and interested in Gombert.
Yes, probably the best way is to separate the "sources" and the "further reading" section. We often use sources that are outdated: some information, for example, in the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica is still useful for some articles, and we list it as a source, while recommending it only with a bit of salt. When I started the Gombert article more than two years ago I didn't have a copy of the more recent Grove so I used the older one. (Recently I've been using mainly the Grove online.) Happy editing! Antandrus (talk) 22:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Sterencio, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
Mak
(talk)
15:25, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Greetings! It's good to see someone else familiar with, and interested in Gombert.
Yes, probably the best way is to separate the "sources" and the "further reading" section. We often use sources that are outdated: some information, for example, in the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica is still useful for some articles, and we list it as a source, while recommending it only with a bit of salt. When I started the Gombert article more than two years ago I didn't have a copy of the more recent Grove so I used the older one. (Recently I've been using mainly the Grove online.) Happy editing! Antandrus (talk) 22:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)