This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 |
It took me one whole year to do that article(Siily Willy), I would apprectiate it if you did not delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sillywilly123456789 ( talk • contribs) 18:05, 19 September 2008
Your first edit was right, and you shouldn't have reverted yourself. This poor woman is a clerical worker instructed to replace our stub on her employer with a panegyric out of the college catalog, and now since we've trimmed it back for WP:COI and WP:NPOV/ WP:SPAM reasons, she wants to erase all signs of her efforts here and remove the employer River Parishes Community College from Wikipedia altogether. As you know, we don't do that with a notable topic. I've restored what she deleted, since it's in Coren's userspace, not hers. Thanks for your vigilance. -- Orange Mike | Talk 16:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for notifying me. It wouldn't be the first time that some unfortunate employee is ordered to create a promotional article on Wikipedia. Her edit seemed suspicious, but I must have reverted myself because she was the only contributor to the section. Nonetheless, I reverted her page blanking [1] though. StaticGull Talk 11:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
nominated for deletion —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shelly No ( talk • contribs) 19:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
It's impossible to move the page Mate (beverage) to Maté (discussion at Talk:Yerba Maté; the long and the short of it is that it's currently located at the Spanish spelling instead of the English) at the moment because there is a revert at the Maté page. I thought removing the redirect would clear it up, but apparently not?
If you can tell me what I need to do or move the page yourself, that would be lovely. Thanks. - LlywelynII ( talk) 14:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
I fail to see how removing a redirect temporarily is vandalism and you could certainly give me some time to reply to you or finish what I was attempting to do before lobbing insults. Thanks. - LlywelynII ( talk) 14:15, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
what can i edit then because i didnt add anything bad and it was context. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawkish88 ( talk • contribs) 14:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
You keep editing my posts lol. The first two were a joke and I WAS going to delete them but ah you beat me to it but but but the last one was true lolol. Reply :D
Friends4eva (
talk) 14:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)!4eva!
Friends4eva (
talk) 14:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
your bot is interfearing with the removal of un-encyclopedic content [Upper_St._Clair_High_School] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Endogenous -i ( talk • contribs) 13:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
your bot is interfearing with the removal of un-encyclopedic vandalism in re [Upper_St._Clair_High_School].
Endogenous -i (
talk) 13:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
04:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.
–Jimmy Wales [1]
WHY ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Endogenous -i ( talk) 05:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
“ | [...] Let's evaluate the controversies on a case-by-case basis. They are:
|
” |
IMO you need to get your head examined. I have made rational arguments, and privided facts, as to why the material was edited and should Not be preserved. IMO I have shown it all to be Unencyclopedic wrt the High School. (though as I have said before, the rape issue is truly controversial (though the facts are not verifyable)) You cite max's origional "research" and opinion, but disregard direct comment from an individual who claims to be present at the event.
Endogenous -i ( talk) 14:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
HELLO —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.215.13 ( talk • contribs) 22:38, 13 October 2008
My experience is a big part in the questioning whether or not there are satanic gatherings near Helltown, with my own circumstances I was in I can provide vivid details and make people know the truth about Helltown. I apologize for trying to better the lack of information in which your website provides. I'll find a better provider of information to let people know as much as they can.
-Logan Patrick Thomas Ostry III —Preceding unsigned comment added by Logan15xc ( talk • contribs) 13:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
but what the FCC is doing is Unconstitutional and i would like for that to be posted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.103.22.248 ( talk) 14:11, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Look me up. I'm on facebook. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blacklight-jhu ( talk • contribs) 14:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
919-272-5319 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blacklight-jhu ( talk • contribs) 16:29, 15 October 2008
Hey there. Just letting you know that your addition of the {{ speedy deletion}} template to your huggle config page has caused it to be listed in the candidates for speedy deletion category, which is odd, to say the least! I'd have a look at changing it :P. Ale_Jrb talk 15:39, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
& #123;
(without the space) ought to fix the problem, and shouldn't mess up Huggle.
