what do you think about moving the page for ed sheeran's ÷ album to "÷ (Ed Sheeran album)" since all his other albums with symbols are like that.. and if you search "ed sheeran" in the search bar, it helps put his album in the suggestions. just an idea. -- Jennica✿ / talk 09:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I was looking on the BPI's Twitter where they have confirmed the certification, so I assumed it would have been added to their official site as well. I wasn't intending on vandalizing the page by any means, but I'll double check the BPI official site in future. Impressive instant ( talk) 17:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey. Just a quick question. See the Polish charts listed here . How reliable is that one? Karst ( talk) 12:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
So I changed all the singer-songwriters on Mariah's pages to "singer and songwriter". I swear I did it yesterday to Shape of You.. but now it begs the question, is Ed Sheeran really considered a singer-songwriter? I can sort of see how he would be "considered" more of one because he plays guitar. On the singer-songwriter article, it doesn't really list any modern artists. If Madonna and Mariah Carey can't be considered singer-songwriters, I don't think Ed should. What do you think? The term is thrown around a lot and I have been taking notice on more pages that have it. -- Jennica✿ / talk 02:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Ss112. You made a comment about KIX Country being a reliable source in List of 2017 albums, so there was no need for an additional source. I would like to comment on why I added a second source, and also why tomorrow I will be undoing your edit. I know nothing about KIX Country myself, and have not heard of it in 3 years of reviewing and adding citations. What I did notice on the website for the KIX Country was that it did not provide a date or an author, which I interpreted it to mean that it was not a periodical news source, but published reviews whenever it suited the radio network. To me, that was acceptable for one source, but cried out for an additional reputable source. Notice that I did not delete the first source, I just backed up the source to improve notability of the referenced citations. I do agree that one source can be sufficient. The fact that I provided a second citation just means that in this case I did not find it sufficient, and wanted additional buttressing. Mburrell ( talk) 03:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey Ss112, i come on your talk page to discuss something. I have no idea why there is a source for the album Sremmlife 2 on Rae Sremmurd's discography where it's just a blue link which you can click on and see it is on the album. Plus i don't think that i ever seen a ref on the "Other charted songs" section for an album (especially if it is there own album). Apparently Magnolia likes to undo any edit i make that does not have a source to it. And I always add stuff that is always right. but it just keeps getting reverted by him. Basically i am writing on your talk page because this is going on for quite a while now, and i don't know what to do at all anymore on wikipedia. I would like your opinion on what should i do because he already reported me for this. JustDoItFettyg ( talk) 21:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I have now completed your move request. Per this diff, I wanted to clarify what you wanted done because both redirects ended up in the same place (and it would make no difference, which is why I contested it). But I looked at the talk pages/edit history and I see what you meant, so I've moved this now for you. st 170 e 11:42, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Sean,
Thanks for your interest in the Ngaiire page. I've had a crack at improving the neutrality and removing material that might be promotional, I do have a bias that will affect the article however.
Would you do me the favor of checking it again and telling me what sections require further attention? Thanks for this Werafa Werafa ( talk) 22:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Sean, I understand the points you make, and am still new enough at wikipedia to need the correction. I'll review it further with this in mind Werafa Werafa ( talk) 04:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
He's warring again, though I did report him. Hopefully by the time you read this he's already blocked. He also has responded to you on the SOY/÷ talk page / as well as my talk page. -- Jennica✿ / talk 03:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
I mean when they blanked the Bebe album and made it a redirect. I thought it was the same thing as a page move. -- Jennica✿ / talk 20:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
There are these IPs are making disruptive editing to Wikipedia. The first one making edits like this [1] [2] [3] [4], these kind of edits got reverted by several other editors for this, I have reported these edits to Laser brain in awhile ago and this IP got blocked for this. And now it appears this editor is using other IP address by making the same disruptive edits, like these just recently [5] [6] [7], I have reported these edits at WP:ANI but have yet got a response. What your opinion on this? TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 04:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Maybe you want to look at my proposal/suggestion(s) at Talk:List_of_number-one_hits_(Germany)#Ed_Sheeran:_historical_record Cheers, -- Rava77 ( talk) 21:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
