Welcome!
Hello, Stan Simmons, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Kip
Kip
08:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
On a recent edit on Operation Repo you removed the citation needed tags. Was there a reason for doing so? Please keep in mind that until we can source those claims the tags should stay put. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 13:30, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Well it would appear there is a source that states the show is fictional, good job finding it. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 14:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Ged
UK
20:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Thank you for enabling their harassment. Stan Simmons ( talk) 20:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Stan Simmons ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Blocked by request of User:Turian, who has labeled my edits as vandalism and engaged in Wiki-bullying with other members of WP:PW over useless references to professional wrestling being edited from articles. This block is nothing more than a continuation of said harassment, which also includes allegations of sockpuppetry.
Decline reason:
Even if this account isn't a sockpuppet, I get the impression that you're only here to make a point. You're very lucky you weren't blocked indefinitely. Blueboy 96 22:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Edits you don't agree with aren't vandalism. Vandalism is a rather strong word to throw around when you're unable to prove how it applies. Stan Simmons ( talk) 20:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Stan Simmons ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
An indefinite block has been placed on my account as the last step in a campaign of harassment and misinformation from WP:PW. They are claiming I am a "sockpuppet" of another user, when I have been editing here for almost two years. I politely request a reversal of this decision from someone not connected to this bullying cabal.
Decline reason:
See WP:NOTTHEM and try again. Sandstein 16:22, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Stan Simmons ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
An indefinite block has been placed on my account after claims that I am a "sockpuppet" of another user. I have been editing here for almost two years (since June 2008). All of my edits have been in good faith, and I have edited a wide variety of articles on different subjects.
Decline reason:
evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Paul Harald Kaspar/Archive is overwhelmingly convincing. This account started editing a few months after the earlier account was blocked, with a few intervening socks. It seems clear that you are maintaining two accounts to give the illusion of greater support for your particular causes. This is unacceptable. -- Jayron 32 02:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Welcome!
Hello, Stan Simmons, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Kip
Kip
08:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
On a recent edit on Operation Repo you removed the citation needed tags. Was there a reason for doing so? Please keep in mind that until we can source those claims the tags should stay put. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 13:30, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Well it would appear there is a source that states the show is fictional, good job finding it. Hell In A Bucket ( talk) 14:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our
guide to appealing blocks first.
Ged
UK
20:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Thank you for enabling their harassment. Stan Simmons ( talk) 20:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Stan Simmons ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Blocked by request of User:Turian, who has labeled my edits as vandalism and engaged in Wiki-bullying with other members of WP:PW over useless references to professional wrestling being edited from articles. This block is nothing more than a continuation of said harassment, which also includes allegations of sockpuppetry.
Decline reason:
Even if this account isn't a sockpuppet, I get the impression that you're only here to make a point. You're very lucky you weren't blocked indefinitely. Blueboy 96 22:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Edits you don't agree with aren't vandalism. Vandalism is a rather strong word to throw around when you're unable to prove how it applies. Stan Simmons ( talk) 20:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Stan Simmons ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
An indefinite block has been placed on my account as the last step in a campaign of harassment and misinformation from WP:PW. They are claiming I am a "sockpuppet" of another user, when I have been editing here for almost two years. I politely request a reversal of this decision from someone not connected to this bullying cabal.
Decline reason:
See WP:NOTTHEM and try again. Sandstein 16:22, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Stan Simmons ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
An indefinite block has been placed on my account after claims that I am a "sockpuppet" of another user. I have been editing here for almost two years (since June 2008). All of my edits have been in good faith, and I have edited a wide variety of articles on different subjects.
Decline reason:
evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Paul Harald Kaspar/Archive is overwhelmingly convincing. This account started editing a few months after the earlier account was blocked, with a few intervening socks. It seems clear that you are maintaining two accounts to give the illusion of greater support for your particular causes. This is unacceptable. -- Jayron 32 02:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.