Hersfold (
t/
a/
c) 17:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Hey, do you mind if I make a minor edit to your User:StaticGull/huggle.css page? One of your recent configuration changes added it to CAT:CSD and I'd like to remove it if you don't care. Thanks. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 00:28, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't find anything wrong in my edit to the article Kimi Raikkonen. I was just adding some extra data, that's all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.132.79.162 ( talk) 14:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
hi how are U?? i hope U are fine.i am very impressed my your editing capability and your contribution.
but i don't know wht is spinning dancing and where it is perform???/
With Love
Dr.Soft —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Soft ( talk • contribs) 16:49, 16 October 2008
hi i don't read your massage... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Soft ( talk • contribs) 15:01, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
I dont think my article should have been deleted as it is perfectly logical the xbox 360 is much better than any playstation console so get that roond ye :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.82.177.16 ( talk) 14:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi there
I don't usually write on Wikipedia but can you PLEASE change the way that is written? I don't want to change it but someone needs to fix the English in that article...please!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.114.255.134 ( talk) 14:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Ahh the joy of frustrated IP's who haven't realised it is usually easier to fix their damage than cause it. Thanks again -- Nate 14 81 15:25, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi there , I didnt understand this edit of yours and my first intution was it was a personal attack kind of. But I thought it is better to ask you if I misunderstood it. Hope you care to help clear my doubt -- Tinu Cherian - 12:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
I edited the page...it was reverted and called vandalism based on the fact only one word was added in "Homosexuals". I reverted this and added in a reference and had the original reverter check the reference.
This is a proper edit, just because someone writes in the word homosexuals does not mean it is a vandalism. I believe you should CHECK what your reverting, and read the references and maybe the whole article. The artcle actually talks about the supposed homosexual relationship between the two saints, and a number of churches have labaled them as homosexual patrons. so please check your reverts
58.106.140.178 ( talk) 18:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Have you heard of a case where vandalism goes unnoticed for five days? See [3] [4] Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 16:57, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 |
It took me one whole year to do that article(Siily Willy), I would apprectiate it if you did not delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sillywilly123456789 ( talk • contribs) 18:05, 19 September 2008
Your first edit was right, and you shouldn't have reverted yourself. This poor woman is a clerical worker instructed to replace our stub on her employer with a panegyric out of the college catalog, and now since we've trimmed it back for WP:COI and WP:NPOV/ WP:SPAM reasons, she wants to erase all signs of her efforts here and remove the employer River Parishes Community College from Wikipedia altogether. As you know, we don't do that with a notable topic. I've restored what she deleted, since it's in Coren's userspace, not hers. Thanks for your vigilance. -- Orange Mike | Talk 16:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for notifying me. It wouldn't be the first time that some unfortunate employee is ordered to create a promotional article on Wikipedia. Her edit seemed suspicious, but I must have reverted myself because she was the only contributor to the section. Nonetheless, I reverted her page blanking [1] though. StaticGull Talk 11:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
nominated for deletion —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shelly No ( talk • contribs) 19:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
It's impossible to move the page Mate (beverage) to Maté (discussion at Talk:Yerba Maté; the long and the short of it is that it's currently located at the Spanish spelling instead of the English) at the moment because there is a revert at the Maté page. I thought removing the redirect would clear it up, but apparently not?
If you can tell me what I need to do or move the page yourself, that would be lovely. Thanks. - LlywelynII ( talk) 14:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
I fail to see how removing a redirect temporarily is vandalism and you could certainly give me some time to reply to you or finish what I was attempting to do before lobbing insults. Thanks. - LlywelynII ( talk) 14:15, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
what can i edit then because i didnt add anything bad and it was context. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawkish88 ( talk • contribs) 14:16, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
You keep editing my posts lol. The first two were a joke and I WAS going to delete them but ah you beat me to it but but but the last one was true lolol. Reply :D
Friends4eva (
talk) 14:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)!4eva!
Friends4eva (
talk) 14:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
your bot is interfearing with the removal of un-encyclopedic content [Upper_St._Clair_High_School] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Endogenous -i ( talk • contribs) 13:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
your bot is interfearing with the removal of un-encyclopedic vandalism in re [Upper_St._Clair_High_School].