How am I edit warring...I undid your edit literally once because the lead looked unorganized before you changed the wording. I appreciate you helpin out with technical stuff as of recent but I'm not just clicking undo for the hell of it. BlaccCrab ( talk) 12:32, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
If you are good with tables can you tool with El Disco Duro? the chart performance section. that person obviously has not read the MOS at all and has included Youtube and Twitter charts [which I didn't even know was a thing]. If not, it's okay. I tried to do it already and it was unsuccessful. -- Jennica✿ / talk 00:32, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
I left a reply to an editor at User talk:Lemongirl942#Rap music articles. You may wish to comment. Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 11:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
I can't remember what page I asked you about this but the links in the Charts area are all messed up on Number 1 to Infinity. I looked through both our talk pages for where I asked you but can't find it. .. do you mind cleaning them up? sorry if these requests are bothersome -- Jennica✿ / talk 08:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Have you ever seen anything like this? His abuse is so extensive he has his own sub article. The sock I get blocked regularly told me he thinks it's unfair that I keep doing it and how I'm a "kapo in a not-that-far past in some prison camp". Crazy that people want to keep coming back. I never knew they made pages like that though. Some of the IPs look like the vandal we saw -- Jennica✿ / talk 12:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- haha @ the fansite thing. and thanks! I don't know if I'll do another one since I didn't think I would have to re-write so much. I don't really play with the writing side of wikipedia so it was sort of a challenge. Maybe sometime down the road... -- Jennica✿ / talk 21:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Excuse me, hello. I'm Lucas. Firsly, I'd like to appologise for however wrong word I'll write here, because I'm not a good English speaker at all. Well, how you know, Alessia Cara recorded a song for Moana's soundtrack and it was released to promote the movie, automatically it was put for individual sales and streams. On her page here in Wikipedia it's not added as a official single, but recently it starts to play on US AC radio and also Canada AC radio. It is on "Others songs" space. Don't you agree that we should put this as an official single? I hope you understand what I'm trying to explain. Thank you for your attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Certificationsaccess ( talk • contribs) 23:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
So I know you said you keep tabs on some k-pop stuff so maybe this is a trend on those pages. This editor wants to put like 50 links under one ref. Let's Not Fall in Love is one of at least 10 examples I came across. What do you think? -- Jennica✿ / talk 21:39, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey, Ss112. I got your message on my talk page, asking me questions about which definite articles articles to sort by, and which to ignore. I know of no rules that say the article needs to be sorted by definite articles or to ignore definite and indefinite articles. I know that several sorting processes outside of Wikipedia ignore definite articles and indefinite articles, so that is what I have been doing. I see no difference between English definite and indefinite articles and foreign language definite and indefinite articles. Although this is an English language encyclopedia article (different type of article), this is not a article that is only for English speaking users, so I have continued applying the same rules across the board.
When I edit the changes, I do all the current changes en-mass, so that I do not know who has made what edits (although I can detect styles, like a Danny0503 edit). I was not trying to insult your knowledge, as I had no idea that you had made the edit. I was just explaining the change. Also, when I restored the citations to Los Campesinos! reference, some other user had stripped the old references and used iTunes, and then you came back and restored one reference but used a new accessdate. Again, not knowing that it was your edit, I just restored the original citations and the original accessdates. There was no insult to you, but when one overeager editor strips information for no good reason (a good reason being a change of released date, or such), there is no reason not to just return the old information. Please don't take it as a slam on you.
Last, Los Angeles is a proper name now, and so the Los is not used as a definite article but part of the full name. But if I look at bands that use The as part of their band name, for example, The Beatles, I find that libraries and such sort it under B, rather than T. Even Wikipedia has a default sort of Beatles, The, when you go into the edit data. It can be argued that when you go into the edit data for Los Campesinos!, there is no sort data that changes the way it is listed. That would be a valid argument. However, an argument on English vs. foreign definite articles is just an English-centric argument and can go either way. Please keep in mind that none of my edits are intended to be personal, and please stand back a bit and see what I might be thinking before getting angry. mburrell 01:25, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
The article Mind of a Genius Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Flat Out (
talk) 23:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
I was of the opinion you reverted my edit on your talk page because you didn't find the discussion which was the reason you stated in the edit summary. So I reverted your revert since the discussion was there a few minutes later.
