This
user account is a
bot operated by
Dvandersluis (
talk). It is used to make repetitive
automated or
semi-automated edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually, in accordance with the
bot policy. This bot was previously approved but has since been retired, and therefore shouldn't be making edits that appear to be unassisted except in the operator's or its own user and user talk space. Administrators: if this bot is malfunctioning or causing harm, please block it. |
If there is an urgent issue with this bot, it will likely be resolved quicker if you email the owner about it. |
Edits such as this are incorrect as the articles are marked as on review or on hold. A change in template may be the cause; please fix. dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 09:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
You're great! 72.189.67.27 ( talk) 22:34, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm trying to figure why the bot is saying there's no date for Canning Dam and Mongolian language. - ΖαππερΝαππερ Babel Alexandria 01:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
The bot failed to run last night.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 15:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I noticed this bot updates Category:Cleanup by month on a daily basis. Ever since Rich Farmbrough has developed his "progess" templates and added them to all maintnance categories, this has become redundant. I'd like to request you to remove Category:Cleanup by month from the list of pages updated by this bot. Debresser ( talk) 19:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, there appears to be no update for 7 April 2010 - usually at 09:00 (UTC). –– Jezhotwells ( talk) 09:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Report is not doing well.
Nergaal (
talk)
03:24, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
It's still updating /before/ GABot can refresh the nom page, resulting in an override of manual updates between. [1] [2] Could it check to see the last time the backlog was updated and update only if the GABot date update of the nomination page is more recent? Viriditas ( talk) 09:21, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, the report didn't update today 13 March. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 11:48, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi. There have been some recent changes to the listing of Arts articles on the WP:GAN page. This has unfortunately lead to Statistician bot ignoring any articles in this category. Is it possible to update the bot to deal with the recent changes. AIRcorn (talk) 04:23, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi bot,
the report did not run this morning. Jezhotwells ( talk) 09:09, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Since the second week of July, the Bot has been failing on its second daily step, updating the GAN Report, since only the first archiving step is getting done. It failed again today, missed four days in a row before yesterday (August 24 through 27), and has generally been getting less reliable finishing the report during the summer.
Can you please take a look and see what's preventing the Bot from creating the GAN Report so frequently? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 17:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
The bot last ran on August 15; so far it's missed two days. Perhaps it needs a restart? Please take a look when you get the chance. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 06:02, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Daniel, I don't mean to be alarmist, but the StatisticianBot has for the past two days updated the Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Report/Backlog archive, but not proceeded on to update the Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Report itself. We do have a high number of total nominations at the moment (514), but we've gone higher in the past, so that may not be it.
These are actually the third and fourth skipped days recently; the bot didn't update on December 9 and 13 either. If you could please check the bot and see why it isn't producing the main /Report page every day, we would very much appreciate it. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 18:52, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Okay, I've made a few more changes to the bot:
I'll continue to keep an eye on this. — Daniel Vandersluis( talk) 18:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
A suggestion: On the GAN page, for each nomination, we have a 90-day page view counter available. I check that stat before I decide to take on a review, as it would appear to me that a page with 100K views should be reviewed earlier than a page with 1000 views in the past 90 days. If a tabular view of this statistic across all GANs was made available, maybe others reviewers would also use that statistic to drive their decisions on what reviews to take on? Thank you for considering this suggestion! -- Concertmusic ( talk) 22:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Daniel, the bot didn't run yesterday or today, so you might want to take a look at it to see what's up. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 07:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
@ Dvandersluis: It now hasn't run since the 4th of November: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations/Report&action=history Kind of annoying given it "only" having been five fucking months, and there's older ones is being given as a reason why there's no rush to review my GAN. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 15:06, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Template:GACstats has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 18:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
This
user account is a
bot operated by
Dvandersluis (
talk). It is used to make repetitive
automated or
semi-automated edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually, in accordance with the
bot policy. This bot was previously approved but has since been retired, and therefore shouldn't be making edits that appear to be unassisted except in the operator's or its own user and user talk space. Administrators: if this bot is malfunctioning or causing harm, please block it. |
If there is an urgent issue with this bot, it will likely be resolved quicker if you email the owner about it. |
Edits such as this are incorrect as the articles are marked as on review or on hold. A change in template may be the cause; please fix. dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 09:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
You're great! 72.189.67.27 ( talk) 22:34, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
I'm trying to figure why the bot is saying there's no date for Canning Dam and Mongolian language. - ΖαππερΝαππερ Babel Alexandria 01:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
The bot failed to run last night.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 15:21, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
I noticed this bot updates Category:Cleanup by month on a daily basis. Ever since Rich Farmbrough has developed his "progess" templates and added them to all maintnance categories, this has become redundant. I'd like to request you to remove Category:Cleanup by month from the list of pages updated by this bot. Debresser ( talk) 19:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi, there appears to be no update for 7 April 2010 - usually at 09:00 (UTC). –– Jezhotwells ( talk) 09:05, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Report is not doing well.
Nergaal (
talk)
03:24, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
It's still updating /before/ GABot can refresh the nom page, resulting in an override of manual updates between. [1] [2] Could it check to see the last time the backlog was updated and update only if the GABot date update of the nomination page is more recent? Viriditas ( talk) 09:21, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi, the report didn't update today 13 March. Thanks. Jezhotwells ( talk) 11:48, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi. There have been some recent changes to the listing of Arts articles on the WP:GAN page. This has unfortunately lead to Statistician bot ignoring any articles in this category. Is it possible to update the bot to deal with the recent changes. AIRcorn (talk) 04:23, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi bot,
the report did not run this morning. Jezhotwells ( talk) 09:09, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Since the second week of July, the Bot has been failing on its second daily step, updating the GAN Report, since only the first archiving step is getting done. It failed again today, missed four days in a row before yesterday (August 24 through 27), and has generally been getting less reliable finishing the report during the summer.
Can you please take a look and see what's preventing the Bot from creating the GAN Report so frequently? Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 17:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
The bot last ran on August 15; so far it's missed two days. Perhaps it needs a restart? Please take a look when you get the chance. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 06:02, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Daniel, I don't mean to be alarmist, but the StatisticianBot has for the past two days updated the Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Report/Backlog archive, but not proceeded on to update the Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Report itself. We do have a high number of total nominations at the moment (514), but we've gone higher in the past, so that may not be it.
These are actually the third and fourth skipped days recently; the bot didn't update on December 9 and 13 either. If you could please check the bot and see why it isn't producing the main /Report page every day, we would very much appreciate it. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 18:52, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Okay, I've made a few more changes to the bot:
I'll continue to keep an eye on this. — Daniel Vandersluis( talk) 18:45, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
A suggestion: On the GAN page, for each nomination, we have a 90-day page view counter available. I check that stat before I decide to take on a review, as it would appear to me that a page with 100K views should be reviewed earlier than a page with 1000 views in the past 90 days. If a tabular view of this statistic across all GANs was made available, maybe others reviewers would also use that statistic to drive their decisions on what reviews to take on? Thank you for considering this suggestion! -- Concertmusic ( talk) 22:28, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Daniel, the bot didn't run yesterday or today, so you might want to take a look at it to see what's up. Many thanks. BlueMoonset ( talk) 07:11, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
@ Dvandersluis: It now hasn't run since the 4th of November: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations/Report&action=history Kind of annoying given it "only" having been five fucking months, and there's older ones is being given as a reason why there's no rush to review my GAN. Adam Cuerden ( talk) 15:06, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Template:GACstats has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 ( talk) 18:55, 10 June 2024 (UTC)