Endogenous -i (
talk) 13:30, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
04:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I can NOT emphasize this enough. There seems to be a terrible bias among some editors that some sort of random speculative 'I heard it somewhere' pseudo information is to be tagged with a 'needs a cite' tag. Wrong. It should be removed, aggressively, unless it can be sourced. This is true of all information, but it is particularly true of negative information about living persons.
–Jimmy Wales [1]
WHY ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Endogenous -i ( talk) 05:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
“ | [...] Let's evaluate the controversies on a case-by-case basis. They are:
|
” |
IMO you need to get your head examined. I have made rational arguments, and privided facts, as to why the material was edited and should Not be preserved. IMO I have shown it all to be Unencyclopedic wrt the High School. (though as I have said before, the rape issue is truly controversial (though the facts are not verifyable)) You cite max's origional "research" and opinion, but disregard direct comment from an individual who claims to be present at the event.
Endogenous -i ( talk) 14:56, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
HELLO —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.215.13 ( talk • contribs) 22:38, 13 October 2008
My experience is a big part in the questioning whether or not there are satanic gatherings near Helltown, with my own circumstances I was in I can provide vivid details and make people know the truth about Helltown. I apologize for trying to better the lack of information in which your website provides. I'll find a better provider of information to let people know as much as they can.
-Logan Patrick Thomas Ostry III —Preceding unsigned comment added by Logan15xc ( talk • contribs) 13:59, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
but what the FCC is doing is Unconstitutional and i would like for that to be posted —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.103.22.248 ( talk) 14:11, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Look me up. I'm on facebook. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blacklight-jhu ( talk • contribs) 14:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
919-272-5319 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blacklight-jhu ( talk • contribs) 16:29, 15 October 2008
Hey there. Just letting you know that your addition of the {{ speedy deletion}} template to your huggle config page has caused it to be listed in the candidates for speedy deletion category, which is odd, to say the least! I'd have a look at changing it :P. Ale_Jrb talk 15:39, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
& #123;
(without the space) ought to fix the problem, and shouldn't mess up Huggle.
Hersfold (
t/
a/
c) 17:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Hey, do you mind if I make a minor edit to your User:StaticGull/huggle.css page? One of your recent configuration changes added it to CAT:CSD and I'd like to remove it if you don't care. Thanks. Thingg ⊕ ⊗ 00:28, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
I don't find anything wrong in my edit to the article Kimi Raikkonen. I was just adding some extra data, that's all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.132.79.162 ( talk) 14:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
hi how are U?? i hope U are fine.i am very impressed my your editing capability and your contribution.
but i don't know wht is spinning dancing and where it is perform???/
With Love
Dr.Soft —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Soft ( talk • contribs) 16:49, 16 October 2008
hi i don't read your massage... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Soft ( talk • contribs) 15:01, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
I dont think my article should have been deleted as it is perfectly logical the xbox 360 is much better than any playstation console so get that roond ye :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.82.177.16 ( talk) 14:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi there
I don't usually write on Wikipedia but can you PLEASE change the way that is written? I don't want to change it but someone needs to fix the English in that article...please!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.114.255.134 ( talk) 14:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Ahh the joy of frustrated IP's who haven't realised it is usually easier to fix their damage than cause it. Thanks again -- Nate 14 81 15:25, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi there , I didnt understand this edit of yours and my first intution was it was a personal attack kind of. But I thought it is better to ask you if I misunderstood it. Hope you care to help clear my doubt -- Tinu Cherian - 12:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
I edited the page...it was reverted and called vandalism based on the fact only one word was added in "Homosexuals". I reverted this and added in a reference and had the original reverter check the reference.
This is a proper edit, just because someone writes in the word homosexuals does not mean it is a vandalism. I believe you should CHECK what your reverting, and read the references and maybe the whole article. The artcle actually talks about the supposed homosexual relationship between the two saints, and a number of churches have labaled them as homosexual patrons. so please check your reverts
58.106.140.178 ( talk) 18:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Have you heard of a case where vandalism goes unnoticed for five days? See [3] [4] Otolemur crassicaudatus ( talk) 16:57, 10 November 2008 (UTC)