I apologise if you found that disruptive.-- Tobiasinator ( talk) 17:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
I'm wondering how when there are only primary sources that that makes something automatically notable. I mean there's not even an article on the Portuguese Albums Chart. Lists of number ones songs and albums should only exist if there are independent and reliable third party sources that refer to number ones on these charts or to the achievement of reaching number one, which are few and far between outside of the most major charts. It's so overkill. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 04:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
If you did not understand, I just want to tell you that since september 2014, French charts is divided into two weekly charts: Donwload charts and Streaming charts. They are both official and the most important charts rankings in France. Dani tefe ( talk) 15:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
The article Long Live the Chief has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 15:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
You're a legend! - The Magnificentist 15:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC) |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I certainly don't want to be at odds with one another. I very much respect and appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia. I hope we can find ways to work together and not step on toes. We're all here to make Wikipedia the best possible encyclopedia. Thank you for your many contributions. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC) |
There was this editor who add these sources here in this article, are these sources reliable for genres? TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 07:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Ss12, can you help me? So, I'm willing to expand the article of the song Love Incredible by Cashmere Cat and Camila Cabello, I saw that you redirect the article to Camila Cabello main article. Can you revert the redirect to the expansion of the article? Please! LikeGaga ( talk) 18:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey, do you mind if you can help me add chart info for Nav, I recently made the article since I think its now time for him to have one, thanks. Bloomdoom2 ( talk) 03:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
A user made this edit [8], I'm not sure if the chart is reliable or not and as you are always on top of this you might be aware of such, hence my question. Thank you MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 15:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery
I was just thinking, would one solution be to simply move a redirect page to draft space? I never did this before because I thought editors weren't supposed to redirect to the draft space, but this would retain the article history, right? --- Another Believer ( Talk) 02:12, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ss112, There is an editor name Moonsdebut8 who keeps adding fake charts to Shether and Remy Ma discography. I already try to revert his edits but he keeps adding it back. Is there anything you can do to help? JustDoItFettyg ( talk) 23:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Editor DrStrauss added this tag to the article, called the critical reception section "very long", but I look at other articles such as Lemonade (Beyoncé album), Born Sinner and Kiss Land, that had the critical reception section at the same rate as Culture (Migos album). Why is the tag is necessary for Culture while these other articles doesn't have the tag? TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 13:13, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
{{ping|USERNAME}}
DrStrauss
talk 21:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Ss112. I truly believe that singles with only one version shouldn't have track listings, as the information is already covered in the info box. For example, in September Song, there's no other versions, no radio edits or remixes, just a single track. The length of the track is already shown in the info box, that track list is just absolutely redundant. Hayman30 ( talk) 11:53, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:Ss112, wondered if this [9] is a reliable source? If it is nu-disco and funk can be added to genres on Slide (Calvin Harris song) page, thanks.-- Theo Mandela ( talk) 07:49, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
I see your point on the other iSpy article, but wouldn't make sense just to put a disclaimer on that article for people that are looking for just the song itself. Also to note that in the article title it specifically says "song". Bloomdoom2 ( talk) 23:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Can you tell me if this chart is notable? I Got You peaked at 27 on Kiss Top 40. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 14:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Right, I hadn't thought of stating the source of track listings rather than putting the ref in the header , i'll remember to do that for my album articles from now on. You'd never have thought that i've been Wiki-ing for 7 years, hah Drneroli ( talk) 21:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
I have restored and expanded this album article so you might want to re-assess it for WP:ALBUM. Cheers, De728631 ( talk) 15:39, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Which one of these sources [10] [11] [12] [13] classified being a hip hop, R&B, dancehall and Afrobeat project. I did read these sources but I like to hear a second opinion of this. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 05:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
This is for all of your countless chart updates on various song and discography articles. Keep up the good work! Snuggums ( talk / edits) 17:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC) |
I have no idea how problem she is.
123.136.107.64 ( talk) 17:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Sean. I admire your work here on Wikipedia. How do you find the time to do it? :) Anyway, I have a little problem. Do you knwow how can I make work albums chart template (Hung Medien) on Au cœur du stade? I believe the cause of this problem is "œ". I tried but the link is always broken. Maybe you could help? :) Max24 ( talk) 17:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
I see you reverted my edit of the song being a sample. Does this really need to be sourced? I mean, just listen to the song and it's clear it's lifted from Donell Jones' song. His vocals and instruments are heard in the background all throughout it. This is one of those things that I don't think really needs a source to be sure, it's like instantly the case. It's like you don't need a source to declare the sky is blue during the day and dark at night. Just look up and it's just the truth. - Jabrona ( talk) 19:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Not really my area of "interest", like you predicted, but I would suggest you reach out to User:Floquenbeam. Widr ( talk) 12:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:Ss112, can we get some genres on Heatstroke please. Do you know any of the main reliable sources like Forbes, Billboard, Rolling Stone etc. Here [14] it's called nu-disco, funk etc. Thanks.-- Theo Mandela ( talk) 19:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you got into a mild scuffle with 47.147.39.254 over an edit the IP user in question made to Automaton (album). I must advise you to please do not take heed to this IP's words, as I have had to deal with this abusive user in the past, and he should not even be editing here. The IP in question is a sockpuppet of the user, Boaxy, who was originally banned as Phrasia, for disruptive edit warring over adding unsourced genres/categories to certain music, anime, TV, etc. articles. When he does cite his sources, his sources (i.e., the iTunes reference) originate from blogs and other unreliable websites. And when he opens a dispute, he resorts to name-calling those who disagree with him (i.e., calling them homophobic, racist, etc.) because he feels "discriminated" against, when that is not so. Eventually, his conduct got him topic-banned from editing certain articles.
I, as a person who was attacked by Boaxy/Phrasia beforehand over a dispute on Talk:Sailor Moon, am only writing this post as an advisory to not heed to this IP address, revert all nonconstructive edits made by the IP, and if he should start trouble again, please report to the sockpuppetry noticeboard. His behavior with you, I noticed, clearly indicates he has not learned his lesson in the first place, and never will learn from his actions.-- Loyalmoonie ( talk) 05:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Chris
Hi Sean. Hung Medien finally updated their website with French charts. I wanted to remove additional French sources for singles on Ed Sheeran discography page but I didn't because it seems Hung Medien still shows Sales chart (digital+physical), and the SNEP sources are for the new Sales+Streaming chart. The differances of peaks are big. Ed is much higher on the Sales+Streaming chart. Should we treat the Sales+Streaming chart as the official one on Wiki? Max24 ( talk) 13:34, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Please check your inbox. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 05:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
what do you think about moving the page for ed sheeran's ÷ album to "÷ (Ed Sheeran album)" since all his other albums with symbols are like that.. and if you search "ed sheeran" in the search bar, it helps put his album in the suggestions. just an idea. -- Jennica✿ / talk 09:05, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I was looking on the BPI's Twitter where they have confirmed the certification, so I assumed it would have been added to their official site as well. I wasn't intending on vandalizing the page by any means, but I'll double check the BPI official site in future. Impressive instant ( talk) 17:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey. Just a quick question. See the Polish charts listed here . How reliable is that one? Karst ( talk) 12:24, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
So I changed all the singer-songwriters on Mariah's pages to "singer and songwriter". I swear I did it yesterday to Shape of You.. but now it begs the question, is Ed Sheeran really considered a singer-songwriter? I can sort of see how he would be "considered" more of one because he plays guitar. On the singer-songwriter article, it doesn't really list any modern artists. If Madonna and Mariah Carey can't be considered singer-songwriters, I don't think Ed should. What do you think? The term is thrown around a lot and I have been taking notice on more pages that have it. -- Jennica✿ / talk 02:35, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Ss112. You made a comment about KIX Country being a reliable source in List of 2017 albums, so there was no need for an additional source. I would like to comment on why I added a second source, and also why tomorrow I will be undoing your edit. I know nothing about KIX Country myself, and have not heard of it in 3 years of reviewing and adding citations. What I did notice on the website for the KIX Country was that it did not provide a date or an author, which I interpreted it to mean that it was not a periodical news source, but published reviews whenever it suited the radio network. To me, that was acceptable for one source, but cried out for an additional reputable source. Notice that I did not delete the first source, I just backed up the source to improve notability of the referenced citations. I do agree that one source can be sufficient. The fact that I provided a second citation just means that in this case I did not find it sufficient, and wanted additional buttressing. Mburrell ( talk) 03:49, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey Ss112, i come on your talk page to discuss something. I have no idea why there is a source for the album Sremmlife 2 on Rae Sremmurd's discography where it's just a blue link which you can click on and see it is on the album. Plus i don't think that i ever seen a ref on the "Other charted songs" section for an album (especially if it is there own album). Apparently Magnolia likes to undo any edit i make that does not have a source to it. And I always add stuff that is always right. but it just keeps getting reverted by him. Basically i am writing on your talk page because this is going on for quite a while now, and i don't know what to do at all anymore on wikipedia. I would like your opinion on what should i do because he already reported me for this. JustDoItFettyg ( talk) 21:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I have now completed your move request. Per this diff, I wanted to clarify what you wanted done because both redirects ended up in the same place (and it would make no difference, which is why I contested it). But I looked at the talk pages/edit history and I see what you meant, so I've moved this now for you. st 170 e 11:42, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Sean,
Thanks for your interest in the Ngaiire page. I've had a crack at improving the neutrality and removing material that might be promotional, I do have a bias that will affect the article however.
Would you do me the favor of checking it again and telling me what sections require further attention? Thanks for this Werafa Werafa ( talk) 22:27, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks Sean, I understand the points you make, and am still new enough at wikipedia to need the correction. I'll review it further with this in mind Werafa Werafa ( talk) 04:15, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
He's warring again, though I did report him. Hopefully by the time you read this he's already blocked. He also has responded to you on the SOY/÷ talk page / as well as my talk page. -- Jennica✿ / talk 03:52, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
I mean when they blanked the Bebe album and made it a redirect. I thought it was the same thing as a page move. -- Jennica✿ / talk 20:33, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
There are these IPs are making disruptive editing to Wikipedia. The first one making edits like this [1] [2] [3] [4], these kind of edits got reverted by several other editors for this, I have reported these edits to Laser brain in awhile ago and this IP got blocked for this. And now it appears this editor is using other IP address by making the same disruptive edits, like these just recently [5] [6] [7], I have reported these edits at WP:ANI but have yet got a response. What your opinion on this? TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 04:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
Maybe you want to look at my proposal/suggestion(s) at Talk:List_of_number-one_hits_(Germany)#Ed_Sheeran:_historical_record Cheers, -- Rava77 ( talk) 21:35, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
How am I edit warring...I undid your edit literally once because the lead looked unorganized before you changed the wording. I appreciate you helpin out with technical stuff as of recent but I'm not just clicking undo for the hell of it. BlaccCrab ( talk) 12:32, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
If you are good with tables can you tool with El Disco Duro? the chart performance section. that person obviously has not read the MOS at all and has included Youtube and Twitter charts [which I didn't even know was a thing]. If not, it's okay. I tried to do it already and it was unsuccessful. -- Jennica✿ / talk 00:32, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
I left a reply to an editor at User talk:Lemongirl942#Rap music articles. You may wish to comment. Thank you. Magnolia677 ( talk) 11:15, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
I can't remember what page I asked you about this but the links in the Charts area are all messed up on Number 1 to Infinity. I looked through both our talk pages for where I asked you but can't find it. .. do you mind cleaning them up? sorry if these requests are bothersome -- Jennica✿ / talk 08:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
Have you ever seen anything like this? His abuse is so extensive he has his own sub article. The sock I get blocked regularly told me he thinks it's unfair that I keep doing it and how I'm a "kapo in a not-that-far past in some prison camp". Crazy that people want to keep coming back. I never knew they made pages like that though. Some of the IPs look like the vandal we saw -- Jennica✿ / talk 12:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
- haha @ the fansite thing. and thanks! I don't know if I'll do another one since I didn't think I would have to re-write so much. I don't really play with the writing side of wikipedia so it was sort of a challenge. Maybe sometime down the road... -- Jennica✿ / talk 21:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Excuse me, hello. I'm Lucas. Firsly, I'd like to appologise for however wrong word I'll write here, because I'm not a good English speaker at all. Well, how you know, Alessia Cara recorded a song for Moana's soundtrack and it was released to promote the movie, automatically it was put for individual sales and streams. On her page here in Wikipedia it's not added as a official single, but recently it starts to play on US AC radio and also Canada AC radio. It is on "Others songs" space. Don't you agree that we should put this as an official single? I hope you understand what I'm trying to explain. Thank you for your attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Certificationsaccess ( talk • contribs) 23:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
So I know you said you keep tabs on some k-pop stuff so maybe this is a trend on those pages. This editor wants to put like 50 links under one ref. Let's Not Fall in Love is one of at least 10 examples I came across. What do you think? -- Jennica✿ / talk 21:39, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey, Ss112. I got your message on my talk page, asking me questions about which definite articles articles to sort by, and which to ignore. I know of no rules that say the article needs to be sorted by definite articles or to ignore definite and indefinite articles. I know that several sorting processes outside of Wikipedia ignore definite articles and indefinite articles, so that is what I have been doing. I see no difference between English definite and indefinite articles and foreign language definite and indefinite articles. Although this is an English language encyclopedia article (different type of article), this is not a article that is only for English speaking users, so I have continued applying the same rules across the board.
When I edit the changes, I do all the current changes en-mass, so that I do not know who has made what edits (although I can detect styles, like a Danny0503 edit). I was not trying to insult your knowledge, as I had no idea that you had made the edit. I was just explaining the change. Also, when I restored the citations to Los Campesinos! reference, some other user had stripped the old references and used iTunes, and then you came back and restored one reference but used a new accessdate. Again, not knowing that it was your edit, I just restored the original citations and the original accessdates. There was no insult to you, but when one overeager editor strips information for no good reason (a good reason being a change of released date, or such), there is no reason not to just return the old information. Please don't take it as a slam on you.
Last, Los Angeles is a proper name now, and so the Los is not used as a definite article but part of the full name. But if I look at bands that use The as part of their band name, for example, The Beatles, I find that libraries and such sort it under B, rather than T. Even Wikipedia has a default sort of Beatles, The, when you go into the edit data. It can be argued that when you go into the edit data for Los Campesinos!, there is no sort data that changes the way it is listed. That would be a valid argument. However, an argument on English vs. foreign definite articles is just an English-centric argument and can go either way. Please keep in mind that none of my edits are intended to be personal, and please stand back a bit and see what I might be thinking before getting angry. mburrell 01:25, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
The article Mind of a Genius Records has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Flat Out (
talk) 23:42, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
I was of the opinion you reverted my edit on your talk page because you didn't find the discussion which was the reason you stated in the edit summary. So I reverted your revert since the discussion was there a few minutes later.
I apologise if you found that disruptive.-- Tobiasinator ( talk) 17:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
I'm wondering how when there are only primary sources that that makes something automatically notable. I mean there's not even an article on the Portuguese Albums Chart. Lists of number ones songs and albums should only exist if there are independent and reliable third party sources that refer to number ones on these charts or to the achievement of reaching number one, which are few and far between outside of the most major charts. It's so overkill. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars Talk to me 04:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
If you did not understand, I just want to tell you that since september 2014, French charts is divided into two weekly charts: Donwload charts and Streaming charts. They are both official and the most important charts rankings in France. Dani tefe ( talk) 15:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
The article Long Live the Chief has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Peter Rehse (
talk) 15:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
You're a legend! - The Magnificentist 15:00, 12 February 2017 (UTC) |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
I certainly don't want to be at odds with one another. I very much respect and appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia. I hope we can find ways to work together and not step on toes. We're all here to make Wikipedia the best possible encyclopedia. Thank you for your many contributions. -- Another Believer ( Talk) 16:01, 15 February 2017 (UTC) |
There was this editor who add these sources here in this article, are these sources reliable for genres? TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 07:03, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello Ss12, can you help me? So, I'm willing to expand the article of the song Love Incredible by Cashmere Cat and Camila Cabello, I saw that you redirect the article to Camila Cabello main article. Can you revert the redirect to the expansion of the article? Please! LikeGaga ( talk) 18:13, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hey, do you mind if you can help me add chart info for Nav, I recently made the article since I think its now time for him to have one, thanks. Bloomdoom2 ( talk) 03:47, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
A user made this edit [8], I'm not sure if the chart is reliable or not and as you are always on top of this you might be aware of such, hence my question. Thank you MarioSoulTruthFan ( talk) 15:51, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery
I was just thinking, would one solution be to simply move a redirect page to draft space? I never did this before because I thought editors weren't supposed to redirect to the draft space, but this would retain the article history, right? --- Another Believer ( Talk) 02:12, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Ss112, There is an editor name Moonsdebut8 who keeps adding fake charts to Shether and Remy Ma discography. I already try to revert his edits but he keeps adding it back. Is there anything you can do to help? JustDoItFettyg ( talk) 23:35, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Editor DrStrauss added this tag to the article, called the critical reception section "very long", but I look at other articles such as Lemonade (Beyoncé album), Born Sinner and Kiss Land, that had the critical reception section at the same rate as Culture (Migos album). Why is the tag is necessary for Culture while these other articles doesn't have the tag? TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 13:13, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
{{ping|USERNAME}}
DrStrauss
talk 21:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Ss112. I truly believe that singles with only one version shouldn't have track listings, as the information is already covered in the info box. For example, in September Song, there's no other versions, no radio edits or remixes, just a single track. The length of the track is already shown in the info box, that track list is just absolutely redundant. Hayman30 ( talk) 11:53, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:Ss112, wondered if this [9] is a reliable source? If it is nu-disco and funk can be added to genres on Slide (Calvin Harris song) page, thanks.-- Theo Mandela ( talk) 07:49, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
I see your point on the other iSpy article, but wouldn't make sense just to put a disclaimer on that article for people that are looking for just the song itself. Also to note that in the article title it specifically says "song". Bloomdoom2 ( talk) 23:48, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Can you tell me if this chart is notable? I Got You peaked at 27 on Kiss Top 40. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 14:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
Right, I hadn't thought of stating the source of track listings rather than putting the ref in the header , i'll remember to do that for my album articles from now on. You'd never have thought that i've been Wiki-ing for 7 years, hah Drneroli ( talk) 21:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
I have restored and expanded this album article so you might want to re-assess it for WP:ALBUM. Cheers, De728631 ( talk) 15:39, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Which one of these sources [10] [11] [12] [13] classified being a hip hop, R&B, dancehall and Afrobeat project. I did read these sources but I like to hear a second opinion of this. TheAmazingPeanuts ( talk) 05:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
This is for all of your countless chart updates on various song and discography articles. Keep up the good work! Snuggums ( talk / edits) 17:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC) |
I have no idea how problem she is.
123.136.107.64 ( talk) 17:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Sean. I admire your work here on Wikipedia. How do you find the time to do it? :) Anyway, I have a little problem. Do you knwow how can I make work albums chart template (Hung Medien) on Au cœur du stade? I believe the cause of this problem is "œ". I tried but the link is always broken. Maybe you could help? :) Max24 ( talk) 17:15, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
I see you reverted my edit of the song being a sample. Does this really need to be sourced? I mean, just listen to the song and it's clear it's lifted from Donell Jones' song. His vocals and instruments are heard in the background all throughout it. This is one of those things that I don't think really needs a source to be sure, it's like instantly the case. It's like you don't need a source to declare the sky is blue during the day and dark at night. Just look up and it's just the truth. - Jabrona ( talk) 19:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Not really my area of "interest", like you predicted, but I would suggest you reach out to User:Floquenbeam. Widr ( talk) 12:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi User:Ss112, can we get some genres on Heatstroke please. Do you know any of the main reliable sources like Forbes, Billboard, Rolling Stone etc. Here [14] it's called nu-disco, funk etc. Thanks.-- Theo Mandela ( talk) 19:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello. I noticed that you got into a mild scuffle with 47.147.39.254 over an edit the IP user in question made to Automaton (album). I must advise you to please do not take heed to this IP's words, as I have had to deal with this abusive user in the past, and he should not even be editing here. The IP in question is a sockpuppet of the user, Boaxy, who was originally banned as Phrasia, for disruptive edit warring over adding unsourced genres/categories to certain music, anime, TV, etc. articles. When he does cite his sources, his sources (i.e., the iTunes reference) originate from blogs and other unreliable websites. And when he opens a dispute, he resorts to name-calling those who disagree with him (i.e., calling them homophobic, racist, etc.) because he feels "discriminated" against, when that is not so. Eventually, his conduct got him topic-banned from editing certain articles.
I, as a person who was attacked by Boaxy/Phrasia beforehand over a dispute on Talk:Sailor Moon, am only writing this post as an advisory to not heed to this IP address, revert all nonconstructive edits made by the IP, and if he should start trouble again, please report to the sockpuppetry noticeboard. His behavior with you, I noticed, clearly indicates he has not learned his lesson in the first place, and never will learn from his actions.-- Loyalmoonie ( talk) 05:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Chris
Hi Sean. Hung Medien finally updated their website with French charts. I wanted to remove additional French sources for singles on Ed Sheeran discography page but I didn't because it seems Hung Medien still shows Sales chart (digital+physical), and the SNEP sources are for the new Sales+Streaming chart. The differances of peaks are big. Ed is much higher on the Sales+Streaming chart. Should we treat the Sales+Streaming chart as the official one on Wiki? Max24 ( talk) 13:34, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Please check your inbox. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 05:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)